IX
FORM-CREATING FORCES
THE PRINCIPLE OF PROGRESS IN EVOLUTION
SERIOUSNESS OF THE HOUR
IN the preceding lecture we studied the principles and powers in the
being of man belonging specifically to Earth-existence. Certain forces
operating in human nature are, in reality, “heritages” from
the earlier embodiments of the Earth: from the Old Saturn period, the
Old Sun period and the Old Moon period. These heritages from primeval
epochs of evolution are contained in the physical body, the ether-body
and the astral body of the earthly human being; but it is the Earth,
the forces deriving actually from the Earth, that have made the
physical body into the instrument of man's present form of
consciousness. The ether-body has received, specifically from the
Earth, the qualities whereby it becomes the bearer of the memory, the
instrument of remembrance. The astral body itself developed during the
Old Moon period of evolution — the planetary predecessor of the
Earth — and the Earth adds the forces which provide for the
operation of human karma. But something else exists as an activity, an
expression of the human personality, something specifically connected
with the “ I ” in man which has been acquired only during
Earth-evolution. Waking consciousness, memory and remembrance, the
operation of karma — these were the active principles added to
the physical-, ether- and astral-bodies in that man was endowed
with the “ I.” We said that the forces of the “ I ”
are sent outwards, towards the outer spiritual world, and that
these forces, unlike those inhering in karma, or in memory, do not
remain inexorably bound up with the human being. A man's memories and
remembrances remain part of him; his consciousness, obviously, has
significance only for him, for other beings have quite different forms
of consciousness; and karma is bound up with the human being in so far
as it has to operate during the earthly incarnations to adjust and
make compensation for his deeds. But “forms” or
“forces” begotten of thoughts or feelings — these
detach themselves from the real “ I ” of man, and in a
certain respect acquire independent existence, independent reality.
Unlike the other forces, they do not remain connected with him.
Now in respect of the forms or forces deriving from the “ I ”
of man, a sharp distinction must be made. The human “ I ”
or Ego can unfold either selfishness or selflessness in the
inner life. According to whether selfishness, or selfless love and
compassion are unfolded, these “forces” or “forms”
operate quite differently. The forces of selfish thoughts become
forces of disturbance, even of destruction; they pass into the
spiritual world actually as destructive forces. On the other hand, all
forces of selfless thoughts enter into the spiritual life of
Earth-evolution, not as destructive but as upbuilding, constructive
forces. In that these forces of selfless thought detach themselves as
it were from the “ I ” of man, they leave behind certain
traces in him. Especially is it true of forces begotten of selfless
thoughts and feelings, that as they go forth from the “ I,”
they leave traces behind in the human being — traces which are
quite perceptible. The more the “ I ” sends out forces born
of selfless thoughts and feelings, the more does a man develop
individuality of form, of gesture, facial expression, and so on —
in short, the power inherent in his own being. The forces of selfish,
self-seeking thoughts and feelings, however, operate in him in such a
way that he has little power to give expression to his own
individuality. We must therefore ask: What is the principle underlying
the distinction to be made among the individual forms of men in the
course of the evolution of humanity?
Everything that is “form” on the Earth derives from the
Spirits of Form. The name “Spirits of Form” is actually
given to these Beings of the Higher Hierarchies because everything
that has form, shape, life — everything that takes on shape
inwardly and evolves an outer form, has received the essential impetus
for this form from the “Spirits of Form.” Now all these
Beings of the Higher Hierarchies are involved in a constant process of
evolution. Not only man, but in a certain sense all the Beings of the
different Hierarchies are involved in a constant process of evolution.
