Re-Embodiment of the Spirit and Destiny *
* (See Addendum 7)
The soul lives between body and spirit. The impressions coming to it
through the body are transitory, enduring only as long as the body
opens its organs to the things of the outer world. Only while the
rose is in my line of vision can my open eye perceive its color. The
presence of the things of the outer world as well as of the bodily
organs is necessary in order that an impression, a sensation or a
perception can occur. But what I have recognized in my mind as truth
concerning the rose does not pass with the present moment, and as
regards its truth, it is not in the least dependent on me. It would
be true even though I had never stood before the rose. What I know
through the spirit is rooted in an element of the soul life through
which the soul is linked with a world-content that manifests itself in
the soul independent of its bodily basis. The point here is not
whether what manifests itself is essentially imperishable, but whether
the manifestation occurs for the soul in such a way that its
perishable bodily basis plays no part, and only that plays a part in
it that is independent of this perishable body. The enduring element
in the soul comes under observation at the moment we become aware that
the soul has experiences not limited by its perishable factor. Again
the important point is not whether these experiences come to
consciousness primarily through perishable processes of the bodily
organization, but the fact that they contain something that does
indeed live in the soul, yet is independent of the transient process
of perception. The soul is placed between the present and duration in
that it holds the middle place between body and spirit. It also
mediates between the present and duration. It preserves the present
for remembrance, thus rescuing it from impermanence by taking it up
into the duration of its own spiritual being. It also stamps what
endures upon the temporal and impermanent by not merely yielding
itself up in its own life to the transitory incitements, but by
determining things out of its own initiative and embodying its own
nature in them in the shape of the actions it performs. By
remembrance the soul preserves the yesterday; by action it prepares
the tomorrow.
If my soul could not retain the red of the rose through remembrance,
it would always have to perceive it anew to be conscious of it. What
can be retained by the soul after an external impression can become a
mental image, independent of the external impression. Through this
power of forming visualizations the soul makes the outer world so much
its own inner world that it can then retain the latter in memory for
remembrance and, independent of the impressions acquired, lead a life
of its own with it. The soul life thus becomes the enduring effect of
the transitory impressions of the external world.
Action also receives permanence when once it is stamped on the outer
world. If I cut a twig from a tree, something has taken place through
my soul that completely changes the course of events in the outer
world. Something quite different would have happened to the branch of
the tree had I not interfered by my action. I have called into life a
series of effects that, without my existence, would not have been
present. What I have done today endures for tomorrow. Through the
deed it acquires permanence just as my impressions of yesterday have
become permanent for my soul through memory.
For this fact of creating permanence through action we do not, in our
ordinary consciousness form a definite visualization such as we have
for memory, or as the result of a perception of an experience made
permanent. Is not the ego of a man, however, linked just as much to
the alteration in the world resulting from the deed as it is to a
memory resulting from an impression? The ego judges new impressions
differently depending upon whether or not it has one or another
recollection. It has also as an I entered into a
different relation to the world according to whether or not it has
performed one deed or another. Whether, in the relation between the
world and my I, a certain new quality is present or not
depends upon whether or not I have made an impression on another
person through my action. I am quite a different person in my
relationship to the world after having made an impression on my
surroundings.
The fact that what is meant here is not so generally noticed as is the
change taking place in the ego through its having acquired a
recollection, is solely due to the circumstances that the moment a
recollection is formed it unites itself with the soul life that man
has always felt to be his own. The external effects of the deed,
detached from this soul life, produce consequences that are again
something quite different from what the memory retains of this deed.
Apart from this, it must be admitted that after a deed has been
accomplished, there is something in the world upon which the ego has
stamped its character. If we really think out what is here being
considered, the question must arise as to whether the results of a
deed, on which the I has stamped its own nature, retain a
tendency to return to the I just as an impression
preserved in the memory is revived in response to some external
inducement. Is it not possible that what has retained the imprint of
the ego in the external world waits also to approach the human soul
from without, just as memory, in response to a given inducement,
approaches it from within? This matter is only put forward here as a
question because it certainly might happen that the occasion would
never arise on which the consequences of a deed, bearing the impress
of the ego, could take effect in the human soul. That these
consequences are present as such, and that through their presence they
determine the relation of the world to the I, is seen at
once to be a possibility when we really follow out in thought the
matter before us. In the following considerations we shall inquire
whether there is anything in human life that, starting from this
possibility, points to a reality.
