LECTURE VI.
Dornach, December 10, 1923.
HERR
DOLLINGER wishes to ask a question about the
honey comb. There are people who eat the wax as well as the
honey, and in restaurants they used at times to serve honey in the
comb. He would like to know if it was a bad thing to eat the comb.
As to the
diseases of bees, he thinks these could not formerly have been as bad
as they are today when the bees are over-exploited.
HERR
MÜLLER said that eating comb-honey was an
idiosyncrasy with some people. Naturally, these are the natural
combs and not artificial ones. He does not think that bee diseases
are the result of exploitation, but that formerly they were less
considered. In those days there were not so many weak stocks and so
one was not so much on the look out for them. A disease had appeared
in Switzerland from England which had not been known in the past.
Herr Erbsmehl thinks this may perhaps be owing to the use of
artificial manures, even the flowers sicken as the result of
this.
DR.
STEINER:
With regard
to these two points, one might say it is quite true that the eating of
honey-comb is a fancy with some people; the real question is whether it
is good for them, and this can, unfortunately only be answered
medically. It is only possible to answer this question when one is
really able to observe these people who eat the honey-comb, thus the
wax, from the point of view of their state of health. I have seen
various people who eat the comb, but they always spat it out when
they had sucked out the honey. I have not so far come across people
who eat any considerable quantity of wax. One should take into
consideration that people digest in very different ways, not everyone
in the same way. There may be people who would get some kind of
gastric trouble simply by eating the wax, and such persons should be
advised not to take it. But there can also be people who are able to
digest the wax without any trouble and get rid of the residue by
excretion. With regard to these people one could certainly say that
because they eat the wax with the honey, (thus leaving the
honey as long as possible still in connection with the wax which has
entered the body), the honey is digested more in the intestines,
whereas otherwise it is not digested till it has left the
intestines and has passed into the lymphatic vessels. It is a
question of the state of health of the person concerned. There are
people who digest more in the intestines, and others more in the
lymphatic vessels; one cannot say that one way is better than the
other, for one is just as good as the other. It depends on the
individual. One could only speak with certainty if one took a number
of people who eat honey in the comb, and others who eat it without
the comb, and then investigated how these two matters are
related.
With regard to
bee-diseases the question is, as is usual in disease, namely, that we must
take into account what Herr Müller has just said. It is so even with
human beings that certain things were not much noticed formerly,
whereas today they are most carefully studied. But here something
essentially different comes in question. The bee-keeper of the past
had really many good instincts: he did many things without being able
to say just why he did them. Today these instincts no longer exist.
Today people always want to know the reason why. To determine this
why it is, however, necessary to study the whole matter very
fundamentally. Modern knowledge is not as a rule in a position to do
this.
You see, the
bee-keeper of old had very good instincts as how to treat the bees, I should
like to say, in quite a personal manner. For instance, you should consider
that there is already a considerable difference between giving
the bees the old straw skeps as in former days, and giving them
wooden hives as one does today. Box-hives are made of wood, and wood
is an entirely different substance to the straw of which the old
skeps were made. Straw attracts quite other substances from the air
than does wood, so we have already a difference in the external
handling. When I add to this all the bee-keeper did in former times,
and above all, the strong instincts he had to do them even if he did
not always know the reason why, he would, for example, place his
bee-hives on some chosen spot, where the wind would blow more often
from one quarter or another, and so on. Today one sets the bee-hives
wherever there is room for them, from reasons of convenience. The
climatic elements are still considered, but no longer to the same
degree.
HERR
MÜLLER stated that he pays great attention
to this; he places his hives on a ridge where they are sheltered from
the north wind and the east wind, and so on.
DR.
