III
As a contribution to
studies connected with the Gospel of St. Matthew, something was said
in the last lecture about the mission of the ancient Hebrew people and
how Christ-Jesus sprang from this people. In studying the Gospels our aim
is to understand little by little how the different streams of spiritual
life converged, in order, eventually, in the great Christian stream,
to provide in common for the further evolution of the earth. All that
could be done in a brief study was to indicate in merest outline the
part played by the ancient Hebrew people in the general evolution of
mankind But it is not possible to understand the Gospel of St. Matthew
unless we at least give some consideration to certain other aspects
of this people.
For the sake of clarity,
let us once more remind ourselves of the soul-nature of the Hebrews,
upon which their whole mission was dependent. We have seen that their
mission differed from that of the other pre-Christian peoples. To the
latter, that which they had inherited of the ancient clairvoyance of
mankind was still an essential factor. Evidence of this clairvoyant
knowledge is to be found among all the peoples of antiquity. We may speak
of it as a ‘primeval wisdom.’ It can be described more exactly
in the following way. — In old Atlantis, vision of the spiritual
world was still the common heritage of men. Although the higher experiences
were accessible only to Initiates, every human being had, at the very
least, a definite conception of the spiritual world, because in certain
intermediary states of consciousness the men of that epoch were still
able to see into the spiritual realm. But this faculty had to be replaced
by one that to-day is uppermost in man, that of intellectual reasoning,
comprehension of the outer world by means of the physical senses; in
other words, experience of the outer physical world. This faculty developed
slowly, and by degrees, in the course of the pre-Christian era. A
considerable residue of the old clairvoyance still survived in the people
of ancient India. The teaching imparted by the Holy Rishis was a primeval
wisdom, inherited from the far past. So too, in the second Post-Atlantean
epoch of culture, what was known to the pupils and followers of Zarathustra
in ancient Persia was a legacy of this old clairvoyance. Chaldean
astronomy, and also the knowledge possessed by the ancient Egyptians,
were both permeated with the ancient wisdom. A science derived from the
faculties typical of later Post-Atlantean humanity would have been
entirely unintelligible to the Egyptians and the Chaldeans. No science,
expressing itself in the form of concepts and ideas of a physical nature,
existed in those days. There was no reflective thinking such as we know
it to-day.
It is by no means
unimportant to be clear in our minds about the difference between a
genuine seer of our own time and a seer, let us say, of ancient Chaldea
or ancient Egypt. There is a very marked difference. One who in the life
and conditions natural in our time unfolds genuine seership, must bring
to bear upon the revelations, inspirations and experiences coming to him
from the spiritual world, the logical reason he is able to acquire here
in the physical world, through the exercise of normal, earthly thinking The
experiences of a seer in modern times can never be completely intelligible
if they are not received by a soul thoroughly schooled in logical, reasoned
thinking. In the modern age these inspirations and revelations from
the spiritual world demand that logical thinking shall be brought to
bear upon them. A person who has such inspirations to-day, but lacks
the will to unfold logical thinking, to develop his earthly faculties
healthily and selflessly, can never achieve more than what is called
‘visionary clairvoyance’, which remains obscure and
incomprehensible, and is for this reason bound to be misleading. Only a
soul possessed of the resolute will to exercise reason can provide
the right conditions for inspirations from the spiritual world in the
modern age. That is why in a spiritual movement such as ours the greatest
possible importance must be attached to the fact that seership shall not
be developed, nor the revelations from the spiritual world proclaimed, in
an amateurish, unbalanced way. The aim for which we must work is that the
soul itself shall bring something to meet the inspirations and
revelations. The development of seership demands the effort and exertion
required in rational thinking. In our time the two cannot be
separated.
For an Egyptian or Chaldean
seer it was an entirely different matter. Together with the inspirations
— which arrived by quite another path — came the principles
of thinking; hence he needed no separate system of thinking. When he
had undergone spiritual training the principles of thinking were given
to him complete, along with the inspirations themselves. The organism
of modern man is no longer suited for this, it has grown out of it;
for humanity is always moving on.
Only by bearing this
difference clearly in mind can we fully understand what is implied by
saying that vestiges of the old clairvoyance still survived in
pre-Christian times, with the one exception of the ancient Hebrew people.
