Editor's Preface
HIS book is the transcript of
a shorthand report of nine lectures given by Rudolf Steiner in the early
part of 1924, about a year before he died. Although his audience consisted
very largely of people who had been studying for many years the spiritual
science which is Steiner's legacy to the world (and which he also called
Anthroposophie), he himself described the course as an
‘Introduction’. The German title of the book is
Anthroposophie: eine Einführung in die Anthroposophische
Weltanschauung. ‘We will begin again,’
he observed in
Lecture IV,
‘where we began twenty years ago;’
and he may well have had in mind that the Movement itself had, in some
sense, begun again only a month or two before with the solemn Foundation
of the General Anthroposophical Society under himself as President at
Christmas 1923. Though he proceeded ab initio, assuming no
previous knowledge on the part of his hearers, this course is not an
elementary exposition of Anthroposophy. We are gradually led deeply
in, and the path is steep towards the end.
There
are many very different approaches to the general corpus of revelations
or teachings which constitutes Spiritual Science. As with Nature herself,
it is often only as the student penetrates deeper and nearer to the
centre that any connection between these different approaches become
apparent. A reader of
Christianity as Mystical Fact,
for example,
which dates from 1902 and of Steiner's lectures on the Gospels might
well be surprised to find that it is possible to read
Theosophy
(1904) without ever discovering that the incarnation of Christ and the
death on Golgotha are, according to him, the very core of the evolution
of the universe and man. The truth is that the mastery of Anthroposophy
involves, for our too stereotyped thinking, something like the learning
of a new language. It would be possible to learn to read Greek and only
afterwards to discover that the New Testament was written in that
tongue.
From this
point of view the present book is in the same category as
Theosophy,
yet even within this category the two approaches are made from such
diverse directions that one might almost suppose the books to be the
work of different men. Nevertheless it is best to look on the following
lectures — as Steiner himself makes it clear that he does —
as a supplement or complement to what is to be found in
Theosophy.
The book
Theosophy
is the most systematic of all the writings that Steiner has bequeathed
to us. Its whole basis is classification and definition and, taken by
itself, it undoubtedly gives (quite apart from the dubious associations
which the word ‘theosophy’ has for English ears)
a false impression of the nature of Anthroposophy. It is as indispensable
to the student as a good grammar is indispensable to a man engaged in
mastering a new language, and it contains as much — and as little
— as a grammar does of all that the language can do and say. Its
method is that of description from outside. And this approach, essential
as it is as one among others, is perhaps the one most likely to lead to
misunderstanding and misrepresentation. Such terms as ‘soul
world’, ‘spiritland’, ‘elemental beings’,
‘aura’, are liable to be taken literally
in spite of the author's express warnings to the contrary. The descriptions
are taken as reproductions of the reality that underlies them
instead of as similes — attempts, that is, at making clear a purely
spiritual reality in words which have received their stamp of significance
from their relation to the physical world.
No one
who studies the teachings of Rudolf Steiner seriously remains in any
real danger of succumbing to this sort of literalness. But anyone reading
hurriedly through the book
Theosophy
— or even through
Theosophy
and the
Occult Science
— and inclined to judge the value of Anthroposophy from that single
adventure may well do so. That is why the present book seems to me to be
an important one — not only for ‘advanced’ students of
Anthroposophy, to whom
it is perhaps primarily addressed, but also to the comparative beginner.
It is condensed and difficult for most readers, and above all for those
who have never dipped into the broad unbroken stream of books and lectures
which flowed from Rudolf Steiner during the twenty years that elapsed
between the publication of
Theosophy
and the delivery of this
Course. But even if the content is far from fully understood, it cannot
fail to give the reader some idea, let us say, of the sort of thing
that is really signified by the spatial and other physical metaphors
in which the systematic exposition of
Theosophy
is couched.
For here
the approach is from within. It is no longer simply the objective facts
and events, but the way in which the soul tentatively begins to experience
these, which the lecturer makes such earnest efforts to convey. We have
exchanged a guide book for a book of travel. The one who has been there
recreates his experience for the benefit of those who have not, trying
with every device at his disposal to reveal what it actually felt
like. Of course the difficulty is still there; it can still only be
done by metaphor and suggestion; but the difficulty is much less likely
to be burked by the reader's surreptitiously substituting in his own
imagination a physical or sense-experience for a purely super-sensible
one.
Compare,
for instance the description of the astral body given in
Theosophy
with the characterisation of it in No. V of these lectures:
One
says to oneself: What I am observing as the astral body of this person
is not really present today, i.e. on the 2nd February 1924. If the
person is twenty years of age, you must go backwards in time — let
us say, to January 1904. You perceive that this astral body is really
back there, and extends still further back into the unlimited. It
has remained there and has not accompanied him through life. Here
we have only a kind of appearance — a beam. It is like looking
down an avenue; there, in the distance, are the last trees, very close
together. Behind them is a source of light. You can have the radiance
of the light here, but the source is behind — it need
not move forward that its light may shine here.
