Lecture I
Dornach, September 23, 1921
If an Oriental
sage of ancient times — we must return to very ancient
times of Oriental culture if we are to consider what I wish
to say here — one who had been initiated into the
mysteries of the ancient East, were to turn his gaze on
modern Western civilization, he might say to its
representatives, “You are really living entirely in
fear; your whole mood of soul is governed by fear. Everything
you do, but also everything you feel, is saturated with fear
and its reverberations in the most important moments of life.
Since fear is closely related to hatred, hatred plays a great
role in your entire civilization.”
Let us make
this quite clear. I mean that a sage of the ancient Eastern
civilization would speak in this way if he stood again today
among Western people with the same standard of education, the
same mood of soul, as those of his ancient time. He would
make it plain that in his time and his country, civilization
was founded on a completely different basis.He would probably
say, “In my day, fear played no part in civilized life.
Whenever we were to promulgate a world conception, allowing
action and social life to spring from it, the main thing was
joy — joy that could be enhanced to the point of a
complete giving of oneself to the world, that then could be
enhanced to love.” This is how he would experience it,
and he would indicate as a result (if he were rightly
understood) what were from his point of view the most
important ingredients, the most important impulses, of modern
civilization. If we knew how to listen to him in the right
way, we would gain much that we really need to know in order
to find a starting point for trying to get a grip on modern
life. Actually, an echo of the ancient civilization still
prevails in Asia, though strong European influences have been
absorbed into its religious, aesthetic, scientific, and
social life. This ancient civilization is in decline, and
when the ancient Oriental sage says, “Love was the
fundamental force of the ancient Oriental
civilization,” then certainly it must be admitted that
but little of this love can be traced directly in the
present. One who is able to discern it, however, can see even
now, in the phenomena of decline of the Asiatic culture, the
penetration of this primeval element of joy, of delight in
the world and love for the world.
In those
ancient times there was in the Orient little of what
afterward has been required of man since the thought
resounded that found its most radical expression in the Greek
saying, “Know thyself!” This “Know
thyself” actually entered human historical life only in
the ancient Greek culture. The ancient Eastern world
conception, comprehensive and light-filled, was not yet
permeated by this kind of human knowledge; it was in no way
oriented toward directing man's gaze into his own being.
In this respect
the human being is dependent on the conditions prevailing in
his environment. The ancient Oriental culture was founded
under a different effect of sunlight on the earth, and its
earthly conditions were also different from those of the
later Western culture. In the ancient East, man's inner gaze
was captured, one could say, by all that surrounds the human
being as the world, and he had a special Inducement for
giving over his entire inner being to the world. It was
cosmic knowledge that blossomed in the ancient Oriental
wisdom and in the view of the world that owed its origin to
this wisdom. Even in the mysteries themselves — you can
infer this from all you have been hearing for many years
— in all that lived in the mysteries of the East there
was no actual adherence to the challenge, “Know
thyself!” On the contrary — “Turn your gaze
outward toward the world and try to let that approach you
which is hidden in the depths of cosmic
phenomena!” — that is how the challenge of the
ancient Oriental culture would have been expressed.
The teachers
and pupils of the mysteries were compelled, however, to turn
their gaze to the inner being of man when the Asiatic
civilization began to spread westward. As soon, indeed, as
mystery colonies were founded in Egypt and in North Africa,
but particularly when the mysteries began to develop their
colonies still further to the West — a special center
was ancient Ireland — then the teachers and pupils of
the mysteries coming over from Asia were faced, simply by
virtue of the geographical conditions of the Western world
and its entirely different elemental configuration, with the
necessity of cultivating self-knowledge and a true inner
vision. Simply because these mystery pupils, when still in
Asia, had acquired knowledge of the outer world —
knowledge of the spiritual facts and beings lying behind the
outer world — simply through this, they were now able to
penetrate deeply into all that actually exists in man's
innermost being. In Asia all this could not have been
observed at all. The inward-turning gaze would have been
paralyzed, so to speak. By means of all that was brought from
the East to the Western mystery colonies, however, man's gaze
having long been directed outward so as to penetrate into the
spiritual worlds, was now enabled to penetrate into man's
inner being. It was actually only the strongest souls who
could endure what they perceived. Man's inner being actually
first came to the consciousness of humanity in these mystery
colonies transported from the Orient and founded in Western
regions.