Let us first consider memory. How does it originate? Evidently in
quite a different way from sensation or perception. Without the eye I
cannot have the sensation blue, but by means of the eye alone I do not
have the remembrance of blue. If the eye is to give me this sensation
now, a blue object must stand before it. The body would allow all
impressions to sink back again into oblivion were it not for the fact
that while the present image is being formed through the act of
perception, something is also taking place in the relationship between
the outer world and the soul. This activity brings about certain
results within man enabling him through processes within himself to
form a new image of what, in the first place, was brought about by an
image from outside. Anyone who has acquired practice in observing the
life of the soul will see the opinion to be quite erroneous that holds
that the perception a man has today is the same he recalls tomorrow
through memory, it having meanwhile remained somewhere or other within
him. No, the perception I now have is a phenomenon that passes away
with the now. When recollection occurs, a process takes
place in me that is the result of something that happened in the
relation between the external world and me quite apart from the
arousing of the present visualization. The mental image called forth
through remembrance is not an old preserved visualization, but a new
one. Recollection consists in the fact, not that a visualization can
be revived, but that we can present to ourselves again and again what
has been perceived. What reappears is something different from the
original visualization. This remark is made here because in the
domain of spiritual science it is necessary that more accurate
conceptions should be formed than is the case in ordinary life, and
indeed, also in ordinary science.
I remember; that is, I experience something that is itself no longer
present. I unite a past experience with my present life. This is the
case with every remembrance. Let us say, for instance, that I meet a
man and, because I met him yesterday, recognize him. He would be a
complete stranger to me if I were unable to unite the picture that I
made yesterday through my perception with my impression of him today.
Today's image of him is given me through my perception, that is to
say, through my sense organs. Who, then, conjures up yesterday's
picture in my soul? It is conjured up by the same being in me that
was present during my experience yesterday, and that is also present
today. In the previous explanations this being has been called soul.
Were it not for this faithful preserver of the past, each external
impression would always be new to us. It is certain that the soul
imprints upon the body, as though by means of a sign, the process
through which something becomes a recollection. Yet it is the soul
itself that must make this impression and then perceive what it has
made, just as it perceives something external. Thus the soul is the
preserver of memory.
As preserver of the past, the soul continually gathers treasures for
the spirit. That I can distinguish between what is correct or
incorrect depends on the fact that I, as a man, am a thinking being
able to grasp the truth in my spirit. Truth is eternal, and it could
always reveal itself to me again in things even if I were to lose
sight of the past and each impression were to be a new one to me. The
spirit within me, however, is not restricted to the impressions of the
present alone. The soul extends the spirit's horizon over the past,
and the more the soul is able to bring to the spirit out of the past,
the more does it enrich the spirit. The soul thus hands on to the
spirit what it has received from the body. The spirit of man,
therefore, carries at each moment of its life a twofold possession
within itself. Firstly, the eternal laws of the good and the true,
and secondly, the remembrance of the experiences of the past. What
the human spirit does is accompanied under the influence of these two
factors. If we want to understand a human spirit we must, therefore,
know two different things about it. Firstly, how much of the eternal
has been revealed to it, and secondly, how much treasure from the past
lies stored up within it.
These treasures by no means remain in the spirit in an unchanged
shape. The impressions that man acquires from his experiences fade
gradually from memory. Not so, however, their fruits. We do not
remember all the experiences lived through during childhood while
acquiring the arts of reading and writing. Yet we could not read or
write had we not had such experiences, and had not their fruits been
preserved in the form of abilities. Such is the transmutation that
the spirit effects in the treasures of memory. The spirit consigns to
its fate whatever can lead to pictures of the separate experiences,
and extracts therefrom only the force necessary for enhancing its
abilities. Thus not a single experience passes by unutilized. The
soul preserves each one as memory, and from each the spirit draws
forth all that can enrich its abilities and the whole content of its
life. The human spirit grows through assimilated experiences, and
although one cannot find past experiences in the spirit as if in a
storeroom, one nevertheless finds their effects in the abilities that
man has acquired.
