Ever since the early days of Christianity it has been the custom
to draw a distinction between the festivals of Christmas and of Easter in
that the Christmas festival has been made immovable, having been fixed at
a point of time a few days after the 21st of December, the
winter solstice, whereas the day of the Easter festival is determined by
a particular constellation of the stars, a constellation of the stars
which unites earth and man with the worlds beyond the earth. To-morrow
will be the first full moon of spring and upon this full moon will fall
the rays of the springtime sun, for since the 21st of March
the sun has been in the sign of spring. When, therefore, men on earth
celebrate a Sunday — a day, that is, which should remind them of
their connection with the sun-forces — when the Sunday comes that
is the first after the full moon of spring, then is the time to keep the
Easter festival. Easter is thus a movable festival. In order to determine
the time of the Easter festival, note must be taken each year of the
constellations in the heavens.
Principles such as
these were laid down at a time when traditions of wisdom were still
current among mankind, traditions that originated from ancient atavistic
clairvoyant faculties and gave man a knowledge far surpassing the
knowledge that present-day science can offer. And such traditions were a
means for bringing to expression man's connection with the worlds beyond
the earth. They always point to something of supreme importance for the
evolution [of] mankind.
The rigid point of
time fixed for the Christmas festival indicates how closely that festival
is bound up with the earthly, for its purpose is to remind us of the
birth of the man into whom the Christ Being afterwards entered.
The
Easter festival, on the other hand, is intended to remind us of an event
whose significance lies, not merely within the course of earth-evolution,
but within the whole world-order into which man has been placed. Therefore
the time of the Easter festival must not be determined by ordinary
earthly conditions; it is a time that can be ascertained only when man
turns his thoughts to the worlds beyond the earth. And there is deeper
meaning still in this plan of a movable time for the Easter festival. It
indicates how through the Christ Impulse man is to be set free from the
forces of earth-evolution pure and simple. For through knowledge of that
which is beyond the earth, man is to become free of the evolution of the
earth, and this truth is indicated in the manner of dating the Easter
festival. It contains a call to man to lift himself up to the worlds
beyond the earth; it contains a promise to man that in the course of
world-history it shall be possible for him, through the working of the
Christ Impulse, to become free of earthly conditions.
To understand all
that is implied in this manner of dating the Easter festival, it will be
helpful to turn our minds to early secrets of the beginnings of
Christianity, to some of those early mysteries which during a certain
period of earthly evolution have become more and more veiled and hidden
from the materialistic view of the world which arose at the beginning of
the Fifth Post-Atlantean epoch and must now be vanquished and superseded.
In order to see the whole matter in a true light it will be necessary
first of all to consider the part played by the figure of St. Paul
in the evolution of the Christ Impulse within the whole history of mankind.
We should indeed
remind ourselves again and again what a great event in the evolution of
Christianity was the appearance of the figure of St. Paul
Paul had had abundant opportunity to inform himself, by external observation,
of the events in
Palestine
that were associated with the personality
of Jesus. All that came to his notice in this way in the physical world
left Paul unconvinced; when these events in
Palestine
had come to an end in the physical sense, Paul was still an antagonist of
Christianity. He became the Apostle of the Christians only after the event at
Damascus,
after he had experienced the
very Being of the Christ in an extra-earthly, super-sensible manner. Thus
Paul was a man who could not be persuaded of the meaning of the Christ
Impulse by evidence of the physical senses, but who could be convinced
only by a super-sensible experience. And the super-sensible
experience that came to him cut deeply into his life — so deeply indeed,
that from that moment he became another man. Nay, more: he became an
initiate.
Paul was well
prepared for such an experience. He was thoroughly acquainted with the
secrets of the religion of the Jews; he was familiar with their knowledge
and their conception of the world. He was thus well equipped to judge of
the nature of the event that befell him at
Damascus
and to have a right view and
understanding of it. The writings of Paul, as we know them, convey only a
weak reflection of all that he experienced inwardly. But even so, when he
speaks of the event of
Damascus
we can discern that he speaks as one who through this event attained
knowledge of cosmic happenings lying behind the veil of the world of
sense. From the very manner in which he speaks it is plain that he is
fully able to understand the difference between the super-sensible world
and the world of sense.
