by Rudolf Steiner
Lecture
V Oslo, Norway October 6, 1913
Yesterday we looked at Jesus of Nazareth's
life from when he was about twelve until the end of his
twenty-first year. From what I was able to relate, you will
certainly have the feeling that some very important things
for Jesus of Nazareth's soul occurred during that
period of time, most important also for the evolution of
humanity. For you will certainly realize from the
fundamental experience obtained from spiritual scientific
studies that everything having to do with human evolution
is interconnected, and that an event of such importance
which happens in a human soul and is related to human
history cannot be without importance for the whole of human
evolution. We recognize just what the event of Golgotha
means from the most varied viewpoints. In this lecture
cycle we are attempting to obtain this knowledge through a
consideration of Christ Jesus' life. Therefore we
shall now again look at the same characteristic point in
time we considered yesterday. What must have lived in Jesus
of Nazareth's soul after all the important events
that happened to him up until he was twenty-eight,
twenty-nine years old, and which I described yesterday?
One can
have a feeling for what lived in his soul from hearing
about a scene that took place during his late twenties. The
scene was of a conversation which Jesus had with his
mother, with that person who had been his mother for many
years through the consolidation of both families. An
intimate and excellent understanding existed with her, a
much better understanding than existed with the other
family members who lived in the house; that is, he could
get along well with them, but they didn't really
understand him. Previously he spoke with his mother about
many of the impressions which had developed in his
soul.
But at the
time in question a most meaningful talk took place between
them, one which allows us to see deeply into his soul. He
had become wiser over time as a result of the events
already described, to the extent that an infinite wisdom
was expressed in his face. But he also felt sadness, which
is often the case, though to a lesser degree. Wisdom had
the effect of causing him to be quite sad when he observed
his human surroundings. Adding to this was the fact that
whenever he had a minute to himself he thought back to how
in his twelfth year a tremendous revolution took place in
his soul — when Zarathustra's soul [ego]
entered into his soul. When at first Zarathustra's soul
entered into his soul he felt only the great richness of
the former. At the end of his twenties he didn't yet
know that he was the reincarnated Zarathustra; but he did
know that a great change had taken place in his soul during
his twelfth year. And now he often had the feeling: Oh, how
different everything was before that change during my
twelfth year! He thought about how infinitely warm his
heart felt then. As a boy he had been detached from the
world, but had the liveliest feelings for the speech of
nature, for what was wonderful in nature. But he had little
disposition for worldly learning. He showed little interest
in school work.
It would be
completely mistaken to assume that the boy Jesus was gifted
in any usual way before his twelfth year. He was
kind-hearted, had a deep understanding of what is human,
great capacity for feeling — an angelic, gentle
being. Now it seemed as if all that had been eradicated
from his soul when he was twelve years of age. And now he
thought and felt about how previously he had been united
with all the deeper universal spirits, how his soul had
been open to the depths of infinite space. And how since
his twelfth year he had suddenly become adept at Hebrew
erudition, which had sprung from within him. He thought
about how on his travels he encountered the pagan cults and
the wisdom and religiosity of Paganism streamed through his
soul. He remembered that between his eighteenth and
twenty-fourth years he had been in contact with the
activities and achievements of common humanity. He then
entered the Essene community at approximately twenty-four
years of age, where he learned an occult teaching and knew
the people who dedicated themselves to that occult
teaching. He thought often of those things. But he also
knew that he had only learned what humanity had accumulated
in wisdom since antiquity — treasures of human
wisdom, culture and moral achievements. He often thought
back on how, before that twelfth year, he felt united with
the divine primeval ground of being and everything seemed
spontaneous, welling up from his warm, expansive, loving
heart and closely uniting him with the other strengths of
the human soul.
