Lecture VI
22nd March 1923.
To begin with today we will remind
ourselves of the indications I have given you concerning the
real nature of human thinking. In the present age, since the
well-known point of time in the 15th century, our thinking
has become essentially abstract, devoid of pictures and
imagery. People take pride in this kind of thinking which as
we know, did not begin to be general until the
above-mentioned epoch; previously to that, thinking had been
pictorial and was therefore a living thinking in the real
sense.
Let us remind
ourselves of the essential character of thinking as it is
today. The living essence of thinking was within us during
the period between death and rebirth, before we descended
from the spiritual into the physical world. This living
essence was then cast off and today, as men of the Fifth
postAtlantean epoch, our thinking is the corpse of that
living thinking between death and a new birth. It is just
because our thinking now is devoid of life that our
ordinary-level consciousness as modern men makes it so easy
for us to be satisfied with comprehending the lifeless and we
have no aptitude for understanding the living nature of the
world around us.
True, we have
thereby acquired our freedom, our self dependence as human
beings but we have also shut ourselves off entirely from what
is involved in a perpetual process of ‘becoming’.
We observe the things around us in which no such process is
operating, which are incapable of germination and have a
present existence only. It may be objected that man observes
the germinating force in plants and animals, but actually he
is deceiving himself. He observes this germinating force only
in so far as it is the bearer of dead substances; moreover he
observes the germinating force itself as something that is
dead.
The essential
characteristic of this kind of perception is indicated by the
following: In earlier epochs of evolution men perceived an
active germinal force everywhere in their environment,
whereas nowadays they have eyes only for what is dead; they
hope somehow to grasp the nature of life too, merely by
observing what is dead. Hence they do not grasp it at
all!
Therewith,
however, man has entered into a quite remarkable epoch of his
evolution. Nowadays, when he observes the sense world,
thoughts are no longer given to him in the way that applies
to sounds and colours. From what I say in the book
Riddles of Philosophy,
you know that thoughts were
given to the Greeks just as sounds and colours present
themselves to us today. We say that a rose is red ; the Greek
perceived not only the redness of a rose but also the thought
of the rose, that is to say, he perceived something
spiritual. And this perception of the purely spiritual has
gradually died away with the rise of the abstract, lifeless
thinking that is only a corpse of what thinking was in us
before our earthly life.
But now the
question arises: If we want to understand Nature, if we want
to form a world-conception for ourselves, how are the
sense-world outside us and the dead thinking within us to be
related to each other? We must be quite clear that when man
confronts the world today, he confronts it with lifeless
thinking. But then, is there death also outside in the world?
There ought at least to be an inkling today that there is
not. In the colours, in the sounds, at the very least, life
seems to proclaim its presence everywhere! To one who
understands the real nature of the senses the remarkable fact
becomes clear that although modern man invariably directs his
attention to the sense-world alone, he cannot grasp this
sense-world by means of thinking, because dead thoughts are
simply not applicable to the living sense-world.
Make this quite
clear to yourselves. — Man confronts the sense-world
today and believes that he should not allow himself to look
beyond it. But what does this mean for modern man — not
to be willing to look beyond the sense-world? It actually
means renouncing all vision and all knowledge. For neither
colour, nor sound, nor warmth, can be grasped at all by dead
thinking. Man thinks, then, in an element quite other than
that in which he actually lives.
Hence it is a
remarkable fact that although we enter the earthly world at
birth, our thinking is the corpse of what it was before our
earthly existence. And today man wants to bring the two
together ; he wants to apply the residue from his pre-earthly
existence to his earthly existence.
And it is this
fact which since the 15th century has constantly asserted
itself in the sphere of thinking and knowledge in the form of
doubt of every kind. This is the cause of the great confusion
prevailing at the present time; it is this that has allowed
scepticism and doubt to creep into every possible mode of
thinking; it is this that is responsible for the fact that
men today no longer have the remotest concept of what
knowledge really is. There is indeed nothing more
unsatisfactory than to examine theories of knowledge in their
modern form. Most scientists abstain from this and leave it
to the philosophers. And in this field one can have
remarkable experiences.
In Berlin, in
the year 1889, I was once visiting the philosopher Eduard
von Hartmann, now long since dead. We spoke about
questions connected with theories of knowledge. In the course
of conversation he said that one should not allow questions
connected with theories of knowledge to be printed; they
should at most be duplicated by some machine or in some other
way, for in the whole of Germany there were at most sixty
individuals capable of occupying themselves usefully with
such questions.