In our present age, the Spirits of Form are moving to the higher rank
of “Spirits of Movement”; the “Spirits of
Personality” to that of “Spirits of Form; the
“Archangeloi” to that of “Spirits of Personality”
or “Archai.” As the Spirits of Form move upwards in rank
they no longer function, in the primary sense, as “Spirits of
Form,” but the succeeding Spirits of Personality do not, at once,
assume the functions of Spirits of Form. This will help you to
understand that something quite definite will come about during the
second half of the period of Earth-evolution into which we have now
passed. At the beginning of Earth-evolution, the Spirits of Form
stamped the principle of form into man; this comes to expression in
the different human forms. Just as the various races have developed
their characteristic qualities, and individual human beings take on
the traits of the several races, so have the various groups of
humanity as a whole all over the Earth received their stamp from the
Spirits of Form. What the Spirits of Form stamped into human beings
has long since passed into the processes of heredity; it has long
since become a heritage, handed down from generation to generation. In
a sense, the Spirits of Form leave man greater freedom as they
themselves move into a higher category and withdraw from the
form-creating function devolving upon them at the beginning of
Earth-evolution. So far as the Beings of the Hierarchies are
concerned, man is drawing nearer and nearer to his “coming of
age.” But of this we must be clear — The Spiritual Beings, moving
up as they do to higher ranks, have themselves to evolve, and prepare
for the next planetary condition of the Earth, in order that during
the Jupiter-existence they may endow the beings who once belonged to
the Earth with forms which will then be appropriate. Towards the end of
a planetary age it is always the case that the being of central
importance — and on the Earth this is man — is left free, so
that the qualities with which he was originally endowed may pass more
freely into his own hands. In the course of Earth-evolution in the
future, therefore, the forces of form, the forms begotten by thoughts
and feelings, will assume greater and greater importance. And in so
far as they are selfless, in so far as they are the offspring of
selfless wisdom, selfless love, these forces will work formatively
upon man. For the design or pattern of the evolutionary process may be
indicated in the following way. The further we go back into the past,
the more do we find that the outer form of the child resembles that of
its forefathers; but the further we go into the future, the more will
the human being, in his outward appearance, become an expression of
the individuality who passes on from one incarnation to another. This
means that in one and the same family (even now it is very frequently
the case and nobody with an eye for such things will deny it) there
will be less and less likeness between the faces of the children and
between the faces of the children and between the other parts of the
human figure, for the reason that the forms will no longer be the
expression of family or race, but more and more the expression of the
individuality. Anyone with a knowledge of Spiritual Science, if he
really observes human beings living all over the Earth, can perceive,
even today, side by side with the inherited characteristics of race or
family, more and more strongly individual lineaments of face, head,
and other bodily forms; he can perceive the striking differences in
form and figure among members of one and the same family. In this
respect, of course, we are in a period of transition; but the Sixth
Post-Atlantean epoch is in preparation, together with its paramount
characteristic, namely, that unlike the conditions obtaining in
earlier periods of culture, outer marks of race will be much less of a
criterion. In the Sixth epoch the criterion all over the Earth will be
the extent to which the individuality has impressed upon his
countenance and upon the whole of his being, the forces left behind by
the forms begotten of selfless thoughts and feelings — especially
those deriving from wisdom.
It is contrary to every principle of true Spiritual Science to say
that just as there was one leading race in each of the culture-epochs
in the past, so in the future, too, there will be another such race,
distinguished by physical attributes. The ancient Indian culture was
borne and sustained by a leading race; so, too, was the culture of
ancient Persia, of the Egypto-Chaldean and Graeco-Latin epochs. But
already today it is apparent that culture, instead of being borne by
one specific leading race, spreads over all races. And it is by
Spiritual Science that culture — a spiritual culture — must
be carried over the whole Earth, without distinction of race or blood.
It is already apparent that our epoch will be succeeded by another of
quite a different character, an epoch when, all over the Earth, the
extent to which a man expresses his innermost being in his outer form,
will be made manifest. It would be sheer contradiction of every
principle of Spiritual Science to speak today of continental limits,
or the limits of any particular territory, in connection with human
beings belonging to the Sixth epoch of culture — for they, in the
future, will be spread over the whole Earth. Only one whose
vantage-point is not that of Spiritual Science, who has some queer bee
in his bonnet that a kind of wheel revolving in spiritual evolution
causes everything to repeat itself just as spring, summer, autumn and
winter repeat themselves when a year has run its course — only
such a one could make the statement that what was necessary for the
creation of races in earlier times will simply be repeated for the
Sixth epoch. Such a statement would be entirely at variance with true
Spiritual Science, and would cut across all knowledge of the actual
and real progress of humanity. The inner power of the soul becomes
more and more manifest as evolution goes forward. The old is not
repeated merely in slightly different form, but actual progress takes
place in the evolution of humanity. If Theosophy is to keep faith with
its good old principles — the first of which is to promote
culture without distinction of race, colour, and so forth, it will not
cherish groundless hopes of a future culture emanating from one
particular race. The deeper connection of Theosophy with the actual
course of evolution consists precisely in this: — that the
processes operating in world-evolution are understood, that thinking
and feeling are brought into harmony with theosophical knowledge, and
the necessary impulses of will made effective in the world. In order
to understand how the power of the soul will more and more be made
manifest in humanity, it is only necessary to bring out one point
clearly, and then we shall realise how the human being evolves as an
individual. (The point that has been developed today has been dealt
with repeatedly, for many years.
