It cannot he doubted that the influence of the Bible on Western Culture has
been greater than that of any other document. It may truly be said that as a
result of the influence of the Bible, the human soul has for thousands of
years maintained a hold on the most inward being of man, — a hold which
has extended to the life of feeling and also to the life of will. The
influence in these two spheres of man's being has been stronger than in his
thinking and conceptional life, although it may be said that all spiritual
life, be it in the region of religion or of exact science, bears traces of the
influence of the Bible. And it is evident to those who look more deeply into
things, that the very arguments of men who to-day feel bound to attack the
Bible — taking up in some cases the radical standpoint of downright
denial — themselves show traces of its influence. There has never been
any general recognition, and to-day there is practically none, of the extent
of the influence of this document; but it exists nevertheless in actual fact
to those who have an unbiased outlook. The attitude adopted towards the Bible
by modern thought, feeling and perception, has for some time past changed
very considerably from what it used formerly to be. The value of the Bible,
the attitude adopted towards it by men who to-day take it seriously has
altered essentially in the course of the 19th Century. We must not of course
undervalue in any sense the standpoint of many modern thinking men who feel
themselves bound to take a firm stand on the ground of Science. There are
others who hold fast to the Bible, who derive all their deepest convictions
from this most significant record, and who prefer to pay no attention when
the value of the Bible is under discussion. The attitude of such people is:
‘Others may think as they like; we find in the teachings of the Bible
all that our souls need and we are quite satisfied.’ Such a point of
view, however justifiable it may be in individual cases, is, in a certain
sense entirely egoistical and by no means without danger for spiritual
evolution.
That which in a given epoch has become an universal blessing to men —
or, let us say, an universal belief and conviction, has always originated with
the few; and it may well be that an ever increasing stream of conviction may
flow out to become universal in no very distant future from the few who
to-day feel themselves compelled to attack the Bible because of their desire
to build up their world-conception conformably with their Science. For this
reason to ignore such spiritual and mental currents and to refuse to listen
because one is oneself satisfied is not without an element of danger. Anyone
who really takes the evolution of mankind seriously ought rather to regard
it as a duty to take notice of the objections brought by sincere seekers for
Truth, and to see what relation these objections have to the Bible.
I have said that the attitude adopted by men, and especially by leaders of
intellectual and spiritual life has changed. To-day we shall do no more than
point to this change. Were we to look back into the past we should find
civilisations where men, especially when they stood at the summit of their
spiritual life, doubted not at all that the very highest wisdom flowed from
the Bible; and that those with whom it originated were not just average men
who were responsible for human errors in it, but were under lofty
inspiration and infused it with wisdom. This was a feeling of reverent
recognition among those who stood on the heights of spiritual life. In
modern times this has changed.
In the 18th Century there was a French investigator who came to the
conclusion that certain contradictions exist in the Old Testament. He
noticed that the two Creation stories at the very beginning of the Bible
contradict one another, that one story describes the work of the six or
seven days including the creation of man, and that then there is a further
account with a different beginning, which ascribes quite a different origin
to man. This investigator was specially disconcerted by the fact that at the
beginning of the Bible two names of the God-head occur, the name of the
‘Elohim’ in the narrative of the six days' creation, and then
later the name of Jehova. There is an echo of this in the German Bible. In the
German Bible the name of the God-head is translated ‘Lord,’
‘God,’ and then Jehova is translated by ‘God the Lord’
or in some such way; at all events the difference is apparent. Upon noticing
this the investigator suspected that something had given rise to the untenable
statement that the Bible was written by a single individual, whether Moses or
someone else, and that different accounts must have been welded together. And
after much deliberation he came to the conclusion that all the existing
accounts corresponding to the different traditions were simply welded
together; one account being amalgamated with another and all the
contradictions allowed to stand.
After, and as a result of this, there appeared the kind of investigation
which might well be called a mutilation of the Bible. To-day there are
Bibles in which the various points of detail are traced back to different
traditions. In the so-called Rainbow Bible it is stated for instance, how
some portion or other that has come to be inserted into the collective
statement has its origin in quite a different legendary tradition —
hence it is said that the Bible must have been welded together from shreds of
tradition. It became more and more general for investigators to proceed
along this line in regard to the Old Testament, and then the same thing
happened in the case of the New Testament. How could the fact be hidden that
when the four Gospels are submitted to literal comparison they do not agree
with each other? It is easy to discover contradictions in the Matthew, Luke
and John Gospels. And so the investigators said: How can the single
Evangelists have written their respective Gospels under lofty inspiration,
when the accounts do not agree? The Gospel of St. John — that most
profound writing of Christendom — was divested of all worth as an
historical document in the minds of some investigators of the 19th Century.
