Lecture III
The Symbolism of Numbers
The Mystics and the Time of Copernicus.
Involution, Evolution and Creation out of Nothingness.
The Number Four, the Sign of Creation.
Today we shall first
occupy ourselves with a consideration of what is called the symbolism
of numbers. When speaking of occult signs and symbols, it is
necessary to mention the symbols that are expressed in numbers, even
if only briefly. You may recall my elucidations of the day before
yesterday in which I spoke of the numerical proportions in the
universe, of the speed with which the single planets move and of the
harmony of the spheres that comes about through these different
speeds. Even from this you can see that numbers and numerical
proportions have a certain meaning for the cosmos and the world. It
is in numbers, we might say, that the harmony that wells through
space is expressed. Now we shall turn our attention to a more
intimate numerical symbolism, the meaning of which we can only touch
upon, however. Were we really to immerse ourselves in it, many other
things would have to be considered. Anyway, you will receive at least
an idea of what is meant when it is said of the old occult
Pythagorean School that it stressed the necessity of immersing
oneself in the nature of numbers in order to gain an insight into the
world.
To think about numbers
may appear dry and dreary to many. To those who are affected by the
materialistic culture of our times it will appear as mere playfulness
if it is believed that, through a consideration of numbers, it is
possible to gain knowledge of the nature of things. There was,
however, a deep reason for the great Pythagoras to tell his pupils
that knowledge concerning the nature of numbers would lead to the
essence of things. But do not think it sufficient to reflect on the
numbers 1, 3, or 7. Real occult teaching knows nothing of witchcraft
and magic, nor of a superstitious meaning of some number. Its
knowledge rests on deeper things, and from the short sketch I will
give you, you will see that numbers can give you a clue to what is
called meditation if you have the key to plunge deeply enough.
The number one
must be our starting point. Later, in considering the other numbers,
it will become clearer how far the number one symbolizes what I shall
say. In all occultism the One has always designated the indivisible
unity of God in the universe. God is indicated by the number one. We
should not believe, however, that anything is to be gained by
becoming engrossed in nothing but this number. You will see later how
this absorption should rightfully come about, and it will be far more
fruitful if we first consider the other numbers.
Two is called
the number of revelation in occultism. This means that whatever
appears to us in the world, whatever reveals itself, whatever is not
in any way concealed, stands as a duality. Thereby we acquire ground
under our feet, whereas with the number one we are groping in the
unfathomable. Everywhere in nature you find that nothing reveals
itself without being related to the number two. Light alone cannot
reveal itself. There must also be shadow or darkness — that is,
a duality. There could never be a world filled with manifest light
were there not corresponding shadow. Thus it is with all things. It
would never be possible for good to manifest if it did not have evil
as shadow-picture. The duality of good and evil is a necessity in the
manifest world. There are infinitely many dualities. They fit all
life, but we must look for them at the right spots.
There is one important
duality in life about which men might well reflect. Yesterday, we
considered various conditions that a man experienced before he became
an inhabitant of our present earth. We saw that on Saturn and on Sun
he had a certain immortality in that he directed his body from
outside, that he broke off pieces of this body and added new ones, so
that he perceived nothing of fading and dying. Human consciousness at
that time was not as it is today, but was dull. Men have wrestled
through to a consciousness for the first time on our earth. It is
here that a man first becomes a being who knew something of himself
and could distinguish himself from objects. For this to occur, it was
necessary not only that he direct his body from the outside, that he
broke off pieces of this body and added new ones, so that he
perceived nothing of fading and dying. Human consciousness at that
time was not as it is today, but was dull. Men have wrestled through
to a consciousness that is bound up with self-consciousness for the
first time on our earth. It is here that a man first became a being
who knew something of himself and could distinguish himself from
objects. For this to occur, it was necessary not only that he direct
himself from outside, but he also had to slip into this body,
perceive himself therein, and say “I” to it. Only because
a man finds himself completely in his body has he been able to
achieve his full consciousness. Now, however, he also shares the
destiny of his body. Earlier, when he still hovered over it, this was
not the case. It was only when a man had achieved this degree of
consciousness that he came into relation with death. At the moment
when his body falls apart, he feels the suspension of his ego because
he identifies himself with his body. Only gradually, through
spiritual development, will he again achieve the old immortality. The
body is here as the school through which to wrestle through to
immortality with self-consciousness. Through death a man acquires
immortality on a higher level. As long as he had not experienced
death, so long was the world unrevealed to him because duality
belongs to the revealed world — death and life.
