Lecture 19:
THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OCCULT KNOWLEDGE AND EVERYDAY LIFE
Berlin, 23rd October 1905
(evening)
[See the
Notes for this Lecture]
Today,
may I say a few things relevant to some of the questions which have
been coming before your souls recently. Today, may I amplify
something which may have been provoked [in your minds] by remarks
made in the last few days. Much has been said about the relationship
of occultism to theosophy, of esotericism to theosophy and so on; but
nothing has been said yet about the relationship of theosophy to
everyday life. I already indicated a week ago that I wished to say a
few words precisely on this subject;
(Note 1)
and that I might direct your
attention rather less to higher vantage points, but rather speak
about how occult perception directly influences everyday living. Not
only is our perspective directed into distant time and space by the
theosophical world outlook, but in addition we can gain a quite
different explanation of everyday questions through occult concepts
which would not be possible through other concepts. We shall then see
how erroneous is the opinion which we so often encounter, namely that
occultism is something impractical, uncommonly far removed from
ordinary everyday life.
And we
will mention another question as well. This question is: How can
anyone who has not yet developed the faculty — which, however, every
human being is destined to have in the future — of seeing into
super-sensible worlds, how can such a person — given the standpoint
that everyone absorbs in their ordinary education — gain a conviction
that theosophical teachings are true, and that the endeavours of
theosophy are valid in practice? The evidence need not be obtained
only by occult observations; indeed, they cannot be so obtained until
they have first been drawn out of another realm, that of everyday
life, which [in fact] prepares us to acquire conviction about the
higher realms of existence. Whatever may have happened in the past,
is still happening today in our daily life.
If we
trace humanity back to the earliest periods of its development, we
find that man originated from a much finer, more spiritual substance
than that of which he is composed today. Present-day man displays a
form consisting of three main bodies — the physical body, the etheric
body and the astral body. The etheric body is a kind of archetypal
image of the physical body. The astral body, the auric sheath that
envelopes and permeates the human being, is the structure in which
the soul life, the life of the instincts and passions, and every
thought as well, all find expression. Basically it was from the still
undifferentiated astral body that the whole human being evolved in
the course of time. If we go back far enough, to the early primeval
epochs of humanity, we find that the physical and etheric substance
that distinguishes modern man used to be dissolved in the original
astral body, like a seed [buried] in the earth.
Present-day man is so to speak condensed out of the astral basic
substance. This process is still taking place every day. When two
people confront each other, then it is above all the astral bodies
which confront each other in love or hate, in kindness or
displeasure, anger or good nature, antipathy or attraction. These are
all phenomena which manifest themselves between astral bodies.
Interaction between people consists of continual exchange of astral
body conditions and relationships. When I confront another person, my
physical body experiences no great change, nor does my etheric body,
but my astral body certainly does. If a person says something filled
with hate to me, then the waves of hatred enter my astral body and
change it. I have to accept what streams out of him into my own
astral body, which is then imbued with very different attributes,
depending on whether it is love and patience or anger and impatience
which stream towards me from the other person.
Something
very similar takes place between teacher and pupil. It makes a great
difference whether a teacher has a loving disposition or is a
narrow-minded egoist. In the astral body of a child we have something
which differs in appearance from the astral body of an adult. The
astral body of a child is bright and clear, and reveals itself to us
as something virginal compared with an astral body which has
developed itself during the course of life. What is the astral body
of a child? It seems like an undifferentiated cloud of light which
only gradually acquires form. Whatever [will] gradually make the
astral body fixed has as yet scarcely begun to be engraved in it, so
that everything possible can still be born to it. It will be formed
by the concepts which the child acquires from its surroundings. These
enter it, colour it, and make it different.
Different
structures flow into the child's astral body and form it, according
to whether what the child absorbs by way of concepts derives from a
materialist or an idealist standpoint. For a process of progressively
filling the soul with concepts begins. If a child is treated
lovelessly, the echo of this lovelessness manifests itself in the
child's astral body. It then seals itself in, as if with a hide,
against the outer world. All this shows us that a continual
remodelling of the astral body is actually taking place, and that
interaction with people has a major influence in this
reshaping.