Men came more and more to be convinced of the fact that it was nothing but a
kind of hymn, written down by someone on the basis of his faith and not an
historical tradition at all. They said that what he had written down could
in no way lay claim to being a true description of what had actually taken
place in Palestine at the beginning of our era. And so the New Testament was
torn into shreds. The Old and New Testaments were treated just like any
other historical document; it was said that bias and error had crept into
them, and that before all things it was necessary to show by purely
historical investigation, how the fragments had been gradually pieced
together. This is the standpoint which more and more came to be adopted by
historical, theological investigation.
On the other side let us turn to those who felt compelled to stand firmly on
the ground of the facts of Natural Science, — who said, quite sincerely
and honestly as a result of their knowledge: ‘What we are taught by
Geology, Biology and the different branches of Natural Science, flatly
contradicts what the Bible relates. The Bible story of the development of the
earth and living beings through the six days of creation, is of the nature of
a legend or a myth of primitive peoples, whereby they tried, in their
childlike fashion to make the origin of the earth intelligible to
themselves.’ And such men alienated themselves from the New Testament in
the same degree as from the Old Testament. Men who feel compelled to hold fast
to the facts of Natural Science will have nothing to do with all the wonderful
acts performed by the Christ, with the way in which this unique Personality
arises at the critical point of our history, and they radically oppose the
very principle on which the Bible is based. Thus we see on the one hand the
Bible torn to pieces by historical-theological investigation, and on the
other hand put aside, discredited by scientific research.
That may serve briefly to characterise the outlook of to-day; but if nobody
troubled about this, and simply persisted in the attitude: ‘I believe
what is in the Bible’ — that would be Egoism. Such men would only
be thinking of themselves and it would not occur to them that future
generations might hold as an universal conviction that which to-day is only
the conviction of a few.
We may now ask: is there perhaps yet a further standpoint other than the two
we have indicated? Indeed there is, and it is just this that we want to
consider to-day. It is the standpoint of Spiritual Science, or
Anthroposophy. We can in the first instance understand this best by means of
comparison. The Anthroposophical standpoint with regard to the Bible offers
to our modern age something similar to that which was accomplished three or
four centuries ago by the mighty achievements of scientific research;
Anthroposophy seeks to form a connecting link with what was achieved by such
men as Kepler, Copernicus, Galileo.
To-day we build upon the foundations of what was achieved by such
personalities as these. When we look back to the relation which in former
days existed between men and nature, we find that in the old Schools or
Academics, certain books carried just as much weight as the Bible does with
many people to-day.
Aristotle,
the ancient Greek scholar, whose achievements
were by no means confined to the sphere of Natural Science, was looked upon
by the widest circles both in the early and later Middle Ages as a
far-reaching Authority. Wherever men were taught about nature the books of
Aristotle were taken as the basis. His writings were fundamental and
authoritative not only in spheres where men pursued the study of Nature in a
more limited, philosophical sense, but also in spheres of definitely
scientific thought. It was not customary in those days to look out at Nature
with one's own eyes, and it was not a question of instruments, apparatus and
other things of that kind. In the time of Galileo a highly symptomatic
incident occurred, and it has been handed down as a kind of anecdote. It was
pointed out by a colleague to a man who was a convinced follower of
Aristotle, that many of the master's utterances were not correct; for
instance that the nerves proceeded from the heart, this being contrary to
the real facts. A corpse was placed in front of the man and it was
demonstrated to him that this utterance of Aristotle did not agree with the
facts. He said: ‘Yes, when I look at that myself it seems a
contradiction, but even if Nature does show it to me I still believe
Aristotle.’ And there were many such men, — men who had more faith
in the teachings and the authority of Aristotle than in their own eyes. To-day
men's point of view about Nature and also about Aristotle has changed. In our
time it would be considered ridiculous to derive from ancient books the
knowledge of nature which men ought to possess. To-day the scientist confronts
nature with his instruments and tries to explore her secrets in order that
they may become a common good for all men. But circumstances were such that in
the time of Galileo, those who were imbued with the teachings of Aristotle to
the same degree as this above mentioned follower, did not understand the Greek
Master in the very least, Aristotle meant something different, something very
much more spiritual, than what we understand to-day by the nerves. And because
of this we cannot do real justice to Aristotle — whose vision was in
accordance with the age in which he lived — until we look into nature
with free and impartial eyes.