STEINER:
In such matters
wood is less sensitive than straw. I have no intention of agitating in
favour of straw skeps; nevertheless differences do exist, and just such
things as these certainly, very definitely, affect the bees with
regard to their inner activities. A tremendous activity goes on in
the body of the bee when it must first gather the nectar from the
plants, and in absorbing it, transforms it. This is really an
immense work. How does the bee accomplish it? It is accomplished
through the quite special relationship between the two different
fluids in the bee. One of these is the gastric juices and the other
the blood-fluid. When you study the bee you find the whitish gastric
juice and the reddish sap of the blood; these are the two main
elements of which the bee is constituted, and all the other parts are
arranged according to the workings of the gastric juice and the
blood. The main point then is this definite proportion between these
two fluids; they differ very considerably in themselves. The gastric
juice is what one calls acid in chemistry, and the blood sap is
chemically called alkaline, which means that it is not acid though it
can be made so; in itself it is however, not acid. When the pepsin is
insufficiently acid, something takes place within the bee which
greatly disturbs its inner organism in the honey-producing process.
The blood sap is only kept sufficiently strong when the necessary
climatic conditions of light and warmth, etc., are present.
It will therefore
be very important to take the right means of establishing the proper balance
between the gastric fluid and the blood if one is to overcome the
many diseases which have recently appeared among the bees. As
bee-keeping can no longer be carried on as in past days, it is no
longer possible to arrive at preventive methods through climatic
conditions of warmth, etc., for these are no longer able to work so
effectively upon the stocks of bees today; one will have to discover
what will be able to work most favourably on the blood sap of the
bee. It will be necessary in the future that bee-keepers take special
care that the blood sap of the bee is rightly provided for. The
following is important: you all know that there are years when the
bees are obliged to get nectar almost exclusively from trees. In such
seasons the composition of the blood sap is endangered, and the bees
are much more liable to disease than at other times. It will be
necessary in the future that the bee-keeper even contrives a small
green-house — it need not be a large one — in which he
can cultivate those plants which the bees not only like, but must
have at certain times of the year. It will be necessary to have at
least some small plot of flowers for the bees especially, for
instance in the month of May. They will not fail to discover them for
themselves whenever the plants they need have failed elsewhere. By
this special cultivation of the necessary plants in the neighbourhood
of the hives it will be possible to combat these diseases. These are
methods I can recommend; I am giving only indications, but they will
most certainly prove satisfactory for they are derived from a
knowledge of bee-keeping, If they are put to the test you will find
that one day they will bear very good fruit for the bee-keeper, for
he will find that the diseases of bees can be prevented by these
means. But if one is to proceed in a practical way all the
connections mentioned above must be taken into account. I have no
wish to make assertions; I only wish to say that these things arise
out of the whole nature of the bees, and that it would be well to
make experiments with especially cultivated plants in seasons when
those most needed have failed, either partially or altogether. It
should be possible in this way to considerably improve the health of
the bees. I am myself quite convinced that these methods will prove
successful when one is able to enter once again into these questions
with a true understanding of nature. You see, it is not possible to
go back to the old methods of bee-keeping. Just as little as there is
any need to be reactionary in the realms of politics, or of life, is
there any necessity to be a reactionary in any other domain. One must
move with the times; but what really matters is that while we leave
the old methods we are careful to balance this by something which
will replace what we have lost. This is essential.
HERR
MÜLLER stated that bee-keepers were
already working in the direction of the special cultivation of
certain plants. For example, the yellow crocus, which is grown in
large quantities for the bees; other plants were cultivated also with
similar small yellow blossoms. Indeed, more than this, for a large
amount of American clover is now planted; a clover which grows six
feet in height and flowers the whole year round. It is cut only in
the autumn; till then the blossom is left for the bees. This might
also be necessary perhaps?
DR.
