CHAPTER IX
HE facts stated at the end of the last chapter cannot but be somewhat
unintelligible to persons who encounter them for the first time, for they
belong to the secrets of numbers. And the secrets of numbers are those
which are in a comparative sense the most difficult to master.
It
has been stated that there is a certain relation between the numbers
seven and twelve, and that this relation has something to do with
time and space. Now this profound mystery can, gradually, be
understood by everybody, but it must necessarily remain a mere
statement to the kind of cognition which today is alone recognised as
such. It has to be elucidated, explained. An understanding of the
‘machinery’ of the world may be reached, as I have
already indicated, by distinguishing between conditions which are
essentially those of space and conditions which belong essentially to
time. We understand the world which surrounds us primarily in terms
of space and time; but if we do not confine ourselves to speaking of
time and space in an abstract sense and endeavour to understand how
conditions are regulated in time and how the different beings in
space are related to each other, we find a thread leading on the one
side through the complicated relations of time, and on the other
through the complex conditions of space. In the first place we
observe the course of world events in the light of spiritual science.
We look back at earlier incarnations of man, of races and
civilisations, as well as of the earth itself. We build up within
ourselves an idea of what will happen in the future, i.e. in time.
And we shall always see our way if we judge of evolution in time from
a framework built up by means of the number seven. We must not build
and speculate and attribute all kinds of meanings to the number
seven; we must only pursue the facts from the point of view of the
number seven. In the first place this number seven is only a means of
facilitating our task. Take, for instance, a man whose spiritual
vision is so far opened that he can examine data of the Akashic
Records of the past. He may use the number seven as a guide and
realise that what runs its course in time is built up on the basis of
the number seven; that which repeats itself in various forms can very
well be analysed by using the number seven as a foundation and
proceeding from this as a basis. In this sense it is right to say
that since the earth goes through various embodiments we have to look
for its seven incarnations; Saturn, Sun, Moon, Earth, Jupiter, Venus
and Vulcan. Because human civilisations pass through seven
incarnations we must seek their connections by once more using the
number seven as a basis. Let us for instance consider the
civilisations in post-Atlantean times. The old Indian is the first,
the second is the old Persian, the third the Chaldaic-Egyptian, the
fourth the Graeco-Latin, the fifth our own and we are expecting two
more, the sixth and seventh to succeed our own. We can also find our
way in the study of the Karma of an individual by trying to look at
his three former incarnations. By starting with the incarnation of a
man of the present day and looking back at his three former
incarnations it is possible to draw certain conclusions concerning
his next three incarnations. The three former and the present
incarnations, plus the three following make seven again. Seven is a
clue for everything that happens in time.
On
the other hand the number twelve is a clue for all things that
co-exist in space. Science, which at the same time was wisdom, was
always conscious of this. It said: ‘It is possible to find the
right way by connecting the spatial relationship of everything that
occurs upon the earth with twelve permanent points in space —
the twelve signs of the Zodiac in the cosmos.’ These are the
twelve basic points with which everything in space is connected. This
declaration was not an arbitrary yield of human thinking; but the
power of thought in those early times had learned from reality and so
ascertained the fact that space was best understood when it was
divided into twelve constituent parts, thus making the number twelve
a clue for all spatial relations. But where the question of changes
came in, that is to say in the time element, the seven planets were
given as a clue by a still older science. Seven is here the clue.
Now
how does this apply to the evolution of human life? We have said that
up to the point of time in human evolution characterised, by the
advent of the Christ-impulse, it is a fact that when a man looked
into his inner being, when he sought the way to the world of the Gods
through the veil of his inner being, he entered — to use a
collective name — the Luciferic world. This too was the path
upon which, in those olden times, man sought for wisdom, upon which
he sought to acquire a higher knowledge concerning the world than he
could find behind the covering of the external sense world. His quest
consisted in sinking down into his inner world; for in this world the
intuitions and inspirations of moral and ethical life originated,
even as the intuitions of conscience arose there. And of course all
other intuitions and inspirations which pertain to the moral nature,
to that which belongs to the soul, arose out of that soul world.
Hence those lofty individualities who were the leaders of mankind in
ancient times, had of necessity first to contact the inner life of a
man if they wanted to give instruction upon that which belongs to the
highest in humanity. The Holy Rishis had to contact the soul-life of
man, his inner being, that is, as did all the great teachers of
humanity in older civilisations. But the soul life of man belongs to
time; it runs its course in time. That which surrounds us externally
groups itself in space; that which runs its course inwardly, groups
itself in time. Hence everything which is to speak to the inner being
of man must use the clue of the number seven. How can we best
understand a being with a message for the inner life of man? How, for
instance, can we best understand those beings with their
fundamentally individual characteristics whom we call the Holy
Rishis? By relating them to soul life which runs its course in time.