That was the great change that took place three or four centuries ago —
and we are experiencing such another now in reference to the Spiritual Science
and those spiritual facts and processes which are the spiritual foundations
of existence.
For centuries the Bible was taken by a very large number of men to be the
only book able to give information about all that transcended the tangible,
physical world. The Bible was the Authority so far as the spiritual world
was concerned, just as Aristotle in the Middle Ages was the authority for
the physical world.
How has it come about that to-day we are in a position to do greater justice
to Aristotle? It is because we face the physical world from a position of
greater independence. And what Anthroposophy has to give to man of modern
times, is the possibility of acquiring direct cognition of the invisible
world, just as centuries ago the new age began to acquire direct knowledge of
the visible world. Spiritual Science states that it is possible for man to
look into and perceive the spiritual world; that he need not be dependent
upon tradition, but can see for himself. This is what true Spiritual Science
has to achieve for modern humanity — it has to convince man that
slumbering powers and faculties exist within him; that there are certain great
moments in life when these spiritual faculties awaken just as when a blind man
is operated upon and is able to see colour and light. To use Goethe's phrase:
the spiritual ears and eyes awaken, and then the soul of man can perceive in
its environment what is otherwise concealed. The awakening of the faculties
slumbering in the soul is possible; it is possible for man to acquire an
instrument whereby he call look into spiritual causes, just as with his
physical instruments he looks into the physical world. We have all kinds of
instruments for the perception of the physical world — and for
perception of the spiritual world there is also an instrument — namely,
man himself, transformed. From the standpoint of spiritual science the most
important thing of all is that the word ‘Evolution’ should be
taken in all seriousness, — ‘Evolution,’ which is a kind of
magic word on many lips. It is not difficult to-day to perceive how the
imperfect continually develops and evolves, and this evolution is carefully
followed up in external Natural Science. To this conception Anthroposophy
would not set up the slightest opposition where it remains in the region of
scientific facts. But Anthroposophy takes the word ‘Evolution’
in its full meaning, — and so seriously that it points to those
faculties which lie in the soul of man by means of which he can become aware
of the Spiritual world. Spiritual beings are the foundation and basis of the
physical world, and man only needs organs to be able to perceive them. I must
here again lay stress upon the fact that today only a few men are in a
position to transform their souls in this way. It requires a highly developed
soul whose spiritual eyes are open before investigation of the spiritual world
can be undertaken and information as to the events and beings there obtained.
But if facts about the higher worlds are made manifest, then all that is
necessary for the understanding of what is told by the spiritual investigator
is healthy discernment, free from all bias pertaining to the intellect or to
human logic. There is no justification for criticising the use of spiritual
investigation, because we cannot see for ourselves. How many men are able to
form a clear conception of
Ernst Haeckel's
researches and follow them up? It is
exactly the same in regard to research in the region of senselife, where
what is illuminated by the understanding passes over into the consciousness,
as it is in regard to what the spiritual investigator has to say about the
information he has gained in the super-sensible world. That which is known
as the super-sensible world through direct perception and human powers of
cognition must pass over into the universal consciousness of mankind as a
result of the Anthroposophical conception of the world.
On the one hand then, we have the ancient Bible bringing before us in its
own way the secrets of the super-sensible worlds and their connection with
the sensible worlds, and on the other we have, in Spiritual Science, the
direct experiences of the investigator in regard to the super-sensible
world. This is surely a point of view similar to that which one finds at the
dawn of modern Natural Science.