Thus far spirit and soul have been considered only within the period
lying between birth and death. We cannot stop there. Anyone wishing
to do so would be like the man who would observe the human body only
within these same limits. Much can certainly be discovered within
these limits, but the human form can never be explained by what lies
between birth and death. It cannot build itself up directly out of
mere physical substances and forces. It can only descend from a form
like its own that arises as the result of what has handed itself on by
heredity. The physical materials and forces build up the body during
life. The forces of propagation enable another body, a body with a
like form, to proceed from it that is to say, one able to be
the bearer of the same life body. Each life body is a repetition of
its forebear. Only because it is such does it appear, not in any
chance form, but in that passed on to it by heredity. The forces that
make possible my human form lay in my forefathers.
The spirit of a man also appears in a definite form, and these forms
of spiritual man are the most varied imaginable. In saying this, the
word form is naturally used in a spiritual sense. No two human beings
have the same spiritual form. Observations should be made in this
region in a manner just as quietly and matter-of-factly as they would
be made in the physical world. It cannot be said that the differences
in man in spiritual respects arise only from the differences in their
environment and their upbringing. No, this is by no means the case
because two people under similar influences of environment and
upbringing develop in quite different ways. We are, therefore, forced
to admit that they have entered on their paths of life with quite
different dispositions. Here we are brought face to face with an
important fact that sheds light on the nature of man when its full
bearing is recognized.
Anyone who is set upon directing his outlook exclusively towards the
side of material happenings could, indeed, assert that the individual
differences of human personalities arise from differences in the
constitution of the material germs. In view of the laws of heredity
discovered by Gregor Mendel and developed further by others, such a
claim can offer much that gives it the appearance of justification
even in scientific judgments. Such judgment only shows, however, that
these people have no insight into the real relation of man to his
experiences. Careful observation shows that external circumstances
affect different people in different ways because of something that by
no means enters immediately into mutual relations with material
development. To the really accurate researcher in this domain it
becomes apparent that what proceeds from the material basis can be
distinguished from what arises through the mutual interaction between
a man and his experiences, although these experiences can only take
shape and form through the participation of the soul itself in this
mutual interaction. The soul stands there clearly in relation to
something within the external world that, by virtue of its very
nature, cannot be connected with the material germinal basis.
Men differ from their animal fellow-creatures on earth through their
physical form, but regarding this form they are, within certain
limits, like one another. There is only one human species. However
great may be the differences between races, people, tribes and
personalities, as regards the physical body, the resemblance between
man and man is greater than between man and any animal species. All
that finds expression in the human species is conditioned by the
inheritance of descendants from forebears, and the human form is bound
to this heredity. As the lion can inherit its physical bodily form
from lion forebears only, so can man inherit his physical bodily form
only from human forebears.
The physical similarity of men is apparent to our physical eyes, and
the differences of their spiritual forms lie revealed to our unbiased
spiritual gaze. There is one fact that shows this clearly the
existence of a man's biography. Were a man merely a member of a
species, no biography could exist. A lion or a dove are interesting
insofar as they belong to the lion or the dove species. The separate
being in all its essentials has been understood when the species has
been described. It matters little whether one has to do with father,
son or grandson. What they have of interest in them, father, son and
grandson have in common. What a man signifies, however, is found only
in his individuality, not in his being merely a member of a species.
I have not in the least understood the nature of Mr. Smith of Hoboken
if I have described his son or his father. I must know his own
biography. Anyone who reflects on the nature of biography realizes
that regarding the spiritual each man is himself a species.
To be sure, those people who regard a biography merely as a collection
of external incidents in the life of an individual may claim they can
write the biography of a dog in the same way they can that of a man.
But anyone who depicts in a biography the real individuality of a man
grasps the fact that he has in the biography of a single man something
that corresponds to the description of a whole species in the animal
kingdom. The point is obviously not that we can say something in the
nature of a biography about an animal especially clever ones.
The point is that the human biography does not correspond to a
biography of an animal, but to the description of the animal species.
Of course, there will always be people who will seek to refute this by
urging that owners of menageries, for instance, know how single
animals of the same species differ individually from one another. The
man who judges in this way, however shows only that he is unable to
distinguish individual difference from difference that is acquired
only through individuality.