[Note 1]).
At the beginning of Earth-evolution, the human being was part of a
group-soul — as expressed in race, blood, family and so on — to a far
greater extent than was the case later on. As evolution continues he
becomes more and more of an individual, develops his individuality. We
have heard what an important part certain forces play in the
development of the individuality during Earth-evolution: consciousness
that is dependent on the physical body; memory and remembrance which
are dependent upon the ether-body; and karma, whereby a man can make
real progress, in that his imperfections and faults do not remain but
can be overcome by him as he passes through one incarnation after
another. But the “forms” or “forces” created by
thoughts and feelings, although they detach themselves from the human
being and lead an independent existence, are nevertheless closely
united with him, in that they leave vestiges behind; these vestiges,
as they are sent out by the “ I ”, contribute to the
definition of the individuality and man gradually divests himself of
the qualities belonging to the group-soul. The trend which will become
more and more general over the globe and will form the essential,
fundamental character of the Sixth epoch of culture, is no kind of
approach to a new group-soul, but far rather the laying aside of the
attributes of the group-soul. Intimately connected with this is the
fact that the spiritual guidance of human beings will become more and
more a matter individual to each one; they will have greater inner
freedom in this respect.
Anyone who has understood the trend of the little book
The Spiritual Guidance of Man and of Mankind
will realise that a movement in this
direction is in very truth taking place in the human race. It is a
fact that in ancient times men lived under external leaders and
teachers, but even in those days, leadership was gradually becoming an
inner concern. Just as the outer form becomes an expression of the
Individuality, so does the path to the spiritual worlds taken by human
beings become more and more their individual concern. It is the duty
of those who have insight into the signs of the times to insist that
human beings have not remained stationary at an earlier stage of
development, that the forces once employed, cannot be repeated in the
same form, simply because men have gone forward in their evolution. In
the age that is coming, the souls of men will become more and more
mature, able to discern and perceive those things of which Spiritual
Science teaches today.
The “Mystery of Golgotha,” as the essential Christ Event,
was an outer happening, striking into the physical world; a future
Christ Event will be an inner concern, inasmuch as the soul of man has
been so quickened by the first Christ Event that in days to come, the
way to Christ will be found in the Spirit, out of the life of soul.
Wherever you look in Spiritual Science as it is presented here, you
will always find — even in the case of very specialised details
— that it is consistent with your own powers of reason and free
judgment, provided only that you make a real effort to apply this free
power of judgment. In that the individual human being is all the time
becoming more accessible to influences from the spiritual world, the
authority of external leadership will gradually lose its weight. It is
very important to realise that the ancient wisdom exists and must be
understood, that understanding of it can constantly increase if men's
souls are open to the spiritual worlds and if they strive to grasp
this wisdom with their powers of reason. This is the very essence of
progressive evolution. However specialised the subjects may be, appeal
to individual reason and judgment must never be excluded. It is a very
different thing to bring forward some young man and announce that he
has this and that incarnation behind him! If I were to tell you such
things I should beg you at the outset not to believe them simply on my
word — but I should never dream of making such assertions
authoritatively, for the simple reason that you could not possibly
convince yourselves objectively of their truth. When, however, it is
said that the same Individuality was present in Elijah, John the
Baptist, Raphael and Novalis — all long since dead — you can
yourselves discover by studying their lives, whether there are
reasonable and sound grounds for such a statement. And no other kind
of appeal must ever be made: the respect due to each individual soul
demands that such a test should be within the realm of possibility.
There are, of course, lazy-minded people who say: “We have to
“believe” you when you speak of the same Individuality
having lived in Elijah, John the Baptist, Raphael and Novalis.”
