You may select a new search term and repeat your search. Searches are not case sensitive, and you can use regular expressions in your queries.

Enter your search term: by: title, keyword, or context

   Query type: 
    Query was: death
  

Here are the matching lines in their respective documents. Select one of the highlighted words in the matching lines below to jump to that point in the document.

• Title: i Spirituality: Lecture 1: Historical Symptomology, the Year 790, Alcuin, Greeks, Platonism, Aristotelianism, East, West, Middle, Ego
  Matching lines:
  • that the ransom had been paid to Death. Thus, in a certain sense, it was a sort of redemption
  • becoming acquainted with Christianity. The ransom was paid to Death by the cosmic powers.
  • be paid to a being who really exists. But death has no reality, death is only the outer limit of
  • reality, death itself is not real and, therefore, the ransom money could not have been paid to
  • Death.
  • the facts, the view that death is not something real resembles the view which says: Cold is not
  • direction. He asks: Is death something real or not? — and objects that, indeed, death is
  • oriental was well aware that his being existed before birth, that it returns through death to the
  • passed through births and deaths. But he did not see as such that inner feeling which lives in
  • reality for him, which passes through births and deaths — was not contained in the space in
  • `nothing' was the outer form. And thus, when the Greek spoke of death, whose causes lie in the
  • spiritual world, as something real, Alcuin could only answer: But death is nothing and therefore
  • death. And the constitution of soul which occupies itself primarily with the human being's
  • experiences between birth and death is the logical, legal one — the
  • transforms itself through births and deaths. There was that which lives in
  • is actually only valid for, and can only encompass, life between birth and death. But this life
  • between birth and death was just what had evaded the oriental. He looked far more to the core of
  • man's being. He had little understanding for what took place between birth and death. And now,
  • within the span between birth and death increased
  • death. You can go through the whole of Hegel's philosophy and you will find nothing that goes
  • Maximum number of matches per file exceeded.
• Title: New Spirituality: Lecture 3: The New Spirituality and the Christ Experiance of the Twentieth Century - 2
  Matching lines:
  • the assertion of egoism beyond death. The wish to extend one's will beyond death led to the
  • is nothing other than what the human being lives through between birth and death, which is then
  • entering into an existence before birth or after death. Nor can its justification be found
  • lives here between birth and death, consists of body, soul and spirit. For the human beings of
• Title: New Spirituality: Lecture 6: The New Spirituality and the Christ Experiance of the Twentieth Century - 5
  Matching lines:
  • only with what man experiences between birth and death and had nothing to do with what is the
• Title: New Spirituality: Lecture 7: The New Spirituality and the Christ Experiance of the Twentieth Century - 6
  Matching lines:
  • as it were, killed off at least once. The most recent of these death-blows was the one dealt by a
  • guarantee for one's longing for life after death. There is today a terrible gap between what is
• Title: New Spirituality: Contents
  Matching lines:
  • concerning the nature of death between the French philosopher
  • and death and capable of establishing the civic-judicial element. The