II
LET US
now continue our inquiry on the lines already laid down, and
attempt to elucidate the nature of man by observing certain Polarities
governing the human organism. Yesterday we found ourselves obliged to
combine the weighing down forces found in the animal with certain
vertical forces to form a parallelogram, and to consider an analogous
phenomenon in the chemical reactions of the muscle. If these ideas are
followed up in the study of the bone and muscular system and are
supported by all the resources of practical experience, we might make
Osteology and Muscular Pathology of greater value for medicine than
has hitherto been the case. Special difficulties arise, however, if we
try to connect the knowledge of man with the needs of medicine today,
in our consideration of the heart. What in Osteology and Myology is
only a slight defect becomes an evident defect in Cardiology. For,
what is the common belief about the nature of the human heart? It is
regarded as a kind of Pump, to send the blood into the various organs.
There have been intricate mechanical analogies, in explanation of the
heart's action — analogies totally at variance with embryology, be it
noted! — but no one has begun to doubt the mechanical explanation, or
to test it, at least in orthodox scientific circles.
My outline of the subjects for consideration in the next few days will
afford piecemeal proof of my general point of view. The most important
fact about the heart is that its activity is not a cause but an
effect. You will understand this if you consider the polarity between
all the organic activities centering round nutrition, digestion,
absorption into the blood, and so on: follow, passing upwards through
the human frame, the process of digestion up to the interaction
between the blood that has absorbed the food, and the breathing that
receives air. An unbiased observation will show a certain contrast and
opposition between the process of respiration and the process of
digestion.
Something is seeking for equipoise; it is as though there were an urge
towards mutual saturation. Other words, of course, could be chosen for
description, but we shall understand each other more and more. There
is an interaction in the first place between the liquefied foodstuffs
and the air absorbed into the organism by breathing. This process is
intricate and worth attention. There is an interplay of forces, and
each force before reaching the point of interplay accumulates in the
heart. The heart originates as a “damming up” organ
(Stauorgan) between the lower activities of the organism, the intake
and working up of food, and the upper activities, the lowest of which is the
respiratory. A damming up organ is inserted and its action is
therefore a product of the interplay between the liquefied foodstuffs
and the air absorbed from the outside. All that can be observed in the
heart must be looked upon as an effect, not a cause, as a mechanical
effect, to begin with. The only hopeful investigations on these lines,
so far, have been those of Dr. Karl Schmidt, an Austrian medical man,
practising in North Styria, who published a contribution to the
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
(1892, No. 15), “The Heart Action and Curve
of the Pulse.” The content of this article is comparatively small, but
it proves that his medical practice had enlightened the author on the
fact that the heart in no way resembled the ordinary pump but rather
must be considered a dam-like organ. Schmidt compares cardiac action
to that of the hydraulic ram, set in motion by the currents. This is
the kernel of truth in his work. But we need not stop short at the
mechanical aspect if we consider the heart action as a result of these
symbolic inter-penetrating currents, the watery and the airy. For what
is the heart after all? It is a sense organ, and even if its sensory
function is not directly present in the consciousness, if its
processes are subconscious, nevertheless it serves to enable the
“upper” activities to feel and perceive the “lower.” As you perceive
external colours through your eyes, so do you perceive, dimly and
subconsciously through your heart, what goes on in the lower abdomen.
The heart is an organ for inner perception.
The polarity in man is only comprehensible if we know that his
structure is a dual one and that the upper portion perceives the
lower. The following too must be considered: the lower functions —
one pole of the whole human being — are considered through the study
of nutrition and digestion in the widest sense, up to their
interaction with respiration The interaction goes on in a rhythmic
activity; we shall have to consider the significance of our rhythmic
system later. But linked up with and belonging to the respiratory
activity there is the sensory and nervous activity, which includes all
that appertains to external perception and its continuation and its
being worked up in the nervous activity. Thus, respiration and sensory
and nervous activity form one pole of the human organism. Nutrition,
digestion, and metabolism in its usual sense, form the other pole of
our organisation. The heart is primarily that organ whose perceptible
motion expresses the equilibrium between the upper and lower
processes; in relation to the soul (or perhaps more accurately in the
sub-conscious) it is the perceptive organ that mediates between these
two poles of the total human organisation. Anatomy, physiology,
biology can all be studied in the light of this principle; and thus
light is thrown, and only thus, upon the human organisation. As long
as you do not differentiate between these two poles, superior and
inferior, and their mediator the heart, you will not be able to
understand man, for there is a fundamental difference between the two
groups of functional activity in man, according to whether they
pertain to the upper or the lower polarity.
