In Rudolf Steiner's autobiography (chapters
35
and
36),
he speaks as follows concerning the character of this privately printed
matter:
“The content of this printed matter was intended as oral
communications, not to be printed ...
“Nothing has ever been said that is not in utmost degree the purest
result of developing Anthroposophy ... Whoever reads this privately
printed material can take it in the fullest sense as containing what
Anthroposophy has to say. Therefore, it was possible without
hesitation ... to depart from the plan of circulating this printed
matter only among members [of the Anthroposophical Society]. It will
be necessary, however, to put up with the fact that erroneous matter
is included in the lecture reports that I have not revised.
“The right to a judgment about the content of such privately printed
material can naturally be conceded only to one who knows what is taken
for granted as the prerequisite basis of this judgment. For most of
this printed matter the prerequisite will be at least the
anthroposophical knowledge of the human being and of the cosmos to the
extent that their nature is set forth in Anthroposophy, and of what crisis
in the form of ‘anthroposophical history’ in the communications
from the world of spirit.”
EXOTERIC and ESOTERIC CHRISTIANITY
Dornach, April 2nd 1922.
The evolution of
mankind is recorded in documents that have been preserved as
religious records, or as other documents relating to
world-conceptions. But it must be emphasized over and over again
that, in addition to these records that have influenced mankind
throughout history (and there is, indeed, a deep justification for
this exterior influence), there are other records, which we may term
esoteric records.
When people spoke in a
deeper sense of a knowledge of man and of man's conception of the
world, they always made a distinction between an exoteric teaching,
that gives a more exterior knowledge of things, and an esoteric
teaching; only those who had trained their hearts and minds
accordingly, were able to penetrate into this teaching. In
Christianity, too, especially as far as its central point, the
Mystery of Golgotha, is concerned, we must make a distinction between
exoteric conceptions and esoteric knowledge. An exoteric
contemplation of Christianity, accessible to all the world, is
contained in the Gospels. Side by side with this exoteric
contemplation, there has always been an esoteric Christianity for
those who were willing — as I have said before — to
prepare their hearts and minds in an adequate way for the reception
of an esoteric Christianity.
All that could be
gathered of the intercourse of the Christ who had passed through
death and had risen from the dead, with those of his disciples who
were able to understand him, was of the greatest importance in this
esoteric Christianity. You know already that the Gospels contain very
little about the intercourse of the risen Christ with his disciples.
But what the Gospels tell us concerning this intercourse of the risen
Christ with his disciples, can indeed give us an inkling and a
foreboding of something very special, that entered the evolution of
the earth through the Christ who rose from the dead. But we cannot go
beyond such forebodings, without an esoteric knowledge.
These inklings of a
truth acquire weight and significance if we add to them Paul's
utterances. Paul's words acquire a particular meaning, for he assures
us that he was able to believe in Christ only from the moment in
which the Christ appeared to him through the event at Damascus. This
gave him the sure knowledge that Christ had passed through death and
that, after his death, he was connected with the evolution of the
earth as the living Christ. The event at Damascus gave Paul a
knowledge of the living Christ and we should bear in mind what this
impiles, when it is said by a man like Paul. Why could Paul not be
convinced of the true existence of the Christ-being before the event
at Damascus? We must bear in mind what it implied for Paul, initiated
to some extent in the Hebrew teachings — that the Being who
lived on earth as Christ-Jesus, had been condemned to a shameful
death on the cross in accordance with human laws and justice. Paul
could not grasp that the old prophecies referred to a Being who had
been condemned lawfully to the shameful death through crucifixion.
Until the event at Damascus, Paul saw in the shameful crucifixion of
Jesus of Nazareth the proof that He could not be the Messiah. Only
the experience at Damascus convinced Paul; the vision at Damascus
convinced him of the truth of the Mystery of Golgotha. In spite of
the fact that Jesus of Nazareth — or better, the Being who was
incarnated in Jesus of Nazareth — had undergone the shameful
death on the cross, something very deep and great is implied in this
confession of Paul's conviction. The traditions that still existed in
the first centuries after Christ, no longer exist. They may exist, at
the most, in the form of outer historical records kept by some secret
society that does not understand them. We must find again, through an
anthroposophical spiritual science, that which surpasses the scanty
communications concerning the Christ, after the Mystery of Golgotha.