Hence in those ancient epochs wherein the great sages spoke, one
question above all was asked: ‘Whence have they descended?’
Just as we might ask a son ‘Who are your father and mother?’
— so ancestry, the time element, was then the subject of
inquiry. On meeting a wise man the primary concern was: ‘Whence
does he come?’ Who was the being who preceded him? What is his
descent? Whose son is he? Therefore in speaking about the Luciferic
world, the number seven had to be taken as basic and the interest was
whose child it was who was speaking to the human soul. We speak of
the children of Lucifer in this sense when we speak of those who in
olden times taught of the spiritual world lying hidden behind the
veil of soul life, behind that which belongs to time.
But
the Christ comes under a different category altogether. The Christ
did not descend to earth by the path of time. The Christ came to the
earth at a certain point of time, but from outside, from space.
Zarathustra saw Him when he directed his gaze to the sun, and spoke
of Him as Ahura Mazdao. To the spiritual vision of man in space Ahura
Mazdao came nearer and nearer until He descended and became Man. Here
therefore the interest lies in the approach through space, not in the
time sequence. The approach through space, this advent of the Christ
out of the infinitude of space down to our earth has an eternal and
not a temporary value. With this is connected the fact that Christ's
work upon earth is not carried on only under the conditions of time.
He does not bring to the earth anything corresponding to the
relationships between father and child, or mother and child, which
exist under time conditions, but He brings into the world something
which goes on side by side, which co-exists. Brothers live side by
side, they co-exist. Parents, children and grandchildren live after
one another in time, and the conditions of time express their
individual relation to each other. But the Christ as the Spirit of
Space brings a spatial element into the civilisation of the earth.
What Christ brings is the co-existence of men in space, a condition
of increasing community of soul regardless of time conditions. The
mission of the Earth planet in our cosmic system is to bring love
into the world. In olden days the task of the earth was to bring in
love with the help of time. Inasmuch as through the conditions of
ancestry and descent, the blood poured — itself from generation
to generation, from father to child and grandchildren, those who were
connected through time were ipso facto those who loved each
other. Family connections, blood relationships, the descending stream
of blood through the generations following each other in time,
provided the foundation of love in the olden times. And the cases
where love took on more of a moral character, were also rooted in the
conditions of time. Men loved their ancestors, those who had preceded
them in time. Through Christ there came the love of soul to soul, so
that that which is side by side, which co-exists in space enters a
relationship which was at first represented by brothers and sisters
living side by side and at the same time — the relationship of
brother love which one human soul is intended to bear towards another
in space. Here the condition of co-existent life in space begins to
acquire its special significance.
Hence
in the olden times, it was natural to speak of those who were
connected by the rule of the number seven: the seven Rishis, and the
seven Sages. But Christ is surrounded by twelve Apostles in whom we
see the prototypes of man living side by side, co-existing in space.
And this love which, independently of successive ages, is to
encompass all that exists side by side in space, will enter social
life on earth through the Christ principle. To love what is around us
with brother love, that is to follow Christ. If, therefore, we speak
in the olden times of the children of Lucifer, the Christ principle
is the impulse, which causes us to say: ‘Christ is the
firstborn of many Brethren.’ And the brotherhood relationship
to Christ, the feeling oneself drawn not as to a father, but as to a
brother, whom one loves as an elder brother, but nevertheless as a
brother, is the fundamental relationship which men have learned to
assume in consequence of the descent of the Christ principle upon the
earth.
These
of course are only instances which illustrate and make clear,
although they do not prove, the relation between the numbers seven
and twelve. The more, therefore, that the Christ influence shines
down into the world, the more allusion is made to the nature and
reality of things by grouping them in twelve's, as for
instance, the twelve tribes of Israel, the twelve Apostles and so on.
In this connection the number twelve has a mystical and secret
meaning as regards the evolution of the earth.
This
may be termed the external aspect, the outer view of the great change
which took place in the earth evolution through the infusion of the
Christ principle. We might speak at great length about the relation
of the number seven to the number twelve and have to leave much that
concerns the deep mysteries of our universe still incomprehensible.
If what has been said in elucidation of the numbers seven and twelve
be taken as clues to the relationships existing in time and in space,
we shall be able to penetrate more and more deeply into the secrets
of the universe. But for all of us this relation between the numbers
seven and twelve should, in the first place, be one which apart from
everything else indicates how profoundly momentous the Christ event
was for the world, and how necessary it is thenceforth to seek
another numerical clue if we are to find our way in it.