These were
the feelings which brought about a very special talk
between him and the mother. His mother loved him terribly
and often spoke with him about all the beautiful and great
things which had become apparent in him since his twelfth
year. At first he never spoke to her about the inner
conflict which he experienced, so that she saw only the
good and the beautiful. Therefore what he told her in this
conversation, which was a kind of general confession, was
all new to her, but she accepted it with a warm and gentle
heart. She understood how he felt, that he was nostalgic
for what he had before that twelfth year. So she tried to
console him by speaking about the things which had become
so beautiful and splendid about him since then. She
reminded him of the renewal of the great teachings and wise
sayings and treasures of the Jewish laws, which had come
about through him. His heart was heavy when he heard his
mother speak so enthusiastically about what he considered
superseded. He said: That may well be, but whether all the
wonderful old treasures of Judaism are renewed through me
or some other, what does it mean for humanity? What has
happened is essentially meaningless. Of course if the
people had ears still capable of listening to the old
prophets, then such a renewal of the prophets' wisdom
would be of use to them. But even if Elias were to come
– Jesus of Nazareth said – and wanted to
announce to our humanity the wonders he experienced in the
expanses of heaven, the people are not there who have ears
to hear Elias's wisdom, or the older prophets, even
Abraham and Moses. All that those prophets announced is
impossible to announce today. The words would blow away in
the wind. Everything I thought to have received is
worthless today.
He told how
a great teacher had recently been more or less ignored. For
although he had not the stature of the old prophets he was,
nevertheless, a profound and important teacher – the
good, old Hillel.
Jesus well knew what Hillel meant for many within Judaism,
even during Herod's rule, when it was hard to gain
respect. And he knew what profound words Hillel had spoken.
It was said of him: The Torah had died among the Jews, but
Hillel revived it. He renewed the original Jewish wisdom,
for those who understood him. Hillel was a wandering
teacher of wisdom; he wandered among the Jewish people like
a kind of new Messiah. Meekness was his main
characteristic. The people praised him highly. I can only
mention a few examples of how Jesus spoke to his mother
about Hillel in order to indicate how he felt about him. He
described Hillel as having a mild, gentle character and who
accomplished great things through gentleness and love.
One
meaningful story has been preserved which shows how Hillel
was a patient man who was open to everyone. Two people bet
on the possibility of angering Hillel, for it was well
known that Hillel was never angry. One of them said: I will
do all possible to anger him – in order to win the
bet. At a time when Hillel was most occupied (he was
preparing for the Sabbath) the man who made the wager
knocked at his door and said in a less than polite way
– and Hillel was the head of the highest priestly
authority, one accustomed to being addressed with respect
– the man called out: Hillel, come out, come out
right now!
Hillel
threw something on and patiently went out.
The man
said sharply: I have something to ask you.
Hillel
said, My dear man, what is your question?
My question
is, Why do the Babylonians have such narrow heads?
Hillel
answered most gently, Well, my dear, the Babylonians have
such narrow heads because their midwives are so clumsy.
The man
left. But after a few minutes he returned and rudely called
Hillel out again: Hillel, come out, I have a question for
you!
Hillel put
his cloak on, went out and said: Well, my dear man, what is
your question?
I want to
ask you why the Arabs have such small eyes.
Hillel
answered gently: Because the desert is so large, it makes
the eyes small, the eyes become small observing the vast
desert.
The man who
had made the bet was becoming anxious now. Hillel went back
to his work.
After a few
minutes the man came again and called out rudely: Hillel,
come out, I have a question to ask you.
Hillel
threw on his cloak, went out and gently said: What do you
wish to ask me?
I want to
ask you why the Egyptians have such flat feet.
Because the
area where they live is so marshy, Hillel said and went
back inside.
A few
minutes later the man came again and told Hillel that he
had something else to ask – that he had made a bet
that he could anger him, but he knew not how to do it.
Hillel said gently: My dear man, it is better that you lose
your bet than that Hillel is angered.
That legend
is told in order to show Hillel's patience, even with
those who antagonize him. Such a man is, Jesus of Nazareth
said to his mother, in many respects like a prophet of old.
And don't we know many of Hillel's sayings that
sound reminiscent of the prophets of old? He repeated
several of Hillel's beautiful sayings, and then said:
You see, dear mother, that Hillel is considered to be an
old prophet who has come again. It occurs to me that what I
know does not come from Judaism alone.
Now Hillel
was born in Babylon and only occupied with Judaism later.
But he descended from David, was related to the house of
David from ancient times, as was Jesus. And Jesus said: If
I could also speak as a son of David, as Hillel does, the
people don't exist who could hear me; such words are
no longer relevant. In ancient times yes, but not now. To
speak thus now is useless and of no worth.