When,
even externally, we compare the life of Paul with the earthly
experience of Christ Jesus, we discover a strange and astounding fact
which becomes intelligible to us only when with the help of spiritual
science. We are able to survey the whole evolution of mankind. I have
often drawn attention to the great difference in the development of the
human soul in the several epochs. I have shown you how man has changed
in the course of evolution through the Indian, Persian,
Egypto-Chaldean, Greco-Latin epochs, on to our own time. When we look
back into the ancient past we find that man remained capable of organic
physical development until an advanced age. The parallelism between the
development of the soul and the development of the body continued until
an advanced age; it is a parallelism that we can recognise now only in
the three stages marked by the change of teeth, puberty and the
beginning of the twenties. As far as outward appearance goes, mankind
has lost the experience of such transitions in later life. In very
ancient Indian times, however, men experienced a parallelism between
the development of soul and of body up to the fiftieth year of life, in
Persian and Egyptian times up to the fortieth year, and in Greco-Latin
times up to the thirty-fifth year. In ordinary consciousness, we
experience a like parallelism only up to the twenty-seventh year and it
is not easy to detect even for so long as that. Now the Christ Impulse
entered into the evolution of mankind at a time when men — especially
those of the Greek and Latin races — experienced this parallelism as
late as into the thirtieth year. And Christ Jesus lived His days of
physical earthly life for just so long as the duration of the span of
life which ran in a parallelism between the physical organisation and
the organisation of soul and spirit. Then, in relation to earthly life,
He passed through the gate of death.What this passage through the gate
of death means can be understood only from the point of view of
spiritual science; it can be understood only when we are able to look
into super-sensible worlds. For the passage through the gate of death is
not an event that can be grasped by any thinking concerned entirely
with the world of sense.
As physical man, Paul
was of about the same age as Christ Jesus Himself. The time that Christ
Jesus spent in His work on earth, Paul spent as an anti-Christian. And
the second half of his life was determined entirely by what came to him
from super-sensible experiences. In this second half of his life he had
super-sensible experience of what men at that time could no longer receive
in the second half of life through sense-experience, because the
parallelism between soul-and-spirit development and physical development
was not experienced beyond the thirty-fifth year of life. And the Event
of Golgotha came before Paul in such a way that he received, by direct
illumination, the understanding once possessed by men in an atavistic
way through primeval wisdom, and which they can now again acquire through
spiritual science. This understanding came to Paul in order that he might
be the one to arouse in men a realisation of what had happened for
mankind through the working of the Christ Impulse.
For
about the same length of time that Christ had walked the earth, did
Paul continue to live upon earth — that is, until about his
sixty-seventh or sixty-eighth year. This time was spent in carrying the
teaching of Christianity into earth-evolution. The parallelism between
the life of Christ Jesus and the life of Paul is a remarkable one. The
life of Christ Jesus was completely filled with the presence and Being
of the Christ. Paul had such a strong after-experience (acquired
through Initiation) of this event, that he was able to be the one to
bring to mankind true and fitting ideas about Christianity — and to do
so for a period of time corresponding very nearly to that of the life
of Christ Jesus on earth. There is a great deal to be learned from a
study of the connection between the life lived by Christ Jesus for the
sake of the earthly evolution of mankind, and the teaching given by
Paul concerning the Christ Being. To see this connection aright would
mean a very great deal for us; only it is necessary to realise that the
connection is a direct result of the super-sensible experience undergone
by Paul. [Rudolf Steiner here considers the "Christ Being" to be the
spiritual being who entered the body of Jesus of Nazareth during the
Baptism in the Jordan; and "Christ Jesus" to be Jesus of Nazareth plus
the Christ Being. Ed.]
When modern theology
goes so far as to explain the event at
Damascus
as a kind of illusion, as a
kind of hallucination, then it is only a proof that in our day even
theology has succumbed to materialism. Even theology has no longer any
knowledge of the nature of the super-sensible world, and entirely fails to
recognise man's need to understand the super-sensible world before he can
have any true comprehension of Christianity.