Now if genus or species in the physical sense becomes intelligible
only when we understand it as conditioned by heredity, so, too, the
spiritual being can be understood only through a similar spiritual
heredity. I have received my physical human form because of my
descent from human forebears, but whence have I received what finds
expression in my biography? As physical man, I repeat the shape of my
forbears. What do I repeat as spiritual man? Anyone who claims that
what comprises my biography needs no further explanation but must be
accepted just as it stands, is also forced to maintain that he has
seen an earth-mound somewhere on which lumps of matter have integrated
themselves quite unaided into a living man.
As physical man I spring from other physical men because I have the
same shape as the whole human species. The qualities of the species,
accordingly, could thus be acquired only within the species. As
spiritual man I have my own shape just as I have my own biography. I
can have obtained this shape, therefore, from no one but myself. I
did not enter the world with undefined, but with defined
soul-predispositions, and since the course of my life as it comes to
expression in my biography is determined by these predispositions, my
work upon myself cannot have begun with my birth. That is to say, I
must have existed as spiritual man before my birth. I certainly did
not exist in my forebears because as spiritual human beings, they
differ from me. My biography is not explainable through theirs. On
the contrary, as a spiritual being I must be the repetition of someone
through whose biography mine can be explained. The only conceivable
alternative at the moment would be that I owe the character of the
content of my biography to a spiritual life in which I existed prior
to birth or, more correctly, to conception. We should, however, only
be allowed to hold this opinion if we are willing to assume that what
acts upon the human soul from its physical surroundings is of the same
nature as that which affects the soul from a purely spiritual world.
Such an assumption contradicts really accurate observation because the
effect of its physical environment on the human soul is like the
impression made by a new experience on a similar past experience in
the same life.
In order to observe these relations correctly, one must acquire a
perception of the impressions operating in human life, whose influence
upon the predispositions of the soul is like that of standing before a
deed that has to be done, and that is related to what has already been
experienced in physical life. But the soul does not bring faculties
gained in this immediate life to meet these impressions, but
predispositions, which receive the impressions in the same way as do
the faculties acquired through practice. He who has insight into
these matters arrives at the conception of earth-lives that must have
preceded this present one. In his thinking he cannot stop at purely
spiritual experiences that preceded this present earth-life. The
physical form that
Schiller
bore was inherited from his forebears. In
the same way that it was impossible for Schiller's physical form to
have grown out of the earth, it was also impossible for his spiritual
being to have originated from it. He must have been the repetition of
another spiritual being through whose biography his own becomes
explicable as his physical human form is explicable through human
propagation. In the same way, therefore, that the physical human form
is again and again a repetition, a reincarnation of a being of the
human species, so too the spiritual man must be a reincarnation of the
same spiritual man, since, as spiritual man, each individual is, in
fact, his own species.
The objection might be made that what has been stated here is a mere
spinning of thoughts, and external proofs might be demanded as are
customary in ordinary natural science. The reply to this is that the
re-embodiment of the spiritual man is, naturally, a process that does
not belong to the domain of external physical facts, but is one that
takes place entirely in the spiritual region. No other of our ordinary
powers of intelligence has entrance to this region save that of
thinking. A person who will not trust the power of thinking cannot in
fact enlighten himself regarding higher spiritual facts. For the one
whose spiritual eye is opened, the above trains of thought act with
exactly the same force as does an event that takes place before his
physical eyes. The individual who ascribes to a so-called
proof, constructed according to the methods of natural
science, greater power to convince than the above observations
concerning the significance of biography, may be in the ordinary sense
of the word a great scientist, but he is far from the paths of true
spiritual research.
One of the most dangerous assumptions at present consists in trying to
explain the spiritual qualities of a man by hereditary transmission
from father, mother or other ancestors. Anyone who holds the opinion,
for example, that
Goethe
inherited what constitutes his essential
being from his father or mother will at first be hardly accessible to
argument because there lies within such a one a deep antipathy to
unprejudiced observation. A materialistic spell prevents him from
seeing the mutual connections of phenomena in their true light.