Just think of
it — one in every million! Naturally, among a million
human beings there is more than one scientist or, at least,
more than one highly educated individual. But as regards real
insight into questions connected with theories of knowledge,
Eduard von Hartmann was probably right; for apart from the
handbooks which candidates at the Universities have to skim
through for certain examinations, not many readers will be
found for works on the theory of knowledge, if written in the
modern style and based on the modern way of thinking.
And so things
jog along in the same old grooves. People study anatomy,
physiology, biology, history and the rest, unconcerned as to
whether these sciences bring them knowledge of reality; they
go on at the same jog-trot. But a time will come when men
will have to be clear about the fundamental fact that because
their thinking is abstract it is full of light and therefore
embraces something in the highest sense super-earthly,
whereas in their life on Earth they have around them only
what is earthly. The two sets of facts simply do not
harmonize.
You may ask:
did the thought-pictures current in days of old accord more
fully with man's nature when his thinking was full of life?
The answer is, Yes — and I will indicate the reason to
you.
The human being
of today is engrossed from his birth to his seventh year in
developing his physical body; then comes the point where he
is able to develop his etheric body as well — this
takes place from the seventh to the fourteenth year. Then
from the fourteenth to the twenty-first year he develops his
astral body; until his twenty-eighth year the sentient soul;
until his thirty-fifth year the intellectual or mind-soul;
and after that the consciousness-soul. It can then no longer
be said that he develops but that he himself is
being developed, for the Spirit Self which will evolve only
in future ages, already participates to some extent in his
development from his forty-second year onwards. And so the
process continues.
Now the period
from the twenty-eighth to the thirty-fifth year in human life
is extremely important. Conditions during this period have
altered essentially since the 15th century. Until then,
influences had continued to come to man from the surrounding
cosmic ether. Because this is no longer the case today, it is
difficult to imagine how man could have been influenced by
the surrounding ether. Nevertheless it was so. Between their
twenty-eighth and thirty-fifth years, human beings
experienced a kind of inner revival. It was as though
something within them was given new life. These experiences
were connected with the fact that in his twenty-eighth year a
man was raised to the degree of ‘Master’ in his
trade; it was not until that age that he experienced a
revival — of course not in a crude but in a delicate
form. He was given a new impulse. This was because the
all-encompassing ether-world worked upon him — the
ether-world which, as well as the physical world, is all
around us.
In the first
seven years of life the ether-world worked through the
processes operating in the physical body of the human being
but it did not work directly upon him until his
twenty-eighth year when the period of the development of the
sentient soul was over. But then, when he entered into the
period of the intellectual or mind-soul at that time, the
ether worked upon him with a vivifying effect.
This no longer
takes place and man would never have achieved independence
today as an individual and a personality, had the process
continued. This also has to do with the fact that the whole
inner disposition of the human soul has changed since those
days.
You must now
accept a concept that may be extremely difficult for modern
thinking to grasp but is nevertheless very important.
In physical
life it is quite clear to us that what is going to take place
only in the future, is not yet here. In etheric life,
however, this is not so. In etheric life, time is, as it
were, a kind of space and what will some day be present
already has an effect upon what precedes it, as well as upon
what will follow. But this should not be a matter for wonder;
it is the same in the physical world too.
If we really
understand Goethe's theory of Metamorphosis, we shall say to
ourselves that the blossom of the plant is already working in
the root. And that is indeed so. It is the case too with
everything in the ether-world: the future is already working
in what has gone before. Thus the fact that man was open to
the influences of the ether-world had an effect upon the
preceding life back to his birth, chiefly upon his world of
thoughts. As a result his world of thoughts was different
from the one that is his in the epoch in which we are living
today, when the doorway between the twenty-eighth and
thirty-fifth years is no longer open, when it is closed.
There was a time when men's thoughts were truly alive. They
made him unfree but at the same time they gave him a feeling
of being connected with his whole environment; he felt
himself to be a living member of the world.
Today man feels
that he exists only in a dead world. This feeling is
inevitable because if the living world were working upon him,
it would make him unfree. Only because the dead world
requires nothing of us, can determine nothing in us, can give
rise to nothing in us — only because it is a dead world
that is working in upon us are we free men.
