IX
HE
LATTER part of the
Bhagavad Gita
is permeated by feelings and shades of meaning saturated with ideas of sattwa,
rajas and tamas. In these last chapters our whole mode of thinking and
feeling must be attuned so as to understand what is said in the sense
of those three conditions. In the last lecture I sought to give an
idea of those important concepts by making use of present-day
experiences. Certainly anyone who enters deeply into this poem must
perceive that since the time when it arose those concepts have
shifted to some extent. Nevertheless, it would not have been correct
to describe them simply by verbal quotations from the poem because
our mode of feeling is different from what is contained there and we
are unable to make those very different feelings our own. If we tried
to we would only be describing the unknown by the unknown.
So in the
Bhagavad Gita
you will find with regard to food that the concepts we
developed last time have shifted a little. What is true for man today
about plant food was true for the ancient Indian of that food Krishna
calls mild, gentle food. Whereas rajas food, which we described
correctly for man today as mineral food (salt, for instance), would
have been designated at that time as sour or sharp. For our
constitution meat is essentially a tamas food, but the Indian meant
by this something that could hardly be considered food at present,
which gives us an idea of how different men were then. They called
tamas food what had become rotten, had stood too long, and had a foul
smell. For our present incarnation we could not properly call that
tamas food because man's organism has changed, even as far as his
physical body.
Thus, in order to
understand these feelings of sattwa, rajas and tamas, so fundamental
in the Gita, it is well for us to apply them to our own
conditions. Now if we would consider what sattwa really is, it is
best to begin by taking the most striking conception of it. In our
time the man who can give himself up to knowledge as penetrating as
our present knowledge of the mineral kingdom is a sattwa man. For the
Indian he was not one who had such knowledge, but was one who went
through the world with intelligent understanding as we would say,
with heart and head in the right place. A man who takes without
prejudice and bias the phenomena the world offers. A man who always
perceives the world with sympathy and conceives it with intelligence;
who receives the light of ideas, of feelings and sentiments streaming
out from all the beauty and loveliness of the world; who avoids all
that is ugly, developing himself rightly. He who does all this in the
physical world is a sattwa man. In the inorganic world a sattwa
impression is that of a surface not too brilliant, illuminated in
such a way that its details of color can be seen in their right
lustre yet bright also.
A rajas impression is
one where a man is in a certain way prevented by his own emotions,
his impulses and reactions, or by the thing itself, from fully
penetrating what lies around him, so that he does not give himself up
to it but meets it with what he himself is. For example, he becomes
acquainted with the plant kingdom. He can admire it, but he brings
his own emotions to bear on it and therefore cannot penetrate it to
its depths.
Tamas is where a man is
altogether given up to his bodily life, so that he is blunt and
apathetic toward his environment, as we are toward a consciousness
different from our own. While we dwell on the physical plane we know
nothing of the consciousness of a dog or a horse, not even of another
human being. In this respect man, as a rule, is blunt and dull. He
withdraws into his own bodily life. He lives in impressions of tamas.
But man must gradually become apathetic to the physical world in
order to have access to the spiritual worlds in clairvoyance. In this
way we can best read the ideas of sattwa, rajas, and tamas. In
external nature a rajas impression would be that of a moderately
bright surface, say of green, a uniform green shade; a dark-colored
surface would represent a tamas impression. Where man looks out into
the darkness of universal space, when the beautiful spectacle of the
free heavens appears to him, the impression he gains is none other
than that blue color that is almost a tamas color.
If we saturate
ourselves with the feeling these ideas give we can apply them to
everything that surrounds us. These ideas are really comprehensive.
For the ancient Indian, to know well about this threefold nature of
his surroundings meant not only a certain understanding of the outer
world, it also meant bringing to life his own inner being. He felt it
somewhat as follows. Imagine a primitive country man who sees the
glory of nature around him — the early morning sky, the sun and
stars, everything he can see. He does not think about it however. He
does not build up concepts and ideas about the world but just lives
on in utmost harmony with it. If he begins to feel himself an
individual person, distinguishing his soul from his environment, he
has to do so by learning to understand his surroundings through ideas
about them.