The difference amounts to this: all the processes of the lower sphere
have their “negative” so to speak, their negative counter-image
in the upper. The important point, however, is that there is no material
connection between these upper and lower spheres, but a
correspondence. The correspondence must be correctly apprehended.
without search for or insistence on direct material connection.
Let us take a very simple example: the tickling irritation which
causes coughing, and the actual cough itself. In so far as they belong
to the upper sphere their complementary counterpart in the lower
sphere is diarrha. There is always a counterpart to every such
activity. And the key to the understanding of man consists in the
correct apprehension of these correspondences with several of which we
shall deal in the course of our study.
Furthermore, there is not only a theoretical correspondence, but, in
the healthy organism, an actual close contact between upper and lower
spheres. In a healthy organism this contact is so close, that any
upper function, whether it be associated with respiration or with the
nerves and senses, must somehow govern a function of the lower sphere
and proceed in harmony with it. This will provide us later on with the
key to the process of disease: there immediately arises an organic
irregularity, whenever there is a predominance of either the upper or
the lower function, which destroys its complementary equilibrium.
There must always be a certain proportion and correspondence between
these two sets of activities, so that they complete one another,
master one another, proceed harmoniously as they are mutually
orientated. For there is this definite orientation. It is individually
different in individual human beings, but nevertheless it governs and
relates the whole of the upper processes to the whole of the lower.
Now we must be able to find the bridge leading from the healthily
functioning organism, (in which the upper spheres correspond
harmoniously with the lower) to the diseased organism. In describing a
disease one may start from the indications in what Paracelsus called
the “Archaeus” and we call the “Etheric body” — or, if to avoid
offending people who do not like these terms, you can also say you
will speak in the first place of indications of disease in the
functional or dynamic, i.e. of the first signs of a morbid condition.
And if we speak of what is first indicated in the etheric body or in
the purely functional, one can also speak of a polarity, but a
polarity which bears within it a non-correspondence, an irregularity,
arising in the following manner.
Let us assume that within the lower sphere, that is to say, the
apparatus of nutrition and digestion in the widest sense, there is a
preponderance of the inner chemical or organic forces of the food
which has been eaten. In the healthy organism it is essential that all
the forces active and immanent in the foodstuffs themselves, which we
examine and test in our laboratory work on these foodstuffs, should be
overcome by the upper sphere, so that they do not in any way interfere
with the efficiency of the inner sphere of the organism and that all
activity from external chemistry and dynamics has been entirely
overcome. But the upper sphere may be inadequate to the task of
penetrating the lower, of thoroughly brewing, or I might say,
etherising it — which is more exact — all through. The result is the
transference into the human organism of a preponderant process which
is foreign to the organism, a process such as normally takes place
outside the human body and should not operate within that body. As the
physical body does not at once bear the brunt of these irregularities,
the first symptoms appear on the functional side, in the etheric body
(Archaeus). If we wish to find a current term to designate certain
aspects of this irregular function, we must call it Hysteria. We shall
use the term Hysteria for the too great autonomy of the processes of
Metabolism; and we shall learn later on that the name is not
inappropriate.
Specific manifestations of hysteria in its narrower sense are nothing
but this irregular metabolism raised to its culmination. In essence,
the hysterical process, even in it's sexual symptoms, consists of
metabolic irregularities, which are external processes having no
rightful place in the human body. That is, they are processes which
the upper sphere has been too weak to master and control.