The question now arises: ‘What has Spiritual Science to say that is able
to help us to understand the biblical truths?’ We must here enter into
details. We must above all point out that when as a result of the methods
laid down by Spiritual Science, man awakens his soul faculties, he sees into
the spiritual world and develops what in comparison to objective cognition is
an Imaginative Knowledge. What is this Imaginative Knowledge? It has nothing
in common with those vague fantasies readily associated with the word
‘Imagination’ nor has it anything whatever to do with somnambulism
and things of that nature, but fundamental to it is a strict discipline by
means of which a man has to awaken these faculties. Let us proceed from
external knowledge in order to make more intelligible what is really meant by
‘Imaginative Knowledge.’ What is characteristic of external
objective cognition? There is for example, the perception of a
‘table’; when the table is no longer before us there remains an
idea, a concept of it, as a kind of echo. First there is the object, and then
the image. Certain systems of philosophy affirm that everything is only image,
conception. This is incorrect. Let us take, for example, the conception of red
hot steel or iron. The conception will not burn, but when we are faced by the
reality the experience is different. The characteristic of objective cognition
is that first the object is there and then the image is formed within us.
Exactly the opposite process must take place in a man who wishes to penetrate
into the higher world. He must first be able to transform his conceptual world
in such a way that the conception may precede the perception. This faculty is
developed by Meditation and Concentration, that is to say by sinking the
soul into the content of certain conceptions which do not correspond to any
external reality. Just consider for a moment how much of what lives in the
soul is dependent upon the fact of your having been born in a particular
town on a particular day. Suppose that you had not been born on that day,
and try to imagine what other experiences would then live within your soul,
and stream through it from morning to evening. In other words, make it clear
to yourself how much of the content of the soul is dependent on your
environment, and then let all that has stimulated you from outside, pass
away. Then try to think how much would still remain in the soul. All
conceptions of the external world which flow into the soul must, day by day,
be expelled from it and in their place there must live for a time the
content of a conception that has not in any way been stimulated from without
and that does not portray any external fact or event.
Spiritual Science — if our search is sincere — gives many such
conceptions and I will mention one as an example. I want to show you how the
soul may gradually be led up into the higher worlds through certain definite
conceptions. Such conceptions may be considered to be like letters of the
alphabet. But in Spiritual Science there are not only twenty-two to
twenty-seven letters, but many hundreds, by means of which the soul learns
to read in the spiritual world. Here is a simple example: suppose we take
the well known Rose Cross and in its simplest form, the black cross adorned
with seven red roses. Very definite effects are produced if for a quarter of
an hour each day the soul gives itself wholly up to the conception of this
Rose Cross, excluding everything that acts as an external stimulus. In order
to be able to understand what comes to pass in the soul as a result of this,
let us consider intellectually the meaning of the Rose Cross. This is not
the most important element, but we shall do it to show that it is possible
to explain the meaning. I shall give it in the form of an instruction given
by teacher to pupil.
The teacher says to the pupil: — ‘Look at the plant standing with
its root in the ground and growing upwards to the blossom. Compare the greater
perfection of man standing before you, organised as he is, with the lesser
perfection of the plant. Man has self-consciousness, has within him what we
call an Ego, an ‘ I ’. But because he has this higher principle
within him he has had to accept in addition all that constitutes his lower
nature, the passion of sense. The plant has no self-consciousness; it has no
Ego, hence it is not yet burdened with desires, passions or instincts. Its
green beauty is there, chaste and pure. Look at the circulation of the
chlorophyl fluid in the plant and then in man at the pulsation of the blood.
That which, in man constitutes his life of passions and instincts, comes to
expression, in the plant, as the blossom. In exchange for this man has won his
self-consciousness. Now consider not only present day man, but look in a
spiritual sense at a man of the far distant future. He will develop, he will
over come, cleanse and purify his desires and passions and will obtain a
higher self-consciousness. Thus, spiritually, you can see a man who has once
more attained to the purity of the plant-nature. But it is because he has
reached a higher stage that his self-consciousness exists in this state of
purity. His blood is as pure and chaste as the plant fluids. Take the red
roses to be a prototype of what the blood will be at some future time, and
in this way you have before you the prototype of higher man. In the Rose
Cross you have a most beautiful paraphrase of Goethe's saying: —
“The man who is without this dying and becoming is a sad stranger on
this dark earth”! Dying and becoming, — what does this mean? It
means that in man there exists the possibility of growing out of and beyond
himself. That which dies and is overcome is represented by the black cross
which is the expression of his desires of senses. The blossoms in their
purity are symbolical of the blood. The red roses and the black cross
together represent the inner call to grow beyond oneself.’
