II.
Concerning Knowledge of the Spiritual World
COMPREHENSION
of the facts stated by spiritual science is made easier, if in the ordinary
life of the soul attention be given to that which gives rise to ideas
capable of such enlargement and transformation that they gradually reach
as far as the events and beings of the spiritual world. And unless this
path be followed with patience we shall easily be tempted to picture
the spiritual world too much like the physical world of the senses.
Indeed, unless we follow this path we shall not be able to form a just
conception of what is actually spiritual, and of its relation to man.
Spiritual
events and beings crowd in upon man when he has prepared his soul to
perceive them. The way in which they announce themselves is absolutely
different from the way in which physical beings and facts do so. But
an idea of this entirely different way of manifesting may be gained
if the process of remembering be called to mind. Let us suppose we had
an experience some time ago. At a definite moment — from one cause
or another — this experience emerges from the depths of psychic
life. We know that what so emerges corresponds to an experience, and
we relate it to that experience. But at the moment of remembrance there
is nothing of the experience present but only its image in the memory.
Now let us imagine an image rising up in the soul in the same way as does
a picture of memory yet expressing, not something previously experienced
but something unfamiliar to the soul. If we do this, we have formed
an idea of the way in which the spiritual world first makes its appearance
in the soul, when the latter is sufficiently prepared for it.
Because
this is so, one who is not sufficiently conversant with the conditions
of the spiritual world will be perpetually bringing forward the objection
that all “presumed” spiritual experiences are nothing else
than more or less indistinct images of the memory, and that the soul
merely does not recognise them as such and therefore takes them to be
manifestations of a spiritual world. Now it should on no account be
denied that it is difficult to distinguish between illusions and realities
in this sphere. Many people who believe they have manifestations from
a spiritual world are certainly only occupied with their own memories,
which they do not recognise as such. In order to see quite clearly in
this respect, it is necessary to be informed of those numerous sources
from which illusion may arise. We may have seen, for instance, something
only once and for a moment, seen it so hastily that the impression did
not penetrate completely into the consciousness; and later — perhaps
in a quite different form — it may appear as a vivid picture. We
possibly feel convinced that we never had anything to do with the matter
before, and that we have had a genuine inspiration.
This and
many other things make it quite comprehensible that the statements made
by those who have supersensible sight appear extremely questionable
to those unacquainted with the special nature of spiritual science.
But one who pays careful heed to all that is said in my books, The
Way of Initiation and Initiation and its Results, about the development
of spiritual sight, will be put in the way of being able to distinguish
between illusion and truth in this sphere.
In
this connection, however, the following should also be noted. It
is true that spiritual experiences appear in the first place as pictures.
It is thus that they rise out of the depths of the soul that is prepared
for them. It is then a question of gaining the right relation to these
pictures. They only have value for supersensible perception when, by
the way in which they present themselves, they show that they are not
to be taken for the facts themselves. Directly they are so taken, they
are worth little more than ordinary dreams. They must present themselves
to us like the letters of an alphabet. We do not look at the shape of
the letters, but read in them what it is desired to express by their
means. Just as something written does not call upon us to describe the
form of the letters, so the images forming the content of supersensible
sight do not call upon us to apprehend them as anything but images ;
but by their own character they force us to look right through their
pictured form and direct our soul's gaze to that which, as a supersensible
event or being, is endeavouring to express itself through them.
As
little as a person on hearing that a letter contains news previously
unknown can deny the possibility of this fact on account of the well-known
character of the letters of the alphabet of which it is composed, so
little can anybody object to clairvoyant pictures being formed out of
well-known objects taken from ordinary life.
It
is certainly true, up to a certain point, that the pictures are
borrowed from ordinary life, but what is so borrowed is not the important
thing to genuine clairvoyant consciousness. The important point is what
lies behind and expresses itself through the pictures.
The
soul must, of course, first prepare itself for seeing such images
appear within its spiritual horizon; but, besides this, it must carefully
cultivate the feeling of not stopping short at merely seeing them, but
of relating them in the right way to the facts of the supersensible
world. It may be said positively that for true clairvoyance there is
required not only the capacity for beholding a world of images in oneself,
but another faculty as well, which may be compared with reading in the
physical world.