But
there is also an inner relationship of space and time which I can
only indicate here in bare outline with which the numbers twelve and
seven have something to do. And my illustration shall be made as was
usual in the mysteries when the relations of twelve to seven in the
cosmos was being portrayed. It has been said that if we do not
consider universal space in an abstract sense, but really relate
earth conditions to universal space, we must refer those earth
conditions to the circle described by the twelve essential points of
the Zodiac, viz. Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra,
Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, Pisces. These twelve
points of the Zodiac were not alone the real and veritable world
symbols for the very oldest divine spiritual beings, but the symbols
themselves were thought to correspond, in a certain sense, with
reality. Even when the earth was embodied as old Saturn, the forces
issuing from these twelve directions were at work upon that ancient
planet; so they were later on the old Sun, and on the old Moon, and
are now and will continue to be in the future. Therefore they have as
it were the nature of permanence, they are far more sublime than that
which arises and passes away within our earth existence. That which
is symbolised by the twelve signs of the Zodiac is infinitely higher
than that which is transformed in the evolutionary course of our
planet from old Saturn to old Sun and from that to old Moon and so
on. Planetary existence arises and passes away, but the Zodiac is
ever there. What is symbolised by the points of the Zodiac is more
sublime than what upon our earth plays its part as the opposition
between good and evil.
In
an early chapter I called your attention to the fact that on
penetrating into the astral realm we enter a world of change —
where something which from one point of view works for good, may from
another point of view appear as evil. These differences between good
and evil have their meaning in evolution and seven is the key number.
That which is the symbol of Gods in the twelve points in space, in
the twelve points of permanence is above good and evil. Out in space
we have to seek for the symbols of those divine-spiritual beings
which considered in themselves and without reference to their effects
upon our earthly sphere, are beyond the differences between good and
evil.
But
now let us conceive that which becomes our earth beginning to be
active. That can only happen by a division as it were coming to pass
in the permanent deities and that which takes place entering into a
different relation to these gods of permanence, who are divided into
two spheres, into a sphere of good and a sphere of evil. In
themselves neither is good nor evil; but inasmuch as it influences
the evolution of the earth it is sometimes good, sometimes evil; so
that all that belongs to the one may be described as the sphere of
goodness, and that which belongs to the other, as the sphere of evil.
In order to obtain the correct conception, we must consider the
civilisations of the post-Atlantean era, which had gone through the
old Indian, the old Persian, the Chaldaic-Egyptian civilisations, and
which will also go through the civilisations which are to follow
these, up to the next great catastrophe, and beyond it. If we inquire
where is there a truer image of what runs through the whole evolution
of mankind than can be found in sense perception or in human
intellect, we must turn to occult science and ask what is that which
is to be discovered in the spiritual world, and which moves more or
less as a continuous spiritual stream through all these seven
civilisations. In the wisdom of the East a word has been formed for
that which runs through all these civilisations; it is — if one
considers its real nature — not an abstraction, but something
concrete — it is a Being. And if we wish to describe this
Being, more intimately, of whom in reality all other beings —
whether the seven holy Rishis or even higher beings who do not
descend into physical incarnation — are the messengers, we may
designate it by a name which has rightly been used by the East. Every
revelation and all the wisdom in the world can be traced back finally
to this one source, the source of primeval wisdom, under the dominion
of a Being who evolves on through each and all the above-named
civilisations of the post Atlantean era, who appears in each epoch in
one form or another, but who is always One Being, the bearer of the
wisdom which has appeared in the most varied guise. When I described
in the last chapter how the holy Rishis breathed in this wisdom and
took it in concretely, this soul of the light which was spread abroad
externally and was breathed in as light-wisdom by the holy Rishis,
was the out flowing of that sublime — I cannot go into this
fully here — we must understand that what only belongs in minor
degree to the sphere of goodness, must also be called good. As soon
as that which in the spiritual world (which as I have said is
permanent, eternal, having nothing to do with time) passes into time,
it divides itself into good and evil. Of the twelve points of
permanence there remain belonging to the good, the five actually
within the sphere of good and the two on the border, making seven.
Therefore we speak of seven as remaining over from the twelve. When
we wish to speak of that which is good and which acts as our guide in
time, we must speak of seven wise men, of seven Rishis, for this
corresponds to reality. Hence also comes the conception that seven
signs of the Zodiac belong to the world of light, to the upper world,
and that the lower five beginning with Scorpio belong to the world of
darkness.