To set up one's
environment objectively before one is always a certain way of
grasping the reality of one's own being. The Indian of the time of the
Bhagavad Gita
said, “So long as one does not
penetrate and perceive the sattwa, rajas, and tamas conditions in
one's environment, one continues merely to live in it. A person is
not yet there, independently in his own being, but is bound up with
his surroundings. However, when the world about him becomes so
objective that one can pursue it everywhere with the awareness that
this is a sattwa condition, this a rajas, that a tamas, then one
becomes more and more free of the world, more independent in
himself.” This therefore is one way of bringing about
consciousness of self. At bottom this is Krishna's concern — to
free Arjuna's soul from all those things that surround him and are
characteristic of the time in which he lives. So Krishna explains,
“Behold all the life there on the bloody field of battle where
brothers confront brothers, with all that thou feelest thyself bound
to, dissolved in, a part of. Learn to know that all that is there
outside you runs its course in conditions of sattwa, rajas and tamas.
Then wilt thou contrast thyself with it; know that in thine own
highest self thou dost not belong to it, and wilt experience thy
separate being within thyself, the spirit in thee.”
Here we have another of
the beautiful elements in the dramatic composition of the
Bhagavad Gita.
At first we are gradually made acquainted with its ideas as
abstract concepts, but afterward these become more and more vivid.
The concepts of sattwa, rajas, and tamas take on living shape and
form in the most varied spheres of life. Then at length the
separation of Arjuna's soul from it all is accomplished, so to say,
before our spiritual gaze. Krishna explains to him how we must free
ourselves from all that is bound up with these three conditions, from
that in which men are ordinarily interwoven.
There are sattwa men
who are so bound up with existence as to be attached to all the
happiness and joy they can draw from their environment. They speed
through the world, drinking in their blissfulness from all that can
give it to them. Rajas men are diligent, men of action; but they act
because actions have such and such consequences to which they are
attached. They depend on the joy of action, on the impression action
makes upon them. Tamas men are attached to laziness, they want to be
comfortable. They really do not want to act at all. Thus are men to
be distinguished. Those whose souls and spirits are bound into
external conditions belong to one or other of these three groups.
“But thine eyes
shall see the daybreak of the age of self-consciousness. Thou shalt
learn to hold thy soul apart. Thou shalt be neither sattwa, rajas nor
tamas man.” Thus is Krishna the great educator of the human
ego. He shows its separation from its environment. He explains soul
activities according to how they partake of sattwa, rajas or tamas.
If a man raises his belief to the divine creators of the world he is
a sattwa man. Just in that time of the Gita, however, there
were men who in a certain sense knew nothing of the Divine Beings
guiding the universe. They were completely attached to the so-called
nature spirits, those behind the immediate beings of nature. Such men
are rajas men. The tamas men are those who in viewing the world get
only so far as what we may call the ghost-like, which in its
spiritual nature is nearest to the material. So, in regard to
religious feeling also these three groups may be distinguished.
If we wished to apply
these concepts to religious feeling in our time we should say (but
without flattery) that those who strive after anthroposophy are
sattwa men; those attached to external faith are rajas men; those
who, in a material or spiritual sense, will only believe in what has
bodily shape and form — the materialists and spiritualists —
are the tamas men. The spiritualist does not ask for spiritual beings
in whom he may believe; he is quite prepared to believe in them, but
he does not want to lift himself up to them. He wants them to come
down to him. They must rap, because he can hear rapping with physical
ears. They must appear in clouds of light because such are visible to
his eyes. Such are tamas men in a certain conscious sense, and quite
in the sense too of the tamas men of Krishna's time.
There are also
unconscious tamas men; the materialistic thinkers of our time who
deny all that is spiritual. When materialists meet in conference
today they persuade themselves that they adhere to materialism on
logical grounds, but this is an illusion. Materialists are people who
remain so not on the basis of logic but for fear of the spiritual.