It is good that we
should confess today, in all sincerity, how difficult it is to find our
way into the ideas presented in the Gospels and in the Epistles of Paul
— ideas that are so totally different from those to which we are
accustomed. For the most part we have ceased to concern ourselves at all
with such ideas. But it is a fact that a person who is completely given up
to the habits and ways of thought of the present day, is far from being
able to form the right ideas when he reads the words of Paul. Many
present-day theologians put a materialistic interpretation upon the event of
Damascus,
even trying to disprove and deny the actual Resurrection of Christ Jesus
— while professing at the same time to be true Christians. Such persons
themselves bear testimony that they have no intention of applying
knowledge of the super-sensible to the essence of Christianity or to the
event of the appearance of Christ Jesus in earthly evolution. The very
fact that the figure of Paul stands at the summit of Christian tradition,
the figure, that is, of one who acquired an understanding of Christianity
through super-sensible experience, is like a challenge to man to possess
himself of super-sensible knowledge. It is like a declaration that
Christianity cannot possibly be comprehended without having recourse to
knowledge that has its source in the super-sensible. It is essential that
we should see in Paul a man who had been initiated into super-sensible,
cosmic happenings; it is essential to see in this light what he laboured
so hard to bring to mankind. Let us try in the language of the present
day to place before our minds one of the things that seemed to Paul, as
an initiate, to be of particular significance.
Paul regarded it of
supreme importance to make clear to men how through the Christ Impulse an
entirely new way of relating themselves to cosmic evolution had come to
them. He felt it essential to declare: that that period of the evolution
of the world which carried within it the experiences of the heathen of
older times, had run its course; it was finished for man. New experiences
were now here for the human soul; they needed only to be perceived.
When Paul spoke in
this way, he was pointing to the mighty Event which made such a deep
incision into the evolution of man on earth; and indeed if we would
understand history as it truly is, we must come back again and again to
this Event. If we look back into pre-Christian times, and especially into
those times which possess to a striking degree the characteristic
qualities of pre-Christian life, we can feel how different was the whole
outlook of men in those days. Not that a complete change took place in a
single moment; nevertheless the Event of Golgotha did bring about an
absolute separation of one phase in the evolution of mankind from
another. The Event of Golgotha came at the end of a period of evolution
during which men beheld, together with the world of the senses, also the
spiritual. Incredible as it may appear to modern man it is a fact that in
pre-Christian times men saw, together with the sense-perceptible, a
spiritual reality. They did not see merely trees, or merely plants, but
together with the trees, and together with the plants they saw something spiritual.
But as the time of the Event of Golgotha drew near, the civilisation that
bore within it this power of vision was coming to an end. Something
completely new was now to enter into the evolution of mankind. As long as
man beholds the spiritual in the physical things all around him, he
cannot have a consciousness which allows the impulse of freedom to
quicken within it. The birth of the impulse of freedom is necessarily
accompanied by a loss of this vision; man has to find himself deserted by
the divine and spiritual when he looks out upon the external world. The
impulse of freedom inevitably implies that, if man would again have
vision of the spiritual, he must exert himself inwardly and draw it forth
from the depths of his own soul.
This is what Paul
wanted to reveal. He told how in ancient times, when men were
only the race of Adam, they had no need to draw forth an active
experience from the depths of their own being before they could behold
the divine and spiritual. The divine and spiritual came to them in
elemental form, with everything that lived in the air and on earth. But
mankind had gradually to lose this living communion with the divine and
spiritual in all the phenomena of the world of sense. A time had to come
when man must perforce lift himself up to the divine and spiritual by an
active strengthening of his own inner life. He had to learn to understand
the words: “My kingdom is not of this world.” He was not to
be allowed to go on receiving a divine and spiritual reality that came
forth to meet him from all sense-phenomena He had to find the way to a
divine and spiritual kingdom that could be reached only by inward
struggle and inward development.
People interpret Paul
today in such a trivial manner! Again and again they show an inclination
to translate what he said into the language of this materialistic age. So
trivial is their interpretation of him that one is liable to be dubbed
fantastic when one puts forward such a view as the following concerning
the content of his message. And yet it is absolutely true.
Paul saw what a great
crisis it was for the world that the ancient vision, which was at one and
the same time a sense-vision and a spiritual vision, was fading away and
disappearing, and that another vision of the spiritual was now to dawn
for man in a new kingdom of light,
[Romans 13:12]
a vision which he must acquire for himself by his own inner
initiative, and which is not immediately present for him in the vision of
the senses. Paul knew from his own super-sensible experience in initiation
that ever since the Resurrection Christ Jesus has been united with
earth-evolution. But he also knew that, although Christ Jesus is present,
He can be found by man only through the awakening of an inner power of
vision, not through any mere beholding with the senses. Should anyone
think he can reach the Christ with the mere vision of the senses, Paul
knew that he must be giving himself up to delusions, he must be mistaking
some demon for the Christ.