Thus, we could point
out dualities at every step in life. In physics you find positive and
negative electricity, in magnetism, forces of attraction and
repulsion. Everything appears in duality. Two, duality, is the number
of appearance, of manifestation.
There is, however, no
revelation save that the Divine holds sway behind the scenes. In this
way, behind every duality a unity is hidden. Therefore, three
is nothing but two and one, that is, the revelation and the existent
divinity backing it.
Three is the number of
the Divinity revealing itself. There is a statement in occultism that
says that two can never be the number for the Divinity. One is a
number for God, and also the three. The one who sees the world as a
duality, sees it only in its revelation. Whoever claims that this
duality is all is always in the wrong. Let us make this clear to
ourselves with an example. Even in places where spiritual science is
discussed, sinning often occurs against the statement of true
occultism that two is the number of revelation but not the number of
fullness or completeness. You will often hear it said in popular
occultism by people who do not really know, that all development runs
its course through involution and evolution, but we shall see the
direction this really takes. First, however let's examine a plant, a
fully developed plant with roots, leaves, stems, blossoms, fruit,
etc. This is an evolution. But now observe the small seed from which
the plant has arisen or can arise. In this tiny seed the entire plant
is, in a sense, already contained. It is hidden within it,
ensheathed, because the seed is taken from the whole plant, which has
laid all its forces into the seed. Here we may therefore make a
distinction between two processes — the one in which the seed's
forces have unfurled themselves and unfolded into the plant,
evolution, and the other in which the plant has folded itself up and,
as it were, crept into the seed, involution.
The process that
occurs when a being that has many organs so forms itself that nothing
of these organs remains visible, so that they contract to a tiny
part, is called an involution. The process of expansion and unfolding
is an evolution. Everywhere in life this duality alternates but
always only within the manifest. You can follow this up not only in
the plant but also in higher realms of life. Let us trace in thought,
for example, the development of European spiritual life from
Augustine to Calvin, that is, roughly through the Middle Ages. You
will find in Augustine a kind of mystical inwardness. No one can read
the Confessions or his other writings without experiencing the
deep inwardness of this man's feeling life. When we advance further,
we come across wonderful characters such as Scotus Erigena, a monk
from Scotland called the Scottish St. John, who later lived at the
court of Charles the Bald. He did not get on well with the Church,
and it is told that the brothers of his order tortured him to death
with pins. Of course, this is not to be taken literally, but it is
true that he was tortured to death. A splendid book was written by
him, On the Divisions in Nature which reveals a great
profundity of thought even though it is found wanting in many ways
from the anthroposophical point of view.
Proceeding further, we
find the German mystics in the region of the Rhine, through whom an
inner warmth poured itself out over great numbers of people. Not only
did the highest of the clergy experience it, but also those who
worked on the land and in the smithies. They were all picked up by
this current of the time. Further along the way we find Nicolaus
Cusanus (1400–64), and so we can follow along in time until the
end of the Middle Ages. Always we find that depth of feeling, that
inwardness, that spreads itself over all strata of the
population.
If we now compare this
time with that following it, with the period that began in the
sixteenth century and extends into our own, we notice a tremendous
difference. At the outset, we find Copernicus who, through a
comprehensive idea, effected a renewal of spiritual life, whose
thought has become so incorporated into human thinking that whoever
believes something else today is counted a fool. We see Galileo, who
discovered the law of gravity by observing the swinging of a church
lamp in Pisa. Step by step we follow the passage of time up to the
present, and everywhere we find the opposite, the strict opposite, of
the Middle Ages. Feeling steadily declines and inwardness disappears.