In such observations as the above, the presuppositions are supplied
for following man beyond birth and death. Within the boundaries
formed by birth and death, man belongs to the worlds of physical body,
of soul, and of spirit. The soul forms the intermediate link between
body and spirit, inasmuch as it endows the third member of the body,
the soul body, with the capacity for sensation, and inasmuch as it
permeates the first member of the spirit, the spirit self, as
consciousness soul. Thus it takes part and lot during life with the
body as well as with the spirit. This comes to expression in its whole
existence. How the sentient soul can unfold its capabilities will
depend on the organization of the soul body. On the other hand, the
extent to which the spirit self can develop itself within the
consciousness soul will depend on the life of that soul. The more
highly organized the soul body, the more complete the intercourse that
the sentient soul can develop with the outer world. The spirit self
will become that much richer and more powerful the more the
consciousness soul brings nourishment to it. It has been shown that
during life this nourishment is supplied to the spirit self through
assimilated experiences and the fruits of these experiences. The
interaction of the soul and spirit described above can, of course,
only take place where soul and spirit are within each other,
interpenetrating each other, that is, within the union of spirit self
with consciousness soul.
Let us consider first the interaction of the soul body and the
sentient soul. It is evident that the soul body is the most finely
elaborated part of the body. Nevertheless, the soul body belongs to
it and is dependent upon it. In a certain sense, physical body, ether
body and soul body compose a single whole. Hence the soul body is
also drawn within the laws of physical heredity that give the body its
shape. Since it is the most mobile and volatile form of body, it must
also exhibit the most mobile and volatile manifestations of heredity.
Therefore, while the difference in the physical body corresponding to
races, peoples and tribes is the smallest, and while in general the
ether body presents a preponderating likeness and in single
individuals a greater divergence, in the soul body the difference is
already a considerable one. In it is expressed what is felt to be the
external, personal uniqueness of an individual. Thus, it is also the
bearer of that part of this personal uniqueness that is passed on from
parents, grandparents, and so forth, to their descendants. As has
been explained, it is true that the soul as such leads a completely
self-contained life of its own in shutting itself up with its
inclinations and disinclinations, its feelings and passions. It is
nevertheless active as a whole and this whole comes to expression also
in the sentient soul. Because the sentient soul interpenetrates and
fills up the soul body, the latter forms itself according to the
nature of the soul and can in this way, as the bearer of heredity,
pass on tendencies, passions and other qualities from forefathers to
children.
On this fact rests the statement of Goethe, From my father I
have stature and the serious manner of life; from my mother, a joyous
disposition and the love of romance. Genius, of course, he did
not receive from either. In this way we are shown what part of a
man's soul qualities he hands over, as it were, to the line of
physical heredity. The substances and forces of the physical body are
in like manner present in the whole sphere of external physical
nature. They are continually being taken up from it and given back to
it. In the space of a few years the matter that composes our physical
body is entirely renewed. That this matter takes the form of the human
body, and that it always renews itself again within this body, depends
upon the fact that it is held together by the ether body. The form of
the ether body is not determined by events between birth or
conception, and death alone, but is dependent on the laws of heredity
that extend beyond birth and death. That soul qualities also can be
transmitted by heredity that the process of physical heredity
receives an infusion from the soul is due to the fact that the
soul body can be influenced by the sentient soul.
Now, how does the interaction between soul and spirit proceed? During
life, the spirit is bound up with the soul in the way shown above.
The soul receives from the spirit the gift of living within the good
and the true, and thereby of bringing the spirit itself to expression
within its own life, within its tendencies, impulses and passions.
From the world of the spirit, the spirit self brings to the
I the eternal laws of the true and the good. These link
themselves through the consciousness soul with the experiences of the
soul's own life. These experiences themselves pass away, but their
fruits remain. The spirit self receives an abiding impression by
having been linked with them. When the human spirit encounters an
experience similar to one to which it has already been linked, it sees
therein something familiar, and is able to take up an attitude towards
it quite different from what would be the case were the spirit facing
it for the first time. This is the basis of all learning. The fruits
of learning are acquired capacities. The fruits of the transitory
life are in this way graven on the eternal spirit. Do we not see
these fruits? Whence spring the innate predispositions and talents
described above as characteristic of the spiritual man? Surely only
from capacities of one kind or another that a man brings with him when
he begins his earthly life. In certain respects, these capacities
resemble exactly those that we can also acquire for ourselves during
life.