This
is only a mere indication serving to show that space, when if
forsakes its sphere of eternity and takes into itself created things
which run their course in time, is divided into good and evil; and in
bringing out the good, seven is raised out of the twelve; seven then
becomes the true number for temporal conditions. For truths, which
belong to time, we must take the number seven as our clue; the
remainder, the number five would lead us into error. That is the
inner meaning of these things.
Do
not at the moment imagine that this is very difficult to understand,
but realise rather that the world is very profound and that there
must be things whose meaning is very hard to fathom.
Christ
came into the world to sit down even with publicans and sinners. He
came in order to take up that which would otherwise have had to be
cast out of the world process. In the story of Oedipus the same thing
had to be cast out that in the Christ-life was gathered up as a
leaven, as was corroborated by the story of Judas. Just as new bread
must be leavened with a small portion of the old, if it is to rise
and spread; so the new world must take in a leaven made of something
which came out of evil. Hence, Judas, who had been cast out from
every place, who had even made himself impossible at the court of
Pilate, could be admitted where the Christ was working. He Who came
to heal the world in such a way that the seven could be changed into
the twelve and that which had been represented by the number seven
might henceforth be represented by the number twelve. The number
twelve is in the first instance represented to us by the twelve
brothers of Christ, by the twelve disciples.
This
must serve as a slight indication of the profound change that thus
came into our whole earth evolution. It is possible to elucidate the
significance of the Christ-principle, and of its entrance into the
evolution of the earth, from many different points of view, and what
has just been touched upon is one of them.
Now
let us once more place before our souls that which is a consequence
of all that has gone before. It is felt and recognised by spiritual
science, wherever it is truly cultivated that with Christ, something
very special entered into the evolution of the earth. Wherever true
spiritual science is studied, it is felt and recognised that there is
one thing which runs through all the Beings of whom we are now
speaking. And what we then described as their wisdom had poured down
in other ages (for instance, in that quite different conception which
was expressed in the old Persian epoch) from the same one Being, who
is the great teacher of all civilisations. The Being who was the
teacher of the holy Rishis, of Zarathustra, of Hermes — the
Being whom we may designate as the great teacher, who in the
different ages manifests Himself in the most various ways — the
Being who as is natural, at first remains entirely concealed from
external vision — is designated, by means of an expression
borrowed from the East, as the totality of the Bodhisattvas. The
Christian conception would designate it the Holy Spirit. The
Bodhisattva is a Being who passes through all civilisations, who can
manifest Himself to mankind in various ways. Such is the Spirit of
the Bodhisattvas. All the ages have looked up to the Bodhisattvas.
The holy Rishis, Zarathustra, Hermes and Moses looked up to them —
it matters not how they named the Being in whom they perceived the
embodiment of the Bodhisattva principle. The Bodhisattva can be given
this one name, ‘The Great Teacher,’ and to him those
individuals looked who wished to receive and could receive the
teachings of the post-Atlantean era. This Bodhisattva spirit of the
post-Atlantean era has taken human form many times, but one such
interests us in particular. A Bodhisattva took on that radiant human
form of the Being of Gautama Buddha — it does not for the
moment concern us in what other fashion he was also manifest. And it
signified an advance of this Bodhisattva when it was no longer
necessary for him to remain in the upper spiritual realms, when his
development in the spiritual worlds was such that he could master his
physical corporeality to the extent of becoming man as Buddha. A
Bodhisattva advancing in human existence is Buddha. The Buddha is one
of the human incarnations of the all-embracing Wisdom figures
underlying the evolution of the earth. In the Buddha we have the
incarnation of that great Teacher who may be called the essence of
wisdom itself. The Buddha is the Bodhisattva who has become an earth
being. And it is unnecessary to believe that a Bodhisattva incarnated
in only the Buddha; for one of the Bodhisattvas has incarnated either
wholly or in part in other human personalities. Such incarnations are
not all similar; it must be quite clear that just as a Bodhisattva
lived in the etheric body of Gautama Buddha, so such an one also
lived in the members of other human individuals; and because the
being of that Bodhisattva who inherited the astral body of
Zarathustra streamed into the members of other individualities, for
instance, Hermes, we may — but only if we understand the matter
in this sense — call other individualities who also are great
teachers an incarnation of a Bodhisattva. It is permissible to speak
of ever-recurring incarnations of the Bodhisattva, but we must
understand that behind all the men in whom the incarnation took place
the Bodhisattva stood as a part of that Being who is the personified
All-Wisdom of our world.