The child
thus has an astral body which is still undifferentiated in form, but
which contains a limitless abundance of possibilities. Take the
astral body of a child which has met with an idealistic teacher, who
himself has a harmonious soul, who views the world with devotion and
is susceptible to its beauty and sublimity, a teacher who is in a
position to create within himself an image of the beauty of the
world; such a teacher will also develop the ability to enter into the
disposition of the child's soul. He will thus encourage tender and
sensitive structures in the child, into which he can direct currents
which become absorbed in the child's own astral substance. A teacher
who is so harmoniously formed within himself continually directs
harmonious currents towards the child. The characteristics of the
teacher flow quite naturally into the child, and together with them
all that world harmony which the teacher has gleaned from his
surroundings in the form of beauty. As teacher he directs into the
child's nature all the greatness he, as a fine person and good
observer has received, thereby bringing about harmonious development
in the child.
Let us
take by contrast a teacher who confronts the child as an egoistical
and pedantic person with narrow and opinionated concepts and ideas.
These qualities conjure up structures in his own astral body which
give it the appearance of being covered with a hard crust, which make
it thoroughly rigid and ponderous in structure. It then emits darts
which are rigidly enclosed within themselves, so that it is
impossible for the child's astral body to absorb them. At the most
they wound the child's astral body like a dart, but they cannot be
absorbed [by it] and they simply go right through.
Or take
something still more everyday. Two people are talking to each other.
One can very well observe in two such people the interaction of their
astral bodies which results from reciprocal communication with each
other.
Something
new is always coming into being in the astral, in the astral
substance. I will make this intelligible to you in the following way.
Through his concepts, a person is continually creating structures in
his astral body. These show themselves in the most various forms. The
astral substance that lies unused between the individual structures
is called ‘intermediary’ astral substance, to distinguish it from
that which has been shaped into structures. This intermediary astral
substance is continually supplementing itself out of the astral
substance in our surroundings, is continually flowing in and out, is
continually renewing itself. But the structures that man has
cultivated by the way he feels and thinks and decides remain
fixed.
Let us
then assume we have two people engaging in an ordinary conversation
with each other. One of them has cultivated rigid, fixed concepts,
which have correspondingly engendered very fixed structures in the
astral substance. The other talks to him and tries to explain
something to him. What must happen if one person is to make something
clear to another? He must inject his own concept into the other
person's astral substance. This concept, this thought, thus flows
into the other person's astral substance. Once there, it must first
of all be absorbed in the intermediary substance and [then] remake
itself and become transformed [in a manner] corresponding to the
forms already developed there.
Now let
us assume that the one is trying to explain to the other something to
do with, say, reincarnation. The other has however already formed a
fixed idea about reincarnation. Let us assume him to be a prejudiced
person who has formed for himself the idea that reincarnation is
something silly and absurd. This thought has hovered in his astral
substance. The new thought of the first person now arrives and
dissolves itself in the intermediary astral substance of the other,
and would then have to be transformed by the thought forms already
existing there. This will not work, however, because his [the second
person's] concepts are too rigid, too fixed. He cannot adapt the
newly transmitted thought to his [own] thought forms and therefore
does not understand it.
The more
a person keeps his concepts flexible, so that these can always be
dissolved in the surrounding intermediary substance, the more he will
understand the other people he encounters. This is why it is so
difficult to convey theosophical life to academically trained people.
The concepts acquired at university engender structures which are
rigid, fixed and enclosed within themselves, which are not easily
dissolvable. The academic usually comes to a theosophical lecture
full of such structures and is then unable to comprehend theosophical
life. It would be quite different if he were educated to say about
any concept: Yes, it could possibly be different, too, for indeed we
have only a limited amount of experience, and much of what we hold to
be correct will still have to be modified in the future. — If he were
to do that then his soul would still be capable of
improvement.
