ABOUT THE
TRANSCRIPTS OF LECTURES
“The results of my anthroposophical work are,
first, the books available to the general public; secondly, a great number of
lecture-courses, originally regarded as private publications and sold only to
members of the Theosophical (later Anthroposophical) Society. The
courses consist of more or less accurate notes taken at my lectures, which
for lack of time I have not been able to correct. I would have preferred the
spoken word to remain the spoken word. But the members wished to have the
courses printed for private circulation. Thus they came into existence. Had I
been able to correct them the restriction:
for members only
would have been unnecessary from the beginning. As it is,
the restriction was dropped more than a year ago.
In my autobiography it is especially necessary to say a
word about how my books for the general public on the one hand, and the
privately printed courses on the other, belong within what I elaborated as
Anthroposophy.
Someone who wishes to trace my inner struggle and effort to
present Anthroposophy in a way that is suitable for present-day consciousness
must do so through the writings published for general distribution. In these
I define my position in relation to the philosophical striving of the
present. They contain what to my spiritual sight became ever more
clearly defined, the edifice of Anthroposophy — certainly incomplete in
many ways.
But another requirement arose, different from that of
elaborating Anthroposophy and devoting myself solely to problems connected
with imparting facts directly from the spiritual world to the general
cultural life of today: the requirement of meeting fully the inner need and
spiritual longing of the members.
Especially strong were the requests to have light thrown by
Anthroposophy upon the Gospels and the Bible in general. The members wished
to have courses of lectures on these revelations bestowed upon
mankind.
In meeting this need through private lecture courses,
another factor arose: at these lectures only members were present. They were
familiar with basic content of Anthroposophy. I could address them as people
advanced in anthroposophical knowledge. The approach I adopted in these
lectures was not at all suitable for the written works intended primarily for
the general public.
In these private circles I could formulate what I had to
say in a way I should have been obliged to modify had it been planned
initially for the general public.
Thus the public and the private publications are in fact
two quite different things, built upon different foundations. The public
writings are the direct result of my inner struggles and labours, whereas the
privately printed material includes the inner struggle and labour of the
members. I listened to the inner needs of the members, and my living
experience of this determined the form of the lectures.
However, nothing was ever said that was not solely the
result of my direct experience of the growing content of Anthroposophy.
There was never any question of concessions to the prejudices or the
preferences of the members. Whoever reads these privately-printed lectures
can take them to represent Anthroposophy in the fullest sense. Thus it was
possible without hesitation — when the complaints in this direction
became too persistent — to depart from the custom of circulating
this material only among members. But it must be borne in mind that faulty
passages occur in these lecture-reports not revised by myself.
The right to judge such private material can of
course, be conceded only to someone who has the pre-requisite basis for such
judgment. And in respect of most of this material it would mean at
least knowledge of man and of the cosmos insofar as these have been
presented in the light of Anthroposophy, and also knowledge of what exists as
‘anthroposophical history’ in what has been imparted from the
spiritual world.”
Extract from
Rudolf Steiner, An Autobiography,
Chapter 35 pp. 386–388, 2nd Edition 1980, Steinerbooks, New
York.
|