The intellect comes steadily to the fore and men become more
clever.
Spiritual science
explains the difference between these two epochs and shows us that
this change had to be. There is an occult statement that says that
the period from Augustine to Calvin was one of mystical involution.
What does this mean? From the time of Augustine to the sixteenth
century there was an outward unfolding of mystical life; it was
outside. But something else was also there — intellectual life
hidden in germinal form. It was, as it were, like a sun buried in the
spiritual earth that unfolded later after the sixteenth century. The
intellect was involuted as the plant is in its seed. Nothing can come
forth in the world that was not previously in such an involution.
Since the sixteenth century, the intellect has been evolving, the
mystical life withdrawing. Now the time has come when this mystical
life must again appear, when through the Anthroposophical Movement it
will be brought to unfolding, to evolution. In this way involution
and evolution disclose themselves alternately everywhere in life.
Whoever stops here,
however, is taking only the outer aspect into account. To reckon with
the whole we must include a third aspect that stands behind these
two. What is this third aspect? Imagine yourself facing a phenomenon
in the outer world. You reflect over it. You are here, the outer
world is there, and from within your thoughts arise. These thoughts
were not there previously. When, for example, you form a thought
about a rose, this thought first arises in the moment you make a
connection with the rose. You were here, the rose there, and now the
thought arises in you. When the image of the rose arises, something
quite new has come about. This is also the case in other spheres of
life. Imagine the artist, Michelangelo, arranging a group of models.
Actually, he did this in the rarest of cases. Michelangelo is here,
what he renders is there. Something new — the image —
arises in his soul. This is a creation that has nothing to do with
involution and evolution. It is something entirely new that arises
from the intercourse between a being that can receive and a being
that can give. Such new creations are always generated through
intercourse of being with being, and such new creations are a
beginning.
Recall what we
considered yesterday, how thoughts are creative, how they can ennoble
the soul, indeed, even work later on forming the body. Whatever a
being once thinks, the thought creation, the concept creation, works
and actively carries on further. It is a new creation, works and
actively carries on further. It is a new creation and at the same
time a beginning because it gives rise to consequences. If you have
good thoughts today, they are fruitful into the remote future because
your soul goes its own way in the spiritual world. Your body returns
to the elements and decays. Even if everything through which the
thought arose disintegrates, the effects of the thought remain.
Let us return to the
example of Michelangelo. His glorious paintings have affected
millions of people. These paintings, however, will one day fall into
dust and there will be future generations who will never see his
creations. But what lived in Michelangelo's soul before his paintings
took outer form, what at first existed as new creations in his soul,
lives on, remains, and will appear in future stages of development
and be given form. Do you know why clouds and stars appear to us
today? Because there were beings in preceding eras who had thoughts
of clouds and stars. Everything arises out of thought creations.
There you have the
number three! In revelation things alternate between involution and
evolution. Behind this is a deeply hidden creation, a new creation
born out of thought. Everything has arisen out of thought, and the
greatest things in the world have gone forth from the thoughts of the
Godhead. From what, then, do things arise since ideas are new
creations? They arise out of nothing! Three different things are here
connected: Creation out of nothingness, which always occurs when you
have an idea; the manifestation of this creation; the course of its
development in time through the two forms, involution and evolution.
This is what is meant when certain religious systems speak of the
world created out of nothingness. If today people deride this, it is
only because they do not understand what is to be found in these
documents.
In the world of
manifestation, to sum it up once more, everything alternates between
involution and evolution. At the root of this is a hidden creation
out of nothingness that unites itself with the two (involution and
evolution) to form a triad. This is a union of the Divine with the
revealed.
So you can see how we
can reflect on the number three. We should not take off and spin
pedantic thoughts about it, but we must look for the duality and
triad that is to be met at every turn. Then we consider the numerical
symbols in the right way, in the Pythagorean sense, and can draw
conclusions leading from one to the other. We could also say that
light and shadow appear in the manifest world, and behind these lies
a third, hidden element.