Let us
take yet another situation, that of a person who encounters someone
else for whom he feels reverence. How does this reverence reveal
itself to anyone endowed, with astral perception? Reverence means
emitting the kind of thoughts which sink into the substance of the
strange astral body, which that substance sucks up, as it were. If,
for instance, you harbour a reverent thought, this is expressed by
you yourself conveying this reverence to the other person as
radiating warmth. This radiating warmth of yours has its reflection
in the astral world, which shows itself as the thought form of
reverence and devotion with a bluish colour. The warm reverent
feeling engenders a thought form which is blue in
character.
But what
is it which appears blueish. You can perceive this if you gaze into
the infinity of the dark universe. It appears blue to you because of
the light in the atmosphere. Similarly, [the reverent thought makes
the astral] that was previously dark appear to you as having this
blueish shade as well; because it is now lit by the bright warm
feeling of reverence. If a dark place is surrounded by a feeling of
reverence, then the dark centre appears to be blueish; just as a
flame appears to you to have a blue core that is surrounded by light.
So is it with the reverent thought as well. It is an empty space
permeated by warmth. If one transmits a reverential thought to
another person, one thereby offers him the opportunity of allowing
his own being to stream into this empty space. This is how the
interaction between the person revered and the person showing
reverence works itself out.
If on the
other hand it is with a feeling of jealousy that you encounter
someone, then a different thought form exists in you, and you bring
this up against him. You then emit the red thought form of egoism or
self love. This, for its part, encloses yet another thought form,
that is full of the concept of [the thinkers] own self, perhaps as a
result .of ambition. This expresses itself not in empty space or in a
hollow structure, but by a form which is completely full, which
nothing else can enter. It is ringed around by a feeling of coldness
and has the directly opposite thought form of an outer ring of blue
around an inner core of red. The coldness of the blue colour pushes
away everything that wants to enter, and the worthless red thought
form stays as it is. It accepts nothing. This is how a jealous
person, that cannot revere anything, stands in relation to
others.
You see,
what takes place in our astral body is nothing else than the product
of daily life. Only someone who is trained to do so can see what is
happening in the astral body. However the effects of these processes
in the astral body are continually present in the physical [plane]
and anyone can satisfy himself about them in [ordinary] life. Anyone
can make the following test if he says to himself: I will leave it
undecided, whether the message of occultism is true or false; but I
will test it without prejudice. I can live as if this message were
based on truth. For I can behave accordingly towards my fellow men;
and if I do this warily, I will indeed see whether life confirms for
me what the occultist says in every individual case. And life will
[indeed] confirm it to you in every instance. You will realise a
tremendous gain from that.
Whoever
reflects on that for himself; whoever, say as a teacher, devotes
himself not only to his own pedagogical concepts and ideas, and works
not only through what he says but also through what he feels,
perceives and thinks; whoever makes himself thoroughly aware that two
astral bodies are interacting, and knows what happens in this
confrontation; whoever does all this will also know he has a duty to
be continually making himself better. To the extent that he becomes
better, the better his influence on the child's dispositions. He does
not destroy these dispositions — on the contrary, he cultivates
them.
It means
something quite different from merely knowing the truth, the reality,
of what we receive in return through revering another person who is
worthy of it — it means something quite different to experience this:
if we transmit to other people countless such thought forms enveloped
in warmth, we ourselves grow thereby, through the greatness of that
other person. That is something totally different again from merely
grasping such things with our intellect, from simply knowing what
they represent. In occultism, we learn to grasp life more earnestly,
we learn to perceive that the things which are not palpable, which
cannot be observed by the senses, are still a reality. We learn to
understand and value the whole scope and significance of our soul
world.