They were chosen from the first, in order to develop a human organism
possessing the faculty of comprehending the outer physical world according
to number, measure and weight, so that by this means they might gradually
rise from knowledge of the physical world to knowledge of the spiritual
reality comprised in the concept of Jahve or Jehovah. The all-essential
point here is that in Abraham there had been chosen a man possessing a
brain so constituted as to enable him to become the progenitor of a whole
people, who would inherit these qualities from him and transmit them
to their descendants. Spiritual promptings must be received, not merely
as arising from within man, but as a gift from without. All that was
derived from Abraham came, primarily, not from within, but as a revelation
from without. This is a factor of immense importance, radically
distinguishing the character of this people from that of the other
peoples of antiquity.
You can well imagine that
the old inherited faculties could not disappear all at once, but that
vestiges remained, even in this people. It was so in the case of Joseph
who in this respect still had much in common with the other peoples.
For this reason he could be the link between the ancient Hebrews and
the Egyptians, who were the latest to remain in the spiritual stream
of the pre-Christian peoples. The development of the new faculties was
bound to be only very gradual.
Why was a people prepared
in this definite way? Why had a people to be chosen for separation from
all the other forms of pre-Christian spiritual life, and why had they
to be endowed with faculties of a special kind? All this had to take
place to make it possible for mankind to be prepared for that great
point of time — already drawing near — when Christ-Jesus
was on earth. It was the point of time when all the old clairvoyance,
all the conditions determined and restricted by blood-relationship had
lost their significance and when something new entered into the life
of man, namely, the full activity of the Ego. Through the widespread
intermingling of blood, conditions which in earlier times had great
meaning and purpose, passed away, but in their place came the possibility
of the full activity of the human Ego. Thus the true kingdom of mankind
— the Kingdom of Heaven — was added to the other
kingdoms.
Now, speaking generally,
when anything is born, men are not immediately prone to recognise it as
what it really is. They certainly do not immediately recognise happenings
of the spiritual life. They are very ready to speak of prophets who
will come in the future — this was quite usual in the times both
preceding and following the birth of Christianity. In the 12th and 13th
centuries there was a veritable mania for prophecy. Here, there and
everywhere people came forward proclaiming the imminent return of Christ,
pointing to the places where He would appear. In other times, too, isolated
phenomena of the kind have occurred. There has been talk about one person
or another being the new incarnation of Christ. — No words need
be wasted on the subject of such prophecies because even when they are
made they bear evidence in themselves of their own defect. One defect
they all have: they speak of an event that is to come, but neglect so
to prepare men's hearts and minds that they are capable of recognising
and understanding it. The position of these people reminds one of the
incident of the teacher which Hebbel gives in his diary. — The
teacher gives a severe thrashing to a particular pupil because he cannot
understand Plato. Hebbel adds, jokingly, that the pupil was the
reincarnated Plato himself! This is the sort of thing that happens to
people who are constantly talking about a Christ who is to come again.
They would be little prepared for the reality, even were it to appear;
they would take the Christ for something altogether different from the
Christ.
Preparation for the Christ
had therefore to be made in advance. This must be realised, before it
is possible to understand the Gospel of St. Matthew. Preparation was
necessary in order that there might at least be a few human beings capable
of understanding the Christ Event, which — to characterise one
aspect only — consisted in knowing that Christ was the One Who
made it possible for men thenceforth to receive from without,
not physical impressions only, but also the Spirit. For this, individual
men had to be prepared.
In point of fact, right
through Hebrew history, some individuals were, by certain methods, prepared
to be able to understand the Christ Event. In the earliest times there
were only a few of these men, but they and their way of life must be
closely studied if we are to realise what careful preparations were
made for the coming of Christ, how the Hebrew people, with the qualities
they had inherited from Abraham, were rendered capable of a prophetic
understanding of how the human Ego would be brought to man through the
Saviour. Those men who were prepared so as to be able to recognise and
understand, by clairvoyance, the significance of the Christ,
were called Nazarenes.
[ Note 11]
These men were able to perceive
clairvoyantly all that had been prepared from the earliest days
of the Hebrews, in order that, out of and through this people, the
Christ might be born and understood. In a mode of life compatible
with the development of clairvoyant insight, these Nazarenes were bound
by strict and strenuous rules. These rules, since they belonged to quite
another age, differ considerably from those essential for the attainment
of spiritual knowledge to-day, although in some respects there is a
certain similarity. Much that was of primary importance in the Nazarene
training is subsidiary to-day, and much that was subsidiary then would
now be essential. Nobody should imagine that methods which in earlier
times led to clairvoyant knowledge of Christ would have the effect of
leading a man of the modern age to the same momentous recognition.