They deny the spirit because they are afraid of it. They are in
effect compelled to deny it by the logic of their own unconscious
soul, which does indeed penetrate to the door of the spiritual but
cannot pass through. One who can see reality can see in a
materialistic congress how each person in the depths of his soul is
afraid of the spirit. Materialism is not logic, it is cowardice
before the spiritual. All its arguments are nothing but an opiate to
damp down this fear. Actually, Ahriman — the giver of fear —
has every materialist by the neck. This is a grotesque but an austere
and fundamental truth that one may recognize if one goes into any
materialistic meeting. Why is such a meeting called? The illusion is
that people there discuss views of the universe, but in reality it is
a meeting to conjure up the devil Ahriman, to beckon him into their
chambers.
Krishna, then,
indicates to Arjuna how the different religious beliefs may be
classified, and he also speaks to him of the different ways men may
approach the Gods in actual prayer. In all cases the temper of man's
soul can be described in terms of these three conditions. Sattwa,
rajas, and tamas men are different in the way they relate to their
Gods. Tamas men are such as priests, but whose priesthood depends on
a kind of habit. They have their office but no living connection with
the spiritual world. So they repeat Aum, Aum, Aum, which
proceeds from the dullness, the tamas condition of their spirit. They
pour forth their subjective nature in the Aum.
Rajas men look out on
the surrounding world and begin to feel that it has something in it
akin to themselves, that it is related to them and therefore worthy
to be worshipped. They are the men of “Tat” who worship
the “That,” the Cosmos, as being akin to themselves.
Sattwa men perceive that what lives within us is one with all that
surrounds us in the universe outside. In their prayer they have a
sense for “Sat,” the All-being, the unity without and
within, unity of the objective and the subjective. Krishna says that
he who would truly become free in his soul, who does not wish to be
merely a sattwa, rajas or tamas man in any one respect or another,
must attain to a transformation of these conditions in himself so
that he wears them like a garment, while in his real self he grows
out beyond them.
This is the impulse
that Krishna as the creator of self-consciousness must give. Thus he
stands before Arjuna and teaches him to “Look upon all the
conditions of the world, with all that is to man highest and deepest,
but free thyself from the highest and deepest of the three conditions
and in thine own self become as one who lays hold of himself. Learn
and know that thou canst live without feeling thyself bound up with
rajas, or tamas, or sattwa.” One had to learn this at
that time because it was the beginning of the dawn in
self-liberation, but here again, what then required the greatest
effort can today be found right at hand. This is the tragedy of
present life. There are too many today who stand in the world and
burrow down into their own soul, finding no connection with the outer
world; who in their feelings and all their inner experiences are
lonely souls. They neither feel themselves bound up with the
conditions of sattwa, rajas or tamas, nor are they free from them,
but are cast out into the world like an endlessly, aimlessly
revolving wheel. Such men who live only in themselves and cannot
understand the world, who are unhappy because in their soul-life they
are separated from all external existence — these represent the
shadow side of the fruit that it was Krishna's task to develop in
Arjuna and in all his contemporaries and successors. What had to be
Arjuna's highest endeavor has become the greatest suffering for many
men today.
Thus do successive ages
change. Today we must say that we are at the end of the age that
began with the time of the
Bhagavad Gita.
This may penetrate our feelings with deep significance. It may also tell us
that just as in that ancient time those seeking self-consciousness had to
hear what Krishna told Arjuna, those seeking their soul's salvation today,
in whom self-consciousness is developed to a morbid degree, these too
should listen. They should listen to what can lead them once more to
an understanding of the three external conditions. What can do this?