Perhaps
someone or other may say that these are rather theoretical
transformations. No, that they are not! We must become quite
differently convinced about the importance of our actions and the
responsibilities which life lays on our shoulders. It is the most
down to earth aspects of life which can be influenced in this way by
occultism. He who knows what results in the invisible world as a
consequence of thoughts and feelings, will surely grasp that it is
just as important for him not to direct evil thoughts towards a
person as it is to refrain from firing bullets at him. He knows that
throwing the thought of hate at astral man is just as harmful for
him, as throwing a roofing slate is for physical man.
Understanding this is easy enough; those who meet together in
groups such as the theosophical groups, will feel and experience it.
For they find a new source of life there. You could say to yourselves
that there is [only] a simplified reality for other people, a
threefold one for us.
Other
people experience reality only through the sense world, and do not
think it wicked to say that ‘thinking is duty-free!’ However, anyone
who has studied the world outlook of theosophy can no longer say that
thinking incurs no cost, but is convinced that he is instead
responsible for what he thinks and feels about other people. You take
this feeling of responsibility out into the world as the finest fruit
of the theosophical conception of the world. Even if we are only
beginners in rehearsal, we are still influencing the visible world
through the hidden, occult world. We are refining and correcting the
world through the hidden realms of existence.
That is
one aspect, how we understand life. There are, however, others as
well. Man does not live alone in the world as an individual; he also
belongs to a family, to a tribe, to a people, that is, to a [larger]
whole. Only in his physical and etheric body is he actually separate
from others; the astral body, as I have already mentioned, has a
porous exterior. The intermediary substance is continually disposed
to receive currents from outside, and to renew itself. If we
consider, however, that we belong to a nation, a tribe, a family,
then the matter acquires a further dimension.
If we
observe the astral bodies of individual people, we find that almost
everyone differs from others in the basic colouring of the astral
body. Each has a particular shade that manifests itself outwardly as
temperament. Temperament expresses itself, then, through a particular
basic colouring. A person relates to his entire surroundings in this
way; the character of the family, the tribe, or the nation to which
he belongs expresses itself in the basic colouring.
As an
occultist one can make interesting observations if for instance, one
revisits a town which one has not seen for, say, ten years. If one
observes the unsullied astral bodies of the children, one will find
that they possess, in addition to their personal basic colouring,
another basic colouring, too. If one had carefully observed these
virginal astral bodies on one's first visit and now compares
them with what one finds in the astral bodies of the children ten
years later, one will see that their appearance has altered. There is
something in the human individual which moves with the evolution of
the town or tribe or nation. This is because the currents in a
collective astral body that is all around me are in continual
interchange with my own [astral body] which lives within the
collective astral body. Hence we have a national temperament,
expressing itself in the group astral body of the nation.
Every
nation, every other community, has such an astral body, and this
flows into the astral bodies of the individual person. A great
disharmony can develop between the individual person and the task of
the whole nation, for this reason; the trends in evolution do not
always all take the same course in the world. The more comprehensive
often hurries ahead of the less comprehensive.
Let us
consider a nation, for example. The nation, as a structure has not
been haphazardly thrown together in the world, it is not something
produced by chance; each nation, on the contrary, has its prescribed
task in the course of human evolution. Anyone who contemplates a
nation from a higher vantage point can reflect that every nation has
a specific task; that his own nation has itself to fulfil a task
which is incumbent on it. He can say to himself: I belong to this
nation, so I must help to serve the common national task — and I am
able so to serve, because an astrality lives in me which belongs to
the whole nation. This national purpose is plainly expressed on the
astral plane; it is an intentional thought — something that lives on
higher planes than the astral plane. In order to meditate on the
thought s of the world laws, one must rise above the astral plane to
the mental plane [devachan].
For
example, the fourth Sub Race, from which our Race came, developed
itself from a small group of people in Asia and made itself into the
Hebraic-Graeco-Latin Race. This had the task of fulfilling the first
mission of Christianity from an ethnic standpoint. The thought
[inspiring] this Race was to spread Christianity in its first stage
through Europe and the adjoining regions. That is an ethnic
thought.