This is one pole of disease. If such morbid manifestations as are
hysterical in character appear, we have to deal with an excess of an
activity that belongs to the external world, but is operating in the
lower sphere of the human organism.
But the same irregularity of reciprocal action can also arise if the
upper process does not take place in the proper way and occurs in such
a way as to overstrain the upper organisation. This is the opposite,
and in some sense, the negative of the lower processes. It is not that
the upper processes are over-stimulated; they cease, as it were,
before the mediating action of the heart transmits them to the lower
sphere. This type of irregularity is too strong spiritually, too
organically-intellectual, if I may use such a term, and shows itself
as Neurasthenia. This is the other pole. We must keep these two
irregularities of the human organism clearly before us — they remain
still in the realm of mere functions, they are two defects, expressed
respectively in the upper and the lower sphere. And we shall gradually
have to learn that the human polarity tends towards either the one or
the other deficiency.
Neurasthenia is a functional excess of the upper sphere. The organs of
that sphere are too much occupied, so that processes which should be
transferred and conducted downwards through the heart, take place in
the upper sphere and do not pass into the lower organic currents
(harmoniously mediated by the damming up in the heart). You will
observe that it is much more important to become aware, so to speak,
of the specific physiognomy of the disease than to study by
post-mortems the organs which have become defective. For post-mortems
reveal only the results and symptoms. The essential thing is to form a
comprehensive picture of the whole morbid condition; to visualise its
physiognomy. This physiognomy will always reveal a tendency in one or
the other direction towards the Neurasthenic or the Hysterical Type.
But of course, we must use these terms in a wider sense than that
usually accepted. If one has acquired an adequate picture of the
interaction of the upper and lower spheres, one will gradually learn
that irregularity manifesting functionally only in its initial stages
— and therefore, as we should say in the etheric sphere — becomes
denser in its forces and takes hold of the physical organism. Thus,
what was at first merely a tendency to hysteria, may take physical
form in various abdominal diseases. And conversely, neurasthenia may
develop into diseases of the throat or head.
The study of this imprint of what were originally only functional
irregularities of neurasthenia and hysteria, will be of the utmost
significance for the medicine of the future. If hysteria has become
organic, there will be disturbances of the whole digestive process and
all the other processes of the abdominal sphere. Such processes have
their repercussions on the whole organism; we must be careful to bear
these repercussions and reactions in mind.
Now let us suppose that a manifestation which would be undoubtedly
hysterical, if it were manifested functionally, does not come to
expression at all as a disturbance of function. It does not appear in
the functional sphere, the etheric body imprints it immediately into
the physical body. It is there, but it is not evident in any definite
disease of the lower organs. We may say indeed that the organs bear
the signature of hysteria. It has been driven into the physical
organism, and therefore does not manifest by hysterical symptoms on
the psychological plane; and it is not yet sufficiently pronounced to
become an appreciable physical affliction. But it is strong enough to
work within the whole organism. Thus we have this peculiar condition:
something on the borderland, so to speak, between sickness and health
influences the upper organic sphere from the lower. It reacts on the
upper sphere and in some sense infects it, appearing in its own
negative. This phenomenon, in which so to speak, the first physical
effects of hysteria affect those regions which are subject to
neurasthenia in their own typical irregularities, gives a tendency to
Tuberculosis. This is an interesting connection. The tuberculous
tendency is a repercussion of the abnormal action of the lower body
sphere on the upper, as has just been outlined. The whole of this
remarkable interaction is set in motion by an uncompleted process
which reacts on the upper sphere, and produces a tendency to
tuberculosis. And it is necessary to recognise this primary tendency
of the human organism before any rational antidote to tuberculosis can
be discovered. For the invasion of the human body by pathogenic
bacteria is only a result of primary tendencies such as I have
described.
This does not contradict the fact that tuberculosis is infectious
under certain conditions. Of course these conditions are a necessary
prerequisite. But unfortunately this predominance of the activity of
the lower organic sphere is alarmingly prevalent in present-day
humanity, and this implies a disastrously frequent predisposition to
tuberculosis.