We come now to the
number four. Four is the sign of the cosmos or of creation. As far as
we can determine with our present organs, the present planetary
condition of the earth is its fourth embodiment. Everything that is
manifest to us on an earth such as ours presupposes that this
creation is the fourth stage. This is but a special case for all
creations that appear thus. They all stand under the sign of the
four.
The occultist says
that men today stand in the mineral kingdom. What does this mean?
Because a man understands only the mineral kingdom, he can only
control this kingdom. Using minerals, he can build a house, a clock,
and other things because they are subject to mineral laws. For
various other activities he does not have this capacity. He cannot,
for example, form a plant from out of his own thinking. To be able to
do this he would himself have to exist in the plant kingdom. Some
time in the future this will be the case. Today men are creators in
the mineral realm. Three other kingdoms, the elementary kingdoms,
have preceded this; the mineral kingdom is the fourth. All told there
are seven.
Men stand in the
fourth kingdom. Only here do they reach their actual consciousness
oriented to the outer world. On the Moon they were still operating in
the third elementary kingdom, on the Sun in the second, and on Saturn
in the first. In the future on Jupiter, they will be able to create
plants as today they are able to construct a clock. Everything
visible in creation stands in the sign of the four. There are many
planets that are not to be seen with physical eyes, such as those in
the first, second, and third elementary kingdoms. Only when such a
planet within creation enters the mineral kingdom can it be seen.
Four is, therefore, the number of the cosmos or of creation. With the
entrance into the fourth condition a being becomes fully visible to
eyes that can see external things.
Five is the number of
evil. This will become clear to us if we again consider human beings.
In their development men have become fourfold beings and thereby
beings of the created world. Here on earth, however, the fifth member
of their being, the spirit self, will be added. Were they to remain
fourfold beings, they would be constantly directed by the gods
— toward the good, of course — but they would never
develop their independence. They have become free through the gift of
their germinal fifth member, but it is also from this that they have
received the ability to do evil. No being can do evil who has not
arrived at “fivefoldness.” Wherever we meet with evil,
such that it can actually adversely affect our own being, there a
fivefoldness is at play. This is the case everywhere, including the
outside world, but people are unaware of it, and our present
materialistic world view has no conception of the fact that the world
can be considered in this way. Actually, there is justification for
speaking of evil only where fivefoldness appears. When, one day,
medicine will make use of this, it will be able to influence
beneficially the course of illness. Part of the treatment would be to
study the illness in its development on the first and fifth days
after its onset, on the separate days at the fifth hour past
midnight, and again during the fifth week. Thus it is always the
number five that determines when the physician can best intervene.
Before that there is not much else he can do than to let nature take
its course, but then he can intervene, helping or harming, because
what can justifiably be called good or evil then flows into the world
of reality. It is possible in many areas to show that the number five
has meaning for outer events.
A man's life consists
of periods of seven years — from birth until the change of
teeth; puberty; seven or eight years later; toward thirty, followed
by the seven year periods throughout the rest of his life. When, one
day, he will take these periods into account and consider what had
best come toward or stand aloof from him, he will come to know much
about preparing a good old age for himself. He can thus bring about
good or evil for the remainder of his life. In the early periods of
life a great deal can be done by observing certain laws of education.
Then, however, there comes an important turning point. This also may
become a regression if he is turned loose in life with complete
confidence too early. The accepted principle of today that sends
young people out into life early is harmful; the fifth period should
be passed before this happens. Such ancient occult principles are of
great importance. This is why, in the past, at the direction of those
who knew something of these things, the years of the apprentice and
journeyman had to be completed before one could be called a
master.
Seven is the number of
perfection. Observation of man himself will make this clear. Today he
is under the influence of the number five insofar as he can be good
or evil. As a creature of the universe he lives in the number four.
When he will have developed all that he holds at present as germ
within him, he will become a seven-membered being, perfect in its
kind. The number seven rules in the world of colour, in the rainbow;
in the world of tone it is found in the scale. Everywhere, in all
realms of life, the number seven can be observed as a kind of number
of perfection. There is no superstition or magic in this.
