WHEN I look back upon my life, the first three decades appeal to me as
a chapter complete in itself. At the close of this period I removed to
Weimar, to work for almost seven years at the Goethe and Schiller
Institute. The time that I spent in Vienna between the first journey
to Germany, which I have described, and my later settling down in the
city of Goethe I look upon as the period which brought to a certain
conclusion within me that toward which the mind had been striving.
This conclusion found expression in the preparation for my book The
Philosophy of Spiritual Activity. An essential part of the general
ideas in which I then expressed my views consisted in the fact that
the sense-world did not pass with me as true reality. In my writings
and lectures at that time I always expressed myself in such a way as
to make the human mind appear as a true reality in the creation of a
thought, which it does not form out of the sense world but unfolds in
an activity above the region of sense perception. This sense-free
thinking I conceived as that which places the soul within the
spiritual being of the world. But I also emphasized strongly the fact
that, while man lives within this sense-free thinking, he really finds
himself consciously in the spiritual foundations of existence. All
talk about limits of knowledge had for me no meaning. Knowing meant to
me the rediscovery within the perceptual world of the spiritual
content experienced in the soul. When anyone spoke of limits of
knowledge, I saw therein the admission that he did not experience
spiritually within himself the true reality, and for this reason could
not rediscover this in the perceptual world.
The first consideration with me in advancing my own insight was the
problem of refuting the conception of the limitation of knowledge. I
wished to turn away from that road to knowledge which looked toward
the sense-world, and which would then break through from the
sense-world into true reality. I desired to make clear that true
reality is to be sought, not by such a breaking through from without,
but by sinking down into the inner life of man. Whoever seeks to break
through from without and then discovers that this is impossible such
a person speaks of the limitation of knowledge. But this impossibility
does not consist in a limitation of man's capacity for knowledge, but
in the fact that one is seeking for something of which one cannot
speak in true self-comprehension. While pressing on farther into the
sense-world, one is there seeking in a certain sense a continuation of
the sensible behind the perceptual. It is as if one living in
illusions should seek in further illusions the causes of his
illusions.
The sense of my conception at that time was as follows: While man is
evolving from birth onward he stands consciously facing the world. He
attains first to physical perception.
But this is at first an outpost of knowledge. In this perception there
is not at once revealed all that is in the world. The world is real,
but man does not at first attain to this reality. It remains at first
closed to him. While he has not yet set his own being over against the
world, he fashions for himself a world-conception which is void of
being. This conception of the world is really an illusion. In
sense-perception man faces a world of illusion. But when from within
man sense-free thought comes forth to meet the sense-perception, then
illusion is permeated with reality and ceases to be illusion.
Then the human spirit, living its own life within, meets the spirit of
the world which is now no longer concealed from man behind the
sense-world, but weaves and breathes within the sense-world.
I now saw that the finding of the spirit within the sense-world is not
a question of logical inferences or of projection of sense perception,
but something which comes to pass when man continues his evolution
from perception to the experience of sense-free thinking.
What I wrote in 1888 in the second volume of my edition of Goethe's
scientific writings is permeated with such views: Whoever
attributes to thinking his capacity for an awareness which goes beyond
sense-perception must also attribute to thought objects which lie
beyond mere sense reality. But these objects of thought are ideas.
When this thinking of the idea grows strong enough, then it merges
with the fundamental existence of the world; what is at work without
enters into the spirit of man: he becomes one with objective reality
at its highest potency. Becoming aware of the idea within reality is
the true communion of man. Thinking has the same significance in
relation to the idea as the eye has for light, the ear for sound. It is the
organ of perception.(1)
I was then less concerned to represent the world as it is when
sense-free thought advances beyond the experience of oneself to a
spiritual perception, than I was to show that the being of nature as
revealed to sense-perception is spiritual. I wished to express the
truth that nature is in reality spiritual. It was inevitable from this
that my fate should bring me into conflict with the contemporary
formulators of theories of cognition. These conceived, to begin with,
a nature void of spirit, and therefore their task was to show how far
man is justified in conceiving in his own spirit a spiritual
conception of nature. I wished to oppose to this an entirely different
theory of cognition. I wished to show that man in thinking does not
form conceptions in regard to nature while standing outside of her,
but that knowing means experiencing, so that man while knowing is
actually inside the being of things. Moreover, it was my fate to knit
my own views to those of Goethe. In this union there were many
opportunities to show how nature is spiritual, because Goethe had
striven toward a spiritual nature; but one does not in the same way
have the opportunity to speak of the world of pure spirit as such
since Goethe did not carry his spiritual view of nature all the way to
direct perception of spirit.
In a secondary degree I was then concerned to find expression for the
idea of freedom. When man acts upon his instincts, impulses, passions,
etc., he is not free. Then impulses of which he becomes conscious as
he does of the impressions from the sense-world determine his action.
But his true being is then not acting. He is then acting on a plane
where his true being has not yet manifested itself. He then discloses
himself as man just as little as the sense-world discloses its being
to mere sense-observation. Now, the sense-world is not really an
illusion, but is only made such by man. But man in his action can
permit the sense-like impulses, desires, etc., really to become
illusions; then he permits illusions to act upon him; it is not he
himself that acts. He permits the unspiritual to act. His spiritual
being acts only when he finds the impulses for action in the moral
intuitions of his sense-free thought. Then he alone acts, nothing
else. Then he is a free being acting from within. I desired to show
that whoever rejects sense-free thought as something purely spiritual
in man can never grasp the conception of freedom; but that such a
conception comes about the moment one understands the reality of
sense-free thinking.
In this field I was at that time less intent upon representing the
world of pure spirit, in which man experiences his moral intuitions,
than to emphasize the spiritual character of these moral intuitions.
Had I been concerned with the former should have been obliged to begin
the chapter in The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity on
Moral Imagination in the following way: The free
spirit acts upon his impulses; these are intuitions which are
experienced by him apart from the existence of nature in the world of
pure spirit without his being aware of this spiritual world in the
ordinary state of consciousness. But it was my concern then only
to describe the purely spiritual character of moral intuitions.
Therefore I referred to the existence of these intuitions within the
totality of the world of human ideas, and said in regard to them:
The free spirit acts upon his impulses, which are intuitions
that by means of thought are selected from the totality of his world
of ideas. One who does not direct his gaze toward a world of
pure spirit, and who could not, therefore, write the first statement,
could also not entirely admit the second. But allusions to the first
statement are to be found in plenty in my Philosophy of Spiritual
Activity; for example: The highest stage of the individual
life is thinking in concepts without reference to a specific content
of perception. We determine the content of a concept by means of pure
intuition out of the sphere of ideas. Such a concept then shows no
relation to definite perceptions. Here sense-perceptions are
intended. Had I then desired to write about the spiritual world, and
not merely about the spiritual character of moral intuitions, I should
have been forced to refer to the contrast between sense-perceptions
and spiritual perceptions. But I was concerned only to emphasize the
non-sensible character of moral intuitions.
My world of ideas was moving in this direction when the first chapter
of my life ended with my thirtieth year, and my entrance upon the
Weimar period.
- Cf. Einleitung zu Goethes naturwissenschaftlichen Schriften,
in Kürschner's Deütsche National-Literatur, p. iv.
|