Let us put forward some
more preliminary ideas before we set out to answer this question. Let
us ask again, what is it that Krishna really wants for Arjuna, whose
relation to external conditions was a right one for his time? What is
it that he says with divine simplicity and naïveté? He
reveals what he wishes to be even to our present time. We have
described how a kind of picture-consciousness, a living imagery,
lighted up man's soul; how there was hovering above it, so to say,
what today is self-consciousness, which men at that time had to
strive for with all their might but which today is right at hand. Try
to live into the soul condition of that time before Krishna
introduced the new age. The world around men did not call forth clear
concepts and ideas, but pictures like those of our dreams today. Thus
the lowest region of soul-life was a picture-like consciousness, and
this was illumined from the higher region — of sleep
consciousness — through inspiration. In this way they could
rise to still higher conditions. This ascent was called “entering
into Brahma.” To ask a soul today, living in Western lands, to
enter into Brahma would be a senseless anachronism. It would be like
requiring a man who is halfway up a mountain to reach the top by the
same way as one still down in the valley. With equal right could one
ask a Western soul today to do Eastern exercises and “enter
into Brahma” because this presupposes that a man is at the
stage of picture consciousness, which as a matter of fact certain
Easterners still are. What the men of the Gita age found in
rising into Brahma, the Western man already has in his concepts and
ideas. This is really true, that Shankaracharya would today introduce
the ideas of Solovieff, Hegel and Fichte to his revering disciples as
the first stage of rising into Brahma. It is not the content,
however, it is the pains of the way, that are important.
Krishna indicates a
main characteristic of this rising into Brahma, by which we have a
beautiful characterization of Krishna himself. At that time the
constitution of the soul was all passive. The world of pictures came
to you, you gave yourself up to these flowing pictures. Compare this
with the altogether different nature of our everyday world.
Devotion, giving ourselves up to things, does not help us to
understand them, even though there are many who do not wish to
advance to what must necessarily take place in our time.
Nevertheless, for our age we have to exert ourselves, to be alive and
active, in order to get ideas and concepts of our surrounding world.
Herein lies all the trouble in our education. We have to educate
children so that their minds are awake when their concepts of the
surrounding world are being formed. Today the soul must be more
active than it was in the age before the origin of the
Bhagavad Gita.
We can put it so:
Bhagavad Gita
Age — rising to Brahma with passive souls.
Intellectual Age (our present age) — actively working our way
up into the higher worlds.
What then must Krishna
say when he wishes to introduce that new age in which the active way
of gaining an understanding of the universe is gradually to begin? He
must say, “I have to come; I have to give thee the ego-man, a
gift that shall impel thee to activity.” If it had all remained
passive as before — a being interwoven with the world, devoted
to the world — the new age would never have begun. Everything
connected with the entry of the soul into the spiritual world before
the time of the Gita, Krishna calls devotion. “All
is devotion to Brahma.” This he compares to the feminine in
man; while what is the self in man, the active working element that
is to create self-consciousness, that pushes up from within as the
generator of the self-consciousness that is to come, Krishna calls
the masculine in man. What man can attain in Brahma must be
fertilized by Krishna. So his teaching to Arjuna is, “All men
until now were Brahma-men. Brahma is all that is spread out as the
mother-womb of the whole world. But I am the father, who came into
the world to fertilize the maternal womb.”
Thus the consciousness
of self is created, which is to work on all men. This is indicated as
clearly as possible. Krishna and Brahma are related to each other as
father and mother in the world. Together they produce the
self-consciousness man must have in the further course of his
evolution — the self-consciousness that makes it possible for
him to become ever more perfect as an individual being. The Krishna
faith has altogether to do with the single man, the individual
person. To follow his teaching exclusively means to strive for the
perfection of oneself as an individual. This can be achieved only by
liberating the self; loosening it from all that adheres to external
conditions. Fix your attention on this backbone of Krishna's
teaching, how it directs man to put aside all externals, to become
free from the life that takes its course in continually changing
conditions of every kind; to comprehend oneself in the self alone,
that it may be borne ever onward to higher perfection. See how this
perfection depends on man's leaving behind him all the external
configuration of things, casting off the whole of outer life like a
shell, becoming free and ever more inwardly alive in himself. Man
tearing himself away from his environment, no longer asking what goes
on in external processes of perfection but asking how shall he
perfect himself. This is the teaching of Krishna.