Then he
summarized his position to his mother. These prophesies of
ancient Judaism are no longer appropriate because the
ancient Jews are no longer here. They must be seen as
worthless now. Strangely enough his mother listened to him
when he spoke about the worthlessness of what she
considered to be most holy. But she loved him deeply and
felt only her infinite love. So something of a profound
intuitive understanding of what he meant reached her. He
went on to tell her about his wanderings to the pagan
places of worship and what he experienced there. He
remembered falling unconscious on the pagan altar and
hearing the transformed Bath-Kol. And then a renewal of the
old Zarathustra teaching flashed before his mind. He
didn't yet know for sure that he carried the
Zarathustra soul within him, but the Zarathustra teaching
and wisdom, the Zarathustra impulse arose within him during
that talk with his mother. Together with his mother he
experienced that great Zarathustra impulse. All the
beautiful and great of the ancient Sun-Teaching arose in
his soul. And he remembered the Bath-Kol words, which I
recited yesterday, and he recited them to his mother:
AUM,
Amen!
Evil rules,
Witness of the severing I,
Selfhood's guilt by others owed,
Now lived in daily bread,
In which heaven's will be not done,
For man deserted your kingdom,
And forgot your names,
You fathers in the heavens.
All the
greatness of the Mithras worship lived in his soul with
those words, rising up as from an inner genius. He spoke
with his mother about the greatness and glory of paganism
and about what lived in the ancient mysteries of the
various peoples, much of which converged in the Mystery
cults of Asia Minor and Southern Europe. But he also
carried in his soul the feeling that this cult had
gradually changed and had come under demonic power, which
he had himself experienced when he was around twenty-four
years of age. It also seemed to him that the old
Zarathustra teaching was no longer appropriate for the
people.
The second
important thing he said was: If all the Mysteries were
united and contained everything which was once great
– the people are not there to hear it. It is all
useless. And if I were to go around announcing the
transformed Bath-Kol, if I were to declare the secret of
why people can no longer live in their physical bodies
together with the Mysteries – the people are not
there today who would understand. Nowadays it would be
demonic. People can no longer hear what was once announced
and heard.
Jesus of
Nazareth knew that what he had heard as the transformed
voice of Bath-Kol was an ancient holy teaching, an
all-powerful prayer wherever the Mysteries were celebrated;
it had been forgotten, but had come to him when he fell
down on the pagan altar. He also saw, however – and
he expressed it clearly in that discussion – that
today it is impossible to make all that understood. Then he
spoke of what he had learned in the Essene circles. He
described the beauty, the greatness and the glory of the
Essene teachings and remembered the Essenes'
gentleness.
Then he
spoke of the third important thing, which had come to him
during his visionary talk with the Buddha: Not all people
can be Essenes. Hillel was right when he said: Don't
separate yourself from society, but live and work within
it. For what am I if I am alone? That's what the
Essenes do though; they separate themselves from the
people, who are then necessarily unhappy. Then he told his
mother about his experience after an intimate conversation
with the Essenes. As he was at the gate leaving, he saw
Lucifer and Ahriman running off.
Since that
moment, my dear mother, I knew that the Essenes protect
themselves by means of their way of life and their occult
teachings to the extent that Lucifer and Ahriman must flee
from their gates. But they send Lucifer and Ahriman to
others in order to be happy themselves. Those words greatly
impressed the loving mother, and she felt herself
transformed, and as one with him. And Jesus of Nazareth
felt as though everything which burdened him had been
lifted from him by this conversation. He saw it and his
mother saw it. The more he spoke, the more she heard, the
more she knew of all the wisdom that had lived in him since
his twelfth year. He also transplanted all his experiences
into her own heart.
He was also
transformed by that talk, so much so that his stepbrothers
and other relatives thought he had lost his mind. What a
pity, they said, he knew so much; he was always very quiet,
and now he has lost his mind. They considered him lost. In
fact he did walk around the house dream-like for days on
end. The Zarathustra-I was preparing to abandon that Jesus
of Nazareth body. And his last resolve was to leave the
house almost mechanically and go to John the Baptist, whom
he already knew.
And then
the event took place which I have often described: the
baptism in the Jordan by John. During that talk with his
mother, the I of Zarathustra withdrew. He was again what he
was at twelve years of age, only grown up. And the
Christ-Being descended into that body at the baptism in the
Jordan. And at the same moment as this baptism in the
Jordan took place, the mother experienced the end of her
transformation. She felt – at the time she was
forty-five, forty-six years old -, she felt herself imbued
with the soul of the woman who was Jesus' mother
until he was twelve when he received the Zarathustra-I; and
who had later died. The other mother's spirit had
descended upon the mother with whom Jesus had the
conversation. And she felt like that young mother who had
given birth to the Luke-Jesus.