... No! they are not obliged to believe it ... but they can try, at
least, to find evidence in the different lives of what, admittedly,
can only be actually discovered by occult research. This evidence can
be found, and it is pure laziness when people say that if someone
speaks of the incarnations of human beings long since dead, this must
be taken on authority just as is the case when the incarnations of
some young person living today are announced. That is a very different
matter! In this respect a deep appeal must be made to Theosophists to
put everything to the test of reason and not to rest content with the
cheap excuse that things cannot be proved. They can be proved, if
there is willingness to do so. This must be constantly emphasised.
A kind of counterbalancing process operates in the world and while, on
the one hand, the development of the individuality is progressing, on
the other, something else will become more and more universal, namely,
the objective knowledge which must be acquired by man. Objectivity of
knowledge, uniformity of knowledge does not gainsay the principle of
individuality. Mathematics in itself is an illustration of this fact.
And so it is the task of occultism — if one may speak of
occultism having such a task at the present time — to provide objective
wisdom and knowledge of the universe. Even although, in the nature of
things, the ideal is not immediately in sight because not every
individual has sufficient time and opportunity to put specific details
to the test, it is true, nevertheless, that although things can
actually be discovered only through occult research, they can be
examined and endorsed by every individual; it is not necessary to take
them on faith. All that is required is to reflect about things, with
reason and sound judgment. Let us take a definite case, remembering
that what will be said about it is applicable everywhere.
Suppose someone says: “Mankind has evolved. Progress is a reality
in evolution. This progress reveals itself in the fact that man is
becoming more strongly individual in his nature and being. It follows
that whereas in olden times, leadership was vested more in persons, in
times to come this kind of leadership will be superseded by objective
wisdom, objective knowledge; personal leadership will recede and
become merely an instrument and means for bringing objective wisdom to
the human being. The ideal vantage-point is that the occult teacher is
no different from a teacher of mathematics, who quite obviously has
his function. But mathematics are not accepted merely on the authority
of the teacher of mathematics; every individual accepts mathematics
because he gradually acquires knowledge and understanding of the
fundamentals. Hence the element of wisdom and of knowledge will more
and more supersede the element of personality” ... Suppose
that such a statement were confronted by another, to the effect that
“the world rolls onwards like a wheel; in olden days there were
great Teachers of humanity, and new ones are about to come ...”
When faced with a statement like that, it is not possible to adopt the
easy-going principle that either the one or the other may be believed;
it is a matter, then, for deciding: which of the two is acceptable to
reason? There is the choice between deciding whether no progress is to
be ascribed to humanity and everything thought of as eternal
repetition, or whether humanity does really progress and that
evolution has meaning and purpose. Those who refuse to recognise any
meaning in evolution can speak, if they like, of the eternal
repetition of epochs of time; but those who see meaning and purpose in
Earth-existence as brought to light by occult research, will not speak
of eternal repetition of the same things — which does not, in fact,
take place.
It is all-important to realise that the faculties of man have
developed and that in this development — to take one example
— the following is involved. In the ancient Mysteries each human
being was obliged to submit to certain enactments and procedures
directed to his own person; thereby he became an “Initiate.”
He passed through the “different grades of Initiation.” In
and through the Mystery of Golgotha these grades of Initiation became
a world-historical Event, made manifest for all humanity. What had in
olden times been an affair of one or another particular centre of
Initiation, became a world-historical event, passed into the common
estate of humanity, and was thereafter accessible to every advancing
individuality. In my book
Christianity as Mystical Fact,
therefore, the Mystery of Golgotha is described as
the culmination and, in a sense, the close of the ancient Mysteries,
because it brought all the ancient religions into one great unity.
Occultism reveals still more clearly how the several streams of
culture are gradually converging into one; but as they converge, they
must be recognised and identified. The very operations of occult
research reveal how the fruits of this research harmonise with what
everyone can accept for himself, from his own observation of
happenings on the physical plane.
Let us take a very far-reaching example, of which you may well say, to
begin with: “There he is telling us something that really cannot
be put to the test of reason, nor even approached by reason.” You
may well say this, when it is first put before you.