In
this sense, then, we gaze upon the Wisdom-element which in olden
times was imparted to mankind from the Luciferic worlds. When we gaze
upon this we are looking at the Bodhisattvas. Now in post-Atlantean
evolution there is a Being who is fundamentally different from a
Bodhisattva and not to be confused with the latter, although this
Being of Whom we are here speaking, was once incarnate in a human
individuality who at the same time received the in-pouring of the
Bodhisattva-Buddha being. Because a man once lived in whom the Christ
incarnated and because at the same time the radiations of the
Bodhisattva entered this human individuality, we must not take the
essential thing in this incarnation to be the embodiment of the
Bodhisattva in the personality who was Jesus of Nazareth. During the
last three years the Christ principle was predominant and the Christ
principle and the Bodhisattva principle are fundamentally different.
How can we instance this difference? It is exceedingly important for
us to know whereby the Christ, Who was once incarnate in a human body
— only once, never before and never after — could so
incarnate. Since that time He can be reached by the path which leads
to the inner essence of the human soul; before then He was accessible
if the gaze, as was the case with Zarathustra, was directed outwards.
Wherein, then, does the difference consist between the Christ,
between that Being to whom we must ascribe such a central position,
and a Bodhisattva? It consists in this, that the Bodhisattva is the
Great Teacher, the incarnation of wisdom, which pervades all the
civilisations, which incarnates in many different ways; but the
Christ is not only a teacher — that is the essential point —
Christ is not only a teacher of men. He is a Being whom we can best
understand if we expand to the sphere where in dazzling spiritual
heights we can find Him as an Object of Initiation and where we may
compare Him with other spiritual beings. There are regions of
spiritual life where, freed of all the dust of earth, we may find the
sublime Bodhisattva being in his spiritual essence and where we may
find the Christ stripped of all that He became on the earth or in its
vicinity. There we find the origin of humanity, the source whence all
life proceeds: the primeval, spiritual source. We find not only one
Bodhisattva, but a series of Bodhisattvas.
Even
as there is a Bodhisattva who underlies our seven successive
civilisations, so there was a Bodhisattva underlying the Atlantean
civilisations, and so on. We find in these spiritual heights a series
of Bodhisattvas, who were, for their age, the great teachers and
instructors not only of mankind but also of those beings who do not
descend into the region of physical life. We find them there as the
great teachers there they gather that which they are to teach, and in
their midst is One Being Who is great not only because He teaches,
and that is the Christ. He is not alone great because He teaches,
rather is He a Being Who works upon the Bodhisattvas who surround Him
by manifesting Himself to them. He is seen by the Bodhisattvas and He
reveals His Glory to them. The Bodhisattvas are what they are through
being great teachers; the Christ is to the world what He is, through
His own Being, through His own Essence. He needs only to be seen, and
the manifestation of His own Being needs only to be reflected in His
surroundings, for the teachings to spring forth. He is not only a
Teacher; He is Life, a Life that pours itself into the other beings,
who then become teachers.
The
Bodhisattvas are mighty teachers because from their spiritual heights
they enjoy the bliss of being able to see Christ. And when in the
course of the evolution of our earth we find incarnations of the
Bodhisattvas, we speak of great teachers of mankind, because the
Bodhisattva principle is the most essential in them. The Christ does
not only teach; we learn of Christ in order to understand Him, in
order to recognise what He is. Christ is more an object than a
subject of learning. The difference between Christ and the
Bodhisattvas is that He is to the world what He is, because the world
is blessed by sight of Him. The Bodhisattvas are to the world what
they are because they are great teachers. Therefore if we wish to
look up to the living being, to the life-source of our earth, we must
look at the incarnation in which was embodied not a Bodhisattva (in
which this fact was the most important feature of the incarnation)
but a Being who did not Himself leave any teaching behind, but who
gathered round Him those who spread Gospels and teachings concerning
Him over the whole world. The point of prime importance is that no
document exists written by Christ Himself, but that teachers surround
Him and speak about Him, so that He is the object and not the subject
of the teaching. It is a remarkable circumstance and one of utmost
importance with reference to the Christ event that nothing has been
received from Him Himself, but that others have written about His
Being. It is therefore not to be wondered at that we are told we can
find all the teachings of Christ in other faiths also; for Christ is
in nowise merely a teacher. He is a Being who desires to be
understood as a Being; He does not wish to sink into us only through
His teachings, but through His life. We may gather together all the
teachings in the world that are accessible to us, and we shall even
then not have sufficient to enable us to understand the Christ. If
men of the present day cannot turn directly to the Bodhisattvas, and
with the spiritual eyes of the Bodhisattvas look up to Christ, then
they must learn from these Bodhisattvas what can eventually make
Christ comprehensible. If therefore we wish not only to become
participant in Christ, but to understand Him, we must not only look
at what Christ has done for us, but we must learn of all the teachers
of West and of East, and we must account it a holy thing to become
familiar with the teachings of the whole known world; we must devote
ourselves to the sacred task of understanding the Christ in His
completeness by means of the highest teaching.