This
was what Paul was continually emphasising to those of his hearers who
were able to understand it: that the old spiritual vision brings no
approach to Christ, that with this old vision one can only mistake some
elemental being for the Christ. Therefore Paul exerted all his power to
bring men out of the habit of looking to the spirits of air and of
earth.
[Gal. 4:3,9]
In earlier times men had been familiar with
elemental spirits, and necessarily so, for in those times they still
possessed atavistic faculties with which to behold them. But now these
faculties could not rightly be possessed by man. On the other hand,
Paul never wearied of exhorting people to develop within themselves a
force whereby they might learn to understand what it was that had taken
place, namely, an entirely new impulse, an entirely new Being had
entered earth-evolution. “Christ will come again to you,” he said, “if
you will only find the way out of your purely physical vision of the
earth. Christ will come again to you, for He is here. Through the
working of the Event of Golgotha, He is here. But you must find Him; He must come again
for you.”
This is what Paul
proclaimed, and in a language which at the time had quite another
spiritual ring than has the mere echo left us in our translation. It
sounded quite different then. Paul sought continually to awaken in man
the conviction that if he would understand Christ, he must develop a new
kind of vision; the vision that suffices for the world of sense is not
enough. today, mankind has only come so far as to speak of the contrast
between an external, sense-derived science, and faith. Modern theology is
ready to admit of the former that it is complicated, that it is real and
objective, that it requires to be learned; of faith it will allow no such
thing. It is repeatedly emphasised that faith ought to make appeal to
what is utterly childlike in man, to that in man which does not need to
be learned.
Such is the attitude
of mind which rejects the event of
Damascus
as unreal, preferring to regard it as a kind of hallucination that befell
Paul. If, however, the event of Damascus was a mere hallucination —
or I might just as well say, if the event of Damascus was what a great
number of modern theologians would have it to be — then we ought
also to have the courage to say: Away with Christianity! For Christianity
has brought with it a belief that is absurd and senseless.
This would be the
necessary outcome of the teaching of modern theology, if only people took
it — first of all, seriously, and secondly, with courage. As a
matter of fact they do neither. They shrink from having nothing but a
merely external, sense-given science, and yet at the same time they deny
the real, inner impulse of the event of
Damascus,
while still professing to
hold fast to Christianity! It is precisely in such things that the
soul-and-spirit sickness of our age comes to clearest expression; for a
deep inner lack of truth is here laid bare. Truth would be obliged to
confess: Either the event of
Damascus
was a reality, an event that
can be placed in the realm of reality, then Christianity has meaning; or
it was what it is asserted to be by modern theology, which wants always
to associate itself with modern science; then Christianity has no
meaning. It is important that people should face such conclusions, for
there is no doubt we live in an age of severe testing. Through man's
becoming inwardly untrue in regard to the very matters that are most
sacred for him — for he ought no longer to call what he has,
‘Christianity’ — through this, a tendency to untruth,
often unconscious but no less destructive on that account, has taken hold
of mankind. That is the real reason for the existence of this tendency. That
is why this tendency to untruth is so closely interwoven with the events
that will inevitably lead to decadence in the whole cultural life of
Europe,
unless people rethink these things in time and turn to spiritual knowledge.
And if we would turn
to spiritual knowledge, it is emphatically not enough to
rest content with looking at life in any superficial way; it is
absolutely essential for us to take things in all their depth of meaning
and to be ready to contemplate the necessity of mighty changes in our own
time.