As I said, this intellectual explanation is not the most important element
and it is only given in order that we may be able better to understand these
things. In a Meditation of this kind the point is that we shall sink
ourselves into the symbol, that it shall stand as a picture before us. And
if it is said that a Rose Cross corresponds to nothing real, our answer must
be that the whole significance lies not in the experience of something
pertaining to the external world through the Rose Cross, but that the effect
of this Rose Cross upon the soul and its slumbering faculties is very real.
No image pertaining to the external world could have the same effect as this
image in all its varied aspects and in its non-reality. If the soul allows
this image to work upon it, it makes greater and greater progress, and is
finally able to live in a world of conceptions that is at first really
illusory; but when it has lived sufficiently long in this conceptual world
with patience and energy, it has a significantly true experience. Spiritual
realities, spiritual beings which otherwise are invisible emerge from the
spiritual environment. And then the soul is able quite clearly to
distinguish what is merely conception, illusion, from true and genuine
reality.
Of course one must not be a visionary, for that is very dangerous; it is
absolutely necessary to maintain reason and a sure foundation for one's
experience. If a man dreams in a kind of phantasy, then it is not well with
him, when the spiritual world breaks in upon his consciousness. But if he
maintains a sense of absolute certainty in his perception of reality, then
he knows how the spiritual events will be made manifest, and he ascends into
the spiritual world.
You will perhaps have surmised from what I have said, that cognition of the
spiritual world is quite different from that of the sense world. The
spiritual world cannot be brought into the range of direct perception by
means of conceptions having but one meaning, and anyone who thinks it
possible to describe what he finds in the spiritual world in the same way as
he would describe what he finds in the sense world — simply has no
knowledge of the nature of the spiritual world. The spiritual world can only
be represented in pictures, and in imagery, which must be regarded merely as
such. When the spiritual investigator looks into the spiritual world he sees
the spiritual causes behind the physical phenomena, and he sees not only
what underlies the present but what underlay the past. One thing above all
else is manifest to him; namely, that man as he stands before us to-day as a
physical being, was not always a physical being. External Natural Science
can only lead us back by way of physical phenomena to what man as a physical
being once was, and the spiritual investigator has no objection to that. But
what surrounds us physically, has a spiritual origin. Man existed as a
spiritual being before he became physical.
When the earth was not yet physical, man existed in the bosom of divine
beings. As ice condenses from water, so did physical man condense from
spiritual man. Spiritual Science shows that the physical is in perpetual
contact with the spiritual. But what underlies the physical can only be
expressed in pictures, if one wants to approximate to physical ideas.
What happens when a man has re-attained the spiritual stage of evolution,
— what comes before him? In a certain sense the spiritual investigator
re-discovers the Bible imagery, as given in the six or seven days of
Creation. The pictures as given there actually appear before him. These
pictures are not, of course, a description of physical occurrences, but the
investigator who looks into the spiritual world, sees in clairvoyant
consciousness, in how wonderful a way the writer of Genesis has portrayed in
these pictures the formation of man from out of the Spirit. And it is
marvelous how, point by point, agreement is established between what is so
perceived by the spiritual investigator and the Bible imagery. The spiritual
investigator can follow in just as unbiased a way as the Natural Scientist
approaches the physical world. He does not derive his wisdom directly from
the Bible, but he finds emphatic agreement with Bible imagery.
I will only mention one such point of agreement. When we go back to ancient
times, it is seen that behind the evolution of man stand certain spiritual
beings who are different from the beings who are there from a definite and
later point of time onwards. Many of you will know that man as he is to-day
is a fourfold being, consisting of physical body, etheric body, astral body
(the vehicle of joy, passions and so forth), and the Ego, the bearer of
human self-consciousness. The three lower members, physical body, etheric
body and astral body, were in existence long before the Ego, which was
incorporated into man last of all. Spiritual beings who are designated in
the Bible as the Elohim worked on these three earlier principles. And when
the Ego began to be incorporated into this three-fold nature, another being
from the spiritual world co-operated in the work of the Elohim. If we
penetrate more deeply into the Bible we shall find that this Spiritual Being
is given the name of Jehova, and rightly so. And in accordance with the
inner principles of evolution itself we see that at a certain point in the
narrative a new name is introduced in place of the old name of the God-head.