My book
An Outline of Occult Science
describes how, at one time, Sun,
Moon and Earth were united in a single planetary existence; the Sun
then separated off and, at a later stage, Mercury and Venus; still
later, Mars separated off from the Sun. The further we go back in
time, the more does such a process become a spiritual process and the
question it is essential to understand is really this: — Who were
the Beings who thus separated? Of primary importance as regards the
Earth, was the Christ Being, the great Sun Being Who through the
Mystery of Golgotha subsequently united again with the Earth. Thereby
all the antecedents of Christianity were brought to a kind of climax
and culmination in Christianity itself. With the Mystery of Golgotha,
a mighty Cosmic Power streamed into Earth-evolution. It might
conceivably be argued that if the Christ came once and once only, this
would imply injustice to the souls who lived before His coming. If a
materialist were to bring forward such an argument, it might be
understandable, but it would certainly not be understandable if it
came from a Theosophist. For he knows that the souls living today also
lived in earlier times, before the Mystery of Golgotha; the coming of
Christ, therefore, is of equal significance for the souls of the
pre-Christian ages, because they all incarnate again in the times
following the Mystery of Golgotha. There is, however, this point to be
made and it must be understood by Theosophists, namely, that in a
certain sense the Buddha forms an exception. We must reach the
vantage-point of the true Buddhist who says that the Individuality in
the Buddha was that of a “Bodhisattva” who was born as the
son of King Suddhodana, rose in his twenty-ninth year to the rank of
Buddha, thereby attaining a height whence he need no longer return to
a body of flesh. That, therefore, was the final incarnation of the
Bodhisattva Individuality who does not reincarnate in the era
following the founding of Christianity. The lectures in Christiania
(Note 2)
drew attention to the fact that a very special mission in the universe
devolves upon an Individuality as sublime as the Buddha. The
Individuality who became the Buddha had been sent from the hosts of
Christ on the Sun to the “Venus men” before they came to the
Earth (see also the description in
Occult Science);
the Individuality
of the Buddha, therefore, had been sent forth by Christ from the Sun
to Venus, as His emissary. This Individuality came to the Earth with
the “Venus men” and had thus reached such an advanced stage
of development that through the Atlantean, on into the Post-Atlantean
era, he was able to attain to the rank of Buddhahood before the coming
of Christ. He was in very truth a “Christian” before the
time of Christ. We know, too, that later on he revealed himself in the
astral body of the Jesus-Child of St. Luke's Gospel — since he
need no longer return in a body of flesh. United as he is with the
Christ Stream, a different task devolves upon him for the times to
come. (This task was described in greater detail in the Christiania
lectures.) The Buddha need not incarnate again in a body of flesh. It
fell to him to fulfil a certain Deed on Mars — a Deed not
identical with the Mystery of Golgotha but to be thought of as a
parallel — namely, the Redemption of the people of Mars. There
is, of course, no question here of a Crucifixion as in the Mystery of
Golgotha, for as may be read in
Occult Science,
the people of Mars are
quite differently constituted from human beings on Earth. These
things, of course, are the results of occult observation and can only
be discovered through clairvoyant investigation.
Now let us think of this fact — that the Buddha was an emissary
of the Christ and had lived on Venus. Then think of the uniqueness of
the Buddha-life, of its fundamental character, and proceed as I did
myself. First, there came to me the occult knowledge: Buddha goes from
Venus to Mars in order there to accomplish a Deed of Redemption for
the beings of Mars. And now take the life of Buddha, and observe how
strikingly it differs from the lives of all the other founders of
religion in that period. The teachings of all the others tend in the
direction of concealing the doctrine of reincarnation; Buddha teaches
reincarnation and founds a community based essentially upon piety,
upon a kind of remoteness from the world. Ask yourselves whether there
are beings for whom this quality would be of fundamental significance
— beings whose redemption could be wrought by all that the Buddha
had lived through and made his own? If it were possible, now, to say
more about the constitution of the Mars beings, you would see that the
Buddha-life was a kind of preparation for a higher mission; that it
occurred in Earth-existence as a kind of culmination and can have no
direct continuation. You may compare much in the Buddha-life with the
indications given by occultism and then you will be able to form some
real judgment of matters with such far-reaching cosmic connections. To
discover them — that will still be beyond you; but you will be
able to examine and study them with the help of all the material at
your disposal, and you will find agreement and conformity among the
indications given. That Buddha is connected with Venus was known,
also, to H. P. Blavatsky. In her
Secret Doctrine,
she writes: “Buddha=Mercury” — “Mercury,”
because in earlier times the names for Venus and Mercury were confused
and reversed. “Buddha = Venus” would be the proper form. A
knowledge possessed by occultists today is already hinted at in
H. P. Blavatsky's
Secret Doctrine
— but it must be understood correctly.