Imagine
what a hugely important event that was! Let us try to feel
it, but also let us feel that now a special being lived on
the earth: the Christ-Being in a human body, a Being who
had not yet lived in a human body, who heretofore had only
been in spiritual regions, who previously had not lived on
earth, who knew the spiritual worlds, but not the earth!
That Being only knew of the earth what was stored in the
three bodies – physical body, etheric and astral
bodies – of Jesus of Nazareth. It descended into
those three bodies, as they had become under the influence
of the thirty years of life which I have already described.
Therefore the Christ-Being was unbiased in respect to his
first earthly experiences.
This
Christ-Being was led at first into solitude. This is also
indicated in the Akasha Record and the Fifth Gospel. Jesus
of Nazareth, in whose body the Christ-Being now dwelled,
gave up everything which had tied him to the world. The
Christ-Being had come to the earth. At first he was drawn
to what was impressed most strongly in the astral body,
like a remaining memory. Yes, he thought, that is the body
which experienced Ahriman and Lucifer fleeing and realized
that the striving Essenes pushed Ahriman and Lucifer off
onto other people. He felt himself drawn to Ahriman and
Lucifer, for it is against them that humanity must fight.
Therefore the Christ-Being, who had never existed in a
human body, departed into solitude to do battle with
Ahriman and Lucifer.
I believe
that the scene I am about to describe is essentially
correct. But it is very difficult to observe such things in
the Akasha Record. Therefore I would like to explicitly
state that one or another detail may eventually be
modified, but that the essential is there. The temptation
scene appears in several Gospels, which describe it from
different sides. I have often emphasized this. I have taken
pains to investigate this temptation scene and would like
to relate how it really was.
At first
the Christ-Being in Jesus of Nazareth's body
encountered Lucifer in solitude – how Lucifer works
on people when they overestimate themselves, have too
little humility and self-knowledge. Take advantage of
man's false pride and self-importance: that is what
Lucifer wants to do! Lucifer approached Christ Jesus and
said more or less the words which also appear in the other
Gospels: Look at me! The other kingdoms in which man
dwells, founded by the old gods and spirits – they
are old. I want to found a new kingdom; I will give you
everything that is beautiful and glorious in the old
kingdoms if you will enter into my new kingdom. But you
must separate yourself from the old and recognize me! And
Lucifer showed him all the beauty of the Luciferic world,
all that would attract a human soul that had even a trace
of pride. But the Christ-Being came from the spiritual
world. He knew who Lucifer is and how the soul must act not
to be tempted on earth by him. He knew nothing of Luciferic
temptation; he knew though how to serve the gods and was
strong enough to reject Lucifer. So Lucifer attacked a
second time, but he came with Ahriman as support and they
both spoke to Christ. One tried to goad his pride: Lucifer.
The other spoke to his fear: Ahriman.
The first
said to him: Through my spirituality, through what I can
give you, you will not need what you now need because you
have entered into a human body as Christ. That body
subjugates you, so you must obey the law of gravity. I can
throw you down and the human body prevents you from
overcoming the law of gravity. If you obey me I will annul
the effects of the fall and nothing will happen to you.
Ahriman said: I will protect you from fear, throw yourself
down! They both closed in on him, but as they balanced the
scales, so to speak, by their insistence, he was able to
resist them. He found the strength which man needs to find
on earth to raise himself above Lucifer and Ahriman.
Then
Ahriman said: Lucifer, you are of no use to me, you have
not increased my power, only diminished it. So Ahriman sent
Lucifer away and carried out the last attack as Ahriman
alone and said the words which resonate in the Gospel of
Matthew: Turn minerals into bread! Turn stones to bread if
you claim to have divine powers. And the Christ-Being said:
Men do not live by bread alone, but by the spiritual which
comes from the spiritual world. The Christ-Being knew that
well, for he had recently descended from the spiritual
world. Ahriman replied: You may be right. But that you are
right and insofar as you are right does not stop me from
stopping you in a certain way. You only know what the
spirit does which descends from the heights. You were not
yet in the human world. Below, in the human world, there
are completely different people; they truly need to turn
stones to bread, they cannot nourish themselves by the
spirit alone. That was the moment when Ahriman told Christ
what one could know on the earth; which, however, the god
who had just stepped upon the earth for the first time
could not yet know. He did not know that it was necessary
below to turn the mineral, metal to money, to bread. So
Ahriman said that the people below are forced to nourish
themselves with money. That was where Ahriman still had
power. And, said Ahriman, I will use this power!