Take the case of a genius. It is known that the boy Mozart could
write out from memory a long musical work after only one hearing. He
was able to do this because he could survey the whole at once. Within
certain limits a man is also able during life to increase his capacity
of rapid survey, of grasping connections, so that he then possesses
new faculties. Indeed, Lessing has said of himself that through a
talent for critical observation, he had acquired for himself something
that came near to genius. We have either to regard such abilities,
founded on innate capacities, with wonder, or to consider them as
fruits of experiences that the spirit self has had through the medium
of a soul. They have been graven on this spirit self, and since they
have not been implanted in this life, they must have been in a former
one. The human spirit is its own species. Just as man as a physical
being belonging to a species bequeaths his qualities within the
species, so does the spirit bequeath its qualities within its species,
that is, within itself. In each life, the human spirit appears as
a repetition of itself with the fruits of its former experiences in
previous lives. This life is consequently the repetition of
others and brings with it what the spirit self has, by work, acquired
for itself in the previous life. When the spirit self absorbs
something that can develop into fruit, it permeates itself with the
life spirit. Just as the life body reproduces the form from species
to species, so does the life spirit reproduce the soul from personal
existence to personal existence.
Through the preceding considerations the thought that seeks the reason
for certain life processes of man in repeated earth lives is raised
into the sphere of validity. This idea can receive its full
significance only by means of observations that spring from spiritual
insight as it is acquired by following the path of knowledge described
at the close of this book. Here it was only intended to show that
ordinary observation rightly oriented by thinking already leads to
this idea. Observation of this kind, it is true, will at first
perceive the idea something like a silhouette, and it will not be
possible to defend the idea entirely against the objections advanced
by observation that is neither accurate nor guided aright by
thinking. On the other hand, it is true that anyone who acquires such
an idea through ordinary thoughtful observation, makes himself ready
for supersensible observation. To a certain extent, he develops
something that, of necessity, he must possess prior to this
supersensible observation, just as one must have eyes prior to
observing through the senses. Anyone who objects that through the
formation of such an idea he can readily suggest to himself the
supersensible observation proves only that he is incapable of entering
into reality by means of free thinking and that it is just he who thus
suggests to himself his own objections.
The experiences of the soul become lasting not only within the
boundaries of birth and death, but beyond death. The soul, however,
does not stamp its experiences only on the spirit that flashes up
within it. It impresses them, as has been shown, on the outer world
also through its deeds. What a man did yesterday is today still
present in its effects. A picture of the connection between cause and
effect is given in the simile of sleep and death. Sleep has often been
called the younger brother of death. I get up in the morning. My
consecutive activity has been interrupted by the night. Now, under
ordinary circumstances it is not possible for me to begin my activity
again just as I please. I must connect it with my doings of yesterday
if there is to be order and coherence in my life. My actions of
yesterday are the conditions predetermining those actions that fall to
me today. I have created my destiny of today by what I did
yesterday. I have separated myself for awhile from my activity, but
this activity belongs to me and draws me again to itself after I have
withdrawn myself from it for awhile. My past remains bound up with
me; it lives on in my present and will follow me into my future. If
the effects of my deeds of yesterday were not to be my destiny of
today, I should not have had to awake this morning, but to be newly
created out of nothing. In the same way it would be absurd if under
ordinary circumstances I were not to occupy a house that I have had
built for me.
The human spirit is no more created anew when it begins its earthly
life than a man is newly created every morning. Let us try to make
clear to ourselves what happens when entrance into this life takes
place. A physical body, receiving its form through the laws of
heredity, makes its appearance. This body becomes the bearer of a
spirit that repeats a previous life in a new form. Between the two
stands the soul that leads a self-contained life of its own. Its
inclinations and disinclinations, wishes and desires, minister to it.
