PART III
THE WISDOM OF THE SPIRIT (Pneumatosophy)
LECTURE IV
Laws of Nature, Evolution of Consciousness
and Repeated Earth Lives.
OU WILL understand that only a short and in a
sense superficial sketch of a pneumatosophy can be given in the four
lectures at our disposal. Obviously, much can only be suggested, some
of which, in fact, really calls for elaboration to confirm it. In
some cases it will even be difficult to understand the context
between the subject matter and what is here termed pneumatosophy.
Yesterday, for example, we showed how one transcends the realm of
merely psychic phenomena and enters regions that, in view of their
whole nature, must be counted among the super-sensible worlds. We
recognized this from the simple fact that the province of the soul in
respect to such matters ends at a definite frontier, and that even
shrewd psychologists, when studying and classifying the realm of the
soul, are brought up short at that point.
Now, anthroposophists as such are familiar from another
angle with concepts we encountered there, such as imagination,
inspiration and intuition; so you will have to take for granted that
all this, as set forth, for example, in my Knowledge of the Higher
Worlds and Its Attainment, can be understood and justified when
one goes far enough in showing the threads that lead from the
ordinary soul life — the life of visualizations, emotions and
reasoning — to imagination, inspiration and intuition. It is
natural that in making this transition we should focus our attention
principally upon the psycho-spiritual elements that are present in
our own soul and spirit, that we should, so to speak, first of all
seek enlightenment concerning our own souls and spirits.
In the course of these lectures we pointed out that in
Western civilization, right up to our own time, people have had
difficulty in recognizing a fact that to us appears fundamental: that
man's spirit passes through repeated earth lives, and at the end of
the second lecture we cited one who was thoroughly representative in
the struggle with such difficulties, Frohschammer. Wrestling with
problems of the first rank, he laments, “What would be the
consequence if man's permanent element, his spirit, were compelled to
immerse itself again and again in a corporeality, in a sort of
purgatory, a prison, a dungeon?” “Should one,” asks
Frohschammer, “look upon everything connected with the
relations of love and the contrast of sexes as a provision for
imprisoning the human soul for the period between birth and death?”
In view of such an honest objection to the doctrine of repeated earth
lives, it behooves us to ask ourselves whether Frohschammer possibly
established a certain standpoint in the case, and whether there might
not perhaps be another as well.
What we must grant in Frohschammer's attitude is his
frank enthusiasm for everything beautiful and glorious in the world,
in the face of all that he cites to the contrary. The spiritual life
of the Occident imbued Frohschammer with this enthusiasm for the
beauty and grandeur of the external world. The doctrine of repeated
earth lives seems to him to imply that a spiritual-eternal element is
assumed by the human individuality, the human spirit — an
element that might be well content and blissful in the spiritual
world, but which is forced into and embodied in a world in no way
commensurate with the lofty sublimity of the human spirit. Were that
the meaning of reincarnation, anyone developing a justified
enthusiasm for the beauty and grandeur of God's nature, for
historical evolution, and for all the latter has brought forth in the
way of exalted human passions and impulses, might well resent the
imprisonment of the human soul, as did Frohschammer.
Is that really the only point of view available? It must
be admitted that among the advocates of the doctrine of repeated
earth lives there are to be found even today those who maintain that
the spirit descends from exalted heights into earth life. Such people
are really not dealing with matters such as spiritual science is
capable of bringing to light out of the spiritual worlds, but merely
with general, vague ideas about repeated earth lives. We could ask
ourselves, “Might not the condition into which we are born be
something beautiful and grand? Might we not recognize that man, as he
appears in his physical form, is an image of God in the true Biblical
sense?” That would suffice to enkindle our enthusiasm, and then
we would admit that man had been transferred, not to a dungeon, but
to a beautiful field of action, to a beautiful house.
Does our contentment, our feeling at home, really depend
upon the house, upon its beauty and grandeur, or upon the concessions
we must make? Does it depend upon the house at all? Possibly its very
grandeur and beauty might be oppressive and prison-like for an
underdeveloped man, chained to it without knowing what to do with it.