Now
the mysteries always make appropriate preparation for the
corresponding duty of mankind. Every age has its special task; and
every age has to receive the truth in the particular form needed by
that epoch. Truth in its present form could not have been given to
the old Indian, or to the old Persian. The truth had to be given to
them in the form suitable to their capacities of perception.
Therefore in the age, which owing to its other characteristics was
best suited to receive the Christ upon earth that is to say the
fourth or Graeco-Latin epoch — the truth about Christ and about
the world connected with Him was brought to mankind in a form adapted
for humanity of that time. To believe that in the age following
directly on the Christ-manifestation the whole truth about the Christ
was already known, is to be in complete ignorance concerning the
progress of the human race. He who believes only the teaching of the
first centuries after the Christ event, who considers that which was
written and recorded then to be the only true Christian teaching,
knows nothing of human progress; he does not know that the greatest
teacher of the first Christian centuries could tell him no more about
Christ than the people of that time were able to assimilate. And
because the men of the first Christian centuries were pre-eminently
such as had descended the deepest into the physical world, their
understanding permitted them to take in comparatively little of the
highest teaching concerning Christ. The majority of the early
Christians could understand but little about the Christ Being.
We
know that in old Indian times men possessed a high degree of
clairvoyance in consequence of the relation of the etheric body to
the other members; but the time had not then come for this vision to
perceive the Christ as anything other than Vishvakarman — a
Spirit in distant regions beyond the sense-world. In the time of the
old Persian civilisation it was first possible dimly to sense the
Christ behind the physical sun. And so it went on. It was possible
for Moses to perceive the Christ, as Jehovah, in thunder and
lightning that is quite near the earth. And in the person of Jesus of
Nazareth the Christ was seen incarnated as man. This is the manner of
human progress; in old India wisdom was absorbed through the etheric
body, in the old Persian period through the astral body, in the
Chaldaic-Egyptian period through the sentient soul, in the
Graeco-Latin period through that which we call the intellectual soul.
The intellectual soul is bound to the world of sense. Therefore it
lost the vision of that which extends far, far beyond the
sense-world. Accordingly in the first post-Christian centuries little
more of existence was seen than that which lies between birth and
death, and that which directly follows as the nearest spiritual
region. Nothing was known of that which passes through many
incarnations. This was due to the condition of human understanding.
Only one part of the life cycle could be made intelligible, man's
life on earth, and the fragment of spiritual life which follows it.
That, therefore, is what we find described for the mass of the
people. But that was not to continue. The outlook of man had to be
prepared for an excursion beyond this part of his understanding.
Preparation had to be made for a gradual revival of the all-embracing
wisdom which man was able to enjoy in the time of Hermes, of Moses,
of Zarathustra and of the old Rishis, as well as for offering us the
possibility of an ever increasing understanding of Christ. Christ had
to come into the world just at a time when the means of understanding
were most contracted. The way had to be opened for the revival of the
ancient wisdom during the ages to come and for placing it gradually
in the service of the understanding of Christ. This could only be
accomplished by the creation of Mystery wisdom. Those men who came
over into and beyond Europe from old Atlantis brought with them great
wisdom. In old Atlantis the majority of the people were instinctively
clairvoyant; they could see into spiritual realms. This clairvoyance
could not develop further; and withdrew perforce into separate
personalities in the West. It was guided there by a Being who once
upon a time lived in deepest concealment, withdrawn behind those who
had already forsaken the world and who were pupils of the great
initiates. This Being had remained behind in order to preserve for
later ages what was brought over from old Atlantis. Among the great
initiates who had founded mystery places in the West for the
preservation of the old Atlantean wisdom, a wisdom that entered
deeply into all the secrets of the physical body was the great
Skythianos, as he was called in the Middle Ages. And anyone who knows
the nature of the European mysteries knows that Skythianos is the
name given to one of the greatest initiates of the earth.
But
there also lived in the world for a long, long time, the Being which
in a spiritual sense we may describe as the Bodhisattva. This
Bodhisattva was the same Being who after completing its task in the
West, was incarnated in Gautama Buddha about six hundred years before
our era. This exalted Being who, as Teacher, had by that time
withdrawn more towards the East was a second great Teacher, a second
great Keeper of the Seal of the wisdom of mankind. There was also a
third individuality destined to greatness of whom we have spoken in
various lectures. [We are here speaking of these Beings in the
spirit in which they were understood by older conceptions of the
world, justified today from the standpoint of spiritual science.]