These things are connected with the whole process of advancing
evolution. The evolution of man must be studied in connection with the
whole universe; man must be thought of as a microcosm within the
macrocosm. The fact that Beings do actually mediate between the
several planets is entirely in line with these concatenations of
cosmic existence, so that a being like the Buddha can actually be
regarded as a mediator between planets. A good principle on which
judgment of all these things may be based, is recognition of human
progress as a reality, recognition of “evolution,” not as a
catchword, but as a truth.
How can we fail to realise that evolution is a reality? Goethe has
shown with such beauty that in each plant, green leaf, petal, calyx,
stamen and pistil are a unity and yet progress is clearly to be
observed — from the green leaf to the petal and the fruit.
Progress in the spiritual life is still more clearly perceptible. It
would be pure abstraction to say that the path of the Mystic has
everywhere been the same, among all peoples and in all ages. If one
were content with cheap persuasion it would be quite easy to tell
people that the mystical experience of a Yogi has never differed from
that of a Christian Saint. But such a statement would not be based
upon knowledge of the facts — not even of the external facts. The
experiences of a Yogi and those of a Christian Mystic like St.
Theresa, for example, differ fundamentally and essentially! Is it not
casting all sense of truth to the winds to compare the experience of
an Indian Yogi with experiences that are permeated through and through
with the Christ Principle — or with the Jesus Principle in the
case of St. Theresa? As true as there is a difference between the red
petal of the rose and the green leaf on its stalk, so is it true that
there is a difference between experiences arising in the practice of
Yoga and those of a later age. There is a fundamental difference and a
progression as well. Even if many lapses occur, it can be perceived,
nevertheless, and the progress outruns and overcomes the lapses.
It is possible for everyone to put these principles to the test of
reason — and that is essential. For Theosophy must be given under
the assumption that it speaks to the innermost soul, the innermost
heart, but is also grasped and assimilated. It would imply that human
beings could never come of age, if in the future they were obliged to
wait, in the same way as was necessary in olden times, for the coming
of World-Teachers — and this quite apart from the fact that no
true occultism will ever speak of such an abstract principle of
repetition, because it is a direct contradiction of what actually
happens. As world-evolution progresses, the factor of independent
judgment and examination will assume greater and greater importance.
That is one of the reasons why it is so difficult in the present age
to speak truly of an Individuality who is so misunderstood, even among
occultists — I mean the Individuality known as Christian Rosenkreutz.