The concept of infection, however, is none the less valid here. For
any highly tuberculous individual affects his fellow beings: and if
any person is exposed to the sphere in which the tuberculous patient
lives, then it may happen that the effect turns again into a cause. I
have often tried to illustrate the relationship between primary causes
of a disease and infection in the following analogy. Suppose that I
meet a friend of mine, whose relations with other people do not in
general touch me. He is sad and has reason to be so, for he has lost
one of his friends by death. I have no direct relationship with this
friend who has died, but I become sad with him at his sad news. His
sadness is, so to speak, first hand and direct; mine arises
indirectly, communicated through him. Nevertheless, the fact remains
that the mutual relationship between me and my friend provides the
pre-condition for this “infection.”
Thus both concepts — of primary origin and of infection — are
justified, and are so especially in the case of tuberculosis. But they
should be applied in a rational manner. Institutions for the treatment
of tuberculous persons are often breeding grounds for tuberculosis. If
tuberculous persons are to be collected and crowded together in
special institutions, then these institutions should be dissolved and
replaced by others as often as possible. There should, in fact, be a
time limit for their dispersion and removal. For this disease has the
peculiarity that its victims are extremely liable to secondary
infections. A case which may be by no means hopeless, becomes serious
if it is surrounded by severe cases of tuberculosis. For the present,
however, I am referring to the specific nature of tuberculosis. And it
offers a striking example of the interaction of various processes in
the human organism. As you will observe, such processes are dominated
by the polarity of the upper and lower spheres, which correspond to
one another as positive and negative images. The particularly striking
phenomena which lead to tuberculosis following the special organic
constitution which I have indicated, may be followed up; and they
reveal in their future development a general concept of the true
nature of disease. Let us take the most frequent symptoms of an
individual who is an incipient tuberculous case. Tuberculosis is in
his future, and his present state prepares for it. We find perhaps
that he coughs, feels pain in the throat and chest, and perhaps also
in his limbs; there will be certain states of exhaustion and fatigue;
and there will be profuse sweating at night.
If we take all these symptoms together what do they mean? They are,
first of all, the effect of those internal irregular interactions to
which I have referred. And at the same time, they represent the
resistance offered by the organism, its struggles against the deeper
foundation of the disease. Let us take the simpler manifestations
first. It is certainly not always and under all circumstances
beneficial to attempt to stop a cough. It may even sometimes be
necessary to stimulate coughing by artificial means. If the lower
organic sphere cannot be controlled by the upper, the healthy reaction
manifests as the irritation leading to coughing, in order to prevent
the invasion of certain things which are undesirable. To suppress
coughing as an invariable rule, may be deleterious, for the body will
then absorb injurious substances. Coughing is the attempt to get rid
of such substances, which cannot be tolerated under the prevailing
conditions. Thus the tickling irritation which provokes coughing is a
danger signal of something which is wrong in the organism, so that the
need arises to repel the invaders, which could otherwise easily effect
an entry.
What of the other symptoms, enumerated above? They too are forms of
organic defence, ways of doing battle with the dangers which approach
as the tubercular tendency. The pains in the throat and limbs simply
proclaim the obstruction of those processes in the lower sphere, which
are not adequately controlled by the upper. If the tubercular tendency
is perceived in good time, it may be beneficial to support the
resistant organism by moderate stimulation of the coughing, by
stimulating the resultant phenomena — as will be indicated in the
subsequent lectures — by appropriate diet, and even by stimulating
the typical fatigue. Again, if there is marked emaciation, this too is
only a form of organic defence. For if this emaciation does not take
place, the process which develops is perhaps that activity of the
lower sphere which the upper cannot control. The organism dwindles and
loses weight, in order to defend itself by getting rid of those
elements which cannot be controlled by the upper sphere.
Thus it becomes exceedingly important to study symptoms and cases in
detail, but not in order immediately to prescribe a corpulency
treatment for any one suffering from emaciation. For this emaciation
may be highly beneficial, in relation to the actual organic conditions
at the time.