This is what we must find again: What did the risen Christ tell to
the disciples that were around him, and that are not mentioned in the
Gospels? For, what the Gospels say of the apostles who met
Christ-Jesus on the way to Emmaeus, and other things recorded of the
apostles, are steeped in tradition and refer to simple souls who were
unable to advance to an esoteric knowledge. For this reason we must
go beyond this and ask: What did the Christ say after his
resurrection to the disciples who were really initiated?
If we want to
understand this, we must begin by taking into consideration the frame
of mind in which men of past ages took up the real Mystery of
Golgotha and how the Mystery of Golgotha changed their
disposition.
When we speak of the
great truths of the past connected with man's earthly evolution, a
modern man finds it very difficult to understand that the first men
who lived on the earth did not possess a knowledge of the kind termed
“knowledge” by us. The first men who lived on the earth
were able to receive the wisdom of gods through atavistic,
clairvoyant capacities. This means nothing less than this: Divine
beings who descended to the earth from higher worlds could impart
their teachings to human beings — in a spiritual way, of course
— and these, in their turn, taught other souls. In the ancient
past of human evolution on earth, it was a well-known fact that men
were taught by the divine beings themselves, who descended to the
earth from spiritual worlds. This condition, transcending the earthly
one, could be attained especially by those men who had passed through
the initiation in the Mysteries, where for the most part, they were
outside their bodies with their souls and were able to reveive the
communications of the gods in a spiritual way, because they were not
dependent on the outer form of speech, or spoken words. They did not
receive these communications in a state of mind resembling today's
dreaming state, but in a living intercourse with divine beings which
took place spiritually, and where they received what these beings
considered to be their own particular wisdom. This wisdom at first
consisted of communications (if I may call them thus) of the gods
concerning the abode of human souls in the divine world before
descending into an earthly body. During that state of consciousness
which I have just described, the gods taught human beings what the
souls experienced before their descent into an earthly body through
conception. Then men felt as if they were being reminded of
something, and they found that the communications of the gods
reminded them of their experiences in the world of the spirit and
soul, before birth, i.e. before conception.
An echo can still be
found in Plato that this was indeed so in ancient times. Today we can
look back on a divine spiritual wisdom received here on earth by men
who were in the frame of mind just described, a wisdom received
— we may indeed say it in the real sense of the word —
from the gods themselves. This wisdom was of a special kind: namely,
of such a kind, that people — strange as it may seem today
— knew nothing of death. It may seem strange to you today, yet
it is so: the oldest inhabitants of the earth knew nothing of death,
just as the child knows nothing of death. The people who were
instructed in the way indicated by me and passed on this instruction
to others who still possessed an atavistic clairvoyance, became
conscious at once of the fact that their soul-being had come down
from divine-spiritual worlds into a body, and that it would leave
this body. They considered this an advance in the life of the spirit
and of the soul. Birth and death appeared to them as a metamorphosis,
as something which is the beginning and end of something. Were we to
draw this schematically we might say that people saw the human soul
in its progressive evolution and considered life on earth as an
interlude. But they did not see in the points “a” and
“b” a beginning and an end, they only saw the
uninterrupted stream of the life of spirit and soul. They did see, of
course, that the people around them died. You will not think that I
am comparing these ancient men with animals; for, although their
outer aspect resembled that of animals, these oldest of men had a
higher soul-spiritual nature. I have already explained this before.
But just as an animal knows nothing of death when it sees another
animal which is dead, so did these ancient men know nothing of death,
for they received only the idea of an uninterrupted stream in the
life of soul and spirit. Death was something pertaining to Maya, the
great illusion, and it made no great impression on men, for they knew
life, only. Although they saw death, they knew nothing of death. For,
their spirit-soul life was not ensnared by death. They saw human life
only from within. When they looked at birth, human life extended
beyond birth, into the spiritual. When they looked at death, the life
of spirit and soul again extended beyond death, into the spiritual;
birth and death had no meaning for life. Life alone was known —
not death.