The supersensible
world is at first to be looked upon as something lying wholly outside
man's ordinary consciousness, which has no means of penetrating into
that world. The powers of the soul, strengthened by meditation, first
bring it into contact with the supersensible world. By means of these
the pictures that have been described emerge from the wave of the soul's
life. As pictures these are woven entirely by the soul itself. And the
materials of which they are made are actually the forces which the soul
has acquired for itself in the physical world. The fabric of the pictures
is really nothing else but what may be characterised as memory. The
clearer we make this to ourselves, in order to understand clairvoyant
consciousness, the better. We shall in that case clearly understand that
they are but images. And we shall also be cultivating a right understanding
of the way in which the images are to be related to the supersensible
world. Through the pictures we shall learn to read in the supersensible
world. The impressions of the physical world naturally bring us much
nearer to the beings and events of that world than the images seen
supersensibly bring us to the supersensible world. We might even say
that these images are at first like a curtain put up by the soul between
it and the supersensible world, when it feels itself to be in contact
with that world.
It is a
question of becoming gradually familiar with the way in which supersensible
things are experienced. Through experience we learn by degrees to read
the images, that is, to interpret them correctly. In more important
supersensible experiences, their very nature shows that we cannot here
have to do with mere pictures of memory from ordinary life. It is indeed
true that in this connection many absurd things are asserted by people
who have been convinced of certain supersensible facts, or at any rate
think they have been. Many people, for instance, when convinced of the
truth of reincarnation, at once connect the pictures which arise in
their soul with experiences of a former earth-life; but one should always
be suspicious when these pictures seem to point to previous earth-lives
which are similar in one respect or another to the present one, or which
make their appearance in such a way that the present life can, by
reasoning, be plausibly explained from the supposed earlier lives. When,
in the course of genuine supersensible experience, the true impression of a
former earth-life, or of several such lives, appears, it generally happens
that the former life or lives are such that we could never have fashioned
them or have desired to fashion them in thought by any amount of thinking
back from the present life, or out of any wishes and efforts in connection
with it. We may, for instance, receive an impression of our former earth
existence at some moment during our present life when it is quite
impossible to acquire certain faculties, which we had during that former
life. So far from its being the case that images appear for the more
important spiritual experiences which might be memories of ordinary life,
the pictures for these are generally such as we should not have thought
of at all in ordinary experience. This tendency increases with real
impressions the more purely supersensible the worlds become from which
they issue. Thus it is often quite impossible to form images from ordinary
life explanatory of the existence between birth and the preceding death.
We may find out that in the spiritual life we have developed affection for
people and things in complete contrast with the corresponding inclinations
we are developing in the present life on earth; and we learn that in
our earth-life we have often been driven to be fond of something which
in the previous spiritual existence (between death and rebirth) we have
rejected and avoided. Any memory of this existence which might be imagined
to result from ordinary physical experiences must therefore necessarily
be different from the impression we receive through real perception
in the spiritual world.
One who is
not familiar with spiritual science will certainly make further objections
against things being in reality as they have just been described. He will
be able to say, for instance: “You are indeed fond of something,
but human nature is complicated, and secret antipathy is mixed up with
every affection. This antipathy to the thing referred to comes up in
you at a particular moment. You think it is a prenatal experience, whereas
it may perhaps be quite naturally explained from the subconscious psychic
facts of the case.” In general there is nothing to be said against
such an objection; and in many cases it may be quite correct. Knowledge
of clairvoyant consciousness is not easily gained, nor is it without
the possibility of objections. But just as it is true that a supposed
clairvoyant may be mistaken and regard a subconscious fact as an experience
of prenatal spirit-life, so it is also true that a training in spiritual
science leads to a knowledge of self which embraces subconscious states
of soul and is able to free itself from any illusions with regard to
them. Here it need only be asserted that that supersensible knowledge
alone is true which at the moment of cognition is able to distinguish
what originates from supersensible worlds from that which has merely
been shaped by individual imagination. This faculty of discernment becomes
so developed by familiarity with supersensible worlds, that perception
may in this sphere be as certainly distinguished from imagination, as
in the physical world hot iron which is touched with the finger may
be distinguished from imaginary hot iron.
|