One can indeed
realize what an impression was produced by this
self-knowledge on the teachers and pupils of the Oriental
mysteries if we repeat a saying that was addressed to the
pupils over and over again by the teachers who had already
cultivated that vision of man's inner being, a saying that
was to make clear to them in what kind of mood of soul this
self-knowledge was actually to be approached. The saying to
which I am referring is frequently quoted. In its full weight
it was uttered only in the more ancient mystery colonies of
Egypt, North Africa, and Ireland as a preparation for the
pupil and as a reminder for every initiate regarding the
experiences of man's inner being. The saying runs thus,
“No one who is not initiated in the sacred mysteries
should discover the secrets of man's inner being; to utter
these secrets in the presence of a non-initiate is forbidden;
the mouth uttering these secrets lays the burden of sin upon
itself, and the ear burdens itself with sin when it hearkens
to those secrets.”
Time and again
this saying was uttered from the inner experience that an
individual, prepared by Oriental wisdom, was able to attain
when he penetrated, by virtue of the earthly conditions of
the West, to knowledge of the human being. Tradition has
preserved this saying, and today it is still repeated —
without any understanding of its innermost nature — in
the secret orders and secret societies of the West that
outwardly still have a great influence. It is repeated only
from tradition, however. It is not uttered with the necessary
weight, for those who say it do not really know what it
signifies. Even in our time, however, this saying is used as
a kind of motto in the secret orders of the West:
“There are secrets concerning man's inner being that
can be transmitted to people only within the secret
societies, for otherwise the mouth uttering them is sinful,
and the ear hearing them is likewise sinful.”
One must say
that, as time has evolved, many people — not in Central
Europe but in Western lands — learn in their secret
societies what has been handed down as tradition from the
researches of the ancient wisdom. It is received without
understanding, although as an impulse it actually often flows
into action. In more recent centuries, actually since the
middle of the fifteenth century, the human constitution has
become such as to make it impossible to see these things in
their original form; they could be absorbed only
intellectually. One could receive concepts about them, but
one could not attain a true experience of them. Individual
shad only some intimations of it. Many people could penetrate
into this realm of experience through such intimations.
Such people
have sometimes adopted strange forms of outer life, as, for
instance, Bulwer Lytton, who wrote Zanoni.
[ Note 1 ]
What he became in his later
life can be grasped only if one knows how he received, to
begin with, the tradition of self-knowledge, but how, by
virtue of his particular, individual constitution, he was
also able to penetrate into certain mysteries. He thereby
became estranged from the natural ways of life. Precisely in
him it is possible to see what a man's attitude toward life
becomes when he admits into his inner experience this
“foreign” spiritual world, not merely into his
concepts but into his whole mood of soul. Many facts must
then be judged by other than conventional standards.
It appeared, of
course, quite outlandish when Bulwer traveled about, speaking
of his inner experiences with a certain emphasis, while a
young woman who accompanied him played a harp-like
instrument, for he always needed to have this harp-music in
between the passages of his talk. Here and there he appeared
in gatherings where everything else went on in a completely
formal, conventional way. He would enter in his rather
eccentric garb and sit down, with his harp-maiden seated in
front of his knees. He would speak a few sentences; then the
harp-maiden would play; then he would continue his talk, and
the maiden would play again. Something coquettish, in a
higher sense of the word — one cannot help
characterizing it in this way at first — was thus
introduced into the ordinary world where pedantic human
convention has made such increasing inroads, particularly
since the middle of the fifteenth century.