It presses thought into its service. As sentient soul, it receives
the impressions of the outer world and caries them to the spirit in
order that the spirit may extract from them the fruits that are
permanent. It plays, as it were, the part of intermediary, and its
task is fulfilled when it is adequate to this part. The body forms
impressions for the sentient soul that transforms them into
sensations, retains them in the memory as thought images, and
surrenders them to the spirit to hold throughout duration. The soul
is really that part of a man through which he belongs to his earthly
life. Through his body he belongs to the physical human species;
through it he is a member of this species. With his spirit he lives
in a higher world. The soul binds the two worlds together for a time.
The physical world into which the human spirit enters, however, is no
strange field of action to it. On it the traces of the spirit's
actions are imprinted. Something in this field of action belongs to
the spirit. It bears the impress of, and is related to, the spirit's
being. Just as the soul formerly transmitted the impressions from the
outer world to the spirit in order that they might become enduring in
it, so now the soul, as the spirit's organ, has converted the
capacities bestowed upon it by the spirit into deeds that are also
enduring in their effects. Thus the soul has actually flowed into
these actions. In the effects of his actions, a man's soul lives a
second independent life. This statement provides us with a motive for
examining life in order to see how the processes of destiny enter into
it. Something happens to a man. He is probably at first inclined to
regard such a happening as something coming into his life by chance,
but he can become aware of how he himself is the outcome of such
chances. Anyone who studies himself in his fortieth year, and in the
search for his soul nature refuses to be content with an unreal,
abstract conception of the I, may well say to himself,
I am, indeed, nothing more nor less than what I have become
through life's experiences, through what has happened to me by reason
of destiny up to the present. Would I not be a different man today
had I, for example, gone through a set of experiences different from
those through which I actually went when I was twenty years of
age? The man will then seek his I not only in those
impulses of development that come to him from within outwards, but
also in what has formatively thrust itself into his life from without.
He will recognize his own I in what happens to him. If we
give ourselves up unreservedly to such a perception, then only one
more really intimate observation of life is needed to show us that in
what comes to us through certain experiences of destiny there is
something that lays hold on the ego from without, just as memory,
working from within, lays hold on us in order to make a past
experience flash up again. Thus we can make ourselves fitted to
perceive in the experiences of destiny, how a former action of the
soul finds its way to the ego, just as in memory an earlier
experience, if called forth by an external cause, finds its way into
the mind as a thought.
It has already been alluded to as a possible subject of consideration
that the consequences of a deed may meet the human soul again.
Regarding the consequences of some deeds, such a meeting is out of the
question in the course of one earth life because that earth life was
arranged especially for the carrying out of the deed. Experience lies
in its fulfillment. In that case, a definite consequence of that
action can no more re-act upon the soul than can someone remember an
experience while still in the midst of it. It can only be a question
here of the experience of the results of actions that do not meet the
ego while it has the same disposition it had during the earth life in
which the deed was done. Our gaze can only be directed to the
consequences of action from another earth life. If an experience of
destiny befalls us, and we feel that it is connected with
the ego like something that has fashioned itself out of the ego's
inner nature, then we can only think we have to do with the
consequences of the actions of former earth lives. We see that we are
led through an intimate thoughtful comprehension of life to the
supposition paradoxical to ordinary consciousness that
the experiences of destiny of one earth life are connected with the
deeds of previous earth lives. This idea again can only receive its
full content through supersensible knowledge; lacking this, it remains
like a mere silhouette. Once more, however, this thought, this idea,
gained by ordinary consciousness, prepares the soul so that it is
enabled to behold its truth in actual supersensible observation.
Only one part of my deed is in the outer world; the other is in
myself. Let us make this relation of the ego to the deed clear by a
simple example from natural science. Animals that once could see
migrated to the caves of Kentucky and, as a result of their life
there, lost their power of sight. Existence in darkness deprived the
eyes of their function. Consequently today the physical and chemical
activity that normally occurs when seeing takes place is no longer
carried on in these eyes. The stream of nourishment formerly expended
on this activity now flows to other organs. These animals are now
able to live only in these caves. They have by their act, by their
immigration, created the conditions of their later life. The
immigration has become a part of their destiny. A being that once
acted has united itself with the results of its action. This is also
true of the human spirit. The soul was only able to impart certain
capacities to the spirit by performing actions, and these capacities
correspond to the actions. Through an action that the soul has
performed, there lives in the soul the energetic predisposition to
perform another action that is the fruit of the first action. The
soul carries this as a necessity within itself until the subsequent
action has taken place. One might also say that through an action
there has been imprinted upon the soul the necessity of carrying out
the consequences of that action.