Krishna — that
is, the spirit who worked through Krishna — appeared again in
the Jesus child of the Nathan line of the House of David, described
in St. Luke's Gospel. Thus, fundamentally, this child embodied the
impulse, all the forces that tend to make man independent and loosen
him from external reality. What was the intention of this soul that
did not enter human evolution but worked in Krishna and again in this
Jesus child? At a far distant time this soul had had to go through
the experience of remaining outside human evolution because the
antagonist Lucifer had come; he who said, “Your eyes will be
opened and you will distinguish good and evil, and be as God.”
In the ancient Indian sense Lucifer said to man, “You will be
as the Gods, and will have power to find the sattwa, rajas and tamas
conditions in the world.”
Lucifer directed man's
attention to the outer world. By his instigation man had to learn to
know the external, and therefore had to go through the long course of
evolution down to the time of Christ. Then he came who was once
withdrawn from Lucifer; came in Krishna and later in the Luke Jesus
child. In two stages he gave that teaching that from another side was
to be the antithesis of the teaching of Lucifer in Paradise. “He
wanted to open your eyes to the conditions of sattwa, rajas, and
tamas. Shut your eyes to these conditions and you will find
yourselves as men, as self-conscious human beings.” Thus does
the Imagination appear before us. On the one side the Imagination of
Paradise, where Lucifer opens man's eyes to the three conditions in
the external world, when for a while the Opponent of Lucifer
withdraws. Then men go through their evolution and reach the point
where in two stages another teaching is given them, of
self-consciousness, which bids them close their eyes to the three
external conditions. Both teachings are one-sided. If the
Krishna-Jesus influence alone had continued, one one-sidedness would
have been added to another. Man would have taken leave of all that
surrounds him, would have lost all interest in external evolution.
Each person would only have sought his own perfection. Striving for
perfection is right; but such striving bought at the price of a lack
of interest in the whole of humanity is one-sided, even as the
Luciferic influence was one-sided. Hence the all-embracing Christ
Impulse entered the higher synthesis of the two one-sided tendencies.
In the personality of
the St. Luke Jesus child Himself the Christ Impulse lived for three
years; the Christ who came to mankind to bring together these two
extremes. Through each of them mankind would have fallen into
weakness and sin. Through Lucifer humanity would have been condemned
to live one-sidedly in the external conditions of sattwa, rajas and
tamas. Through Krishna they were to be educated for the other
extreme, to close their eyes and seek only their own perfection.
Christ took the sin upon Himself. He gave to men what reconciles the
two one-sided tendencies. He took upon Himself the sin of
self-consciousness that would close its eyes to the world outside. He
took upon Himself the sin of Krishna, and of all who would commit his
sin, and He took upon Himself the sin of Lucifer and of all who would
commit the sin of fixing their attention on externalities. By taking
both extremes upon Himself he makes it possible for humanity by
degrees to find a harmony between the inner and the outer world
because in that harmony alone man's salvation is to be found.
An evolution that has
once begun, however, cannot end suddenly. The urge to
self-consciousness that began with Krishna went on and on, increasing
and intensifying self-consciousness more and more, bringing about
estrangement from the outer world. In our time too this course is
tending to continue. At the time when the Krishna impulse was
received by the Luke Jesus child mankind was in the midst of this
development, this increase of self-consciousness and estrangement
from the outer world. It was this that was brought home to the men
who received the baptism of John in the Jordan, so that they
understood the Baptist when he said to them, “Change your
disposition; walk no longer in the path of Krishna” —
though he did not use this word. The path on which mankind had then
entered we may call the Jesus-path if we would speak in an occult
sense. In effect, the pursuit of this Jesus-path alone went on and on
through the following centuries. In many respects human civilization
in the centuries following the foundation of Christianity was only
related to Jesus, not to the Christ Who lived in Jesus for the three
years from the baptism by John until the Mystery of Golgotha.