He might say, “Yes, the house is beautiful, but it annoys me to
be locked up in it.” That is what becomes evident through
observation based on spiritual science, observation that ascends by
way of imagination, inspiration, and intuition to a genuine cognition
of what remains continuous in man throughout his various earth lives.
The first thing man has always experienced when arriving
in the imaginative world from the world of visualizations —
retrogressing, as it were, in the manner often described — is,
to be sure, a world of images. All sorts of people have at all times
entered this imaginative world. Considered purely in appearance, this
imaginative world, which can open up before the soul either through
careful concentration and meditation or through special aptitude,
still presents at first the rudiments of the external world of the
senses. One sees houses, animals, people; various events unroll in
pictures; scenes and beings are there in a living world of images. On
the other hand, this imaginative world stamps itself as pertaining,
in a certain sense, to the super-sensible world through the fact that
it is not within one's arbitrary power to decipher the symbolism of
the images, that in determining this or that, one is subject to inner
laws, that definite experiences express themselves in definite
pictures.
Thus a man can be fairly sure that in any case he is
developing certain levels of his soul, that in certain stages certain
capacities grow, that he attains to living in certain regions of the
super-sensible world, when, for example, a cup is offered him, or he
is led through a stream, or he is baptized, and so forth. It can also
happen that within this imaginative world, and these are less
agreeable experiences, he encounters his various passions and
impulses that appear to him symbolically either as huge, frightful
animals, or as little squirming, wriggling ones. This plane of the
spiritual world, attainable by man, can of course be described only
approximately. On the whole, even when this world is highly
distasteful and appears altogether hideous and the animals
symbolizing his passions seem loathsome, this world appears in most
cases quite agreeable. As a rule, people disregard the nature of what
they experience and are gratified to be able to see at all in the
spiritual world.
That is readily understandable because the spiritual
world does not weigh heavily, even when it appears ugly. It is
fundamentally a world of images, and only when a man lacks the
requisite strength, so that it overwhelms him, crushes him, as it
were, does it indeed destroy the health of the soul life. What we can
call a feeling of moral responsibility, particularly toward the great
world events, need not necessarily result from such seeing; the exact
opposite can occur. People who have achieved great skill in
penetrating this imaginative world may be morally quite casual, for
instance, in the matter of a feeling for truth and falsehood. In this
world there is strong temptation not to take truth pertaining to the
physical world seriously, and that in a way is deplorable. One is
prone to lose the ability to distinguish between what is objectively
true and false.
To stand firmly in this imaginative world, to be able to
learn its true meaning, is a matter of development. As a human being
a man can be quite undeveloped and yet see into this imaginative
world; he can see many vision-like phenomena of the higher world
without rating at all high as a human being. It is all a matter of
development. In the course of time development shows that one learns
to distinguish certain imaginations exactly as one learns to
differentiate in the physical world, only in the physical world this
occurs so early in life that we take no account of it. In the
physical world we learn to distinguish between an elephant and a tree
frog, and as we learn to differentiate, the world begins to take
shape. When a man first faces the imaginative world, it is as though
he took the tree frog for the same sort of animal as the elephant.
How uniformly important this imaginative world seems! It
is only through development that we learn the relative importance of
different things, that something outwardly small may be perhaps more
important than another thing outwardly bigger. These things of the
imaginative world do not seem big or little to us by reason of what
they are, but of what we see in them. Let us suppose a person to be
haughty and arrogant. His quality of arrogance will appeal to him,
and when he passes into the imaginative world this feeling, his
delight in arrogance, is transferred to the size of the beings he
sees there. Everything in the imaginative world that appears as
arrogance, haughtiness, looks gigantic to him, while everything that
to a humble man must seem great appears to him small, like the tiny
tree frog. The appearance of this world depends entirely upon
individual attributes. Perception of the correct relative sizes, the
actual intensities and qualities, is a question of development.
The phenomena are entirely objective, but they can be
completely distorted and seen in caricature. The essential thing is
for man to pass through in a certain way what he himself is, in this
higher cognition as well. He must learn to know himself in an
imaginative way. That, indeed, is a precarious matter, because a
perspective of what the imaginative world offers is wholly
determined, rightly or wrongly, by the person's own qualities. What
does that mean, that a man must learn to know himself through
imaginative cognition? It means that through the agency of the images
he meets in the imaginative world, he must see himself as an
objective image. Just as in the physical world he has this bell
before him as something objective, so he must meet himself in the
imaginative world as the reality he is. This he can achieve in a
normal way only by actually ascending through meditation from
perception of the outer world to life in visualizations, that is, in
certain symbolical visualizations that will free him from perception.