We see too, the circumstances surrounding the origin of man which is
described in a two-fold way in the Bible. For in point of fact man as a
threefold being was dissolved into the universe: as a three-fold being he
came into existence afresh, and then from out of the transformed three-fold
man, the Ego developed. So that the cleft that would seem to lie between the
first and second chapter of Genesis, and that has been the subject of so
many false interpretations, is explained by spiritual investigation. It is
only a question of rightly understanding the Bible and that is not very easy
to-day. Spiritual Science shows that in the beginning higher Spiritual
Beings were present; the descendants of these Beings are men, man has
emerged from the bosom of Divine Spiritual Beings. We may speak of man as
the descendant of the Gods in the same sense as we speak of the child being
the descendant of his parents. From the standpoint of Spiritual Science we
must look upon the human being standing before us as an Earth-man, the
descendant of divine-spiritual beings.
Does the Bible tell us anything about this? Indeed it does, but we first
must learn how to read it. The fourth sentence of the Second Chapter of
Genesis runs: ‘These are the generations of the heavens’ ... and
so on. This sentence is misleading, for it does not give what is really to be
found at this place in the Bible. The text ought really to stand as follows:
‘What follow here and will now be described are the descendants of the
Heavens and the Earth as they were brought forth by the divine power.’
And by the words ‘the Heavens and the Earth,’ divine spiritual
beings are meant, divine spiritual beings whose descendant is man. The Bible
describes exactly what the spiritual investigator rediscovers independently.
Many of those who fight against the Bible to-day are directing their attacks
against something of which they have no real knowledge. They are tilting
against straws. The Anthroposophical view is exactly expressed in this fourth
sentence. We might show verse by verse through the Old and New Testaments how
man, when he ascends into the spiritual world through his own faculties,
rediscovers the results of his investigation in the Bible. It would lead us
too far now if we tried to describe the New Testament in a similar way. In
my book
Christianity as Mystical Fact
the Lazarus miracle among others is given in
its real form. The manner of treating such subjects to-day makes it
impossible for us to get at their real meaning, for modern commentators of
the Bible are naturally only able to find what accords with their own
personal knowledge. Their knowledge does not transcend sense-cognition,
hence the many contradictory interpretations and expositions of the
individual Biblical ‘Authorities.’ The only qualified expositor of
the Bible is a man who, independently of the Bible, is able to reach the same
truths as are there contained. Let us take for sake of example an old book
— Euclid's Geometry. Anyone who understands something of Geometry to-day
will understand this book. But one would of course only place reliance on
someone who had really studied Geometry to-day. When such a man comes to
Euclid he will recognise his teachings to be true. In the same sense a man who
approaches the Bible with philological knowledge only can never be a real
‘Authority.’ Only a man who is able to create the wisdom from out
of his own being can be a real Authority on the Bible.
It may be said then, that the Bible is intelligible to a man who can
penetrate into the spiritual world, who can receive its influences into
himself. The Bible induces in such a man an absolute certainty that it is
written by Initiates and inspired souls; a man who can to-day penetrate into
the spiritual world, understands the great Scribes of the Bible. He knows
them to have been true Initiates, ‘awakened souls’ who have
written down their experiences from the levels of the spiritual worlds; if
he knows this, he also knows what is hidden within their words.