Every line of
evolution, however, works its way onward up to a certain tension. In
the course of time this longing for individual perfection was driven
to such a pitch that men were in a certain sense brought more and
more into the tragedy of estrangement from the divine in nature, from
the outer world. Today we are experiencing this in many ways. Many
people are going about among us who have little understanding left of
our environment. Therefore, it is just in our time that an
understanding of the Christ Impulse must break in upon us. The
Christ-path must be added to the Jesus-path. The path of one-sided
striving for perfection has become too strong. It has gone so far
that in many respects men are so remote from their surroundings that
certain movements, when they arise, over-reach themselves
immediately, and the longing for the opposite is awakened. Many human
souls now feel how little they can escape from this enhanced
self-consciousness, and this creates an impulse to know the divinity
of the outer world. It is such souls as these who in our time will
seek the understanding of the Christ Impulse that is opened up by
true anthroposophy; the force that does not merely strive for the
one-sided perfection of the individual soul but belongs to the whole
progress of humanity. To understand the Christ means not merely to
strive toward perfection, but to receive in oneself something
expressed by St. Paul, “Not I, but Christ in me.” “I”
is the Krishna word. “Not I, but Christ in me,” is the
Christian word.
So we see how every
spiritual movement in history has in a certain sphere its
justification. No one must imagine that the Krishna impulse could
have been dispensed with. No one should ever think either that one
human spiritual movement is fully justified in its one-sidedness. The
two extremes — the Luciferic and the Krishna impulses —
had to find their higher unity in the mission of the Christ.
He who would understand
in the true anthroposophic sense the impulse necessary for the
further evolution of mankind, must realize how anthroposophy has to
become a means of shedding light on all religions. He must learn to
see how the different streams in evolution all flow into the one main
current of development. It would be a dilettante way of beginning to
do this if one tried to find again in the Krishna stream what can be
found in the stream of Christianity. Only when we regard the matter
in this way do we understand what it means to seek a unity in all
religions. There is, however, another way of doing so. One may repeat
over and over, “In all religions the same fundamental essence
is contained.” In effect, the same essence is contained in the
root of a plant, in the stem, leaves, flowers, the pollen, and the
fruit. That is true, but it is an abstract truth. It is no more
profound than if one were to say, “Why make any distinctions?
Salt, pepper, vinegar, and milk all have their place on the table;
all are one, for all are substance.” Here you can tell how
futile such a way of thought can be, but you do not notice it so
easily when it comes to comparing religions. It will not do to
compare the Chinese, Brahmin, Krishnan, Buddhist, Persian, Moslem,
and Christian faiths in this abstract way, saying, “Look,
everywhere we find the same principles. In each case there is a
Savior.”
Abstractions can indeed
be found in countless places and in countless ways, but this is a
dilettante method because it leads to nothing. One may form societies
to pursue the study of all religions, and do so in the same sense as
saying pepper, salt, etc. are one because they are all substance.
That has no importance. What is important is to regard things as they
really are. To the way of looking at things that goes so far in
occult dilettantism as to keep on declaiming the equality of all
religions, it is one and the same whether what lived in the Christ is
the pivot of the whole of evolution or whether it can be found in the
first man you meet in the street. For one who wishes to guide his
life by truth it is an atrocity to associate the impulse in the
world's history that is bound up with the Mystery of Golgotha and for
which the name Christ has been preserved — to associate that
impulse with any other impulse in history, because in truth it is the
central point of the whole of earthly evolution.
In these lectures I
have tried by means of a particular instance to indicate how
present-day occultism must try to throw light on the different
spiritual movements that have appeared in the course of human
history. Though each has its right and proper point of contact, one
must distinguish between them as between the stem of a plant and the
green leaf, and the green leaf from the colored petal, though all
together form a unity. If one tries with this truly modern occultism
to penetrate with one's soul into what has flowed into humanity in
diverse currents, one recognizes how the different religious faiths
lose nothing of their greatness and majesty. How sublime was the
greatness that appeared to us in the figure of Krishna even when we
simply tried to get a definite view of his place in evolution. All
such lines of thought as we can give only in outline are indeed
imperfect enough, and you may be assured that no one is more aware of
their imperfection than the present speaker. But the endeavor has
been to show in what spirit a true consideration of the spiritual
movement toward individuality in mankind must be carried out. I
purposely tried to derive our thoughts from a spiritual creation
remote from us, the
Bhagavad Gita,
to show how Western minds can perceive and feel what they owe to Krishna;
what he, through the continued working of his impulse, still signifies
for their own upward striving.