Men gradually came out
of this frame of spirit. On tracing the evolution of mankind from the
oldest times to the Mystery of Golgotha, one may say: more and more,
human beings learnt to know death. They learnt to know death more and
more as something that made an impression on them. Their souls became
entangled in death, and out of man's feelings arose the question:
what happens to the soul when man goes through death?
You see, in far
distant ages people never contemplated death as an end. Their problem
was at the most one dealing with the special nature of metamorphosis
involved. They asked whether the breath leaves man and continues
streaming, and whether the soul enters thereby into eternity; or
else, they had some other conception of the way in which the life of
spirit and soul continues. They thought about the nature of this
continuation, but they did not think of death as an end. Only with
the approach of the Mystery of Golgotha people really felt that death
has a meaning and that life on earth is something that ends.This, of
course, did not assume the form of a problem formulated in a
philosophical or scientific way, but it entered the soul as a
feeling. Men on earth had to come to this feeling, for it was
necessary for the evolution of mankind that the understanding, or the
intellect, should enter life on earth. But the intellect depends on
the fact that we are able to die. I have often mentioned this. Man
had therefore to become entangled in death. He had to become
acquainted with death. The old ages in which man knew nothing of
death were all non-intellectualistic. Men received their ideas
through inspirations from the spiritual world and did not think about
them. There was no intellect. But the intellect had to come. If we
express it in a soul-spiritual way, the understanding could come only
because man is able to die and carries within him all the time the
forces of death. In a physical way, we might say that death can enter
because man deposits salts, i.e. solid mineral substances, dead
substances, not only in the body, but also in his brain. The brain
has the constant tendency to deposit salt — I might say, toward
an incomplete ossification. So that the brain contains a constant
tendency toward death. This inoculation of death had to enter in
mankind. And I might say, that the result of this necessary
development — that death began to have a real influence in
man's life — was the outward acquaintance with death. If men
had remained the same as in the past, where they did not really know
death, they would never have been able to develop an intellect, for
the intellect is only possible in a world where death holds sway.
This is how matters
stand, seen from a human aspect. But they can also be contemplated
from the aspect of the higher hierarchies, and then they will appear
as follows: The higher hierarchies contain in their being the forces
that have formed Saturn, the Sun, the Moon and finally the Earth. If
the higher hierarchies had expressed their teachings amongst
themselves, as it were, up to the Mystery of Golgotha, they would
have said: We can form the Earth out of Saturn, Sun and Moon. But if
the Earth were to contain only what we have placed into Saturn, Sun
and Moon it would never have been able to develop beings who know
something about death, and can therefore develop the intellect within
them. We, the higher hierarchies, are able to let an Earth proceed
out of the Moon, on which there are men who know nothing of death,
and on which they cannot develop the intellect. It is not possible
for us, higher hierarchies, to form the Earth in such a way that it
is able to supply the forces which lead man towards the intellect. We
must rely, for this, on an entirely different being, on a being who
comes from another direction than our own — The Ahrimanic
Being. Ahriman is a being who does not belong to our hierarchy.