Those who have a real link with him will never disobey the principle
here described. But recognition of the principle of evolution —
which reveals itself most clearly in the intrinsic worth of a human
being — is difficult and gradual. Christian Rosenkreutz whom we
recognise as the one by whom the true occult movement will be led on
into the future and who will assuredly never add weight to his
authority by means of any outer cult, will be misunderstood — he
more than all. Those who have any knowledge of this Individuality
know, too, that Christian Rosenkreutz will be the greatest of martyrs
among men — apart from the Christ Who suffered as a God. The
martyrdom of Christian Rosenkreutz will be caused by the fact that so
few make the resolve to look into their own souls, in order there to
seek for the evolving individuality, or to submit to the uncomfortable
fact that truth will not be presented ready-made but has to be
acquired by intense struggle and effort; requirements of a different
character will never be brought forward in the name of the
Individuality known as Christian Rosenkreutz. These requirements are
in line with the character of the present age and with what is felt by
men of the present age, even if in many respects they misinterpret
it. The present age feels quite distinctly that the principle
of individuality will assume greater and greater prominence. Even if
here and there this truth is expressed grotesquely and sometimes far
too radically, the very fact that it is expressed is indication of a
sound instinct in humanity. Many a time one is amazed that in spite of
the materialism and the many absurdities current in modern
civilisation, an absolutely true instinct, although it is often pushed
to extremes and caricatured, prevails in regard to many things. An
example occurs in a book recently published:
Zur Kritik der Zeit,
by Walter Rathenau. It contains a passage to the effect that the time for
the founding of sects, for belief in authority, has gone forever as a
possible ideal for mankind ... As, however it is a fact that every
sound development in our time calls forth its opposite, belief in
authority and mania for dogma are rampant in certain circles. And yet:
anyone who knows the world today will realise that nothing can so
deeply undermine peace and harmony among men as non-recognition of the
principle here outlined. The ideal of man must be to fathom and
recognise objective truth, to be led through objective truth itself
into the spiritual worlds. Hindrances would be laid in his path by
attempts to base some truth upon narrow, personal authority — a
mode of procedure that is, furthermore, quite impermissible so far as
the future is concerned. This must be clearly understood. Many years
of work in the field of Spiritual Science have shown how very
difficult things are. Not only here, but wherever theosophical work is
possible, it is always difficult to make this principle of
theosophical striving the root-nerve of theosophical activity. The
reason of the difficulty is that there are always people who will not
bestir themselves to grasp what must be the fundamental impulse of our
age. Objections that may crop up here and there would die a natural
death if people would only give a little thought to the fundamental
requirements of the times and realise that humanity is ever and
everywhere going forward. To lay hold of the whole essence and spirit
of Theosophy — that is what matters! But it would run counter to
the very essence of Theosophy if a certain teaching that is being
broadcast today were to find any widespread acceptance, namely, that
culture which should be the common property of all mankind without
distinction of race and colour, is conditioned by some particular
continental factor. Is it really possible to take back with one
sentence what has been proclaimed in another? Is it difficult to see
the contradiction when it is said on the one hand that universal
wisdom must be spread as a possession of all men without distinction
of race and other differences, while on the other it is said that the
civilisation of the future rests with a race localised within
geographical boundaries? It is high time to reflect on these things
and get to the root of them. Is it possible to speak of the progress
of humanity when it is constantly reiterated that the same need —
in this case, the authority of a personal teacher — exists in the
world as of yore? Is it possible to say that man's own spiritual
forces must grow stronger, that he must by his own efforts find the
way to the spiritual world, if this is made dependent upon the
authority of a single individual on the physical Earth? It is
extremely easy to say that all opinions have equal weight in the
Theosophical Movement. This remains a catchword when it is not taken
really in earnest. Above all it remains a catchword when the opinions
of others are misrepresented. Once before I have been obliged to say
that “equal right of opinion” is no more than a phrase if
our work here — which has nothing whatever to do with any
specific territory or race on the Earth — is presented by the
other side as though it were suitable only for the German mind. It is
an affair of humanity, like mathematics — not the affair of any
particular nation. To speak of our work here as being an affair of one
particular nation, of a strictly limited territory, is an untruth. To
quote a catchword does not justify the spreading of untruths in the
world. In such circumstances, moreover, the other side may well become
the victim of injustice. A semblance of intolerance may easily be
created, simply because a stand has to be taken for the truth. The
hour shows signs of becoming very serious in this connection. What I
am saying here will be understood only by those who take Theosophy in
real earnest and will not countenance things that run counter to the
fundamental principles of theosophical work. Suppose one were obliged
to ward off certain untruths from those who cannot put everything to
the test for themselves, can the other person say: “That is
intolerance”? He can, of course, say so if, under the guise of
truth, he is merely seeking domination and authority! In the future,
spiritual truth will work by reason of its own inherent strength, its
own power, independently of physical circumstances. And it will be a
great and splendid achievement if Theosophy can promote unity of
culture over the whole Earth. Not for personal reasons, not for
national reasons, nor for any “human” reasons whatever, but
for purely theosophical reasons it makes one's heart bleed that in
England today the President of the Theosophical Society should be
making speeches which really cannot be described as
“theosophical” but are eminently political. Thinking of the
good old traditions of Theosophy, the heart bleeds to hear it said in
a theosophical address that the day will come for proclaiming:
“England together with India, at the centre; America and Germany,
right and left. One World Policy under the banner of Theosophy!”