This is the
correct description of the temptation story. The questions
weren't definitively answered – Luficer's
questions perhaps, but not Ahriman's. Something more
was required for that.
As Christ
Jesus left the solitude of the wilderness he felt himself
released from all he had experienced and learned from his
twelfth year on; he felt the Christ-spirit to be more
connected with what had lived in him before his twelfth
year. In fact he felt no longer connected with what was old
and arid in humanity. He was even indifferent to the
language spoken around him and he was silent at first. He
walked around Nazareth and farther a field, visited many of
the places he knew as Jesus of Nazareth, and there
something extremely peculiar happened. Please note that I
am telling the story from the Fifth Gospel, and it would
make no sense to look for contradictions with the other
four gospels. I am relating what the Fifth Gospel says.
Silently,
like having nothing to do with the surroundings, Christ
Jesus went at first from inn to inn, working with the
common people. Ahriman's saying about bread had left
a deep impression on him. Everywhere he found the people
who knew him from before, and these were the people to whom
Ahriman had to gain access because they needed to turn
stones to bread, or what is the same – turn money,
metal to bread. He had no need to associate with those who
observed Hillel's – or others' –
moral teachings. But he did associate with those whom the
other gospels call tax collectors and sinners, for they
were the ones most inclined to turn stones into bread. He
spent much time with them.
But here is
the strange thing that happened: Many of them already knew
him from the time before his thirtieth birthday, when he
had been with them as Jesus of Nazareth. They knew his
mild, kind and wise nature and he was well loved in every
house and inn. That love remained. They often spoke of the
dear Jesus of Nazareth who had come to those houses and
those places. And the following happened — as though
an effect of cosmic law. (I am relating scenes which often
repeat themselves, which clairvoyant research can often
confirm.) There were families for whom Jesus of Nazareth
had worked, who sat together after work, when the sun had
gone down, and liked to talk about the dear fellow who had
been with them as Jesus of Nazareth. They spoke of his love
and gentleness and about the warm feelings that streamed
through their souls when he lived under their roofs. In
some of these houses where they sat and talked about Jesus
of Nazareth for hours on end, an image of Jesus of Nazareth
would appear as a vision shared by the whole family. Yes,
he visited them in the spirit; or also, they created his
spiritual image. You can imagine what it meant for such a
family when he appeared to them in a vision, and what it
meant to them when he now returned after the baptism in the
Jordan and they recognized him, except that his eyes were
more brilliant. They saw the transfigured face which had
once looked upon them so kindly, this whole man whom they
had seen sitting with them in the spirit. We can well
imagine how the people in such families felt and what the
sinners and tax collectors experienced who, because of
their karma, were surrounded by all the demons of those
times.
Now
Jesus' transformed nature became evident, especially
in such people. Previously they had felt his love, warmth
and gentleness, but now a magical power emanated from him.
While previously they had felt merely comforted, now they
felt themselves healed. They went to their neighbors who
were also depressed and brought them to him. And thus it
happened that Christ Jesus, after he had defeated Lucifer
and had only been stung by Ahriman, was able to accomplish
what is described in the Bible as driving out demons.
Many of the
demons he had seen as he lay like dead upon the sacrificial
altar went out of the people when he stood before them as
Christ Jesus. The demons saw their enemy. As he wandered
through the land he often had to think about how he had
lain upon the altar where instead of gods there were demons
and where he couldn't perform the rite. He also had
to think about Bath-Kol, who had revealed the old mystery
prayer to him, which I told you about. He concentrated
especially on the center line of that prayer: “Now
lived in daily bread”. The people who were around him
now had to turn stones into bread. And many among them had
to live from bread alone. And the words from that ancient
pagan prayer – “now lived in daily bread”
– sank deeply into his soul. He felt the whole
incorporation of man in the physical world. He felt that
because of this necessity for bread in human evolution the
names of the Fathers in heaven, that is the names of the
spirits of the higher hierarchies, had been forgotten. And
he felt that no humans existed who could still hear the
voices of the old prophets. He now knew that living in
daily bread is what had separated men from heaven and what
must lead them to egotism and into Ahriman's
clutches.