STEINER:
Certainly,
such things are no doubt done, but as a rule the right connections are
not known. What Herr Müller had mentioned at first, was excellent
and should be continued, but with regard to the American clover that
flowers all the year round, this will in future be avoided, for this
plant cannot bring about any improvement at all in the blood-sap of
the bees; it acts only as a stimulant, and for a very short time. It
is very much the same as trying to cure a man with alcohol, the bees
are stimulated to more activity for a certain time. The very greatest
care should really be taken today not to grow plants for the bees
that are totally foreign to them; bees in their whole organic nature
are bound up with a particular country. This is very evident, for the
bees from different parts of the world differ widely from one
another. There is, for instance, the mid-European bee already
referred to here, the common domestic bee. The Italian bee again is
quite unlike the Spanish bee, and so on. Bees are most strongly bound
by their habits to their native country, and one cannot help them in
any real way by giving them the nectar or honey belonging to
entirely different countries. They have then, so much work to do in
their own bodies that there are great disturbances there; the bees
are forced to try and adapt themselves, to make their organisation as
much as possible like that of the bees over there, in those countries
where the clover comes from. Hard facts will prove in time that
though such methods may appear successful for a few years, disastrous
results will follow. It is quite true as has been said, that so far
there are no definite indications of this, but it will none the less
occur, and then people must abandon all such methods, or continue
them as was done in the case of the vines. You will remember that in
the seventies or eighties, phyloxera appeared and is destroying the
vineyards of Europe, over immense areas. At the time I was able to
study this matter, as I had a very good friend who was a farmer, and
who also edited an agricultural paper, and gave much attention to
this whole problem. People began to wonder why the American vine
appeared immune to this disease. But what did it all amount to? It
amounted to this, that the remedies by which the disease could be got
rid of with the American vine, could not be used with the same result
on the European vine. The consequence was, that even when everyone
began to cultivate the American vine, they could succeed in keeping
it in health, whereas the European vines died out. The cultivation of
the European vine had to be given up altogether; the whole
cultivation of the vineyards was Americanised, and everything has
been completely changed. This has happened in many places. To think
in this mechanical manner is valueless; one must be quite clear that
things through their whole nature may be bound up with definite
localities, and this fact must be taken into account. Otherwise
though some temporary success may follow, it cannot be permanent.
Are there any
other questions you would like to ask? Or are all you gentlemen content
to eat honey without so much discussion about it? Perhaps some question
may occur to one or another of you.
Meanwhile,
I should like to say something quite briefly about the nature of this
honey-making process of the bees. It is something so really wonderful
that there should be these tiny little creatures that are able to
transform what they have gathered from the flowers or plants in
general, into the honey which is so health-giving, and which should
really play a far greater part in the nourishment of men and women
today. It is not realised how important the consumption of honey
actually is. For example, if it were possible to influence the social
medicine of today, it would be discovered that if people about to be
married would eat honey as a preparation for the future, they would
not have rickety children. Honey when assimilated can affect the
reproductive processes, and greatly influence the building up of the
body of the child. The consumption of honey by the parents, and above
all by the prospective mother, works especially into the bony
structure of the child. Results such as this will appear when
these questions are considered in their essential aspects. In the
place of the trivialities put forward in scientific journals today,
it will be asked, when once we have some real knowledge of these
things: “What is it best to eat at this or that time of
life?” “What is best at another time of life?”
Indeed, gentlemen, this will be of immense value, for the general
state of health will then essentially improve, and more especially
will this affect a man's vitality. Today people attach very little
value to such matters. Those whose children do not suffer from
rickets are naturally very pleased, but they do not think very much
about it, it is taken as a matter of course. Only those complain
whose children are born with rickets. It is just in the case of such
most valuable social and medical methods that people remain
indifferent, for it is generally taken for granted that such measures
are concerned merely with what they regard as a normal condition.
They have first to be persuaded that this is not the case. It should,
however, be recognised that extremely favourable results would appear
in this direction, and I am sure that if it could in this way be
realised that through spiritual science it is possible to arrive at
such conclusions, people would begin to look towards the things of
the spirit. They would do this to a far greater extent than at
present, when they are only told to pray that this or that may
happen. Truly, gentlemen, these things which can be learnt by the
spirit, and which modern science ignores, are such that one is able
to know that during the times of betrothal and pregnancy, honey can
be of inestimable value.
