PREFACE
The present cycle of
lectures was given in 1906 in Paris and the report of it by Edouard
Schuré now published in English in its entirety for the first
time marks the beginning of a new phase in the life of Rudolf
Steiner. Accompanied by Marie von Sievers (later Marie Steiner),
Rudolf Steiner had been invited, by the famous French author and
dramatist Edouard Schuré, to address a group consisting mainly
of Russians in a small villa on the outskirts of Paris. Among them
were writers of note such as Dimitri Merejkowski, his wife Zinaida
Hippius, a poetess in her own right, and S. Minski. Originally it had
been planned that the course be held on Russian soil but the
revolution of 1905 had made that impossible.
At this time Edouard
Schuré (1841–1929), a man of 65, stood at the height of
his career. He had written more than a dozen major works including
The Great Initiates
(1889),
A History of the German Lied, A Collection of Celtic Legends,
two important works on Richard
Wagner, and a number of dramas striving to recapture the lost
ritualistic element of the ancient mysteries on the stage. He felt
powerfully drawn not only to Richard Wagner the composer, but also to
the man. He had met the maestro on three occasions and was present in
Munich at the dramatic opening of
Tristan and Isolde.
Schuré's
interest in the occult was profound. He had written
The Great Initiates
(1889) as a result of his deep connection over a period
of many years with Margherita Albana-Mignaty, who continued to
inspire him even after her death. Rudolf Steiner often referred to
the importance of this book and although it was written ten years
before the end of Kali-Yuga (the Age of Darkness), he spoke of this
work as a herald of the new Age of Light, when human beings would
again seek for their spiritual connection with the great initiates of
the past. For some time before their first meeting in Paris, Marie
von Sievers and Schuré had corresponded. An unusual set of
circumstances led to the fact that indirectly it was Schuré
who had brought about the meeting between Marie von Sievers and
Rudolf Steiner which was to prove so fruitful for the growth of the
Anthroposophical movement. Unable to reply to a specific question
related to the occult, Schuré advised the young Marie von
Sievers to turn to Rudolf Steiner in Berlin. A little later Marie von
Sievers wrote so enthusiastically to Schuré (in excellent
French) of her meeting that he, too, wished to become acquainted with
Steiner personally. This was to happen six years later in Paris on
the occasion of these lectures. The recognition must have been
immediate. Schuré, twenty years Steiner's senior, never tired
of recounting this significant meeting: for the first time, he felt
himself to be in the presence of an initiate. “Here is a
genuine Master who will play a crucial part in your life.”
Schuré recognized Steiner as one who stood fully in the world
of today and yet could also behold in clear consciousness the
boundless vistas of the super-sensible. A warm friendship quickly
developed between the two men: vacations spent together in Barr
(1906–1907) in Schuré's summer house in the
Alsace; long walks over the Odilienberg, and an active correspondence
(mostly on the part of Marie Steiner, who translated several of
Schuré's dramas into German). The substance of a number
of intimate conversations has been recorded by Rudolf Steiner in the
“Document of Barr.” [The “Document of
Barr,” dated Sept. 9, 1907 and printed in English translation in the
Golden Blade,
1966.] In 1907 Schuré's
Sacred Drama of Eleusis
was produced under the direction of Rudolf Steiner at the
great Munich Congress of the Theosophical Society. It was on this
occasion that Rudolf Steiner said that from this time on, art and
occultism should always remain connected. In 1909 the first
performance of Schuré's drama,
The Children of Lucifer,
was given using a German translation of the French text
by Marie Steiner. The deeper connection now becomes obvious: Schuré
the poet, a Celtic-Greek soul, devoted to the renewal of the ancient
mysteries, and one of the first Frenchmen to recognize Richard
Wagner's impulse towards the “Gesamtkunstwerk” (a total
ritualistic experience embracing all the art forms), now
whole-heartedly supported Rudolf Steiner in the great Munich
endeavors (1907–1913). This period saw the birth of the mystery
dramas and the first performances of Eurythmy. It was also in Munich
that plans had been made for the building of the First Goetheanum
(the House of The Word) which was later erected on the Dornach hill
near Basel in Switzerland.
The war years
(1914–1918) brought an unfortunate clouding over of their
friendship due to Schuré's stubborn chauvinism which
nevertheless did not interfere with his continued championing of
Richard Wagner. But with Rudolf Steiner, he broke his connection. A
few years after the war the friendship was renewed and it must have
been an amazing sight to have seen the old, still robust,
white-haired Schuré in animated conversation with Steiner as
they walked up and down on the terrace of the First Goetheanum in
Dornach. Years later, Schuré would still speak of his profound
indebtedness to Rudolf Steiner both for the personal help he had
received from him and for his having brought the new mysteries
clearly to expression in an age of materialism.
These lectures were
given on the fringe of the International Theosophical Congress held
in Paris and attended by delegates from many countries. Rudolf
Steiner himself attached a distinct importance to this course in
Paris where he formulated a basic view of Esoteric Christianity which
a few years later was to separate him radically from the Theosophical
Society. In the 37th chapter of
Rudolf Steiner, The Story of My Life
[Rudolf Steiner Publishing Co., London and New York,
1928.] (written in 1924–25 shortly before his death) we find the
following passage:
In the Paris cycle of lectures I brought forward a
perception which had required a long process of “ripening”
in my mind. After I had explained how the members of the human being
— physical body; etheric body, as mediator of the phenomena of
life; and the “bearer of the ego” —
are in general related to one another, I imparted the fact that the
etheric body of a man is female, and the etheric body of a woman is
male. Through this a light was cast within the Anthroposophical
Society upon one of the basic questions of existence which just at
that time had been much discussed. One need only remember the book of
the unfortunate Weininger, “Geschlecht und Charakter,”
(Sex and Character), and the contemporary poetry.
But the question was carried into the depths of the
being of man. In his physical body man is bound up with the cosmos
quite otherwise than in his etheric body. Through his physical body
man stands within the forces of the earth; through his etheric body
within the forces of the outer cosmos. The male and female elements
were carried into connection with the mysteries of the cosmos.
This knowledge was something belonging to the most
profoundly moving inner experiences of my soul; for I felt ever anew
how one must approach a spiritual perception by patient waiting and
how, when one has experienced the “ripeness of consciousness,”
one must lay hold by means of ideas in order to place the perception
within the sphere of human knowledge.
It is perhaps not
without significance that it was in Paris, where Thomas Aquinas had
elaborated some seven centuries earlier his Christ-oriented
Scholasticism, that Rudolf Steiner gave his first course on an
Esoteric Christian Cosmology appropriate to the dawn of the new Age
of Light. Schuré's notes in French of the 18 lectures,
published in French in 1928, constitute the only record of this
course. They now appear for the first time in English translation in
their entirety in book form, readily available to the modern student
of the Science of the Spirit.
R. M. Querido
|