However, the spiritual
movement we here represent necessarily demands that we enter
concretely, and with real love, into the special nature of every
current in man's spiritual history. This is a bit inconvenient
because it brings us all too near to the humble thought of how little
after all we really penetrate into their depths. Another idea follows
upon this, that we must go on striving further and ever further. Both
of these ideas are inconvenient. It is the sad fate of that movement
we call anthroposophy, that it produces inconvenient results for many
souls. It requires that we actively lay hold of the definite,
separate facts of the world's development. At the same time it
requires each of us to say earnestly to himself, “I can indeed
reach something higher, and I will. Always it is only a certain stage
and standpoint that I have attained. I must forever go on striving —
on — and on — without end.”
Thus, all along it has
been not quite comfortable to belong to that spiritual movement that
by our efforts is endeavoring to take its place in what is called the
Theosophical Movement. [Dr. Steiner is referring here,
and in the following passages, to his break with the Theosophical
Society and to the formation of the Anthroposophical Society. A full
account of these events can be found in G. Wachsmuth,
The Life and Work of Rudolf Steiner,
pp. 186–189, available from the
Anthroposophic Press, Inc.] It has not been easy, because we
demand that people shall learn to strive ever more deeply to
penetrate the sacred mysteries. We could not supply you with anything
so easy as introducing some person's son or even daughter, saying,
“You need only wait, the Savior of mankind will appear
physically embodied in this boy or girl.” We could not do this
because we must be true. Yet, one who perceives what is happening
cannot but regard these latest proceedings as the final grotesque
outcome of the dilettante comparison of religions that can also be
put forward so easily, and that continually repeats what should be
taken as a matter of course, the tritest of all sayings, “All
religions contain the same essence.”
The last weeks and
months have shown — and my speaking here on this significant
subject has shown it again — that a circle of people can be
found at the present time who are ready to seek spiritual truths. We
have no other concern than to put these truths forward, though many,
or even everyone, may leave us. If so, it will make no difference in
the way the spiritual truths are here proclaimed. The sacred
obligation to truth will guide that movement that underlies this
cycle of lectures. Whoever would go with us must do so under the
conditions that have now become necessary. It is certainly more
convenient to proceed otherwise, not entering into another side of
the matter as we do by pointing out the reality in all things. But
that also is part of our obligation to truth. It is simpler to inform
people of the equality and unity of religions, or tell them they are
to wait for the incarnation of a Savior who is predestined, whom they
are to recognize not by themselves but on someone's authority.
Human souls today will
themselves have to decide how far a spiritual movement can be carried
on and upheld by pure devotion to the ideal of truthfulness. In our
time it had to come to that sharp cleavage, whose climax was reached
when those who had no other desire than to set forth what is true and
genuine in evolution, were described as Jesuits. This was a
convenient way of separating, but the external evidence was the work
of objective falsehood. This cycle of lectures may once more have
shown you that we have been working out of no one-sided tendency,
since it comprises the present, the past, and the primal past, in
order to reveal the unique, fundamental impulse of human evolution.
So I too may say that it fills me with the deepest satisfaction to
have been able to give these lectures here before you. This shows me
there is hope because there are souls here who have the impulse, the
urge toward that which works also in the super-sensible with nothing
but simple, honest truthfulness.
I was forced to add
this final word to these lectures, for it is necessary in view of all
that has happened to us in the course of time down to the point of
being excluded from the Theosophical Society. Considering all we have
suffered, and all that is now being falsely asserted in numerous
pamphlets, it was necessary to say something, although a discussion
of these matters is always painful to me.
Those who desire to
work with us must know that we have taken for our banner the humble,
yet unconditional, honest, striving for truth; striving ever upward
into the higher worlds.
|