Ahriman comes into the stream of evolution from another direction. If
we tolerate Ahriman in the evolution of the Earth, if we allow him a
share in it, he brings us death, and with it, the intellect, and we
can take up in the human being death and intellect. Ahriman knows
death, because he is at one with the Earth and has trodden paths
which have brought him into connection with the evolution of the
Earth. He is an initiate, a sage of death, and for this reason he is
the ruler of the intellect. The gods had to reckon with Ahriman
— if I may express it in this way. They had to say: the
evolution cannot proceed without Ahriman. It is only a question of
admitting Ahriman into the evolution. But if Ahriman is admitted and
becomes the lord of death and, consequently, of the intellect too, we
forfeit the Earth, and Ahriman, whose sole interest lies in
permeating the Earth with intellect, will claim the Earth for
himself. The gods faced the great problem of losing to a certain
extent their rule over the Earth in favour of Ahriman. There was only
one possibility — that the gods themselves should learn to know
something which they could not learn in their godly abodes which were
not permeated by Ahriman — namely, that the gods should learn
to know death itself, on the Earth, through one of their emissaries
— the Christ. A god had to die on earth, and he had to die in
such a way that this was not grounded in the wisdom of the gods, but
in the human error which would hold sway if Ahriman alone were to
rule. A god had to pass through death and he had to overcome
death.
Thus the Mystery of
Golgotha meant this for the gods: a greater wealth of knowledge
through the wisdom of death. If a god had not passed through death,
the whole Earth would have become entirely intellectual, without ever
reaching the evolution which the gods had planned for it from the
very beginning.
In past ages, people
had no knowledge of death. But they learnt to know death. They had to
face the feeling that through death, i.e. through the intellect, we
enter a stream of evolution which is quite different from the one
from which we come.
Now the Christ taught
his initiates that he came from a world where death was unknown; he
learnt to know death, here on earth, and conquered death. If one
understands this connection between the earthly world and the divine
world, it will be possible to lead the intellect back gain into
spirituality. We might express approximately in this way the content
of the esoteric teachings given by the Christ to his initiated
disciples: it was the teaching of death, as seen from the scene of
the divine world. If one wishes to penetrate into the real depths of
this esoteric teaching, one must realize that he who understands the
entire evolution of mankind knows that the gods have overcome Ahriman
by using his forces for the benefit of the Earth, but his power has
been broken because the gods themselves learnt to know death in the
being of Christ. Indeed, the gods have placed Ahriman into the
evolution of the earth, but, in making use of him, they have forced
him to come down into the evolution of the earth without completing
his own rulership. He who learns to know Ahriman since the Mystery of
Golgotha and he who knew him before, knows that Ahriman has waited
for the world-historic moment in which he will not only invade the
unconscious and subconscious in man, as in the case since the days of
Atlantis (you know this through my
“Occult Science”),
but will invade also
man's consciousness. If we apply human expressions to the willing of
gods, we might say that Ahriman has waited with longing for the
moment in which to invade human consciousness with his power. His
purpose was thwarted because he knew nothing of the divine plan
whereby a being — the Christ — was to be sent to the
Earth, a being who underwent death. Thus the intervention of Ahriman
was possible, but the sharp edge was taken off his rule. Since then,
Ahriman uses every opportunity to encourage men in the exclusive use
of the intellect. Ahriman has not lost all hope today that he will
succeed in inducing men to use only their intellect. What would this
imply? If Ahriman would succeed in convincing men against all other
convictions that man can live only in his body and that, as a
spirit-soul being, he cannot be separated from his body, the idea of
death would seize the souls so strongly that Ahriman would be able to
realize his plans quite easily. Ahriman hopes for this always. One
might say, for instance, that special joy fills the heart of Ahriman
— if one can speak of a heart in Ahriman's case, but this is a
comparison, for I must always use human expressions in cases where
other expressions should really be found — that special joy
lives in Ahriman's soul since the period stretching from the forties
of the 19th century until about the end of the 19th century; in the
predominant sway of materialism Ahriman could cherish new hopes for
his rule over the earth. In this time even theology becomes
materialistic. I have mentioned already that theology has become
unchristian and that the theologian from Basle, Overbeck, wrote a
book in which he tried to prove that modern theology is no longer
Christian. This gave new hopes to Ahriman.
An antagonism to
Ahriman exists today only in the teachings like those that stream
through Anthroposophy. If Anthroposophy can again make clear to men
the independence of the spirit-soul being which is not dependent on
the bodily being, Ahriman will have to give up his hopes for the
time. The battle of the Christ against Ahriman is again possible. And
we can have a foreboding of this in the Temptation described in the
Gospel. But a full understanding can be gained only by penetrating
into what I have often set forth, namely, that Lucifer plays a
greater part in the older evolution of mankind, and that Ahriman
began to have an influence on human consciousness since the Mystery
of Golgotha. He had an influence also before that time, but not on
the consciousness of man.