I have just
said that it is a most wonderful thing that the bee should be able to
gather substances from the storehouse of nature and then transform them
into this honey which is of so great value to human life. You will best
understand on what the origin of honey actually rests if I describe
to you the sane process in the quite different form in which it
appears in those relatives of the bees, if I may call them so, the
wasps.
The wasps do
not provide man with honey, but they prepare a substance that can be made
use of medicinally, though of a very different kind to that prepared for
us by the bees. In the next lecture I will also speak about the ants,
but first, will we consider a certain species of wasp. There are
wasps that have the peculiarity that they do not deposit their
eggs at random, but place them on plants or on the leaves or bark of
trees, even into the blossoms of trees.
[Drawing on the blackboard.]
Here for example is the branch, here an
oak-leaf, and the wasp with its ovipositor which is hollow, (the
sting would be here) lays its egg in the oak-leaf, or in some other
part of a plant. What then happens? Where the egg has been placed the
whole surrounding tissue of the leaf is changed; the leaf would have
been quite different if the egg had not been laid there. Very good,
let us now see what has happened.
The whole growth
of the plant has been affected, and protruding from the leaf, entirely
surrounding the little wasp-egg, we find the so-called gall-nut or
gall-apple, those little brownish coloured nuts or apples so often
seen on trees. They are there because a wasp deposited an egg at this
spot, and all round the egg there is this metamorphosed
plant-substance which entirely envelops it. The wasp egg would perish
if it were laid in any other place; it can only exist and develop
because this protective substance encloses it which the gall-wasp
steals from the plant. The wasp robs the plant of this substance. You
see, the bee lays its egg in the cells of the comb; the larvae
develop and emerge as bees, which in their turn steal the substance
of the plant, and elaborate it within themselves. The wasp does this
at an earlier stage, for in the depositing of the egg the wasp
already takes from the plant the substance it needs. The bee, as it
were, waits a little longer, the wasp does it earlier. In the case of
the higher animals, and with man, the egg is already surrounded with
a protecting sheath within the body of the mother. In this
instance what the wasp has to take from the plant is provided by the
mother. This gall-nut is simply built up from the substance of the
plant, just as the chorion is formed as a sheath round the egg in the
body of the mother, and is ejected later with the after-birth. You
see how close is the relationship between the wasp and the plant. In
districts especially rich in wasps one can find trees almost
entirely covered with these galls. The wasp lives with the
trees; it depends on them, for its eggs would never develop if it
could not procure this protective covering from the different trees
or plants. These galls have very many and various forms, there are
some which do not look like small apples, but are interwoven and
hairy, but everywhere the small germ of the wasp is in the centre. At
times these galls look like shaggy little nuts. We see how close is
the relationship between the wasps and the plants with which they
share their existence.
When the wasp
has matured, it eats its way with its sharp jaws out of the gall-nut, and
emerges as a wasp, and after a period of living in the outer world lays
its eggs on a leaf or the bark of a tree; the egg and larval stages are
always passed through as a living together with the plants.
Well, gentlemen,
you may perhaps say — what has all this to do with the production
of honey? It has actually a great deal to do with it, for when such
things are observed in the right way one learns to know how the honey
was first prepared in nature, and we find once more an instance of
how the instinctive knowledge of the people in older times took these
things into account.
Perhaps some
of you know that in the south, and more especially in Greece, the cultivation
of fig trees is of much importance. These are the so-called wild figs
which are certainly rather sweet, but there are people with a still
sweeter tooth, who wish to have fig trees that bear still
sweeter figs than those of the wild trees. What do these people
do?