The first demand made
of a Nazarene was total abstention from all alcohol; indeed, the taking
of any food prepared with vinegar was most strictly forbidden. Those
who obeyed the prescribed rules to the letter were obliged to refrain
from consuming anything whatsoever derived from the grape. This was
because it was held that in the grape the plant-forming principle has
overstepped a certain point, namely the point where the sun-forces alone
are working on the plant. In the grape there are at work, not the
sun-forces alone, but something that develops inwardly and has already
matured by the time the sun-forces are weakening in the autumn. Hence
anything deriving from the grape might be drunk only by those who did not
aspire to the higher form of clairvoyance, but who worshipped the god
Dionysos and were content that their faculties should rise up as it were
out of the earth. Further, as long as his preparation and training lasted,
the Nazarene was committed never to touch or come into contact with
anything that has an astral body and can die; briefly, the Nazarene
must avoid anything of an animal nature. In the strictest sense of the
word he must be a vegetarian. Therefore in certain regions the strictest
Nazarenes fed only on the carob bean, the so-called ‘St. John’s
bread; this was a very common food among them. They also fed on the
honey of wild bees — not cultivated bees — and other
honey-seeking insects. John the Baptist, in later days, adopted this
way of life, feeding on the carob bean and wild honey. In the Gospels
it is said that his food was locusts and wild honey, but this must be
regarded as a mistranslation. — I have elsewhere called your
attention to other mistranslations of the same kind.
[ Note 12]
Another of the main
stipulations in the preparation for seership was that during the period of
their training the Nazarenes must not allow their hair to be cut. The
reason for this is intimately connected with the whole process of human
evolution. This relationship of hair to human evolution is a fundamental
fact. All in man that concerns his true being can be understood only if we
try to see it against its spiritual background. Strange as it may sound,
in our hair we have a relic of certain rays by which the sun-forces
were once instilled into man. What the sun in earlier times thus instilled
into man was something living. We find clear illustrations
of this in times when man still had consciousness of deeper realities.
For example, in many ancient sculptures of lions it is clearly evident
that the sculptuor's aim was not simply to copy a lion as we know it
to-day with its mane. A sculptor, still cognisant of the traditions
born of ancient knowledge, portrayed a lion in such a way as to convey
the impression that the hairs in the mane seem to be inserted into the
body as if from outside, like instreaming rays of the sun which have,
as it were, hardened into hairs. One can therefore well imagine that
in ancient time it might have been quite possible, by leaving the hair
uncut, to receive certain forces into one's being, especially if the
hair was young and healthy. — But even in the times of Hebrew
antiquity this was, in point of fact, regarded among the Nazarenes as
hardly more than a symbol.
The progress of mankind
however, did in fact depend to some measure upon his allowing the spiritual
reality behind the sun to stream into his being. The fact that as time
went on man was born as a less and less hairy being was symptomatic of
his advance from the old, upwelling gift of clairvoyance to reasoned
thought concerning the outer world. We must picture the men of the
Atlantean and earliest Post-Atlantean epochs with a copious growth of
hair — a sign that spiritual light was still shining down upon them
in great strength. As the Bible tells, the choice was made between the
smooth-skinned Jacob and the hairy Esau. In Esau we must see a descendant
of Abraham in whom the last residue of an ancient phase of human evolution
still survived, manifesting in his growth of hair. The man possessed of
faculties leading him outward into the world around, is represented in
Jacob, who was gifted with the qualities of cleverness with all its
darker sides. Esau is ousted by Jacob.
Thus in Esau another
offshoot of the main line of development is cast aside. From him sprang
the Edomites, in whom old, inherited faculties continued to be propagated.
— All these things are accurately and beautifully expressed in the
Bible.
But now there had to arise
in man a new consciousness of the spiritual life, and it had to arise,
in a new way, in the Nazarene, through keeping his hair uncut during the
time of his preparation. The relation of hair to the light of the spirit
in the ancient world is confirmed by the fact that with the exception
of an insignificant cipher, “light” and “hair”
are expressed in the ancient Hebrew language by the same word. The ancient
Hebrew tongue is full of indications of the deepest secrets of human
evolution and must be regarded as a momentous revelation of wisdom through
language. Such, then, was the purpose underlying the Nazarene custom
of allowing the hair to grow long. — To-day, of course, this is
no longer essential.