It is he who was the teacher of the old Persians, the great
Zarathustra. The three great spiritual Beings and individualities
known to us under the names of Zarathustra, Gautama Buddha and
Skythianos are, as it were, incarnations of Bodhisattvas. That which
lived in them was not the Christ.
Mankind
had now to be given time to experience in itself the advent of Christ
Who had formerly made Himself manifest to Moses upon Mount Sinai;
Jehovah was the same Being as Christ, though wearing another form.
Time had to be allowed to mankind in which to prepare to receive the
Christ. That occurred in the epoch in which the comprehension for
such things reached the nadir. But preparation had to be made, in
order that understanding and wisdom should again grow greater and
greater; and this was part of Christ's mission on earth.
There
is a fourth individuality named in history behind whom for those who
have the proper comprehension, much lies hidden — an
individuality still higher and more powerful than Skythianos, than
Buddha or than Zarathustra. This individuality is Manes, and those
who see more in Manichaeism than is usually the case know him to be a
very high messenger of Christ. It is said that a few centuries after
Christ had lived on the earth, there was held one of the greatest
assemblies of the spiritual world connected with the earth that ever
took place, and that there Manes gathered round him three mighty
personalities of the fourth century after Christ. In this figurative
description a most significant fact in connection with spiritual
development is expressed. Manes called these persons together to
consult with them as to the means of reintroducing the wisdom that
had lived throughout the changing times of the post Atlantean age and
of causing it to unfold more and more gloriously in the future. Who
were the personalities brought together by Manes in that memorable
assembly? (It should be remembered that such an event can only be
witnessed by spiritual sight.) He called together the personality in
whom Skythianos lived at that time, and also the physical reflection
of the Buddha who had then appeared again, and the erstwhile
Zarathustra who was wearing a physical body at that time. Around
Manes was this council, himself in the centre and around him
Skythianos, Buddha and Zarathustra. And in that council a plan was
agreed upon for causing all the wisdom of the Bodhisattvas of the
post-Atlantean time to flow more and more strongly into the future of
mankind; and the plan of the future evolution of the civilisations of
the earth then decided upon was adhered to and carried over into the
European mysteries of the Rosy Cross. These particular mysteries have
always been connected with the individualities of Skythianos, of
Buddha and of Zarathustra. They were the teachers in the schools of
the Rosy Cross; teachers who gave their wisdom to the earth as a
gift, in order that through it the Christ Being might be understood.
Hence in all spiritual Rosicrucian schools the deepest reverence is
paid to these old initiates who preserved the primeval wisdom of
Atlantis; to the re-incarnated Skythianos, in whom was seen the great
and honoured Bodhisattva of the West; to the temporarily incarnated
reflection of the Buddha, who also was honoured as one, of the
Bodhisattvas; and finally to Zarathustra, the reincarnated
Zarathustra. These were looked up to as the great Teachers of the
European Initiates. Such presentations must not be taken in the sense
of external history, although they elucidate the historical course of
events better than any external description could do.
Let
me illustrate this statement by saying that there is hardly to be
found a single country in the Middle Ages in which a certain legend
was not everywhere current, though at that time no one in Europe knew
anything of Gautama Buddha, and the tradition of Gautama Buddha had
been completely lost. Yet the following story was related (it is to
be found in many books of the Middle Ages and is one of the widely
disseminated stories of that period): Once upon a time there was a
King in India to whom a son was born called Josaphat. Extraordinary
things were prophesied about this child when he was born. His father
therefore especially guarded him; he was only to know what was most
precious, he was to dwell in perfect happiness, he was not to become
acquainted with pain and sorrow or with the misfortunes of life. He
was protected from everything of that sort. It happened, however,
that Josaphat one day went out of the palace and passed in succession
a sick man, a leper, an aged man and a corpse — so runs the
tale. He returned deeply moved into the king's palace and chanced
upon a man whose soul was filled with the secrets of Christianity and
whose name was Balaam; Balaam converted Josaphat, and this Josaphat
who had experienced all this, became a Christian.