As he
wandered with such thoughts through the land, it turned out
that those who most strongly felt how Jesus of Nazareth had
been transformed became his disciples and followed him.
From various stops on his way he would select one or
another of them, those who felt that impulse most strongly.
Soon there was a large number of such disciples. These
people had a completely new basic outlook, who because of
him were different from those whom he described to his
mother as not being able to hear the old prophesies. And
then the god's mission on earth struck him: I am not
here to tell men how the gods brought the spirit down to
earth, but how mankind can find the way from the earth up
to the spirit.
And then
the voice of Bath-Kol came to him and he knew that the
ancient formulas and prayers must be renewed; he knew that
man must seek the way to the spiritual word from below. He
inverted the last line of the prayer to make it appropriate
for the people of those new times and because it was not to
refer to the many spirits hierarchical beings, but only to
one spiritual being:
“Our
father who art in heaven.”
And the
second line, which he had heard as the next to last line:
“And forgot your names” – he inverted to
accord with the needs of the times:
“Hallowed by thy name.”
And the
third line, which was: “For man deserted your
[plural] kingdom,” he inverted to: “Thy kingdom
come,”
And the
line: “In which heaven's will be not
done,” he inverted so people could now understand it,
for the old version was incomprehensible; he inverted it,
for a complete inversion of the way to the spiritual world
was to take place: “Thy will be done in heaven as it
is on earth.”
And the
mystery of bread, the mystery of the incarnation in the
physical body, the mystery of all that had been revealed to
him by Ahriman's sting – he transformed these
things in such a way that man could feel that the physical
world also comes from the spiritual world, although it is
not directly apparent. So he changed the line about daily
bread into a request: “Give us this day our daily
bread”. And the words: “Selfhood's guilt
by others owed” he changed to: “Forgive us our
trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against
us.” The second line of the old mystery prayer
– “witness of the severing I” he changed
to: “but deliver us”, and the first line:
“Evil rules” he made “from evil.
Amen”.
Thus the
prayer which Christianity learned to know as the “Our
Father” was transformed through the inversion of the
voice of Bath-Kol, which Jesus heard when he fell upon the
altar, to what Christ Jesus taught as the new mystery
prayer, the new Our Father. The Sermon on the Mount and
other things Jesus taught his disciples came into being in
a similar way.
Christ
Jesus had a remarkable effect on his disciples. Please bear
in mind that I am merely relating what is written in the
Fifth Gospel. As he made his way through the land his
effect on his surroundings was remarkable. It is true that
he was together with his disciples but, because he was the
Christ-Being, it was as though he was not only present in
his own body. One or another of the disciples would
sometimes feel as though he were also acting in them, in
their own souls. They felt that the Christ-Being was in
them and began to say things which in reality only Christ
Jesus himself could say. So the group traveled around and
spoke to other people but it wasn't always Christ
Jesus who spoke, but one of the disciples, for he shared
everything with the disciples, also his wisdom.
I must
admit that I was astonished when I realized that the
conversation with the Sadducee, as related in the Gospel of
Mark, was not spoken by Christ Jesus from Jesus'
body, but by one of the disciples. It often happened that
when Christ Jesus left the group he was with it anyway.
Either he walked with them spiritually or he appeared to
them in his ether-body. His ether-body was among them,
walked around the country with them, and it was not always
possible to determine whether his physical body was
actually there, or if it was his ether-body.
That was
the manner of the interaction with the disciples and the
people when Jesus of Nazareth became the Christ-Jesus. He,
though, experienced this time as I have already mentioned.
At first the Christ-Being was relatively independent of
Jesus of Nazareth's body, but had to gradually become
more and more similar to it. And the longer he lived the
more he was bound to Jesus of Nazareth's body, and a
profound pain came over him in the last year due to being
bound to the ailing body of Jesus of Nazareth. But he
continued to wander about the land with a large group of
disciples. One spoke here, another there, and one could
think that it was always Christ Jesus – for Christ
spoke through them all.
It was once
possible to listen in to a conversation among scribes. They
said: In order to frighten the people it would be possible
to kill any one of them; but it could be the wrong one,
because they all talk alike. That wouldn't help us,
because then the real Christ Jesus could still be there.