But an the
other side we must also understand clearly that precisely
because of what man has within him now in complete freedom,
precisely through his thoughts, which are dead, he can
acquire no understanding of the life round about him; he can
understand the death around him — and only that.
Now if there
were to be no change in the attitude and mood of man's soul,
the discordance in culture and civilization which is becoming
more and more apparent, would inevitably increase and the
inner assurance and resoluteness of the soul would
progressively diminish. This would be even more apparent if
men were to pay real attention to the knowledge they glean
today from what is said to be irrefutable. But they still do
not pay attention. They still content themselves with
traditional religious ideas which they no longer understand
but which have been propagated. Even in the sciences people
content themselves with these ideas. When a man pursues any
particular science he generally has no idea, when he begins
really to grasp it, that he is still clinging to the old
traditions, while the modern ideas which are only dead,
abstract thoughts, do not even approach the sphere of the
living.
In earlier
times, because the ether worked in him, man could also come
in touch with the living nature of the sense-world. When he
still believed in the reality of the spiritual world, he
could also grasp the essential nature of the world of the
senses. Today, when he believes only in the world of the
senses, the strange thing is that his thoughts, although
dead, are now spiritual in the very highest degree! Here
there is dead spirit. But man is not conscious of the fact
that today he Looks into the world with the heritage of what
was his before his earthly life. If his thoughts were still
living, vivified by the surrounding ether, he could look into
the living world of his environment. As, however, nothing
comes to him from his environment and he has to rely only on
what he has inherited from a spiritual world, he can no
longer understand the physical world around him.
This is
apparently paradoxical but for all that an extraordinarily
important fact. It provides the answer to the question: Why
are modern men materialists? They are materialists because
they are too spiritual! They would be able to understand
matter everywhere if they could comprehend the life that is
present in all matter. But because they confront the life
with their dead thinking, men make this life itself into
something that is dead and see lifeless substance everywhere.
It is because they are too spiritual, because they have
within them only what was theirs before their birth, that
they become materialists. A man does not become a materialist
through knowledge of substance — in point of fact he
has no real knowledge — but he becomes a materialist
because he does not live on the Earth in the real sense.
And if you ask
why hardened materialists, such as Büchner,
Vogt and the rest, have become such out-and-out
materialists, the answer is: because they were too spiritual,
because they had nothing within them that connected them with
earthly life, but only what they had experienced before their
life on Earth — and this was dead. This remarkable
phenomenon in human civilization, this materialism, is in
truth a profound mystery.
Now in the
present epoch, because his thoughts are no longer imbued with
life from without, from the ether, man can transcend his dead
thoughts only by instilling life into them himself. And the
only possibility of doing this is by instilling life as
conceived in Anthroposophy into his world of thoughts, by
imbuing his thoughts with life and then penetrating into the
life inherent in the world of the senses. He must therefore
vivify himself inwardly. He must himself impart life to dead
thoughts through inner activity of soul, and then he will
overcome materialism. He will begin to judge everything
around him differently. And from this very platform you have
heard a great deal about the many possibilities of such
judgments.
Let us focus
our attention today on a particular subject: the
plant-kingdom in our environment. We know that many plants
are consumed as foodstuffs by animals and human beings and
are worked upon in the processes of nourishment and
digestion. In the way generally indicated they can be
assimilated into the animal and human organisms. And now we
suddenly come across a poisonous plant, let us say henbane or
belladonna. What have we there? Suddenly, among the other
vegetation, we find something that does not combine with the
animal and human organisms as do other plants.
Let us be clear
in our minds about the basis of plant-life. I have often
spoken about this. Let us picture the surface of the Earth
and the plants growing out of it. We know that the physical
organization of the plant is permeated by its ether body. But
as I have often pointed out, the plant would not be able to
unfold if the all-pervading astrality did not contact it from
above by way of the blossom (lilac).
The plant has
no astral body within it but the astrality touches
it from above. As a rule the plant does not absorb the
astrality but only allows itself to be touched by it. The
plant does not assimilate the astrality but towards the
blossom and the fruit there is interplay with the astrality
which does not, as a rule, combine with the ether-body or
physical body of the plant.
In a poisonous
plant, however, it is different. In a poisonous plant the
astrality penetrates into the actual substance of the plant
and combines with it. A plant such as belladonna or, let us
say, henbane, hyoscyamus, sucks in the astrality either
strongly or more moderately and so bears astrality within
itself — in an uncoordinated state, of course, for if
it were coordinated the plant would have to become an animal.