Humanity has
little idea of the degree of conventionalism into which it
has grown; people have less and less idea of it simply
because it comes to seem natural. One sees something as
reasonable only insofar as it is in line with what is
“done.” Things in life, however, are all
interconnected, and the dryness and indolence of modern
times, the relationship human beings now have to one another,
belongs to the intellectual development of the last few
centuries. The two things belong together. A man such as
Bulwer Lytton, of course, did not fit into such a
development; one can quite well picture to oneself people of
more ancient times traveling about in the world accompanied
by a younger person with some pleasant music. The disparity
between one attitude of soul and another need only be seen in
the right light; then such a thing can be understood. With
Bulwer Lytton, however, something lit up in him that no
longer could exist directly in the modern intellectual age
but only as tradition.
One must,
however, recover the knowledge of the human being that lived
in the mystery colonies of which I have spoken. The ordinary
human being today is aware of the world around him by means
of his outer, physical sense impressions. What he sees, he
orders and arranges with his intellect. Then he looks also
into his own inner being .Basically this is the world that
man surveys and out of which he acts. The sense impressions
received from outside, the mental images developed from these
sense impressions, these mental images as they penetrate
within, becoming trans-formed by impulses of feeling and of
will, together with everything that is reflected back into
consciousness as memories — here we have what forms the
content of the soul, the content of life in which modern man
weaves and out of which he acts. At most modern man is led by
a kind of false mysticism to ask, “What is actually
within my inner being? What does self-knowledge yield?”
In raising such questions he wishes to find the answer in his
ordinary consciousness. This ordinary consciousness, however,
only emerges from what actually originated in outer sense
impressions and has been transformed by feeling and will. One
finds only the reflections, the mirror-images, of outer life
when looking in to one's inner being with ordinary
consciousness; and although the outer impressions are
transformed by feeling and will,man still does not know how
feeling and will actually work. For this reason he often
fails to recognize what he sees in his inner being as a
transformed mirror-image of the outer world and takes it,
perhaps, as a special message from the divine, eternal world.
This is not the case, however. What appears to the ordinary
consciousness of modern man as self-knowledge is only the
transformed outer world, which is reflected out of man's
inner being into his consciousness.
If man really
wished to look into his inner being, he would be obliged
— I have often used this image — to break the
inner mirror. Our inner being is indeed like a mirror.We gaze
on the outer world. Here are the outer sense impressions. We
link mental images to them. These mental images are then
reflected by our inner being. By looking into our inner being
we arrive only at this mirror (see drawing
below, red). We see what is reflected in this memory
mirror (red arrows). We are just as unable to gaze into man's
inner being with ordinary consciousness as we are to look
behind a mirror without breaking it. This, however, is
precisely what was brought about in the preparatory stage of
the ancient path of Oriental wisdom: the teachers and pupils
of the mystery centers that came to the West could penetrate
directly through the memories into the inner being of man.Out
of what they discovered they afterward spoke those words that
actually were meant to convey that one had to be well
prepared — above all in those ancient times — if
one wished to direct one's gaze to the inner being of man.
What, then,
does one behold within the human being? There, one sees how
something of the power of perceiving and thinking, which is
developed in front of the memory-mirror, penetrates below
this memory-mirror. Thoughts penetrate below this
memory-mirror and work into the human etheric body, into that
part of the etheric body that forms the basis of growth but
is also the origin of the forces of will. In looking out into
the sunlit-space and surveying all that we receive through
our sense impressions, there radiates into our inner being
something that on the one hand becomes memory images but that
also trickles through the memory-mirror, permeating it just
as the processes of growth, nutrition, and so on permeate
us.
The
thought-forces first permeate the etheric body, and the
etheric body, permeated in this way by the thought-forces,
works in quite a special way on the physical body. Thereupon
a complete transformation arises of the material existence
that is within the physical body of man. In the outer world,
matter is nowhere completely destroyed. This is why modern
philosophy and science speak of the conservation of matter,
but this law of the conservation of matter is valid only for
the outer world. Within the human being,matter is completely
dissolved into nothingness. The very essence of matter is
fully destroyed. It is precisely upon this fact that our
human nature is based: upon being able to throw back matter
into chaos, to destroy matter utterly,within that sphere that
lies deeper than memory.