If we look at the
human mind and soul we must say that the most important point in
mankind's evolution lies where man learns to know that the
Christ-impulse contains a living force which enables him to overcome
death in himself, when he unites himself with it.
Seen from the
spiritual world this implies that Ahriman was drawn into the
evolution of the earth by the hierarchies belonging to Saturn, Sun,
Moon, Earth, etc. But his claims of rulership were hedged in because
they were placed at the service of the evolution of the earth.
Ahriman has, as it were, been forced to enter the evolution of the
earth. Without him, the gods could not have placed intellectualism
into mankind and if they had not succeeded in taking off the sharp
edge to Ahriman's rule through the Christ event, Ahriman would have
rendered the whole earth intellectual from within and material from
without. The Mystery of Golgotha is not only an inner mystical event;
we must look upon it entirely as an outer event which cannot,
however, be set forth according to an outer materialistic, historical
investigation. It must be set forth in such a way as to show the
entrance of Ahriman into the evolution of the earth, and, at the same
time, the overcoming of Ahrimanism, to a certain extent. Thus we have
a battle of the gods which was enacted through the Mystery of
Golgotha. That a battle of the gods took place on that occasion, is
contained also in the esoteric teachings imparted by the Christ to
his initiated disciples, after his resurrection. If we are to
designate that which existed in the form of an esoteric Christianity,
we might say that in past ages of the evolution of the earth people
knew of the existence of these worlds through the manifestations that
I have characterized a short while ago. But these divine worlds could
not tell them anything concerning death, for death did not exist in
the worlds of the gods, and it did not exist for man, because he
gained knowledge only of the steady uninterrupted progress of the
spirit and soul through the spheres of the gods. Man came nearer and
nearer to the understanding of death. By yielding himself up to the
Christ, he could gain for himself a sure power which enabled him to
overcome death. This is man's inner evolution.
But the esoteric
element which Christ gave to his initiated disciples consisted
therein, that He told them: What took place on Golgotha, is the
reflection of superterrestial events and of the relationship between
the worlds of the gods connected with Saturn, Sun, Moon and the
present Earth, and Ahriman. The cross of Golgotha cannot be looked
upon as something earthly, but as something having a meaning for the
entire universe — this was the content of esoteric
Christianity.
Perhaps we can awaken
a particular feeling in connection with esoteric Christianity:
Imagine two esoteric disciples of the Christ, who progress more and
more in the acquisition of an esoteric Christianity, and imagine them
speaking together while they are still battling with their doubts:
One of them would say more or less the following words to the other
one: The Christ who is teaching us, has descended from worlds which
are known from the past. Gods were known in past ages, but they were
gods who could not speak of death. If we had remained with these
gods, we would never have learnt anything concerning the nature of
death. The gods themselves had first to send down to the earth a
divine being, in order to learn something concerning death though one
of their own ranks. After His resurrection, Christ teaches us what
the gods had to fulfill in order to guide the evolution of the earth
to a right end. If we keep to him, we will learn something that men
could not learn until then. We learn what the gods did behind the
scenes of the worlds's existence in order to further the evolution of
the earth in the right way. We learn how they brought in the forces
of Ahriman, without allowing them to be of harm to man, but to be of
use to him. What the initiated disciples received as the esoteric
teaching of the risen Christ was something deeply moving. A disciple,
such as the one described above, could only have continued by saying:
Today we would know nothing at all concerning the gods, for we would
be in the meshes of death had Christ not died and risen, and had He
not taught us, after His resurrection, the experiences of the gods
concerning death. As human beings, we must immerse ourselves into a
period of time in which we can no longer know anything of the gods.
