You may select a new search term and repeat your search. Searches are not case sensitive, and you can use regular expressions in your queries.

Enter your search term: by: title, keyword, or context

   Query type: 
    Query was: father
  

Here are the matching lines in their respective documents. Select one of the highlighted words in the matching lines below to jump to that point in the document.

• Title: Lecture: The Seeds of Future Worlds
  Matching lines:
  • words, to an affirmation of what we may call the Father God.
  • of the Father God. It is indeed true that if anyone sets out to
  • Father God, he must be in some way ill. To be an atheist is to be
  • consciousness we can come to the Father God, but no further. It is
  • Gospels; that the Gospels are the message of the Father, and that
  • the message of the Father God. Here you may see quite clearly how
  • recognise even in theology only the Father God, and to understand the
  • of the Father God. Thus in the sense of this theology Christ is of
  • true teaching concerning the Father God.
  • implied in this. First, the belief that the message of the Father God cannot
  • there to speak of the Father God; they assumed that the Gospels were
  • opinion that the Gospels speak only of the Father God is proof that
  • between the Father God and God the Son. These fine differences that
  • world, man comes to the Father God. From tradition, he has God the Son.
  • should apply only to the Father God and transfers it to the
  • the Father — but it calls the Father “Christ,”
  • difference between Father and Son. Soloviev is inwardly justified in
  • so speaking because for him both the Father and the Christ are
  • Father and Christ. If you are inwardly honest with yourselves, you
  • Father God and the Christ, the two ideas become confused and
  • Maximum number of matches per file exceeded.
• Title: Cosmosophy 1: Lecture II
  Matching lines:
  • words, to an affirmation of what may be called the Father
  • Father God. One can even say, as I have often expressed it,
  • up all the natural laws in what is called the Father God, he
  • this Father God. This far one can go with ordinary
  • are the message of the Father, and that Christ Jesus actually
  • message of the Father God. Here you may see quite clearly how
  • people to recognize, even in theology, only the Father God
  • more than the message of the Father God. In the sense of this
  • concerning the Father God.
  • Father God cannot be found by an ordinary study of the world.
  • imagine that the Gospels were to speak of the Father God;
  • Gospels actually speak only of the Father God is proof that
  • the question of the distinction between the Father God and
  • between the Father God and the Son God, which so engaged
  • Father God. From tradition, he has God the Son. The Gospels
  • should apply actually only to the Father God and
  • actually have the Christ at all; it has only the Father, but
  • it calls the Father “Christ,” because at one time
  • between the Father and the Son. Soloviev is justified in
  • speaking in this way, because for him both the Father and the
  • Maximum number of matches per file exceeded.