During the time of his
preparation the Nazarene had to be led to a very definite clairvoyant
experience which would reveal to him that the approach of Christ to
mankind was drawing near. The last great Nazarene lived at the time of
Christ. His name was John the Baptist. Not only had he himself experienced
the complete experience of the Nazarene training but he enabled all
those whom he aspired to bring to their true manhood, to experience
it likewise.
[ Note 13]
This complete experience is nothing
else than the Baptism of John. It is important to understand exactly
what its effect was upon their inner development. What was this Baptism,
and to what did it lead? In the first place a man was plunged under
water, the effect being that his etheric body in the region of his head
was loosened somewhat from the physical body, whereas normally the etheric
body is firmly knit with the physical body. It is well known that if
a man is on the point of drowning, the whole tableau of his life flashes
before him as a result of the loosening of his etheric body. This was
what happened in the Baptism given by John. A man beheld his life-tableau,
events of his life otherwise completely forgotton. Moreover the nature
and constitution of the human in that particular epoch was also revealed
to him. The physical body evolves out of the shaping and moulding which
it receives from the etheric body, but this member of man's being which
gives form to the physical body can be perceived only if it is loosened
from the physical body, as happened in the Baptism of John.
If a man had undergone
such a baptism three thousand years before our era, he would have become
conscious that the highest spiritual condition that can be bestowed
upon the human being can only come to him as a heritage from the ancient
past — for whatever was given to man out of the spiritual worlds
in very ancient times was essentially a heritage. This heritage of the
past was portrayed in the etheric body and acted as a formative force
upon the physical body. Even to those who had developed beyond the normal
stage, such a baptism would have revealed that all their knowledge was
founded upon ancient spirit-inspiration. This experience was described
as the vision of the soul-nature of the etheric body, in the form of
the Serpent. Those who had had this experience were called
Children of the Serpent,
because they had seen how the Luciferic beings
had descended into the being of man; how the etheric body which had
given the physical body its form and shape was itself a creation of
the Serpent.
Now, however, in a baptism,
not three thousand years before John the Baptist, but in his own day,
something quite different came to light. Among those who were baptised
there were some whose very nature gave evidence of the progress in human
evolution: namely, of the vastly increased power of the Ego, derived
from its experience of the outer visible world. Moreover the picture
arising for them was entirely different from that revealed at the earlier
baptisms. Men now beheld the creative forces of the etheric body, no
longer in the image of the Serpent, but in the image of the Lamb.
(See
Appendix III, p. 76)
This etheric body was no longer permeated from within by what issued from
the Luciferic forces, but was wholly surrendered to the spiritual world
which shines into the souls of men through the phenomena of the outer
world. In the Baptism of John this vision of the Lamb came to those
who were able to understand what at that time Baptism signified. Moreover
they knew from what they themselves experienced, that man had become an
altogether different, a quite new being. The few who experienced this at
the Baptism of John were able to say: A great and momentous event has come
to pass; man has become a different being; the Ego has now the rulership
on earth! — Among those whom John baptised there were some who had
been made ready to understand the signs of the times, to recognise that so
supreme an event had come to pass.
[ Note 14]
This had always been the
goal of the Nazarenes. Through the experience brought by this Baptism
they recognised that the coming of Christ was near at hand. This they
knew from the form in which the etheric body appeared before them, when
loosened in the baptism. It was the mission of John the Baptist to reveal
that now the time had come when the Ego could express itself fully in
man's nature; thereby he brought the ages of antiquity to their fulfilment.
He gathered around him a community to whom he was able to reveal that
now, through the emergence of the Ego in the real sense, the Christ
Principle could draw into mankind. John the Baptist brought the Nazarene
movement to such a height, that, out of his prophecy alone, it found
its fulfilment. He gathered around him a community able to understand
the approaching Christ Event. — Only in this light are the words
spoken by John the Baptist intelligible. Such words must be taken in
their deepest meaning. It is quite wrong that students of these matters
to-day should regard John the Baptist merely as a raging fanatic, a
man who storms at the Pharisees, calling them “a generation of
vipers”, and cries out to them: “Think not to say within
yourselves, We have Abraham to our father; for I say unto you, that
God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.”
().