The gods found a new way of speaking to us. This way went through the
Mystery of Golgotha. The essential knowledge conveyed to the
disciples through the Mystery of Golgotha, was that men could again
approach the divine worlds which they had left. In the first period
of the Christian evolution, the disciples were permeated by this
stirring teaching. Many a one, whom history barely mentions, bore
within him the knowledge which he could have gained only because in
the early times he had enjoyed the teaching of the risen Christ
himself, or else because he was connected in some way with the
teachers who had been taught by the Christ.
Later on, all these
things were exteriorized. They were exteriorized to such an extent
that the first heralds of Christianity attached great value to the
fact of being able to say that they were the disciples of one who had
been taught by a disciple of the apostles. It was a continuous
development, for he who imparted the teaching, had known one who had
seen an apostle, i.e. one who had known the Lord himself, after his
resurrection. In the past, some value was still attached to this
living development, but the form in which it reached a later mankind
was already exteriorized. It had assumed the aspect of an outer
historical description. But, essentially, it goes back to what I have
just set forth. The incorporation of the intellect, which began
already, and particularly, during the fourth and fifth centuries
after the Mystery of Golgotha, and underwent a special change in the
fifteenth century — the beginning of the fifth post-atlantean
epoch — this development of the intellect brought about the
loss of the ancient wisdom which enabled man to grasp something of
the spiritual truths, whereas the new wisdom was not there. To a
certain extent, men forgot for a whole age everything that had an
esoteric significance in Christianity.
As stated, some
records dealing with this esoteric knowledge remained in the keeping
of secret societies, the members of which no longer understood the
content of these records — in our age, certainly not. These
records really refer to the teachings that were imparted by the risen
Christ to some of his initiated disciples.
Suppose that the
ancient Hebrew teaching had not received new life through
Christianity — then, Paul's conviction before the event at
Damascus would have been justified. For, Paul more or less accepted
the view that there is an old traditional teaching, which existed
originally as a divine-spiritual revelation given to men in a distant
past, in the spiritual form which I have described. Then, this was
preserved in written records. Amongst the Hebrews, there were scribes
who knew what was contained in the records from out of the ancient
wisdom of the gods. The sentence that condemned Christ-Jesus to death
came from such scribes. While he was still Saul, Paul looked up to
this original divine wisdom of the past and thought that this ancient
wisdom was the source of the knowledge which came streaming down even
to the scribes of his time. The fact that prominent men took up the
calling of a scribe, could, however, bring this divine wisdom only as
far as the pronouncing of righteous sentences. Impossible —
quite impossible — for an innocent man to be condemned to death
through crucifixion! Especially if things took the course they did
take during the trial of Christ Jesus. This was the course of Paul's
thoughts. Only the Roman Governor, Pontius Pilate, was already
entangled instinctively in quite another world-conception and could
utter the pregnant sentence: What is Truth? Paul, as Saul, could not
possibly imagine that what had taken place according to a righteous
judgement, might not be truth. What a conviction had to be gained by
Paul? The conviction that there can be error in the truth which used
to come streaming down to men from the gods, for men have changed it
into error — into an error so strong, that the most innocent of
all had to pass through death. The original divine wisdom streams
down as far as the wisdom of the scribes, who were the Hebrew
contemporaries of the Mystery of Golgotha. This wisdom can only
contain truth — thought Saul. But he had to think otherwise.
When Paul was still Saul, he used to say: If he, who died on the
cross, is indeed the Christ and the Messiah, this current of wisdom
must contain error in its truth, and error brought Christ to the
cross. That is, man must have turned the old divine wisdom into
error. Naturally, only the actual fact that this is so, indeed, could
convince Saul. Only Christ himself could convince him, by appearing
to him in the event at Damascus. What did this mean for Saul? It
meant that a divine wisdom no longer existed, for the Ahrimanic
element had entered into it.