A man must live long and often enough in the pure inner
life of visualizations to transmute it into something he passes
through naturally. Then he will gradually notice something like a
split in his personality. Often during the transition stages he will
have to make an effort to prevent a certain condition from growing
too strong. When this peculiar condition approaches, he faces a
visualization in which he lives, in which he is. It seems to him that
that is the way he is; that is he. Then occasionally he notices that
the remainder of his being, the part of him not freed, becomes like
an automaton. He notices a desire to express something automatically,
to gesticulate. Unschooled people will sometimes catch themselves
making faces, but that sort of thing should really not be allowed to
go beyond an initial experiment. Here he must keep himself in hand.
Like other objects, his own being must be kept without.
The possibility of attaining to this imagination
as one should depends largely upon having previously developed
certain psychic attributes, for in connection with this imaginative
self-cognition all sorts of illusions arise. Everything in the way of
human pride, in fact, every kind of human susceptibility to illusion,
lies in ambush. You can see a great variety of things in the
imaginative world. For example, you might mistake something that is
really purely a matter of the feelings for yourself. It is a common
phenomenon that people hold high opinions of themselves, and a person
of this sort, in reflecting on the extraordinary creature he has
become, is prone to conclude that he must have been something
exalted, royal, or the like — Charlemagne, Napoleon, Marie
Antoinette, or the reincarnation of some saint. Because such people
tend to consider their individuality so important, the individuality
they encounter occupying their body in the sense world, they can only
assume that in a previous incarnation they were something exalted.
These matters are indeed serious, for they point to the
fact that the manner in which a man's own being confronts him
imaginatively depends entirely upon his soul. The point is that we
alter our own beings if we really get completely away from ourselves,
if we work with all our energy to learn to know all our attributes
that we can observe in ordinary life, the attributes we believe to be
dreadful and possibly objectionable to other people. We must take
serious note of these attributes that we carry about with us but
really should not possess. We are naturally not concerned here with
saying agreeable things but with speaking the truth objectively. We
can rest assured that, if we will only go to work objectively,
self-criticism will prove to be a full-time task, and only in the
last extremity should we engage, as is rather commonly done by
humanity, in criticism or judgment of others. He who occupies his
mind much with others and criticizes them freely, can be sure that he
is far too little concerned with himself to enable him to clear away
what must be cleared away if he is to see his own individuality in
its true likeness. The reply to the oft-repeated query of why one
does not progress, which by rights a man should answer himself, is
obvious. He should refrain from all criticism of others except when
outer necessity demands it. Above all, he should never forget what
this “refrain” implies. It includes, for example, the
occasional acceptance of something disagreeable or baneful. Certainly
one must accept such things, but anyone who seriously believes in
karma knows, naturally, that he brought all that on himself; karma
placed the other man where he was in order that he might inflict the
injury. A genuine personal reason for taking the world to task never
really exists.
A great deal, then, is required to attain to this
imagination, this self-cognition. Having achieved it, you will see
why Frohschammer's picture of imprisonment is wrong. You come to
realize that, while this incarnation in which you find yourself is
indeed wonderfully beautiful and glorious, you yourself are not
beautiful, you are not so constituted as to be able to take advantage
of all that it offers. You say to yourself, “Here I stand in
the world, at a certain point of time and space, surrounded by all
that is grand and mighty. I have bodily organs to convey all this
glorious and mighty magnificence. I have every reason to believe that
we live in a paradise, even when ills befall us because it all
depends merely upon whether the dome of the sky towers above us, the
stars travel their paths, the Sun rises every morning and sets in the
glow of evening.” For full satisfaction, however, we are given
our outer world and our bodies with their organs, but great indeed is
the difference between what we might derive from the world and what
we actually do derive. Why do we extract so little from it? Because
something is embodied in our corporeality that is diminutive compared
with the world, something that allows us to perceive a trifling
sector of it. Just compare what your eyes actually see in the world
with what you might see!