An especially instructive characteristic of the incipient tuberculous
subject, is the heavy loss of perspiration at night. This is a form of
organic activity taking place during sleep, which should really take
place during working hours, during full physico-spiritual awakeness.
But it does not do so, and is obliged to find expression during sleep.
This is both a symptom and a method of defence. When the organism is
relieved from spiritual occupation, it has recourse to the form of
activity manifest in “night sweats.”
To evaluate this fact properly, we must know something of the close
connection between all the excretory processes and those activities
which include soul and spirit. The constructive processes, the vital
processes proper, are the foundation of the mere unconscious.
Corresponding to the conscious soul and organic functions of our waking
hours, are always processes of excretion. Even our thinking does not
correspond to constructive cerebral processes, but to processes of
excretion, i.e. destruction. And night sweats are an excretory
phenomenon which should be concurrent with a spirit and soul activity
in normal life. But as the upper and lower spheres are not in correct
interaction with one another, the excretory process accumulates and
then takes place at night, when the organism is relieved from spirit
and soul activity.
Thus you will see that a careful study of all the processes connected
with growth and development in the healthy and the diseased human
organism leads to the conclusion that there is an interaction between
the phenomena of disease. Emaciation is one phenomenon. But in its
relation to the tubercular tendency, it is part of the disease. Indeed
I would say that the phenomena of disease are organically linked up.
They constitute an ideal organisation. One such phenomenon belongs in
a sense to another. Therefore it is entirely reasonable to come to
the help of an organism — keeping to the example of incipient
tuberculosis — which has not the strength to react adequately and to
provoke from outside the necessary reaction, viz. that one form of
disease is made to follow on another. The doctors of old enunciated
this truth as a significant educational rule of medicine. They said:
The danger of being a physician is that he must not only be able to
cure sicknesses but must also provoke them. And in the same measure in
which the physician is able to heal diseases he can also provoke them.
The ancient world was more aware of these subtle inter-relationships
(through the atavistic power of clairvoyance) and they beheld in the
physician a double power, who could smite with sickness, if he were of
evil will, as well as cure. This aspect of medicine is associated with
the need to provoke certain states of disease, in order to put them
into a certain relation to others. Such conditions as coughing, pains
in the throat and chest, emaciation, persistent fatigue, profuse
nocturnal perspiration, all are symptoms of disease, yet they must
sometimes be provoked, even though they are diseased.
This will naturally lead to the duty not to abandon the sick person
when only half-healed, i.e. when the necessary phenomena have been
provoked for then the second stage of the healing process begins. We
must not only see to it that the appropriate counter-reactions have
taken place, but that these reactions are now cured and the whole
organism restored to its proper way of functioning. Thus in tubercular
cases, having stimulated coughing and pains in the throat, for
example, we must then pay heed to the processes of elimination; for
there will then be always a tendency to constipation and stasis. It
will be necessary to quicken the digestive function into a function of
evacuation, even to the extent of stimulating diarrha. It is always
necessary to stimulate diarrhtic action, following the provoked
coughing, pains in the throat and similar symptoms. For we must not
consider or treat manifestations of the upper sphere, as though
confined to that sphere alone. We must often seek a cure through the
processes of the lower sphere, even where there is no direct material
connection but merely a correspondence.
These correspondences deserve the most careful consideration. Let us
take as an example the typical fatigue and exhaustion. I should prefer
not to regard this fatigue as purely subjective, but as organically
determined, as emerging always when the metabolic processes are not
fully controlled by the upper sphere. Now if these conditions of
fatigue have to be stimulated in the treatment of tuberculosis, they
must be subsequently countered, at the appropriate moment, by means of
a diet which activates the digestion. (We shall deal later with the
special requisites of such a diet). Thus the person in question will
digest his food better and more easily than usual.
Emaciation, similarly, should receive a dietary treatment, leading to
a degree of fat formation which cushions the organs and their tissues.