So,
too, the astral body has remained behind, and only throws its beam
into life. It has really remained in the spiritual world and has not
come with us into the physical. In respect to our astral body we always
remain before conception and birth, in the spiritual world. If we
are twenty years old in 1924, it is as if we were still living spiritually
before the year 1904 and, in respect to our astral body, had only
stretched forth a feeler.
‘Thus,’ he adds a few pages later, ‘if you describe the
astral body as I have done in my
Theosophy
you must realise,
in order to complete your insight (my italics)’:
that what is active here is the ‘radiance’ of something far
back in time. The human being is really like a comet stretching its tail
far back into the past. It is not possible to obtain a true insight into
man's being unless we acquire these new concepts. People who believe
one can enter the spiritual world with the same concepts one has for
the physical world should become spiritualists, not anthroposophists.
In the same way one could compare the description of the etheric body in
the earlier book with its treatment here in
Lecture IV.
The etheric body
is not a vehicle of any such ‘life-force’, as is understood by
the creative evolutionists. It is totally incompatible with the assumptions
of positivist science. If it can be described as a ‘formative
forces’ body, it can equally well be described, from another
approach, as a thought-body. This is the approach which is required for
all the teachings which Steiner developed later concerning the descent
of the Cosmic Intelligence and its progressive embodiment in the personal
intelligence of man. And it is this approach which is chosen in the book
which follows.
He begins
by describing the practical steps needed to develop the ‘strengthened
thinking’ which is the first stage of higher knowledge. And he
continues:
If you
strengthen your thinking the supra-terrestrial spatial world begins
to concern you and the ‘second man’ you have discovered just
as the earthly, physical world concerned you before. And, as you ascribe
the origin of your physical body to the physical earth, you now ascribe
your second existence to the cosmic ether through whose activity earthly
things become visible. From your own experience you can now speak
of having a physical body and an etheric body ... I stretch
out my physical arm and my physical hand takes hold of an object. I
feel in a sense the flowing forces in this action. Through strengthening
my thought I come to feel that it is inwardly mobile and now induces a
kind of ‘touching’ within me — a ‘touching’
that also takes place in an organism; this is the etheric organism; that
finer, super-sensible organism which exists no less than the physical
organism, though it is connected with the supra-terrestrial, not the
terrestrial.
Equally important is the exposition in this lecture of the way in which
astral and etheric find outward expression in the physical
constitution of man, the etheric in his fluid organisation, which can
only be understood with the help of the concept of the etheric body, and
the astral in that ‘third man’ — who is physically the
‘airy man’ and who can be experienced as ‘an inner
musical element in the breathing’. The nervous system is shown to
be the representation of this inner music.
The matter in this book is extremely condensed and one feels one is
maiming it by arbitrary selections such as I am making for the purpose
of this Introduction. I have, for instance, said nothing of the extensive
and detailed discourse on dreams contained in
Lecture VII,
and
VIII,
which some readers may even find the most enlightening thing in the
book. One final selection may however perhaps be made. In these lectures
Steiner approaches the life after death by speaking of ‘four phases
of memory’. The theme is first heard in
Lecture VI,
where, after speaking of the nature of memory he emphasises that it is
not the concern of the remembering individual alone, but is there for
the sake of the universe — ‘in order that its content may
pass through us and be received again in the forms into which we can
transmute it’.
The universe needs us because, through us, it ‘fulfils’
itself — fills itself again and again with its own content. ...
The universe gives its cosmic thoughts to our etheric body and receives
them back again in a humanised condition.
It receives them back when we die. The moment we die, the world takes
back what it has given. ‘But it is something new that it receives,
for we have experienced it all in a particular way.’ Then, in the
ninth and last lecture, the last three phases of memory lead into —
indeed become — in a miracle of condensation — all that
is presented so differently in
Theosophy
under such titles as ‘The Soul in the Soul-World after
Death’.
Is this
an esoteric or an exoteric work? Certainly it will be more readily
appreciated by readers who have worked through other approaches to be
found in the books and lecture-cycles and perhaps especially in the
Leading Thoughts.
Yet it is the whole aim and character of Spiritual Science, as Rudolf
Steiner developed it, to endeavour to be esoteric in an exoteric way.
For that was what he believed the crisis of the twentieth century demands.
And I doubt if he ever struggled harder to combine the two qualities
than in these nine lectures given at the end of his life. Thus, although
he was addressing members of the Anthroposophical Society, I believe
that he had his gaze fixed on Western man in general, and I hope that
an increasing number of those who are as yet unacquainted with any of
his teaching may find in this book (and it can only be done by intensive
application) a convincing proof of the immense fund of wisdom, insight
and knowledge from which these teachings spring.
OWEN BARFIELD
London,
August 1960.
|