When we have learned to know ourselves imaginatively, we
realize that we are by no means as well adapted to this world as we
would be if we could make proper use of our entire organism. We
discover that what we are, in the light of imaginative cognition,
must be opposed by something else in the world. Here we arrive at an
interesting dilemma that must impress our souls if we would really
learn to know the world. We find that in view of all that surrounds
him in the world, man, as he learns to know himself in the
imaginative world, cannot possibly consider himself great and mighty.
It is not a case of coming from a higher world and being imprisoned
in this earth body, but of being not at all adapted to it, not able
to make use of it all. For this reason the imaginative world is
opposed by another, a world that corrects what man does badly as a
result of his inability to use his body. As opposed to what man is in
the imaginative world we have the whole cultural evolution of man,
from the beginning of the world to the end.
Why is this the case? We understand now that in the
course of the cultural evolution of the earth man must become,
through many incarnations, what he will be able to be in some one
future incarnation, and for this reason he has the longing to keep
returning. In each incarnation he must long for what is impossible of
achievement in a single earth life. He must keep returning; then he
can eventually become what it is possible to be in one incarnation.
Precisely by acquiring the knowledge of and feeling for what he
really should be in one life, but what he cannot be for inner —
not outer — reasons, he knows what feeling must predominate in
the soul when he passes through the portal of death. The
predominating feeling must be a longing to return, in order to
become, in the next life and in subsequent ones, what he could not
become in one incarnation. This longing for ever new earth lives must
be the most powerful force. These thoughts can only be touched upon,
but they yield the strongest confirmation of reincarnation.
The accuracy of what I have stated is confirmed by
something else as well. We can continue our efforts to reach the
spiritual world. In a purely technical way we can achieve perception
of the higher world by ignoring external perceptions and devoting
ourselves to the life of visualizations. There is a still further
possibility of giving a definite turn to meditation and
concentration, namely, by endeavoring to let our memories unfold with
complete inner faithfulness, with absolute inner conscientiousness.
This need only be done for a few hours, but seriously. What is one,
really, in life? Well, by means of logic and the theory of knowledge
we learn that one is an ego, but in ordinary life one is a very
doubtful ego. One is exactly what this ego is filled with at the
moment. If you are playing cards, you are exactly what the
impressions of the card game provide. Your consciousness is actually
filled with the impressions of the card game, or whatever it may be.
This is the ego to which consciousness can attain. It is attainable,
but it is something highly variable, fluctuating.
We really find out what this ego has been by placing our
memories before us. Instead of having them behind us, as is usual, we
place them before us. That is an important proceeding. In ordinary
life we are the result of our memories. Suppose that on a certain day
you had experienced nothing but disagreeable things, horrible things.
Just think how all that, concentrated, makes you feel in the evening
— cross, unresponsive, carping, and so on. Then again, you may
have had nothing but gratifying experiences, again concentrated; you
are pleasant, smiling, perhaps cordial. So, at one time we are one
thing, at another time another. We are exactly what we have behind us
as experiences. When we bring all these as memories and place them
before ourselves, at the same time going through them once more, we
are then behind them. If you do that seriously — not in a
routine, mechanical way, if you really relive it all, even for only a
few hours, then something enters your soul, if it is sufficiently
observing, which one might call a sort of fundamental tone that you
yourself seem to be — a bitter, acid-bitter, fundamental tone.
If you then go to work on yourself thoroughly, which again really
depends on your development, that process will rarely show you to
yourself as a sweet being. You will be able to find a bitter
fundamental tone in yourself.
That is the truth, whether we like it or not. One who is
capable of applying the requisite attention to himself will in this
way gradually arrive at what may be called inspirational cognition of
himself. The path leads through bitter experiences, but finally one
seems like an instrument badly out of tune in the harmony of the
spheres, causing a discord there. Through this further self-knowledge
we realize still more clearly how little we are able to make of this
glorious divine nature, whereas we could make so much of it if we
were equal to it. If we repeat such an exercise many times, then,
toward the end of our lives, but beginning as early as the
thirty-fifth year, the peculiar character of the tone compels us to
realize how much there is to improve upon what we were in life, and
that we should long for reincarnation in order to be able to correct
our shortcomings. That is one of the most important results of
inspirational cognition. When a man learns to know his own
fundamental tone, he discovers how ill adapted he is to external
nature, and how little opportunity he has to find peace and inner
harmony. Those who boggle at the idea of reincarnation only show how
incapable they are of understanding themselves in their inadequacy,
how egotistical they are in having no wish to develop further so
beautiful a gift of God.