In
earlier times, the idea of reincarnation and karma was universally
accepted. Then came a radical change; people were educated in the
belief that the single physical life was of importance. This is very
apparent in Greek art, because it developed the feeling for outward
form. Therein lay the ennobling of the physical plane for the outward
senses. The law then came to be developed in the Roman nation; this
had its effect directly on the physical plane. Finally, Christianity
permeates law with a morality, so that one single earth life gains so
much importance that a whole eternity comes to be made dependent on
it. This is a onesided thought, but it was correct and necessary. The
Catholic peoples took upon themselves the mission of spreading
Christianity, carrying it to Northern Europe, whereby the Germanic
peoples received a new mission.
Thus we
see that a national thought lives in the entire nation, and every
individual [member] is fitted to this thought. In our time, we have
turned to account in technology, for the benefit of the city-dweller,
the same thing that was originally cultivated by Greek art in the
beautiful forms of the sense world in the sphere of sculpture, the
same thing that was cultivated as law, and later deepened into
morality. Cities were founded, they grew and flourished and thus
developed a culture of their own, the culture of the bourgeoisie.
From this then evolved a utilitarian morality, which provided the
impetus for the growth of a one-sided science, that ought to have
reached its highest point in our present time.
In this
we can recognise the workings of a devachanic principle. It is the
universal aspect of these changes in the course of evolution which
shows us in what way a national thought has its effect. How this
thought comes to expression depends on the nation's group astral
body, on the national temperament. Art, for instance, with any other
nation than the Greeks, would find expression in a quite different
way,
Now
although the national thought does live in every individual [member],
the individual is much more than just his national thought. In
addition, he brings his own personality to expression. Something
quite remarkable and special shows itself to us here. It is much
easier for a person to see his way in the thought world of his
nation, in his devachanic mission, than it is to bring about the
[correct] balance between his own feelings and the national feelings.
This is not so easy, especially for those who have acquired higher
education and sophistication of a particular kind. The adjustment
between the feelings of the individual and the nation is more quickly
made in the lower levels of evolution, because at those levels a
greater empathy develops between individual sensibilities and the
national sensibility. The lower the individual level, the stronger
the expression of the national sensibility within him, rather as the
animal is an expression of the species.
As man
develops, however, he raises his own astral body up, it becomes more
differentiated, more specific. And it is then possible for his astral
body to be in a position to acquire that form of mind which lies
above the mind of his nation. When what shines down from this higher
level is intellectually or mentally grasped, then ideals can easily
be taken up. It sometimes also happens that the feelings of a
person's astral body have not developed so far as his thinking. The
thoughts of a nation could influence the thinking of the individual
so powerfully that they take hold of him before he has developed far
enough within himself.
Individuals for whom this proves to be the case are passionate
idealists; they are the martyrs for the progress of a nation. They
are so because they themselves are hurrying ahead of what is actually
in the rest of their astral body, because they direct their wholly
elevated souls to an ideal in a selfless way. Then, when such people
come to die, their undeveloped astrality asserts itself all the more
strongly; for that part of it which does not lie within the national
ideal comes into play. Henceforth it is only concerned with its own
development. When such a person dies, who was a great and noble
idealist, who has devoted himself to the ideals of his nation, he
becomes overrun by the personal element still present in him. For the
lower qualities of his astral body become totally predominant. Now
suppose that such a person has become a martyr. He created something
noble, but has been illtreated by his nation, just as such advanced
natures sometimes are. Despite this, he would indeed habitually
follow his ideals boldly and spiritedly so long as he lived, looking
neither to the left nor the right. But if he is persecuted, perhaps
killed, on account of his ideals, then the thought of revenge comes
into play immediately after his death. What he had suppressed as
personal will still be there in Kamaloka.