And the subsequent treatment of night sweating, after powerful
stimulation, must be through the suggestion of activities in which
there are spiritual efforts to be made; the patient makes efforts
bound up with thoughts, which make him sweat until a normal
perspiration is gradually regained.
It is obvious that if we first realise the correspondence between the
upper and lower sphere in man, by a correct understanding of the
cardiac function, then we can understand the first fore-shadowing of
the disease on the functional plane in the etheric body, as we have
done in the case of Neurasthenia and Hysteria. Then we can pass on to
an understanding of its imprints on the organic and physical
structure, and finally to the physiognomy of the disease as a whole.
This comprehensive image will enable us to stimulate the course of
sickness in the direction of a more or less secondary disease, in
order, when the time has come, to lead the whole process back to
health.
Of course the worst obstacles to these therapeutic methods are
external and social conditions; therefore medicine is to a large
extent a social problem. On the other hand, the patients themselves
offer grave difficulties, for they expect their doctors to “get rid of
something”, as they often express themselves. But if we simply “get
rid of” some existent condition, it may well be that we make their
state worse than before. This must be taken into account; often one
does make them worse than before, but they must then wait till the
opportunity arises to restore them to health once more. Before that
can happen, however, as many of you can testify, they have only too
often fled and ceased treatment!
So the proper study of both the sick and the sound human being
convinces us that the physician must have a hand in the
after-treatment if the whole treatment is to be of real value. And you
must direct your efforts publicly to this goal. We live in a time of
belief in authority and it should not be difficult to initiate such
public efforts and emphasise their necessity. I must, however, beg
your permission to observe that neither the individual patients of the
medical profession find it inopportune to follow up all the ultimate
ramifications of disease, and are more or less satisfied if they have
“got rid of” something.
You will observe that this correct perception of the role of the heart
in the human organism is able to lead us gradually into the essence of
the state of disease. It is, however, vital to note the radical
difference between the activities of the lower organic sphere, which
have to some degree overcome external chemical processes (but are yet
at the same time somewhat like the upper activities) — and the upper
activities which are opposed and polar to them.
It is extraordinarily difficulty to define this organic dualism
adequately, for our language has hardly any terms to indicate
processes contrary to the physical and the organic. But perhaps you
will understand clearly — and I shall not hesitate to come up against
possible prejudices amongst you — if I try to elucidate this dualism
with the following analogy. We shall deal in detail with the subject
later on.
Let us think of the qualities proper to any sort of material
substance, that is, the qualities essential to its working when
absorbed into the lower sphere of the organism, e.g. through the
digestion. But if I may use the expression — we can homeopathise, we
can dilute the aggregate states of the substances in question. This is
what happens if one dilutes in the way of homeopathic doses. Here
something occurs which does not receive due attention in the Natural
Science of today, for mankind has a strong tendency to abstractions.
They say, for example, that from a source of light — for example, the
sun — the light radiates in all directions, and finally disappears
into infinity. But this is not true. No such form of activity vanishes
into infinite space, but it extends within a certain limited orb and
then rebounds elastically, returning to its source, although the
quality of this return is often different from its centrifugal
quality.
(See
Diagram 5).
In Nature there are only rhythmical
processes, there are none which continue into infinity. They revert
rhythmically upon themselves. That is not only the case in
quantitative dispersion, but also in qualitative. If you subdivide any
substance, it has at first certain distinctive qualities. These
qualities do not decrease and diminish ad infinitum; at a certain
point, they are reversed and become their opposites. And this
intrinsic rhythm is also the foundation of the contrast between the
upper and lower organisation. Our upper organisation works in a
homeopathic way. In a certain sense it is diametrically opposed to the
process of ordinary digestion, its opposite and negative. Therefore we
might say that when the homeopathic chemist manufactures his minute
dilutions, he thereby transfers the qualities which are otherwise
linked with the lower organic sphere, into those which belong to the
upper sphere. This is a most significant inner relationship and we
shall discuss it in the ensuing lectures.
|