Twenty Articles From
The Newspaper:
The Threefold Social Order
Wanted: Insight!
A
complex of ideas such as that of
the threefold social order is often accused of having no “practical
recommendations” on this or that specific issue. “Now there
is the collapse of the currency! What does the proponent of the threefold
order suggest as a remedy?” The only reply he can give is, “The
whole recent course of world economy has been one that meant competition
between the different nations, and thus it led to the depreciation of
money in one particular case. Improvement can begin only when, instead
of instituting specific measures with a view to remedying this or that,
the whole course of economic life is transformed by means of the threefold
system. Specific measures may of course improve particular aspects for a
while; but so long as the character of economic methods remains essentially
the same, isolated ‘improvements’ can do no good. In fact,
an ‘improvement’ in one quarter is bound to make matters worse
in another.”
The only really practical means to rebuild what has been destroyed
is the threefold social order itself. For example, if people would make
comprehensive changes consistent with the threefold order within a part
of the economy suffering under depreciation, the actual course of events
would remedy the evil. Only someone who is for one reason or another
afraid of practical work in the sense of the threefold social order
could ask the question mentioned above. Such a person wants the proponents
of the threefold idea to tell him how to cure particular symptoms without
applying the three-fold cure to the disease itself.
In this
point lies the variance between the representatives of the threefold
idea and all those who fancy it possible to retain the old form of social
life with its unified state, and to succeed in building up a new structure
within it. The whole idea of the threefold social organism rests on
a perception that the old social orientation of the unified state is
what has brought the world into its present catastrophic situation;
and that one must therefore decide to rebuild from the ground up in
keeping with the threefold idea.
Until
the courage for such a thoroughgoing measure is aroused in a sufficiently
large number of people, our diseased social life will never be restored
to health. Without this thoroughgoing change, the only thing that can
possibly take place is a hoarding of economic and political power by
the victorious nations and the oppression of the vanquished. The victors
can, for a while, continue with the old system; the evils that
result from it at home can be balanced through their domination of the
vanquished. However, the vanquished are at this very moment in a plight
that necessitates the instant, thoroughgoing action proposed here. It
would, of course, be better if the victors, too, acquired insight. The
conditions they are bringing about at home must, as time goes on, lead
to a recognition of the intolerable situation in the vanquished country
— and thus to new catastrophes. The vanquished, however, cannot
afford to wait, for each delay makes their life situation more and more
impossible.
The threefold idea is certainly one that runs counter to the habits
of thought and feeling of those who favor a unified national state.
To admit to themselves candidly that the evils they now see around them
are the result of this idea is, for many today, like being asked to
stand with no ground beneath their feet. The ground these people want
to stand on is the unified state. They want to take it as given, and
build upon it institutions they hope will lead to an improved state
of affairs. However, what is necessary is to create new ground; for
this, the courage is lacking.
The main thing that is necessary in order for the three-fold idea to
take effect is to see that as many people as possible realize nothing
but a radical change can do any good. Far too many people have already
allowed the narrowest range of life to shape their judgment in public
affairs. This is especially true of the very people who are active in
the large industrial concerns. They credit themselves with an all-embracing
faculty of judgment in large affairs; actually, they are capable only
of what their own narrow range of life has taught them.
What must be done is to promote a clear understanding (of which there
is so little today) of the circumstances of public life. The more people
there are who know how the forces of public life have operated until
now, and how they have inevitably led to the present catastrophe, the
fewer will be the obstacles to the threefold social order. Everything
that can help to spread such clear perceptions prepares the soil on
which the threefold idea can take practical effect.
Accordingly,
one must not expect much to come of discussions with members of one
or another party; for in the end, as long as they choose to remain within
their party, they will still tend to interpret every thought put forward
by supporters of the threefold idea according to the party's convenience.
Once one has recognized the value of this impulse, one should make it
understood far and wide. One can do nothing with people who do not want
the threefold social organism, but only with those who are filled with
the idea. Only with these people is it possible to discuss the details
of public affairs. One really ought to see that one simply cannot speak
with Mr. Erzberger about public affairs as long as Mr. Erzberger is
Mr. Erzberger!
I write
this because I see that, in this respect, not all those who have embarked
upon the threefold idea are sailing on the right tack. The threefold
social order is an idea one must serve unreservedly if one wants to
serve it at all. It affords a basis for mutual discussions with each
and every one; but the idea must lose nothing of its radicality
in discussion. People will take this course of action once
they perceive the real causes of the downfall. Such a perception will
give the needed courage for thoroughgoing measures. For the prevailing
helplessness is, after all, simply the consequence of a lack of
insight.
|