The second goal, then, that we can reach in our search
for self-understanding is inspiration: the understanding of
man as the spiritual tone world reveals him. There, when we have
learned to know our own tone, so to speak, we discover how ill
adapted we are to what lives in the great realm of nature. Another
possible approach would start from the lapse into mere morality of
what properly pertains to destiny, taking account of how little we
are able to arrive at the peace and inner harmony for which we yearn.
Those who have achieved the power of self-knowledge will often have
occasion to realize how incapable they are of finding the inner calm
and confidence that they are bound to crave. Recall this beautiful
passage in Goethe's writings. He is seated on a mountain-top that
voices the tranquility of earth's lovely nature. Beneath him lies
what earth's eldest son, the granite rock, has spread before his
eyes, and he senses the greatness of nature's laws — repose in
contrast to delirious joy or frantic misery — the swinging
pendulum, the inner tone in the nature of man.
When we study the laws of nature, study what still lives
in space as natural laws, we come to see that just as the evolution
of culture is the counterpart of imaginative man, so the world of
natural laws — the true laws of nature out there in space —
are the counterpart of inspired man.
Penetrating maya, the world of spiritual activity
reveals itself in the laws of nature with that inner quiet
consistency that, through our errors, has become restless
discordance, and we recognize it as such when we have discovered the
inspired man within us. Then this thought can come to us that when we
really understand the essence of nature's laws we know, indeed, that
the earth passes from one form to another, but that something in the
laws of nature gives assurance that in it, man must find the
compensation for what he himself ruins. That is because of the
inherent verity of the laws of nature, and it applies even when man
passes through his various incarnations, that is, when he receives
into himself throughout a long cultural evolution what he must so
receive because it lies potentially within the scope of one
incarnation.
Thus we find a deep connection between all that is
spread out in nature as spirit deeds manifested in natural laws, and
what we discover within ourselves, through inspiration, to be our
deeper self. That is why in all esotericism, in all mysticism, the
inner peace and harmony of nature's laws are always held up as the
ideal for man's inner law. It was by no means fortuitous that in the
ancient Persian initiation one who had attained to the sixth stage
was called a Sun hero. His inner law and sureness were such that he
could no more deviate from the prescribed path than could the sun
from its course through the universe. If the sun could depart from
its course for one moment, untold revolutionary destruction would
inevitably result in the cosmos. There is a further step that we can
take on our way to self-comprehension. We could ascend to the grasp
of man in intuitive cognition, but that would lead us into
such exalted regions that it would be extraordinarily difficult to
clarify the matter, or to designate that world that appears
externally as the counterpart of intuitive man.
From all this you will see that the human being is, in
fact, able to observe all that he has the possibility of being, that
is, what he might be in that glorious exterior structure of the world
in which he is “imprisoned,” surely not because this
exterior structure is bad, but because he falls so far short of
measuring up to it. This shows us that the important thing is a right
evaluation of all world contexts, a proper understanding of the basis
of that sort of spiritual cognition, including the nature of man,
that is presented by anthroposophy. Most of the objections commonly
raised arise out of principles that completely misjudge world
contexts.
Finally, we must ask, “Why is it necessary for man
to be externally embodied at all?” In order to illustrate still
further what little remains to be said, I should like to remind you
of Dr. Unger's lectures on the position of the ego and the “I
am” in the whole inner life of man; also of what you can find
on the subject in The Philosophy of Freedom and in Truth
and Science. True, a little thought can show us that a
significant being hides behind the ego or the “I am,” but
what we experience we experience in our consciousness precisely as
our ego-consciousness, our self-consciousness. This is interrupted,
even when we fall asleep, and if we were able to keep on sleeping,
never awaking, we might still have an ego but we could never be aware
of it through our own agency. Our awareness of it depends upon the
employment of our bodily organization, our corporeality, while awake.