... And then we are accused of “intolerance” when it is
necessary to protest against the introduction of the personal element
into the leadership — where it should never be. It makes an
occultist's heart ache that the label “theosophical” should
be tacked on to this kind of statement. Once again I repeat: the
heartache is not caused by personal or human considerations but for
purely theosophical and occult reasons. It is grievous that the
root-principle of theosophical teaching should be tainted —
either consciously or unconsciously — with national and
imperialistic aspirations! It is grievous to me not because I have
anything whatever against any country or any aspirations on the Earth,
but because the placing of such aspirations in the foreground shows at
the very outset that the most intensely personal element is
insinuating itself into the true ideal of Theosophy.
Many times I have spoken earnest words of the tasks and aims of
Theosophy. The occultist does not speak without reflection. He knows
very well when he must use such words! What I have said to you is
entirely remote from any emotion, any desire, any sympathy or
antipathy; it is demanded by something you may perhaps yourselves
realise, namely, the seriousness of the hour — I mean, for
Theosophy, for Occultism. As I have so often said, Theosophy must draw
from the well-springs of human wisdom the message that is needful for
mankind in the present age. If Theosophy is to move towards this
ideal, it must stand on its own feet, set up its own rules of conduct
— not only for what it has to say, but for how it has to confront
the world — in order that standards prevailing in the outside
world shall not play into our theosophical Movement. For there they
become an evil, a great evil. As often as certain usages current in
the outside world are introduced into the theosophical Movement, just
so often is the Movement handed over to the forces of destruction. To
outside eyes, these usages, when introduced into Theosophy, sometimes
assume so grotesque a form that the world will certainly take good
care not to copy things that may grow from the rich and fertile soil
of occultism. Every kind of league exists in the world today —
for the promotion of Peace, Vegetarianism, Anti-Alcoholism and what
not — all of which are perfectly justifiable goals. But when the
basic principles of a society are stretched in order to include the
foundation of Unions or even Orders connected with the coming of
figure-heads, founders of religion, future World-Saviours
(Note 3)
... then the outside world will certainly not follow suit! I cannot imagine
that a Statesman would found a league to await the coming of a new
Statesman, or a General to await the coming of a great General in the
future!
These things are so simple that only a little reflection is necessary.
For to found an Order to await the coming of a World-Saviour is just
as grotesque as it would be to found a league to await the coming of a
new Statesman or a great General. A certain person who is striving
today to found a branch of such an Order, used the following argument
to me: “Yes, but after all, in the year 1848 a league was founded
for the purpose of uniting the German States — and then there was
Bismarck too ... he certainly helped to bring the German Reich to
birth.” I could only reply: “Really I am not aware that a
league was ever founded to await the coming of a “Bismarck”!
Do you think I am saying this jokingly? I say it because occultism has
also this side to it, that if it is not cultivated in the right way,
it can actually undermine instead of developing the powers of
judgment, and I say it because I am in deep earnest about these
things. Many occult teachings have been gathered together here; in
fifty years, possibly, one point or another may have been investigated
still more closely, may have to be differently expressed.
But even if no fragment remains of the knowledge that has brought
forward — I do desire that one thing shall have survived, namely,
this: that here there was inaugurated and sustained a
theosophical-occult movement taking its stand solely and entirely upon
integrity and truth. Even if in fifty years it is already said;
Everything must be corrected; but at least they were out to be true,
to let nothing happen except what is true ... even then my ideal
would have been attained. That integrity and truth can prevail in an
occult movement, whatever storms may rise up against us in the world
— I am not so arrogant as to say that this has been
“achieved,” but rather that this is the goal towards which
we have striven.
- Note 1:
- The reference here is to certain prejudiced and faulty views
contained in the teachings emanating from the Theosophical Society.
- Note 2:
- Man in the Light of Occultism, Theosophy and Philosophy.
- Note 3:
- For those who have only lately become acquainted with the
Anthroposophical conception of the world, let it here be mentioned
that these words were spoken at the time when Mrs. Besant had
founded the “Order of the Star in the East,” with
objects similar to those indicated here, and rejected by me.
Mrs. Besant's subsequent malicious agitation against Germany is,
moreover, a direct result of the errors into which she was falling
at that time.
|