IN the Theosophical Society artistic interests were scarcely fostered
at all. From a certain point of view this situation was at that time
quite intelligible, but it ought not to have continued if the true
sense for the spiritual was to be nurtured. The members of such a
society centre all their interests at first upon the reality of the
spiritual life. In the sense-world man appears to them only in his
transitory existence severed from the spiritual. Art seems to them to
have its activity within this severed existence. It seems, therefore,
to be apart from the spiritual reality for which they seek. Because
this was so in the Theosophical Society, artists did not feel at home
there.
To Marie von Sievers and to me it was important to make the artistic
also alive within the Society. Spiritual knowledge as an experience
takes hold, indeed, of the whole human existence. All the forces of
the soul are stimulated. In formative fantasy there shines the light
of the experience of spirit when this experience is present.
But here there enters something which creates hindrances. The artist's
temperament feels a certain misgiving in regard to this shining in of
the spiritual world in fantasy. He desires unconsciousness in regard
to the dominance of the spiritual world in the soul. He is entirely
right if what we are concerned with is the stimulation of
fantasy by means of that element of clear-consciousness which has been
dominant in the life of culture since the beginning of the age of
consciousness. This stimulating by the intellectual in man
has a deadly effect upon art.
But just the opposite occurs when spiritual content which is actually
perceived shines through fantasy. It is here that all the formative
force in man arises which has ever led to art.
Marie von Sievers had her place in the art of word-shaping; to
dramatic representation she had the most beautiful relationship. Here,
then, was a sphere of art for anthroposophy in which the fruitfulness
of spiritual perception for art might be tested.
The word is the product of two aspects of the experience
which may come from the evolution of the consciousness soul. It serves
for mutual understanding in social life, and it serves for imparting
that which is logically and intellectually known. On both these sides
the word loses its own value. It must fit the
sense which it is to express. It must allow the fact to be
forgotten that in the tone, in the sound, in the formation of the
sound, there lies a reality. Beauty, the shining of the vowels, the
characteristics of the consonants are lost from speech. The vowels
become soulless, the consonants void of spirit. And so speech leaves
entirely the sphere in which it originates the sphere of the
spiritual. It becomes the servant of intellectual knowledge and of the
social life which shuns the spiritual. Thus it is snatched wholly out
of the sphere of art.
True spiritual perception falls as if wholly from instinct into the
experience of the word. It becomes experience in the
soul-representing intoning of the vowels and the spiritually empowered
colours of the consonants. It attains to an understanding of the
secret of the evolution of speech. This secret consists in the fact
that divine spiritual beings could once speak to the human soul by
means of the word, whereas now the word serves only to make oneself
understood in the physical word.
An enthusiasm kindled by this insight is required to lead the word
again into its sphere. Marie von Sievers developed this enthusiasm. So
her personality brought to the Anthroposophical Movement the
possibility of fostering artistically the word and word-shaping. The
cultivation of the art of recitation and declamation grew to be an
activity by means of which to impart truth from the spiritual world
an activity which forms a part receiving more and more consideration
in the ceremonies which found a place within the Anthroposophical
Society.
The recitations of Marie von Sievers at these ceremonies were the
initial point for the entrance of the artistic into the
Anthroposophical Society; for a direct line leads from these
recitations to the dramatic representations which then took place in
Munich along with the course of lectures on anthroposophy.
By reason of the fact that we were able to unfold art along with
spiritual knowledge, we grew more and more into the truth of the
modern experience of the spirit. Art has indeed grown out of the
primeval dreamlike experience of spirit. At the time in human
evolution when the experience of spirit receded, art had to seek a way
for itself; it must again find itself united with this experience when
this enters in a new form into the evolution of culture.
|