It does not become an animal; the astrality within it is in a
compressed state.
As a result,
interaction takes place between what is present in a plant
saturated with astrality and the processes of assimilation in
the animal and human organisms. If we eat plants that are not
poisonous, we absorb not only those constituents of the plant
which the chemist works up in the laboratory, not only the
actual substance of the plant but also the etheric life
forces ; but we must, as I have said here before, destroy the
substance completely during the process of nutrition. In
feeding on what is living, man must kill it within himself.
That is to say, within his own organism he must expel the
etheric from the plant-substance.
In the lower
man, in the metabolic system, the following remarkable
process takes place. When we eat plants, that is to say,
vegetable substance — the same also applies to cooked
foodstuffs but it is specially marked when we eat raw pears,
or raw apples, or raw berries — we force out the
etheric and absorb into our own ether-body the dynamic
structure which underlies the plant. The plant has a definite
form, a definite structure. It is revealed to clairvoyant
consciousness that the structure we thus take into ourselves
is not always identical with the form we see externally. It
is something different. The plant-structure rises up within
us and adapts itself to the organism in a remarkable way.
And now
something very strange occurs. Just suppose — I must
speak rather paradoxically here but it is exactly how things
are — suppose you have eaten some cabbage. A definite
form (blue in diagram) becomes visible in the lower man as a
result, and activity is generated there.
To the extent to which this activity is
generated in the lower man through the eating of cabbage, the
actual negative of the process makes its appearance in the
upper man, the head-man. So having sketched the form which
appears in the lower part of the organism, I now sketch in
the upper man a hollow form (blue, red).
It is actually the case that the eating of
the cabbage produces in us a definite form or structure and
that the negative of it appears in our head.
And into this
negative we now receive the impressions of the external
world. This is possible because we have the hollow space
within us — I am of course speaking approximately
— and all nutritive plants have this effect.
If we have
eaten something that is usually known as a foodstuff, the
cohesiveness of its form is only strong enough to persist for
twenty-four hours, in the course of which we must continually
be dissolving it; one period of waking and sleeping dissolves
it and it must again and again be formed anew. This is what
happens when we have eaten nutritive plants — plants
which have a physical body and an etheric body in their
natural growth and do not allow the astrality to do more than
play around them.
But now let us
suppose that we drink the juice of henbane. Henbane is a
plant that has sucked astrality into itself and consequently
has a much more strongly cohesive form. In the lower man,
therefore, there is a much firmer form which cannot easily be
dissolved and which actually asserts its independence!
Consequently the corresponding negative is more
pronounced.Now suppose some human being has a brain with a
structure that is not properly maintained. He tends to lapse
into clouded, somnolent states because his astral body is not
established firmly enough in the physical body of his brain.
He drinks the juice of henbane and that produces in him a
firm plant-form which in turn gives rise to a strong
negative. And so by energizing the etheric body of his lower
body and bringing into it a firm form through the taking of
henbane, clearly defined thoughts may arise in a person whose
brain was, so to speak, too soft, and the clouded state may
pass away. Then, if in the rest of his organism he is strong
enough — he may often be ordered this medicine for his
condition — if he is strong enough to rouse the
corresponding life-forces into activity and his brain is
again in order, a poison such as this may help him to
overcome his tendency to lapse into somnolent states.
Belladonna, for
example, has a similar effect. Let me indicate in a sketch
the effect it produces.
By taking
belladonna the etheric body is reinforced by strong
‘scaffolding’. Hence when belladonna is taken in
a suitable dosage which the patient can stand — after
all, one can be cured by a remedy only if one can stand it
— then a strong scaffolding is built, as it were,
within the etheric body of the lower man. This strong
scaffolding produces its negative in the head. And upon this
reciprocal action of positive and negative depends the
healing process we expect from belladonna.
You must,
however, be clear that when dealing with such effects, the
factor of spatial distance can be ignored. The man of today,
with his lifeless but massive intellect, imagines that if
something is going on in his stomach it can get into his
brain only if it visibly streams upwards. This, however, is
not the case; processes in the lower body generate processes
in the head as their counterpart and spatial distance does
not come into consideration. If one is able to observe the
etheric body, it can be seen distinctly how a form lights up
in the etheric body of the lower body (red in diagram), while
in the etheric body of the head, now darkened, the form is
reproduced in negative.