This is what
was pointed out to the mystery pupils who were led from the
East into the mystery colonies of the West, especially
Ireland. “In your inner being, below the capacity for
memory, you bear within you something that works
destructively, and without it you could not have developed
your thinking, for you must develop thinking by permeating
the etheric body with thought-forces. An etheric body that is
permeated with thought-forces, however, works on the physical
body in such a way as to throw its matter back into chaos and
to destroy it.” If, therefore, a person ventures into
this inner being of man with the same attitude with which he
penetrates as far as memory, he enters a realm where the
being of man wants to destroy, to extinguish, what is there.
For the purpose of developing the human, thought-filled
“I” or ego, we all bear within us,below the
memory-mirror, a fury of destruction, a fury of dissolution,
in relation to matter. There is no self-knowledge that does
not point with the greatest intensity toward this inner human
fact.
For this
reason, whoever has had to learn of the presence of this
source of destruction
[ Note 2 ]
in the inner being of man must take an interest in the
evolution of the spirit. With all intensity he must be able
to say to himself: spirit must exist and, for the sake of the
continuance of the spirit, matter should be extinguished.
It is only
after humanity has been spoken to for many years about the
interests connected with spiritual scientific investigation
that attention can be drawn to what actually exists within
the human being. Today we must do so, however, for otherwise
man would consider himself to be something different from
what he really is within Western civilization. Within Western
civilization man is the sheath for a source of destruction,
and actually the forces of decline can be trans-formed into
forces of ascent only if man becomes conscious of this, that
he is the sheath for a source of destruction.
What would
happen if man were not to be led by spiritual science out of
this consciousness? Already in the evolution of our time we
can see what would happen. What is isolated, separated, as it
were, in the human being, and should work only within him, at
the single spot within where matter is thrown back into
chaos, now breaks out and penetrates outer human instincts.
That is what will happen to Western civilization, yes, and to
the civilization of the whole earth. This is shown by all the
destructive forces appearing today — in Eastern Europe,
for instance. It is a fury of destruction thrust out of the
inner being of man into the outer world, and in the future
man will be able to find his bearings regarding what actually
flows into his instincts only when a true knowledge of the
human being once again prevails, when we become aware once
more of the human source of destruction within, which must be
there, however, for the sake of the evolution of human
thinking. This strength of thinking that man must have in
order that he may have a world conception in keeping with our
time, this strength of thinking which must be there in front
of the memory-mirror, brings about the continuation of
thinking into the etheric body, and the etheric body thus
permeated by thinking works destructively upon the physical
body. This source of destruction within modern Western man is
a fact, and knowledge merely draws attention to it. If the
source of destruction is there without man being able to
bring it to consciousness, it is much worse than if man takes
full cognizance of this source of destruction and from this
stand-point enters into the evolution of modern
civilization.
When the pupils
of these mystery colonies, of which I have spoken, first
heard of these secrets, their immediate response was fear.
This fear they learned to know thoroughly. They became
thoroughly acquainted with the sensation that a penetration
into man's inner being — not frivolously in the sense
of a nebulous mysticism but undertaken in all sincerity
— must instill fear. This fear felt by the ancient
mystery pupils of the West was overcome only by disclosing to
them the whole significance of the facts. Then they were able
to conquer through consciousness what had to arise in them as
fear.
When the age of
intellectualism set in, this same fear became unconscious,
and as unconscious fear it is still active. Under all kinds
of masks it works into outer life. It is suited to the modern
age, however, to penetrate into man's inner being.
“Know thyself” has become a rightful demand. It
was by a deliberate calling forth of fear, followed by an
overcoming of this fear, that the mystery pupils were
directed to self-knowlege in the right way.
The age of
intellectualism dulled the sight of what lay in man's inner
being, but it was unable to do away with the fear. It thus
came about that man was and still is under the influence of
this unconscious fear to the degree of saying, “There
is nothing at all in the human being that transcends birth
and death.” He is afraid of penetrating deeper than
this life of memory, this ordinary life of thought, which
maintains its legitimacy, after all, only between birth and
death. He is afraid to look down into what is actually
eternal in the human soul, and from this fear he postulates
the doctrine that there is nothing at all outside this life
between birth and death. Modern materialism has arisen out of
fear, without having the least intimation of this. The modern
materialistic world conception is a product of fear and
anxiety.