A nation
which treats its idealists in this fashion creates for itself bad
powers in Kamaloka, which rebound against it. Russia has created bad
powers of this kind. For years it has illtreated many noble
personalities with the rod. The baser forces of these personalities
are now active in Kamaloka as enemies of what lives in Russia, as
enemies of those for whom they made sacrifices in life. Such martyrs,
who have recently died, can now be seen fighting on the side of the
Japanese, against their own people. This is a fact which becomes
comprehensible to us if we look into the more deeply active powers of
the life of the soul. The events of the future become clear to us if
we look at them from this aspect.
We live
as members of the Germanic peoples, flanked by Slavonic peoples in
the east, and by Anglo-American peoples in the west. Both the
Americans and the Slavs are rising races who have to fulfill their
purpose in the future, races who still stand at the beginning of
their national thought. The basic characteristic of the Slavonic
peoples is expressed in their spiritual talents. If you try to
understand the Slavonic culture, you will find that it tends towards
a spiritual culture, that something spiritual is growing there. These
Slavonic peoples had first to confront the races lying to the east,
the Chinese and Japanese. These are the remnants of earlier races
from Atlantis, as indeed all Mongolians are the residues of later
Atlantean culture. They have astral bodies which intrinsically tend
towards spirituality. The Slavonic peoples have to confront
these.
In
America we have a certain parallel. There, materialism is carried to
the extreme, and has been pursued radically in all national
perspectives. In modern times, that has led to the spirit itself
being interpreted in a materialistic way. Whereas, among the Slavonic
peoples, individual personalities such as Tolstoy arose, who sought
to stimulate development in a great and beautiful way, the American
people took pains to conceive spirituality and the soul in a material
way. Thus we find a strongly material spirituality and [indeed]
spiritualism among them. With them, the spirit is sought for in
exactly the same way as they search after physical truths. But it is
precisely in the manner of seeking that the difference lies. If you
seek to see the spiritual with the eyes, it becomes psychic, and this
psychic aspect has developed itself very strongly in
America.
The
American nation has to confront another ethnic element deriving from
Atlantis and endowed with psychic tendencies. This ethnic element
lives in the negro peoples. The way and manner in which these two
races develop together is significant: psychic has to confront
psychic, spiritual has to confront spiritual. Thus we have a
spiritual national thought in the east and a psychic one in the
west.
We have
experienced science and art on an external level; the spirit should
now be raised back up again. This can happen in a double way — either
in a spiritual way or in a psychic way. The spiritual way leads to
progress, the psychic way is retrogressive.
You can see how the world here becomes
understandable, when we contemplate it from an occult basis. Again,
no one need say that we cannot convince ourselves of these things.
One only has to take what actually happens. One will be led to
conviction through experience, when one compares the psychic view of
the world and psychic research with the occult view of the world. If
we seek to understand the occult view of the world then the world of
phenomena becomes more and more comprehensible as well. Such an
occult-spiritual world outlook leaves us no gaps in the comprehension
of the world. From that we will then gain the belief in the world
which the occultists report; and through that we educate an element
in ourselves, which will raise us higher. This is no blind belief,
but a tried and tested belief. This belief will grow stronger and
more justified, firmer and surer, with every gain in experience. And
when belief has engendered this sense of sureness in itself it has
also developed the basis for knowledge. Man has always had to
experiment before being raised to knowledge. Anyone who wants to have
knowledge before investigation is like someone wanting to have the
fruit before the seed. We have to earn our knowledge. What we already
know, we need not investigate. What the investigator lacks in
certainty or confidence, the certainty and confidence of belief must
supply. [The two] must work together, therefore, and then they will
undividedly produce in the end what must come to us undivided — the
fruit of experience, knowledge.
Let us
listen to the occultists and let us say neither yea nor nay to them.
But let us treat is as a basis for our own life and our own conduct;
let us treat it as if their investigations were useful guides for our
life, for we will find that they will [indeed] lead us through life
and will ultimately bring us to an inner knowledge, to a life
pulsating in us. Then we will find that we can indeed trust them to
guide us to investigation, to satisfaction and to a harmonious life
within ourselves.
|