You can
perceive for yourselves that Nature everywhere tends to
produce such phenomena. You know that a properly formed wasp
has a kind of head in front, a kind of hind-quarter, and
wings. That is a properly formed wasp.
But there are
also wasps which look like this (lower form in diagram). They
have a sting and drag their hind-quarters after them: the
gall-flies. And even in the physical sphere, this appendage
between the front part of the body and the hind-quarter is
reduced to a minimum; the sting is greatly reduced.
As soon as one
enters the spiritual realm, no visible sting is necessary any
longer. And when you come across certain beings in the
elemental world — you remember that I spoke to you not
long ago about the elemental kingdoms — you may see,
for example, some being ... then there is nothing ... far
away there is a different being. And gradually it dawns on
you that the beings belong together; where the one goes the
other also goes. So you may find yourself in the remarkable
position — in the elemental world it can indeed be so
— of discovering that here there is one part of an
elemental-etheric organism, and there the other part; then
one part may have turned round, but when this happened the
other part cannot move directly to a new position but must
follow the path taken by the first.
So you see, for
those substances which neither the human nor the animal
organism can immediately destroy, which produce a stronger
and more lasting scaffolding, it is a matter of finding a
connection with what, in a quite different part of the human
organism, can also work constructively and with healing
effects.
This gives you
a vista of how the world can again become living and be
revealed as such to man. Today, having only a heritage from
the spiritual world, man has no possibility of approaching
the living environment. He will, however, one day understand
it again, he will again perceive how physical thinking is
related to the whole universe. Then the universe will help
him to discover why things are connected in this way or in
that, why, let us say, the relation of a non-poisonous plant
to the human and animal body is different from that of a
poisonous plant. Only in this way is a re-vitalizing of the
whole of human existence possible.
Now this may
cause the modern comfort-lover to say: the men of old were
far better off than we are, for the surrounding ether still
worked upon them and they had living thoughts; they still
understood such matters as the essential difference between
poisonous and non-poisonous plants. — You know, of course,
that animals still understand this difference, for they have
no abstract thoughts to detach them from the world. Hence the
animals are able through instinct to distinguish poisonous
from non-poisonous plants.
Yes, but it
must be emphasized over and over again that under such
conditions man would never have been able to exercise his
freedom. For what keeps us inwardly living — even in our
thoughts — robs us of freedom. However paradoxical it may
seem, with respect to the thoughts belonging to earlier
earthly lives, we must each become an empty nothingness; then
we can be free. And we become a nothingness when we receive
into ourselves as corpses the living thoughts which were ours
in pre-earthly existence, receive them into ourselves, that
is to say, in their condition of ‘non-being’.
Therefore with our dead thoughts we really go about as blanks
in our waking life on Earth as far as our soul-life is
concerned. And only out of this state of blankness or
nothingness can our freedom become reality.
This is quite
comprehensible. But we can understand nothing truly if we
have nothing living within us. We can understand what is
dead, but that will not bring us a single step further in our
living relation to the world. And so, while safeguarding our
freedom in face of the interruption in understanding that has
come about, we must achieve new understanding by beginning
now, in earthly existence, to give life to our thoughts by
the power of our will. At every moment we can distinguish
between living and dead thoughts. When we rise to the level of
pure thinking — I have spoken of this in the book,
The Philosophy of Freedom
— we can be free men. If we fill our thoughts with feeling
we shall, it is true, leave freedom aside, but in compensation we
shall renew our connection with the environment. We participate
in freedom through the consciousness that we are always capable
of approaching nearer and nearer to pure thought, and in acts
of moral intuition draw from it moral impulses.
Thereby we
become free men; but we must first regulate our inner life of
soul, the inner disposition of our soul, through our own
deeds on Earth. Then we can take the results of those deeds
with us through the gate of death into the spiritual world.
For what has been achieved by individual effort does not go
to waste in the universe.
I may have
demanded difficult thoughts from you today but you will
realize on reflection that we come nearer to understanding
the world by learning to understand man, and especially the
relation of physical man — the apparently physical man
for he is really not a physical man alone, being permeated
always by the higher members of his organism — to the
other aspects of the physically manifested world, as we have
learnt to know it from the example of poisonous plants.
|