Thus Paul reached the
point of seeing that mankind's evolution had been seized by an enemy
and that this enemy is the source of error on earth. In bringing the
intellect, he brings also the possibility of error, and, in its
greatest aspect, this error is responsible for the death on the cross
of the most innocent of all. First, this conviction must be gained
— that He who has no stain upon him, died on the cross. This
enabled men to see how Ahriman crept into the evolution of humanity
and how a super-sensible, superterrestial event existed in the
evolution of the Ego, through the enactment of the Mystery of
Golgotha. An esoteric fact can never be merely mystical. It is always
an enormous mistake to explain mere mysticism as esotericism. The
esoteric knowledge is always a knowledge of facts which take place,
as such, in the spiritual world, and remain hidden behind the veil of
the physical world. For, behind this veil, the adjustment between the
divine world and Ahriman takes place, as enacted in the death on the
cross of Christ-Jesus. Paul felt that error, leading to the death on
the cross, can only enter a world wherein man is seized by the
Ahrimanic powers. And when he had understood this, he learnt the
truth of esoteric Christianity.
Paul was undoubtedly
one of those who belonged, in this sense, to the initiates. But
initiation gradually died out, through the growing influence of
intellectualism. Today we must return to a knowledge of esoteric
Christianity: we must know again that Christianity does not only
contain what is exoteric, but goes beyond the forebodings that can be
awakened through the Gospels. Today very little is said concerning an
esoteric Christianity, but humanity must return to this knowledge,
which is not based on outer documents. We must learn to fathom what
the Christ himself taught to his initiated disciples after his
resurrection, and we must take for granted that he could impart such
teachings only after having passed through an experience, here on
earth, which he could not have had in the divine world — for
until the Mystery of Golgotha death did not exist in the divine
worlds. No being of the divine worlds had passed through death
— Christ is the first-born who passed through death from the
world of the hierarchies, connected with the evolution of the Earth
that went through Saturn, Sun and Moon.
The secret of Golgotha
is the inclusion of death into life. Before Golgotha, the knowledge
of life did not include death. Now death became known as an essential
part of life, as an experience which strengthens life. Humanity went
through a weaker form of life when nothing was known of death;
humanity must live more forcefully if it wants to pass through death
and yet remain alive. Death, in this connection, is also the
intellect. Men possessed a comparatively weaker sense of life when
they had no need of the intellect. The older people who obtained
their knowledge of the divine worlds in the form of images and inner
manifestations, did not die inwardly. They always remained alive.
They could laugh at death because they remained alive inwardly. The
Greeks still relate how happy the ancients were because, when death
approached them, they became so dazed within, that they hardly
noticed it. This was the last remnant of a world-conception that knew
nothing of death. Modern man experiences the intellect. Intellect
renders us cold and dead within. It paralyses us. When our intellect
is active, we do not really live. We must feel that when we are
thinking, we are not really alive, that our life is poured into the
empty pictures of our understanding. A strong life is needed in order
to experience the living activity contained in the lifeless images
formed by our intellect, a creative, living activity inspite of all.
A strong life is needed to reach the sphere where moral impulses flow
out of the force of pure thinking, and where we learn to understand
the freedom in man, through the impulses of pure thinking.
This is what I tried
to set forth in my
“Philosophy of Freedom”,
which is really an
ethical conception, and tries to show how dead thoughts can be
awakened into life in the form of moral impulses, and thus be led to
resurrection. An inner Christianity is undoubtedly contained in this
“Philosophy of Freedom”.
With these
explanations I wished to place before your souls, from a particular
aspect, something concerning an esoteric Christianity. This age,
which is so full of disputes concerning the nature of Christianity in
an exoteric, historical sense, needs an esoteric Christianity —
it is necessary to point out the esoteric teachings of Christianity.
I hope that they will not be taken lightly, but with the needed
earnestness and responsibility. When speaking of such things, one
feels how difficult it is to clothe these experiences in the words of
modern speech, which has already become abstract. For this reason, I
have tried to attune your souls by describing the inner processes of
man in the form of images, in order to form a thread leading from the
single human being to that which constitutes, in an esoteric sense,
the historical evolution of humanity, which is contained, as
something essential, in the Mystery of Golgotha.
|