I would like here to mention an experience of my own in reference to another
matter. When I was engaged on special work in the
Goethe
Archives in Weimar,
I tried to prove something quite externally. You all know Goethe's beautiful
prose Hymn to Nature ‘Oh Nature we are encircled and embraced by
thee,’ and so on. This hymn depicts in beautiful words that everything
given to us by Nature is given in Love, that Love is the crown of Nature. This
composition was lost sight of for a time by Goethe himself, and when he was an
old man and what remained of his literary work was given over to the Duchess
Amelia, it was found. Goethe was questioned about it, and said ‘Yes, I
recognise the idea that came to me then.’ The composition was accepted
as having been written by Goethe until certain hair-splitters refused to admit
that he was the author and attributed it to someone else. My purpose was to
investigate the truth about this composition. It had come to my knowledge that
at an early period of his life Goethe had with him a young man called Tobler,
who had an exceedingly good memory. During their walks together Goethe had
elaborated his idea, Tobler had thoroughly assimilated it, and because of
his marvelous memory had been able afterwards to write it down very nearly
word for word. I tried to show that a great deal of what is to be found in
Goethe's conceptions later on is intelligible in the light of this
composition. The point is that someone other than Goethe had penned it on
paper, but the idea itself in its phrasing and articulation was Goethe's
— and that is what I tried to make clear. Later on, when my work was
published, a celebrated Goethean scholar came to me and said: ‘We owe
you a debt of gratitude for throwing light upon the subject, for now we know
that this composition is by Tobler.’ You may well imagine how amused I
was! This is how things present themselves to the minds of people who are at
pains to prove that in the course of time some particular portion of the Bible
was written by one man or another. Some people consider the most important
thing to be who finally did the writing, and not which Spirit was the origin
and source. But with us the essential thing is to understand how the Bible
was able to come into being from the Spirits of those who looked into the
Spiritual World and experienced it.
And now let us examine whether there is in the Bible itself, anything that
explains this way of looking at things.
The Old Testament lends itself to a great deal of controversy, for the
events there have grown dim. But it will be clear to anyone who does not
want to wrangle, that the Old Testament faithfully describes the significant
process of the penetration of the Ego into the entire nature and being of
man. Anyone who from the point of view of Spiritual Science, reads of the
call to Moses at the Burning Bush will understand that in reality Moses was
then raised into the Spiritual world. When God appeared to Moses in the
Burning Bush, Moses asked: ‘Who shall I say to the people hath sent
me?’ God said: ‘Tell them that One Who can say “I am”
hath sent thee.’ And if we follow up the whole process of the
incorporation of the Ego, step by step, then the Bible illuminates what is
found in Spiritual Science independently.
But something else is evident as well, namely, that from a Christian point
of view the Bible should not be considered from the same point of view as
other historical documents. If we consider the figure of Paul we can learn a
great deal that can lead us to this realisation. When we study the earliest
form in which Christianity was promulgated, from which all its later forms
are derived, we shall find that none of the Gospel narratives are given by
Paul at all, but that he speaks of something quite different. What gave the
impulse to Paul? How did this unique Apostle acquire his understanding of
the Christ? Simply and solely as a consequence of the event of Damascus,
that is, not as a result of physical but of super-sensible truths. Now what
is at the basis of the teaching of Paul? It is the knowledge that the Christ
— although he was crucified — lives; the event of Damascus reveals
Christ as a Living Being who can appear to men who ascend to him; — it
reveals, moreover that there is in very truth a spiritual world. And Paul
makes a parallel between Christ's appearance to him and His appearance to
others. He says: ‘First He appeared to Cephas, then to the Twelve, then
to five hundred Brethren at once, to James and then all the Apostles, and last
of all to me also as to one born out of due time.’ This reference by
Paul to ‘one born out of due time’ is strange. But this very
expression is evidence to experienced Initiates that Paul speaks with perfect
knowledge of Spiritual Science. He says that he is ‘born out of due
time.’ and from this we realise that his illumination is to be traced
back to a certain fact. I will just hint at the meaning. He means to explain
in these words that because he has been born out of due time he is less
entangled in material existence. He traces back his illumination to his
knowledge: the Christ lives and is here. He shows that he bases his
Christianity upon this super-sensible truth and that it is conviction
acquired as the result of direct perception.
The earliest form of Christianity as it spread abroad is based upon
super-sensible facts. We could show that what is contained in the John Gospel
is based upon super-sensible impressions which the writer of that Gospel
gives as his own experience, and realising that originally it was possible
for Christianity to win belief on the basis of super-sensible experiences of
men who were able to look into the spiritual worlds, we can no longer
imagine that it is right to apply to the Bible the same standard as we apply
to other external documents.
Anyone who examines the Gospels with the same methods as he employs in the
case of other documents, is confronted by something whose inner contents he
can never fathom. But a man who penetrates into the experiences of the
writers of the Gospels will be led into the spiritual world and to those
personalities who have built up their knowledge and their wisdom from out of
the spiritual world and have given them to us.