— John the Baptist would have been no more
than a brawler, had he not rejoiced when Pharisees and Sadducees came
to him to be baptized. Nevertheless when they come, he inveighs against
them. Why is this?
When the inner meaning
of these things is understood it is at once obvious that the words are
not just outpourings of fanatical abuse, but have profound significance.
This, however, can only be understood by reflecting upon a certain feature
in the history of the ancient Hebrew people.
From what has been said
it will be clear to you that in Abraham there had been chosen a man
whose constitution was such that at the right time the Christ could be
born of his descendants. But this required the development and elaboration
of faculties which had been present in Abraham as rudiments only. We
must realise that if these rudiments were to be unfolded it was constantly
necessary for certain elements to be eliminated. We have already seen
how this happened in the case of Joseph, but there were even earlier
examples, such as Esau, from whom the Edomites descended, because in
him too an ancient heritage had remained. Only such qualities as were
compatible with the goal described were to be preserved. This is indicated
in a wonderful way. — Abraham had two sons: Isaac, the son of Sarah,
and Ishmael. The Hebrew nation were the descendants of Isaac. In Abraham,
however, there were other qualities as well. If these other qualities
had been transmitted through the Hebrew generations, the right conditions
would not have been achieved. Hence this different element must be
radically thrust away into another line of descendants, into the
descendants of Ishmael, the son of Hagar, the Egyptian bond-woman.
Therefore two lines of descent go out from Abraham, the one through Isaac,
and the other through the outcast Ishmael, who having the blood of an
Egyptian in his veins, must have in his constitution elements unfitting
for the mission of the Hebrew people.
But now something momentous
comes to pass! The task of the Hebrew people was to propagate in the
direct line of heredity the qualities that were intrinsically their
own, and everything that was an ancient heritage, ancient wisdom, had
to be imparted to them from without. Hence they had to go to
Egypt in order to receive what could be given to them there. Moses was
able to impart this to his people because he was an Egyptian initiate.
But he certainly could not have done so had he possessed wisdom merely
in its Egyptian form. It would be erroneous to imagine that the ancient
Egyptian wisdom could be simply grafted on to what flowed down from
Abraham. This would not have been compatible with the intrinsic character
of the Hebrew people and would have produced an abortive form of culture.
Moses brought with him to the wisdom he acquired from his Egyptian
initiation something of a quite different nature. Hence he could not
simply impart to the Israelites what came from the Egyptian initiation.
His first real gift to them was made after the revelation on Sinai, and
made outside Egypt.
What, then, is the
revelation on Sinai? What was vouchsafed to Moses there, and what was it
that he imparted to the Israelites? He imparted something that could well
be grafted into the stem of this people because it was related to them
in a very definite way. In times past the descendants of Ishmael had
wandered away from their country and had settled in the regions now
traversed by Moses and his people. Moses found in the Ishmaelites, among
whom there was Initiation of a certain kind, those attributes and qualities
which had been transmitted to them through Hagar, qualities which were
derived from Abraham, but in which were preserved many elements inherited
from the ancient past. Out of the revelations that he received from
this branch of the Hebrew people, it became possible for Moses to make
the revelation of Sinai intelligible to the Israelites. In regard to
this there is an ancient Hebrew legend that in Ishmael a shoot of Abraham
was cast out into Arabia, that is, into the desert. What sprang from
this stock is contained in the teaching of Moses. On Sinai, the ancient
Hebrew people received back again, in the Mosaic Law, what had been
cast out from their blood: they received it back from without.
Here we also see how in
the wonderful mission of the Hebrew people everything had to be given
to them; had to be received back at a later stage as a gift. As
a gift from without Abraham had, in Isaac, received the whole Hebrew
nation. Again, Moses and his people received back from the descendants
of Ishmael what had once been thrust out from their midst. During the
period of their isolation in the wilderness they had to build up their
own constitution, and also receive back as a gift from their God, what
they had cast out. So, too, Jacob was in the end reconciled with Esau,
thus receiving again what, in Esau, had been cast away. — The
Bible must be read with scrupulous attention if the import of the words
it contains is to be rightly understood.