Again and again we
must ask: What is a festival such as that of Easter for the greater part
of mankind? It may be said of very many people that when they are in
the circle of their friends who still want to gather together to keep the
festival, all their thinking about Easter runs along the lines of old
habits of thought; they use the old words, they go on uttering them more
or less automatically, they make the same renunciation in the same
formula to which they have long been accustomed. But have we any right
today to utter this renunciation, when we can observe on every hand a
distinct unwillingness to take part in the great change that is so
necessary in our own time? Are we justified in using the words
of Paul: “Not I, but Christ in me!” when we show so little
inclination to examine into what it is that has brought such great
unhappiness to mankind in the modern age? Should it not go together with
the Easter festival that we set out to gain a clear idea of the destiny
that has befallen mankind and of what it is that alone can lead us out of
the catastrophe — namely, super-sensible knowledge? If the Easter
festival, whose whole significance depends upon super-sensible knowledge
— for knowledge of the senses can never explain the Resurrection of
Christ Jesus — if this Easter festival is to be taken seriously, is
it not essential that people should consider how a super-sensible
character can be brought again into the human faculty of knowledge? Should
not this be the thought that rises up in our minds today: All the
lying and deception in modern culture is due to the fact that we
ourselves are no longer in earnest about what we recognise as the sacred
festivals of the year?
We keep Easter, the
festival of Resurrection, but in our materialistic outlook we have long
ago ceased caring whether or not we have a real understanding of the
Resurrection. We set ourselves at enmity with the truth and we try to
find all manner of ingenious ways of accepting the cosmic jest —
for indeed it would be, or rather it is a jest that man should keep the
festival of the Resurrection and at the same time put his whole faith in
modern science which obviously can never make appeal to such a
Resurrection. Materialism and the keeping of Easter — these are two
things that cannot possibly belong together; they cannot possibly exist
side by side. And the materialism of modern theology — that too is
incompatible with the Easter festival. In our own time a book entitled
“The Essence of Christianity” has been written by an eminent
theologian of
Central Europe,
and is
accounted of outstanding importance. Yet throughout this work we find
evidence of a desire not to take seriously the fact of the Resurrection
of Christ Jesus. There you have a true symptom of the times!
People must learn to
feel these things deeply in their hearts. We shall never find a way out
of our present troubles unless we develop understanding of the enmity
cherished by the modern materialistically minded man towards the truth,
unless we learn to see through things like this, for they are of very
great significance in life today.
During the Fifth
Post-Atlantean epoch a new tendency has been at work, a tendency towards
a scientific knowledge that is adapted to the power of human reason and
judgment; and now it is time that this should go further and develop into
a knowledge of the super-sensible world. For the Event of Golgotha is an
event that falls absolutely within the super-sensible world. And
the event of
Damascus,
as Paul experienced it, is an event that can be understood only out of
super-sensible ideas. On the understanding of this event depends whether
one can in very truth feel something of the Christ Impulse, or whether
one cannot. The man of the present day is faced with a severe test when
he asks himself: In the time that has been christened
‘Easter,’ how do I stand to super-sensible knowledge? For
Easter should remind him, by the very way its date is determined, to look
up from the earthly to what is beyond the earth. The man of modern times
has left himself no more insight into what is beyond the earth than at
most that which is given him in mathematics and mechanics, and now in
spectro-analysis. These sciences are the groundwork upon which he tries
to build up his knowledge concerning all that is beyond the earth. He no
longer feels that he is himself united with those worlds, and that the
Christ descended thence when He entered into the personality of Jesus.
Let me beg you to
give these thoughts, which are so pertinent to our present problems, your
full and earnest attention. I have often pointed out what a fine
spiritual nature such as Herman Grimm must needs think of the
Kant-Laplace theory. It is true, the theory has undergone some
modification in our day, nevertheless in all essentials it is still the
prevailing theory of the universe. It is said that the solar system has
come out of a primeval nebula, and in course of mighty changes undergone
by the nebula and its densifications, plants, animals and also man have
come into being. And carrying the theory further, a time will come when
everything on the earth will have found its grave and when ideals and
works of culture will no longer send their voice out into the universe,
when the earth itself will fall like a bit of slag into the sun; and
then, in a still later time, the sun will burn itself out and be
scattered in the All, not merely burying, but annihilating everything
that is now being made and done by man.
Such a view of the
ordering of the world must inevitably arise in a time when man wants to
grasp that which is beyond the earth with mathematical and mechanical
knowledge alone. In a world in which he merely calculates or investigates
qualities of the sun with the spectroscope — in such a world we
shall never find the realm whence Christ came down to unite Himself with
the life of the earth! There are people today who, because they cannot
get clarity into their thoughts, prefer not to let themselves be troubled
with thinking at all, and go on repeating the words they have learned from
the Gospels and from the Epistles of St. Paul, simply repeating by rote
what they have learned, never stopping to think whether it is compatible
with the view of the evolution of the earth and man that they acquire
elsewhere. But that is the deep inward untruth of our time: men slink away
into some comfortable dark corner instead of bringing together in their
thought the things that essentially belong together. They want to raise a
mist before their eyes so that they may not need to ‘think
together’ the things that belong together. They raise a mist before
their eyes when they keep a festival like Easter and are at the same time
very far indeed from forming any true idea of the Resurrection of which
they speak; for a true idea of it can only be formed with spiritual and
super-sensible knowledge.