Only the disciples can identify him. They would certainly
not tell their enemies which is the right one. But Ahriman
had become strong enough in respect to the question which
remained, which Christ couldn't resolve in the
spiritual world, but only on earth. He would have to
experience the most terrible deed – what it means to
turn stones to bread. For this Ahriman made use of Judas of
Iscariot. There was no spiritual means available to
identify who among men who revered him was actually the
Christ. For where the spirit worked he was not
identifiable. Only when an individual – Judas –
used means which were unknown to Christ, could he be
recognized. He could not be recognized except when someone
in the service of Ahriman would betray him for money alone.
In this way Christ Jesus was bound to Judas, something
which befell him during the temptation event, which is
understandable in a god: He didn't know that it was
only correct in heaven that one does not need stones for
bread. The betrayal took place because Ahriman had retained
his sting. Therefore Christ had to come under the power of
the lord of death, insofar as Ahriman is the lord of death.
That is the connection between the story of the temptation
and the mystery of Golgotha with Judas' betrayal.
There is
much more to be said from the Fifth Gospel than what I have
said here. But during the course of human evolution surely
the other parts of the Fifth Gospel will be revealed. I
have attempted to give you an indication by telling you
more in the way of how it is. At the end of these
lectures, it has occurred to me once more what I said at
the end of the first lecture – that the needs of the
times make it necessary to speak about this Fifth Gospel
now. And I would like to urge my dear friends to treat what
has been said about the Fifth Gospel in the appropriate
way.
You see, we
already have enough enemies and they act in a quite
peculiar way. I don't wish to speak of this now,
perhaps you already know about it from reading the
“Newssheet”. You also know the strange fact
that there are people who have been saying for a long time
now that what I teach is infected with all kinds of
dogmatic Christianity, even with Jesuitism. Especially
certain followers of the so-called Adyar-Theosophy talk in
the worst way about this supposed Jesuitism, as well as
many more hateful, unscrupulous things. And a certain
source claiming outrage at the narrow-mindedness and
perversity of our teaching, then completely falsified it. A
man from America learned our teaching over a period of many
months, wrote it down, brought it to America in a watered
down version and then published a Rosicrucian Theosophy,
which he copied from us. [The reference is to Max Heindel
– ed.]He says that he learned a lot from us, but that
he was then called by the masters and learned more from
them. He was silent about the fact that he took the more
profound things from my unpublished lecture cycles. One
could accept that such a thing could happen in America One
could, like Hillel, remain meekly silent – even when
it spreads to Europe. Those who are most enraged at us here
make a translation and in the translation say: Although
there is also a Rosicrucian world view in Europe, it is
narrow-minded and Jesuitical, and it can only thrive in the
pure air of California.
Well,
that's enough! That is our enemies' method. We
can look at these things not only calmly, but also with
compassion – but we may not close our eyes to them.
When such things happen, then care must be taken by those
who for years indulged such people who acted without
scruples. I would really prefer not to speak about such
things, were it not necessary in the service of truth. One
must see everything with clarity.
When one
the one hand these things are spread around, it does not
protect us from others who may find such things unpleasant
in a somewhat more honest way. I won't annoy you with
all the silly junk written by both sides. All this peculiar
literature by Freimark, Schalk, Maack, etc. would not be
worthy of note because of its inferiority. But there are
people who simply cannot stomach something like the Fifth
Gospel. And perhaps no hate was as honest as that which
arose when something about the mystery of the two Jesus
children was first made public.
Real
anthroposophists will treat this Fifth Gospel, which is
given in good faith, correctly. Take it with you, discuss
it in the branches, but tell the people how it must be
treated. Make sure that it is not cast irreverently to
people who might ridicule it.
We stand
against our times with clairvoyant investigation, so
necessary for the times, and above all against academe. We
are aware of this. Those who were together with us at the
laying of the foundation stone of our building know how
necessary is the spreading of a spiritual teaching with
strict observance of truth. We tried to be conscious of how
distant our present culture is from this search for truth.