By means of its actions the human spirit has really brought about its
own destiny. In a new life it finds itself linked to what it did in a
former one. It may be asked, How can that be, when the human
spirit on reincarnating finds itself in an entirely different world
from the one it left at an earlier time? This question is based
on a superficial notion of the connections of destiny. If I change my
scene of action from Europe to America, I also find myself in entirely
new surroundings. Nevertheless, my life in America depends entirely
on my previous life in Europe. If I have been a mechanic in Europe,
my life in America will shape itself in quite a different way from
what would have been the case had I been a bank clerk. In the one
instance, I should probably be surrounded in America by machinery, in
the other, by banking paraphernalia. In each case my previous life
decides my environment. It attracts to itself, as it were, out of the
whole surrounding world, those things that are related to it. So it
is with the spirit self. It inevitably surrounds itself in a new life
with what it is related to from previous lives. On that account sleep
is an apt image of death because a man during sleep is withdrawn from
the field of action in which his destiny awaits him. While we sleep,
events in this field of action pursue their course. We have for a
certain time no influence on this course of events. Our life on a new
day depends, nevertheless, on the effects of the deeds of the previous
day. Our personality actually embodies or incarnates itself anew
every morning in our world of action. What was separated from us
during the night is spread out around us, as it were, during the day.
So it is with the actions of former human embodiments or
incarnations. They are bound up with a man as his destiny, just as
life in the dark Kentucky caves remains bound up with the animals
that, by migrating into them, have lost their power of sight. Just as
these animals can only live in the surroundings in which they have
placed themselves, so the human spirit is able to live only in the
surroundings that it has created for itself by its acts. That I find
in the morning a certain state of affairs, created by me on the
previous day, is brought about by the immediate course of events.
That I find surroundings when I reincarnate corresponding to the
results of my deeds in a previous life, is brought about by the
relationship of my reincarnated spirit with the things in the
surrounding world. From this we can form an idea of how the soul is
set into the human constitution. The physical body is subject to the
laws of heredity. The human spirit, on the contrary, has to incarnate
over and over again, and its law consists in its bringing over the
fruits of the former lives into the following ones. The soul lives in
the present, but this life in the present is not independent of the
previous lives because the incarnating spirit brings its destiny with
it from its previous incarnations. This destiny determines life.
What impressions the soul will be able to have, what wishes it will be
able to have gratified, what sorrows and joys shall develop for it,
with what men and women it shall come into contact all this
depends upon the nature of the actions in the past incarnations of the
spirit. The soul must meet those people again in a subsequent life
with whom it was bound up in a previous life because the actions that
have taken place between them must have their consequences. When this
soul seeks re-embodiment, those other souls that are bound up with it
will also strive towards their incarnation at the same time. The life
of the soul is, therefore, the result of the self-created destiny of
the human spirit. The course of man's life between birth and death is
determined in a threefold way. In consequence, he is dependent in a
threefold way on factors that lie on the other side of birth and
death. The body is subject to the law of heredity; the soul is
subject to its self-created destiny. We call this destiny, created by
man himself, his karma. The spirit is under the law of
re-embodiment, repeated earth lives. One can accordingly also
express the relationship between spirit, soul and body in the
following way. The spirit is immortal; birth and death reign over the
body according of the laws of the physical world; the soul life, which
is subject to destiny, mediates the connection of both during an
earthly life. All further knowledge about the being of man
presupposes acquaintance with the three worlds to which he belongs.
These three worlds are dealt with in the following pages.
Thinking that frankly faces the phenomena of life and is not afraid to
follow out to their final consequences the thoughts resulting from a
living, vivid contemplation of life can, by pure logic, arrive at the
conception of the law of karma and repeated incarnations. Just as it
is true that for the seer with the opened spiritual eye, past lives
lie like an open book before him as experience, so it is true that the
truth of these things can become obvious to the unbiased reason that
reflects upon it.
What is said here should be compared with the
Addenda
Addenda)
at the end of the book.
|