We can experience other things outside of our body, but our ego in
the first instance only by confronting the outer world. For if man
had never descended to earth in order to make use of a body, he would
for all eternity have felt himself to be but a component of an angel,
as the hand feels itself to be a member of the organism, and he would
never have achieved self-consciousness. He might have become aware of
any number of grandiose facts in the world, but never could he have
arrived at ego-consciousness without being incarnated in a physical
body. That is where he had to turn for his ego-consciousness.
You need only study sleep consciousness in order to see
that the human being does not work together with his ego in sleep.
Ego-consciousness presupposes imprisonment in a body, employment of
the instruments of the senses and of the brain. Now, if during a
single incarnation man is able only to a slight extent to make use of
all that is given him in this incarnation, it should not seem
surprising when clairvoyant consciousness tells us that a thorough
search in the human ego, in so far as the latter manifests itself in
its true form, discloses as its prime impulse, its predominant force,
the longing for ever new earth lives, in order to fill and enrich
this ego-consciousness more and more, to develop it to an ever higher
state.
In so doing we would be echoing something in our
theosophy that the theosophists of the eighteenth century so often
maintained, something that can be helpful if expanded into
pneumatosophy. How did eighteenth century theosophists like Ottinger,
Völker, Bengel, and others express from their monotheistic
standpoint the activity of spirit and of divine spirits, or of the
Divine Spirit, as they called it? They said, “The bodily world,
corporeality, is the goal of God's ways.” That is a lovely
concept, “the goal of God's ways.” It means that by
virtue of its inherent impulses, divinity passed through many
spiritual worlds, then descended in order to arrive at a kind of goal
from which it turns back to rise again. This goal is the shaping, the
crystallizing, of the bodily, corporeal form. Were we to translate
this utterance of the eighteenth century theosophists into more
emotional phraseology, we could say, “Ardently longing for
incarnation in a corporeality is the way the spirit reveals itself to
us when we contemplate it in the higher regions, and it ceases to
manifest itself in this longing for incarnation only after it has
been embodied and has started back. The Divinity manifests itself as
ardently desiring embodiment in the flesh, and not until the
re-ascent to the spirit has commenced may this ardor abate.”
That wonderful utterance of the eighteenth century
theosophists did more to illuminate and clarify the mysteries of man
than much that was said in the philosophies of the nineteenth
century, and theosophical activity and endeavor fell off completely
in the first two thirds of the nineteenth century. In the eighteenth
century genuine theosophy of the older kind was to be found in
diverse localities but it lacked the knowledge of incarnation
because Christian evolution retarded it in the Occident. Concerning
divinity, those eighteenth century theosophists knew that
“corporeality is the goal of God's ways.” They knew the
goal of God's ways, but not that of man. They did not find it in the
case of man, otherwise they would have understood from each
incarnation, from the entire nature of man, that there must arise the
longing for a new embodiment, until such time as everything that fits
man to rise to new forms of existence has been extracted from the
life on earth.
At the conclusion of these lectures on pneumatosophy I
feel more than ever how sketchy and incomplete everything must be
left, and what I said in connection with the first two cycles,
Anthroposophy and Psychosophy, applies here as well.
The intention has been to provide stimulating suggestions. If you
will follow up these suggestions, you will find plenty of material
for working out what has been offered. You will need to look about in
the world and take account of manifold factors. One cannot escape the
fact, however, that spiritual science is so comprehensive that, were
we to proceed systematically and in the manner commonly aimed at in
other sciences, we would not have progressed to the point where our
sections actually stand after ten years of work. We would be about as
far along as we might be after the first three months.
Let me say at the close of this cycle that spiritual
science depends upon souls that are seriously willing to work out
independently what has been merely suggested. In such independent
work much will crop up out of regions that have not even been
mentioned. Everyone proceeding with an independent spirit will find
points of contact for this work. Our communion will become ever
closer if we keep intensifying the feeling that we receive something
in order to be stimulated, so that our innermost self comes more and
more to take part in the worlds that are intended to be revealed to
mankind through the spiritual current we have come to call
anthroposophy.
|