It
is not necessary to bring the Akashic records to our aid in order to
interpret this legend, since ordinary philology suffices to reveal
the origin of the name Josaphat. Josaphat is derived from an old word
Joaphat; Joaphat again from Joadosaph; Joadosaph from Juadosaph which
is identical with Budhasaph — both these last forms are Arabic
— and Budhasaph is the same name as Bodhisattva. So the
European occult teaching not only knows the Bodhisattva, it also
knows, if it can decipher the name of Josaphat, the meaning of that
word. This cultivation of occult knowledge in the West by means of
legends contained the fact that there was a time when the being who
lived in Gautama Buddha became a Christian. Whether this be a matter
of knowledge or no, it is none the less true. Just as belated
traditions may exist, as men may believe today that which was
believed thousands of years ago, and which has been propagated by
means of tradition — so they may also believe that it accords
with the laws of the higher worlds for Gautama Buddha to have
remained the same as he was six hundred years before our era. But it
is not so. He has ascended, he has evolved and in the true
Rosicrucian teachings the knowledge of this fact has been preserved
in the form of the above legend.
Within
the spiritual life of Europe we find him who was the bearer of the
Christ, Zarathas or Nazarathos — the original Zarathustra —
appearing again from time to time; in the same way we meet with
Skythianos again and the third great pupil of Manes, Buddha, as he
was after he had taken part in the experiences of later ages.
Thus the European who
had some knowledge of initiation looked into the changing ages and
kept his gaze fixed on the true figures of the Great Teachers. He
knew of Zarathas, of Buddha, of Skythianos — he knew that
through them wisdom was pouring into the civilisation of the
future-wisdom which had always proceeded from the Bodhisattvas and
which must be used in order to promote understanding of the greatest
treasure of all comprehension, the Christ, Who is fundamentally a
completely different Being from the Bodhisattvas and Whom we can
understand only by gathering together all the wisdom of the
Bodhisattvas. Therefore in the spiritual wisdom of Europe there is a
synthesis of all the teachings that have been given to the world
through the three great pupils of Manes and by Manes himself. Even
though men may not have understood Manes, a time will come when
European civilisation will take such form that there will be a
feeling for what is connected with the names of Skythianos, Buddha
and Zarathustra. They give to mankind the material whose study will
teach us to understand Christ, and through them our understanding of
Him will grow more and more complete. The Middle Ages certainly
showed a strange form of reverence and worship to Skythianos, to
Buddha and to Zarathustra when their names began to percolate
through; in certain communities of the Christian religion anyone who
wished to be taken for a true Christian had to utter the formula: ‘I
curse Skythianos, I curse Buddha, I curse Zarathas!’ But what
it was then thought necessary to curse will become the centre for
those who will best make Christ comprehensible to man, a central
point to which mankind will look up as it did to the great
Bodhisattvas through whom the Christ will be understood. Today
mankind can at the most bring two things to these teachings of the
Rosy Cross — two things which may indicate a beginning of the
power and greatness that will appear in the future in the form of the
understanding of Christianity, Spiritual science of today will be the
means of making one such beginning, by bringing the teachings of
Skythianos, of Zarathustra, of Gautama Buddha to the world again, not
in their old but in an absolutely new form, accessible to
investigation from out its very nature. The elements of what we learn
from these three great Teachers must be embodied into civilisation.
From Buddha, Christianity had to learn the teachings of reincarnation
and of Karma, but in the older religion they are to be found in an
ancient guise, unsuited to modern times. Why are the teachings of
reincarnation and of Karma flowing into Christianity today? Because
the initiates have learned to understand them in a modern sense, just
as Buddha himself after his fashion understood them — and
Buddha was the great Teacher of reincarnation. In the same way we
shall attain to an understanding of Skythianos, whose teaching deals
not only with the reincarnation of men but with the powers which rule
from eternity to eternity. So shall the central Being of the world,
the Christ, be ever more and more understood. In this way the
teachings of the initiates gradually flow into humanity. The
spiritual scientist of today can only bring two things in as
elementary beginnings compared to what must come about in the future
spiritual evolution of mankind. The first element will be that which
sinks into our innermost being in the form of the Christ-life; and
the second will be an increasingly comprehensive understanding of the
Christ by the aid of spiritual Cosmology. The Christ life in the
inmost heart and an understanding of the world which leads to an
understanding of Christ — these are the two elements. We may
begin today, for we are only on the threshold of these things, by
having the right feeling. We meet together for the purpose of
cultivating right feeling about the spiritual world and all that is
born out of it, as well as right feeling towards man. And as we
cultivate this right feeling we gradually make our spiritual forces
capable of receiving the Christ into our innermost being; for the
higher and nobler our feelings become, the more nobly can Christ live
within us. We make a beginning by teaching the elementary truths of
our earth evolution, by seeking that which we owe originally to
Skythianos, Zarathustra and Buddha and by accepting it as they teach
it in our age, in the form they themselves know it, their evolution
having progressed to our present age. We have reached a point in
civilisation now where the elementary teachings of initiation are
beginning to be disclosed.
|