This fear thus
lives on in the outer actions of human beings, in the social
structure, in the course of history since the middle of the
fifteenth century, and especially in the nineteenth century
materialistic world conception. Why did these people become
materialists, that is, why would they admit only the outer,
that which is given in material existence? Because they were
afraid to descend into the depths of the human being.
This is what
the ancient Oriental sage would have wished to express from
his knowledge by saying, “You modern Westerners live
entirely steeped in fear. You establish your social order
upon fear; you create your arts out of fear; your
materialistic world conception has been born from fear. You
and the successors of those who in my time established the
ancient Oriental world conception, although they have come
into decadence now — you and these people of Asia will
never understand one another, because with the Asiatic
people, after all, everything sprang ultimately from love;
with you everything originates in fear mixed with
hate.”
This certainly
sounds radical, so I prefer to try to bring the facts before
you as an utterance from the lips of an ancient Oriental
sage. It will perhaps be believed that such a one could speak
in this way were he to return, whereas a modern person might
be considered foolish if he put these things so radically!
From such a radical characterization of these things,
however, we can learn what we really must learn today for the
healthy progress of civilization. Humanity will have to know
again that rational thinking, which is the highest attainment
of modern times, could not have come into existence if the
life of ideas did not arise from a source of destruction.
This source must be recognized, so that it may be kept safely
within and not pass over into outer instincts and thence
become a social impulse.
One can really
penetrate deeply into the connections of modern life by
looking at things in this way. The world that manifests as a
source of destruction lies within, beyond the memory-mirror.
The life of modern man, however, takes its course between the
memory-mirror and the outer sense perceptions. Just as little
as the human being, when he looks into his inner being, is
able to see beyond the memory-mirror, so far is he from being
able to penetrate through all that is spread out before him
as sense perception; he cannot see beyond it. He adds to it a
material, atomistic world,which is indeed a fantastic world,
because he cannot penetrate through the sensory mental
images.
Man is no
stranger, however, to this world beyond the outer, sensory
mental images. Every night between falling asleep and
awakening he penetrates this world. When you sleep, you dwell
within this world. What you experience there beyond the
sensory mental images is not the atomistic world conjectured
by the visionaries of natural science. What lies beyond the
sphere of the senses was actually experienced by the ancient
Oriental sage in his mysteries. One can experience it,
however, only when one has devotion for the world, when one
has the desire and the urge to surrender oneself entirely to
the world. Love must hold sway in cognition if one wishes to
penetrate beyond the sense impression. It was this love in
cognition that prevailed especially in the ancient Oriental
civilization.
Why must one
have this devotion? One must have this devotion because, if
one sought to enter the world beyond the senses with one's
ordinary human I, one would be harmed. The I, as experienced
in ordinary life, must be given up if one wishes to penetrate
into the world beyond the senses. How does this I originate?
This I is formed by the human being's capacity to plunge into
the chaos of destruction. This I must be forged and hardened
in that world lying within man as a source of destruction.
With this I one cannot live beyond the sphere of the outer
sense world. Let us picture to ourselves the source of
destruction in whole human organism. What I am portraying is
to be understood intensively, not extensively, but I would
like to sketch it for you. Here is the source of destruction,
here the human sheath. If what is inside were to spread out
over the whole world, what would then live in the world
through man? Evil! Evil is nothing but the chaos thrust
outside, the chaos that is necessary in man's inner being. In
this chaos,which must be within man, this necessary source of
evil in man, the human I, the human egoity, must be forged.
This human egoity cannot live beyond the sphere of the human
senses in the outer world. That is why the I-consciousness
disappears in sleep, and when it figures in dreams it often
appears as though estranged or weakened.