We should realise that those from whom the Gospels proceeded were Initiates,
awakened souls, taking into consideration as well that there may be
different stages of awakening. Just imagine that different people are
describing a landscape from a mountain; one stands at the bottom, another in
the middle and another at the summit. Each of these men will describe the
landscape differently, according to his point of view. This is how the
spiritual investigator looks at the four Gospels. The writers of the four
Gospels were Initiates of different degrees. It is understandable that there
may be external contradictions, just as there would be in the description of
a landscape from a mountain. The deepest of all is the Gospel of John. The
writer of the John Gospel was the most deeply initiated into the mysteries
of what took place in Palestine at the beginning of our era because he wrote
from the summit of the mountain.
Spiritual Science is able to elucidate the Gospels fully, and to prove that
the various contradictions in Genesis at the beginning of the Old Testament
disappear. Direct perception, then, of the spiritual worlds brings us again
to an understanding of the Bible which is a most wonderful document. A man
who engages in spiritual investigation will find that there are four
standpoints to be distinguished among men who approach the study of the
Bible. The first is the standpoint of the naive believer, who has faith in
the Bible as it stands and pays no attention to any other consideration; the
second is that of ‘clever’ people who stand neither on the ground
of historical research, nor of Bible analysis, nor of Natural Science. They
say: ‘We cannot recognise the Bible to be an uniform document.’
And when such men realise that Natural Science contradicts the Bible they
become ‘Free Thinkers,’ so-called ‘Free Spirits.’
They are in most cases honest, sincere seekers after truth. But then we come
to something that transcends the standpoint of the ‘clever’
people. Many Free Thinkers have held the point of view that the Bible is only
suitable for a childlike stage of human evolution, and cannot hold its own
against Science. But after a time it strikes them that much of what is given
in the Bible has a figurative sense; that it is a garment woven around
experiences. This is the third standpoint — that of the Symbolist. Here
a pure arbitrariness reigns, and the view that the Bible is to be understood
symbolically.
The fourth standpoint is that of Spiritual Science. Here there is no longer
ambiguity, but in a certain sense literal interpretation of what is said in
the Bible. We are brought back again to the Bible in order to understand it
in a real sense. An important task of Spiritual Science is to restore the
Bible to its real position. It will be a happy day when we hear in modern
words what really is to be found in the Bible, different, indeed, from all
that is said to-day.
We may pass from sentence to sentence and we shall see that the Bible
everywhere contains a message to Initiates from Initiates; awakened souls
speak to awakened souls. Spiritual investigation does not in any way
alienate us from the Bible. A man who approaches the Bible by spiritual
investigation experiences the fact that details become clear to him about
which he formally had doubts because he could not understand them. It
becomes evident that it was his fault when he was not able to understand.
Now, however, he understands what once escaped him, and he gradually works
through to a point of view where he says: ‘Now I understand certain
things and see their deep content: others, again appear to be incredible. But
just as formerly I did not understand what is now clear to me, so later I
shall discover that it has a deep import.’ And then such a man will
with gratitude accept what hashes up in him, leaving to the future what he
cannot yet explain.
The Bible in all its depth will be revealed only in the future, when
spiritual investigation, independently of any kind of tradition, penetrates
into the spiritual facts, and is able to show mankind what this document
really contains. Then it will no longer seem unintelligible, for we shall
feel united with what streamed into spiritual culture through those who
wrote it down. In our age it is possible for us, through Initiation, again
to investigate the spiritual world. Looking back to the past we feel
ourselves united with those who have gone before us, for we can show how
step by step they communicated what they had received in the spiritual
world. We can promise that the Bible will prove itself to be the most
profound document of humanity, the deepest source of our civilization.
Spiritual Science will be able to restore this knowledge. And, however much
bigoted people may say: ‘The Bible does not need such a complicated
explanation — it is the very simplicity that is right’ —
it will be realised some day that the Bible, even when it is not fully
understood works upon every heart by virtue of its intrinsic mysteries. It
will be realised too that not only is its simplicity within our grasp, but
that no wisdom is really adequate for a full understanding of it. The Bible
is a most profound document not only for simple folk, but also for the wisest
of the wise. Wisdom, therefore, investigated spiritually and independently,
will lead back to the Bible. And Spiritual Science, apart from everything
else that it has to bring to humanity, will be the means of accomplishing
a re-conquest of the Bible.
|