Now just imagine
you have a wild fig tree; this wild fig tree is a special favourite with a
certain kind of wasp which lays its eggs upon it. Let us picture this
tree, and on its branches a wild fig into which the wasp inserts its
egg. Now the grower of the figs is in his way a clever fellow; he
lets the wasps lay their eggs in the wild figs which he cultivates
just for this very purpose. Later this fellow gathers two of these
figs, just at the moment when the wasp eggs are not quite fully
developed, when the wasps are not yet ready to creep out, and he
takes a reed and ties the two figs together so that they are held
firmly. And now he goes to a fig tree that he wants to improve, and
he hangs the two figs he has tied together, and within which are the
eggs of the wasp not yet fully developed, and binds them on to the
fig-tree which he wishes to sweeten. And now the following happens:
the wasps within the figs feel that something has happened, for the
figs which were gathered now begin to dry up, for they are no longer
supplied with the sap of the tree, and get very dry. The immature
wasp inside senses this, even the egg is aware of it, and the result
is that the wasp is in a terrible hurry to come out of the fig. The
grower always starts this process in the spring; he first lets the
wasp lay its eggs, and in the month of May he quickly gathers the two
figs and carries out his plan. The little creature inside thinks, now
I must hurry up, now the time has come when the figs dry up. In a
terrible hurry the wasp emerges much earlier than it would otherwise
have done. If the fig had remained where it was before, it would only
have crept out in the late summer; now it must creep out in the early
summer with the result that there is a second brood. It lays eggs in
the summer which would otherwise have been laid in the following
spring. Now these late eggs which are deposited on the tree that is
to be further cultivated, do not reach full maturity, they only
develop to a certain stage. The result of this is, that those figs
into which the second brood has been placed become twice as sweet as
the wild figs. This is the method of improving the figs, of making
them twice as sweet.
What has actually
happened here? The wasps, which though they differ from the bees are yet
related to them, the wasps take just that substance from the plant
which is on the way to become honey. If in the clever way of the
cultivator of the fig trees, the figs of the wild tree containing the
eggs of the wasp are thrown up and tied so that they remain hanging
up there, and if one then is clever enough to induce the wasps to
weave again into the tree what they have taken from the other tree,
then honey in the form of sweetness is, as it were, filtered into
these grafted fig-trees; it enters into the figs in the form of
sweetness because the wasps have prepared it in an extremely fine
state of dilution; Nature itself has brought it about in an indirect
way.
You see,
gentlemen, nothing has been taken away from Nature, the essence of the
honey remains within Nature. The wasp cannot prepare the honey in the way
the bee does, for its organisation is not adapted to this. But when, by
this by-path, it is compelled during the stages of its growth, to carry
the sweetness of the honey from one fig-tree to another, the
sweetness of the grafted figs can be increased; a kind of
honey-substance is then within them.
You see,
gentlemen, we arrive here at something very interesting. It seems that
these wasps have a body which is unable to gather the nectar, the
honey-substance from Nature, and transform it into honey within itself.
But man can bring it about that from one fig-tree to another a kind of
honey-making takes place. The bee is therefore a creature that
develops a wasp-like body so much further that it is able to
accomplish this quite apart from the trees; in the case of the wasp
the process must be left within the tree itself. So we must say: the
bee retains within itself more of that force which the wasp only
possesses at a very young stage, as long, that is, as it is in the
egg, or larval state. When the wasp develops further it loses the
power of producing honey; the bee retains it and can make use of it
as a fully matured creature.
Just think,
gentlemen, what it signifies that one can in this way look into Nature's
processes, and can say to oneself: within the plants there is concealed
this honey, this substance that tends towards sugar-sweetness. It is
there; it shows itself, if only one follows the right path; one has
only to assist Nature by seeing that the wasp comes at the right
moment to the tree that is to be improved.
Here, in our
country such things cannot be done, it is no longer possible today. There
was once a time in the evolution of the earth when from the wasps, which
as long as 2,000 years ago, and indeed, still today, could be persuaded
by some clever fellow to produce a second brood as I have described.