The only possible way
in these days for man to unite a right feeling with Easter is for him to
direct his thought in this connection to the world-catastrophe of his own
time. For in very deed a world-catastrophe is upon us. I do not mean
merely the catastrophe that happened in the recent years of the war, but
I refer to that world-catastrophe which consists in the fact that men
have lost all idea of the connection of the earthly with that which is
beyond the earth. The time has come when man must realise with full
and clear consciousness that super-sensible knowledge has now to arise out
of the grave of the materialistic outlook. For together with
super-sensible knowledge will arise the knowledge of Christ Jesus. In
point of fact, man has no other symbol that fits the Easter festival than
this — that mankind has brought upon itself the doom of being
crucified upon the cross of its own materialism. But man must do
something himself before there arises from the grave of human materialism
all that can come from super-sensible knowledge.
The very striving
after super-sensible knowledge is itself an Easter deed, it is something
which gives man the right once more to keep Easter. Look up to the full
moon and feel how the full moon is connected with man in its phenomena,
and how the reflection of the sun is connected with the moon, and then
meditate on the need today to go in search of a true self-knowledge
which can show forth man as a reflection of the super-sensible. If man
knows himself to be a reflection of the super-sensible, if he recognises
how he is formed and constituted out of the super-sensible, then he will
also find the way to come to the super-sensible. At bottom, it is
arrogance and pride that find expression in the materialistic view of the
world. It is human pride, manifesting in a strange way! Man does not want
to be a reflection of the divine and spiritual, he wants to be merely the
highest of the animals. There he is the highest. But the point
is, among what sort of beings is he the highest? This pride leads man to
recognise nothing beyond himself. If the natural scientific outlook on
the world were to be true to itself, it would have the mission of
impressing this fact again and again upon man: You are the highest of all
the beings of which you can form an idea. The ultimate consequences of
the point of view that sets out to be strictly scientific, are such as to
make a man turn pale when they show him on what kind of moral groundwork
they are based — all unconscious though he may be of it. The truth
is, we are today living in a time when Christ Jesus is being crucified
in a very special sense. He is being put to death in the field of
knowledge. And until men come to see how the present way of knowledge,
clinging as it does to the senses and to them alone, is nothing but a
grave of knowledge out of which a resurrection must take place —
until they see this, they will not be able to lift themselves up to
experiences in thought and feeling that partake of a true Easter
character.
This is the thought that
we should carry in our hearts and minds today. We still have with us the
tradition of an Easter festival that is supposed to be celebrated on the
first Sunday after the first full moon of spring. The tradition we have,
but the right to celebrate such a festival — that we have not, who
live in present-day civilisation.
How can we acquire
this right again? We must take the thought of Christ Jesus lying in the
grave, of Christ Jesus Who at Easter time vanquishes the stone that has
been rolled over His grave — we must take this thought and unite it
with the other thought which I have indicated. For the soul of man should
feel the purely external, mechanistic knowledge like a tombstone rolled
upon him; and he must exert himself to overcome the pressure of this
knowledge, he must find the possibility, not to make confession of his
faith in the words: “Not I, but the fully developed animal in
me,” but to have the right to say: “Not I, but Christ in
me.”
It is related of a
learned English scientist [T.H. Huxley] that he said he would rather
believe that he had by his own power worked his way up little by little
from the ape stage to his present height as man, than that he had
descended from a once ‘divine’ height, as his opponent, who
could not give credence to the ideas of natural science, appeared to have
done.
Such things only
serve to show how urgent it is to find the way from the confession of
faith: “Not I, but the fully developed animal in me,” to that
other confession of faith: “Not I, but Christ in me.” We must
strive to understand this words of Paul. Not until then will it be
possible for the true Easter message to rise up from the depths of our
hearts and souls and enter into our consciousness.