Koberwitz,
14th June, 1924.
The
Nature of weeds, animal plagues and the so-called plant diseases
before the tribunal of nature
In
the lectures that are to follow, I shall base myself to a great
extent on what you have heard me say concerning plant growth and also
animal forms. We shall have to attempt to put into aphoristic form
some of the spiritual scientific concepts concerning the enemies of
agriculture, animal and vegetable, and the diseases of plants. These
matters can only be studied in concrete cases, they must be dealt
with specifically, for there is little that can be said in a general
way.
I
shall begin with examples which, if they are taken as the
starting-point of experiments, may lead to something further. I shall
begin with the subject of weeds or noxious plants. What we have to do
is not so much to find a definition for what we mean by weeds, as to
discover how to remove such plants from a field when we do not wish
to have there. Some of us, perhaps, as a habit from our student days,
may be inclined to seek for definitions. I have given way —
although without much enthusiasm — to such an inclination and
have looked up in various books the definitions given of a weed. I
found that most authors say: “A weed is that which grows where
it is not wanted,” which does not go very deeply into the
essence of the matter. Nor can we very successfully apply such a
definition to the essential nature of the weed, for the simple reason
that before the tribunal of nature the weed has just as much right to
grow as plants that are useful to us. Clearly, we must approach the
matter from a somewhat different angle. We must ask ourselves how in
a particular piece of ground we can get rid of what was not meant by
us to grow there, but which nevertheless does so because of the
general aspects of nature ruling there.
The
answer to this question can only be found by taking account of those
things which we have been discussing during the last few days. It was
pointed out that we must learn to distinguish those forces which
arise in the cosmos but are absorbed by the earth and work upon plant
growth from within the earth. These forces come from Mercury, Venus
and Moon and act not directly, but through the mediation of the
earth. They must be taken into account if we wish to follow up how
the mother plant gives rise to a daughter plant, and so on. On the
other hand, we must consider the forces taken by the plant from the
outer-earthly, and brought to it by way of the atmosphere from the
outer planets. Broadly speaking, we may say that the forces coming
from the nearer planets (see Lectures 2 and 3) are very much
influenced by the workings of lime in the soil, while those coming
from the distant planets fall under the influence of silicon. And, in
fact, workings of silicon, even though they proceed from the earth,
act as mediators of the forces coming from Jupiter, Mars and Saturn,
but not for those of Moon, Mercury and Venus. People are quite
unaccustomed to take these things into account. Ignorance of the
cosmic influences, whether they come through the atmosphere around
the earth, or whether they come from below through the medium of the
earth, has caused great harm. Let us take a special case to
illustrate this. The old instinctive knowledge had disappeared from
large areas of the civilised world; the soil was exhausted, and such
parts of the old traditions that the peasants had preserved was also
worn out. And so the vineyards far and wide were decimated by
Phylloxera (or grape-louse). People were powerless to cope with the
Phylloxera that was destroying the vineyards. I could tell you of an
agricultural paper that used to be published in Vienna in the
eighties. Appeals from all sides were made to the editor to supply
some remedy for Phylloxera, but to his despair he knew of none and
that was at a time when the pestilence was most acute. For the
science of today is not able to deal effectively with such evils as
these; what is needed is insight into the connections I have been
expounding to you here.
Image 1