One can well say that the cry for the spirit is heard
through our times, but that people are too proud or limited
to want to know anything about the true spirit. The amount
of truthfulness necessary in order to witness the spirit
must first be acquired. For this amount of truthfulness is
lacking in today's educated milieu and, what is
worse, this lack is not recognized. Treat what you have
heard here about the Fifth Gospel so that it is treated
reverently in the branches. We do not emphasize this due to
egotism, but for a completely different reason, because the
spirit of truth must live in us and the spirit must stand
truthfully before us.
People talk
today about the spirit, but have no idea of the spirit even
when they do. There is a man who has won great respect
because he talks so much about the spirit – Rudolf
Eucken. He talks a lot about the spirit, but when you read
his books – try it sometime – he always writes:
The spirit exists, one must experience it, be together with
it, sense it, — and so on. All through these books
endlessly repeated: spirit, spirit, spirit! They talk about
the spirit in this way because they are too lazy or
arrogant to go to the source of the spirit. And such people
are greatly respected nowadays. It is difficult today to be
convincing about what is brought in such a concrete way
from the spiritual world, such as the description of the
Fifth Gospel. Seriousness and truthfulness are requisites
for that. In one of Eucken's latest books, “Can
We Still be Christians?”, he goes on and on about
soul and spirit, spirit and soul, like a tapeworm, and many
such volumes are written, for that is how one gains great
respect and fame – when one claims to know something
about the spirit, for people don't notice when
reading the amount of untruthfulness involved. On one page
we read: Humanity is beyond believing in demons; no one can
be expected to believe in them. But in another place in the
same book we find the peculiar sentence: “Contact of
the divine with the human creates demonic powers.”
The same man speaks seriously here of demons. Isn't
that the deepest inner untruthfulness? But I don't
see that many of our contemporaries notice this
untruthfulness.
We stand at
a point today when the truth about the spirit is in
opposition to our times. We must always remember this in
order to be clear about what we must do in our hearts if we
wish to participate in announcing the spirit, the new life
of the spirit which is so necessary for humanity. How can
one hope to be well received in leading the human soul to
the Christ-Being through spiritual teaching when the clever
philosophers and theologians say that there was a
Christianity before Christ! They show that the
rituals and similar legends existed previously in the
Orient. The clever theologians explain to all and sundry
that Christianity is nothing more that a continuation of
what previously existed. And such literature is greatly
esteemed by our contemporaries, who don't realize
what is happening.
When one
speaks of the Christ-Being as spiritually descended, and
then finds the Christ-being worshiped in the same ritual
form as the pagan gods were worshiped, and when that is
used to deny the Christ-Being, which is the case, it is
using the following logic: Someone stays at an inn and
leaves his clothes there. It is obvious from the clothes
that they belong to him. Afterwards a person such as
Schiller or Goethe due to some circumstance puts the
clothes on and comes out with the clothes belonging to the
other person. Then someone goes around saying asking what
kind of special person is that. I have examined the
clothes, they belong to so-an-do, and he is not at all
special. Because the Christ-Being to some extent uses the
clothes of the old rituals, the clever people come and fail
to realize that the Christ-Being only puts them on as a
garment and what is now in the old rituals is the
Christ-Being.
And take
the sum of scientific monistic considerations, libraries
full – they are evidence of the Christ-Being's
clothes, and they are even true! The hounds of cultural
evolution are held in high regard and their science is
accepted. We must paint this picture in our minds if we
want to absorb what is meant with this Fifth Gospel, not
only in understanding but also in feeling. What is meant is
that we must assert our truth correctly in these new times
as a new annunciation, and realize how impossible it is to
make it comprehensible to the old times. Therefore Gospel
words may be spoken now as we take leave of each other: We
will not get far in spiritual development with the way
people think today. Therefore this thinking must be changed
and put in a different direction. And those whose nature is
one of compromise, who have no desire for a clear picture
of what is there now and what must come, will be of little
use in what is spiritually necessary in the service of
humanity.
I was
obliged to speak of this Fifth Gospel, which is sacred to
me. And I take leave of your hearts and souls with the wish
that the bond which has arisen between us through other
things may be strengthened through this spiritual
investigation of the Fifth Gospel, which is especially dear
to me. And perhaps this can release a warm feeling in your
hearts and souls: When we are separated in distance and
time we want nevertheless to be together, feel together
what we are to develop in our souls and to what we are duty
bound by the spirit in our times.
Hopefully
what we strive for will be accomplished in every soul. I
think this is the best farewell greeting I can give at the
end of this lecture cycle.
|