The whole history of the
Hebrew people is full of significant happenings such as these. The
giving of the Law by Moses is connected with something that springs
from the descendants of Hagar, whereas the Hebrew blood, which
represents the specific Israelitish faculties, springs from Sarah. Hagar
or Agar in Hebrew is the same as Sinai, which means the
‘stone mountain’, the great stone. One might say that Moses
received the revelation of the Law from the ‘great stone’
— a material representation
of Hagar. The Law given to this Judaic people did not spring from the
highest faculties in Abraham, but from Hagar, from Sinai. Those, therefore,
who are followers merely of the Law as given on Sinai — that is,
the Pharisees and the Sadducees — are exposed to the danger of
their development coming to a standstill. They are those who at the
Baptism of John will see, not the Lamb, but the Serpent.
Viewed in this light,
what would otherwise seem to be mere abuse on the part of the Baptist
becomes a righteous warning to the Pharisees and Sadducees when he cries
out to them: ‘Ye who are followers of the Serpent, take heed that
in the baptism ye have the true vision’; — that is to say,
the vision of the Lamb, not of the Serpent! He also tells them that
they must not rely upon the fact that they have Abraham as their father.
For this came to their lips as a mere phrase; they were swearing by
what had proceeded from the Sinai stone, but had now ceased to have
significance. ‘Now’ — said the Baptist — ‘out
of the universe there is drawing near the newborn Ego, and this Ego
I make known to you. I declare to you how out of Judaism there will
spring the true inheritance which has been carried down the generations,
and to which men will swear allegiance, not now by the stone of Sinai,
but by that which is everywhere round about us. The children of God
will be made manifest, when, behind the material, the spiritual will
be visible. Out of these stones God's word is able to raise up children
unto Abraham. You speak without understanding when you say: “We
have Abraham as our father”.
Only in the light of what
has here been said is meaning imparted to these words of the Baptist.
Nor are such things disclosed by the Akasha Chronicle alone; they stand
in the Bible itself. Compare the words of the Apostle Paul in his Epistle
to the
().
What I have told you here is confirmed
by St. Paul. He too says that the word Hagar or Agar is identical with
Sinai and indicates that what was given on Sinai is a covenant which
must be outgrown by those who, through the development of the essential
qualities of Abraham in the successive generations, are now to realise
what has come into the world through Christ.
This again points to a
saying which must in future be understood. It is pitiful indeed that
in an age when intelligence has reached such heights, men have yet given
so little reflection to such words as: “Repent ye!”According
to the real meaning, the translation should be somewhat as follows:
‘Change the tenor of your minds!’ In many passages it is said
that John baptised unto repentance, that is to say, he baptized with
water in order that a change might take place in the tenor and attitude
of the soul. When those who had been baptized came out of the water,
it behoved them so to change the tenor of their souls that they no longer
looked back to the old traditions, but forward to what the freed Ego,
which Christ would give, should contain. The hearts and minds of men
were to be turned from the direction leading to the ancient gods into
the direction leading to the new divine-spiritual Beings. It was in
this sense that the Baptism of John was to bring about a change of heart
and soul. John baptized with water in order that there might be called
forth in some human beings the power to recognise the coming of the
Kingdom of Heaven, and with that recognition to understand who Christ-Jesus
is.
Herewith something more
has been added to what we have already come to know of the mission of
the ancient Hebrew people. All these things will lead step by step to
a better understanding of Christ. We have seen how the mission of the
Hebrews takes shape with most wonderful inner coherence. We have seen
how there were present in Abraham, faculties which developed in the
Hebrew people through successive generations. This required that many
elements should be discarded and that the suitable elements should develop
further in the blood, through propagation. That for which this people
from Abraham onwards were specially gifted and chosen, was concentrated
in one single Being, in Jesus. The Jews had to be maintained in their
mission by a teaching; but that teaching had to come from without, and,
in point of fact, from what they themselves had once cast out. The elements
derived from Ishmael might not remain in the blood, but must
be present purely in the domain of knowledge. This the Hebrew
people received back again in the giving of the Law by Moses on Sinai.
This Law had fulfilled its purpose at the point of time when what had
come from the “stone” was no longer needed, but when men
possessed what was to be bestowed upon mankind from the universe. Thus
slowly and gradually preparation was made for the time when out of the
stones, the sons of God — that is, the race of Man — could
arise, when, behind all ‘stones’, behind all the earth,
the spiritual world should be made manifest.
These are but fragmentary
contributions towards an understanding of the mission of the Hebrew
people. Only when we fully understand this mission can we begin to
comprehend the majestic figure of Christ-Jesus as presented to us in
the Gospel of St. Matthew.
|