The I, which is
actually forged in the source of evil, cannot pass beyond the
sphere of the sense phenomena. Hence to the perception of the
ancient Oriental sage it was clear that one can go further
only through devotion, through love, through a surrender of
the I — and that on penetrating fully into this further
region one is no longer in a world of Vana, of the weaving in
the habitual, but rather in the world of Nirvana, where this
habitual existence is dispersed.
This
interpretation of Nirvana, of the sublimest surrender of the
I, as it exists in sleep, as it existed in fully conscious
cognition for the pupils of the ancient Oriental civilization
— it is this Nirvana that would be alluded to by an
ancient Oriental such as the one I introduced to you
hypothetically. He would say, “With you, since you had
to cultivate the egoity, everything is founded on fear. With
us, who had to suppress the ego, everything was founded on
love. With you, there speaks the I that desires to assert
itself. With us, Nirvana spoke, while the I flowed out
lovingly into the entire world.”
One can
formulate these matters in concepts, and they are then
preserved in a certain way, but for humanity they live as
sensations, as feelings, fluctuating and permeating human
existence. Such feelings and sensations constitute what lives
today on the one hand in the Orient and on the other in the
West. In the West, human beings have a blood, they have a
lymph, that is saturated by egoity forged in the inner source
of evil. In the Orient, human beings have a blood, a lymph,
in which lives an echo of the longing for Nirvana.
Both in the
East and in the West these things escape the crude
intellectual concepts of our time. Intellectual understanding
strives somehow to draw the blood from the living organism,
put it on a slide, place it under a microscope, look at it,
and then form ideas about it. The ideas thus arrived at are
infinitely crude, even from the point of view of ordinary
experience. This is all that can be said. Do you believe that
this method touches the subtly graded distinctions between
the people who sit here next to one another? The microscope
naturally gives only crude concepts about the blood, about
the lymph. Subtle shades of difference are to be found even
among people who have come from the same milieu. These
nuances, however, naturally exist much more intensely between
human beings of the East and those of the West, although only
a crude picture of them can be gained by the modern
intellect.
All this thus
lives in the bodies of the human being from Asia, Europe, and
America, and in their relation to one another in outer social
life. With the crude intellect that has been applied in the
last few centuries to the investigation of outer nature, we
shall not be able to tackle the demands of modern social
life; above all we shall not be able to find the balance
between East and West, though this balance must be found.
In the late
autumn of this year (1921) people will be going to the
Washington Conference,
[ Note 3 ]
and discussions will take place there about matters that were
summed up by General Smuts,
[ Note 4 ]
England's Minister of South Africa, with, I would say,
an instinctive genius. The evolution of modern humanity, he
said, is characterized by the fact that the starting point
for cultural interests, which has hitherto been in the
regions bordering the North Sea and the Atlantic Ocean, is
now moving to the Pacific. The culture of the regions
situated around the North Sea has gradually spread throughout
the West and will become a world culture. The center of
gravity of this world culture will be transferred from the
North Sea to the Pacific.
Humanity stands
face to face with this change. People still talk, however, in
such a way that their speech emerges out of the old, crude
concepts, and nothing essential is reached — although
it must be reached if we are really to move forward. The
signs of the times stand with menacing significance before
us, and they say to us: until now only a limited trust has
been needed between human beings, who in fact were all
secretly afraid of one another. This fear was masked under
all sorts of other feelings. Now, however, we need an
attitude of soul that will be able to embrace a world
culture. We need a trust that will be able to bring into
balance the contrasts of East and West. Here a significant
perspective opens up, which we need. People today believe
that economic problems can be handled quite on their own
account — the future position of Japan in the Pacific,
or how to provide all the trading peoples on earth with free
access to the Chinese market, and so on. These problems,
however,will not be settled at any conference until people
become aware that all economic activities and relations
presuppose the trust of one human being in another. In the
future this trust can be attained only in a spiritual way.
Outer culture will be in need of spiritual deepening. I
wished today to look from a different viewpoint at matters we
have discussed often before. Tomorrow we shall speak further
in this way.
|