These wasps crept out and were given the opportunity of laying their
eggs in the figs, which were then again and again gathered. Thus, in
the course of time, it was possible that bees could be developed from
these wasps.
The bee is a
creature which in very ancient times was developed from the wasp. Today
one can still see that it is by means of an animal activity,
namely that of the wasps, that honey is first prepared in the realms
of nature.
So now, you can
also understand how closely related to this is the fact that the bees
place their honey in the cells of the honey-comb. This comb consists
mainly of wax, and wax is not only necessary in order that the bees
may deposit their honey there, for the bee can only produce honey
when its whole organism is active in the right way. It must therefore
secrete wax.
The second fig
tree in which sweetness arises of itself, is also richer in wax than the
wild tree. It differs especially from the wild tree in that it is richer
in wax. Nature has herself increased the wax so that the cultivated
figs, the sweetened figs, grow on a tree which in a certain way,
Nature has made richer in wax.
You can already
see here a model, as it were, for what appears in bee-keeping.
If you now go to
work very carefully, and make a cross-section from the trunk of the cultivated
fig tree, you will find, if you look carefully, patterns just like
the wax cells of the comb. Within the tree-trunk you find
certain growths similar to the honey cells, formed from the
precipitated wax of the tree. The tree that is richer in wax uses it
in a kind of honey-cell formation.
So we can say:
when we study this special cultivation of the fig trees we discover a kind
of honey production in Nature that has not yet appeared openly, for the
honey remains within the figs. The bees, if I may so express it,
bring out into the open what remains still within Nature in the
sweetened figs. Thus, what would otherwise have remained within the
tree-trunk, forming there these natural cells, which are only less
definite, less substantial than the bee cells, and fade away again,
this whole wax and honey-making process is driven up into the figs,
so that Nature is herself a bee-keeper. The bees have drawn it forth
from Nature and have these processes within themselves.
What does the
bee then do? The bee deposits its eggs within the hive, and the egg matures
there. It does not need to change the substance into a gall-apple, it takes
the nectar directly from the plants, neither does the bee need to go
to the tree that is richer in wax, for she accomplishes in herself
what takes place in the tree-trunk, and deposits in the comb the
juices of the plant which she transforms into honey, which in the
case of the cultivated tree, remains in the juices of the fig. One
can say that what in Nature lies concealed in the tree through the
wasps, now happens outwardly, and it becomes clear what it really is
that we have before us, when we look into the hive with its
marvellously built comb of waxen cells. It is indeed, gentlemen, a
wonderful sight, is it not Herr Müller? A wonderful sight is the
artistic construction of these waxen cells with the honey
within them.
You have only
to look at it gentlemen, and you will say to yourselves — the bees
with their waxen combs really show us a kind of artistically formed tree-trunk
with its many branches. The bee does not need to go to the tree to
lay her eggs there, but they build for themselves a kind of picture
of a tree, and in the place of the figs growing there, she puts honey
into the finished cells. We find, as it were, a copy of the
artificially cultivated fig tree which the bees have made.
Truly, gentlemen,
this is to look into the very heart of Nature, and realise what can be
learnt from her. Men have yet to learn much from Nature, but for this they
must first learn to recognise the spiritual in Nature. Without this
recognition of the spirit in Nature, one merely stands and gapes, and
should one journey to the south and see how those clever fellows
there tie the figs together, the figs pierced by the wasps, and throw
then up into the trees and bind and fix them there we shall gape as
tourists do, even when they are scientific gentlemen, and not know
what to make of it, They do not know that he saves the bees their
labour, for Nature will put the honey into the figs for him.
In those
countries where figs are plentiful, they are as health-giving as honey,
for it is honey at an earlier stage of development that is already in
the figs.
You see, these
are things which we ought to know if we are to discuss a matter of such
importance as bee-keeping. I believe that by such means we shall in
time arrive at points of view of true value.
|