Now let us look back
again to the number one. Because we have considered other numbers,
what is now to be said about one will appear in the right light. The
essence of the number one is its indivisibility. Of course, it can be
subdivided, for example, 1/3, 2/3, etc. but this can only be
accomplished in thinking. In the world, especially in the spiritual
world, when you take the two-thirds away, the one-third still remains
a part of it. In the same sense it can be said that when some part of
God is separated from Him and becomes manifest, the remainder exists
as something that still belongs to it. In the Pythagorean sense we
can say, “Divide the unity, but never otherwise than to have in
your underlying thoughts the remainder connected with what has been
separated.”
Take a thin golden
plate of glass and look through it. The world will appear yellow
because that is the colour that will be reflected. But in white light
other colours are also contained. What happens to them? They are
absorbed by the object. Hence, a red object appears red because it
reflects the red rays and absorbs the rest. It is not possible to
separate red from white light without leaving the other colours
behind. With this we touch the edge of a world secret. You look at
things in a certain way. You see, for instance, a red cloth spread
out on the table and visualize at the same time that green is hidden
in it. In this way you have accomplished what in the Pythagorean
sense is called “The division of the One so that the rest is
preserved.” If you carry this out meditatively, if you again
and again unite separated parts into a unity, you have brought about
a meaningful development through which you can attain spiritual
heights.
Mathematicians have an
expression for this that holds good in all occult schools: 1 = (2-x)
- (1+x). [Ed: see Note 1]. This is an occult
formula that expresses how Oneness can be divided and the parts so
arranged that the One results. It indicates that, as occultists, we
should not think of Oneness simply as One, but as parts that we add
together again.
So, in this lecture we
have examined what is called number symbolism and learned that when
we meditate on the world from the standpoint of numbers, we can
penetrate deep world secrets.
To complete these
remarks let it be said once more that in the fifth week, on the fifth
day, or in the fifth hour we can find important things that can be
missed or made good. In the seventh week, on the seventh day, or in
the seventh hour (or in a definite relationship, say, 3 1/2 because
seven is also in this number), something can happen through the thing
itself. On the seventh day of an illness, for instance, a fever will
take on a definite character; this might also occur on the fourteenth
day. These things are always based on number relationships that point
to the structure of the world.
Those who steep
themselves in the right way in what, in the Pythagorean sense, we may
call the “study of numbers,” will learn to understand
life and the world in this number symbolism. Of this the lecture
today was meant to give you roughly sketched thoughts.
- Note
1: We feel this mathematical expression to be a
translation error: we will leave the original text alone (we're
trying to stay true to the printed book), and offer this
correction to the text from Matija Kolaric:
-
I posted the
question to the German mailing group [email protected]
about this math thing. There were a lot of answers: I will
insert one of them, my lines after the second solid line. I
know you might not speak German, but you shall get the
point.
Sorry Matija, I
do not write German. Yes, there is a translation error. Here's
the original German text:
“Wenn man
das meditativ durchführt, daß man das Geteilte stets
wieder zur Einheit verbindet, so ist das eine bedeutungsvolle
Arbeit, durch die man in der Entwickelung hoch aufsteigen kann.
Es gibt in der Mathematik einen Ausdrück dafür, der
in den okkulten Schulen überall gilt:
1 = (2 + x) - (1 + x)
“Das ist
eine okkulte Formel, welche ausdrücken soll, wie man die
Eins teilt, und wie man die Teile so darstellt, daß sie
wieder die Eins ergeben. Der Okkultist soll die Teilung der
Einheit so denken, daß er die Teile immer zur Einheit
wieder zusammenfügt.”
(GA 101 – 1.Auflage, Gesamtausgabe Dornach 1987)
Greetings from
France,
Jean-Marc
There was, after
this, a good explanation, looks like Steiner, but Felix Hau,
who wrote it, did not say if it was Steiner or his own, or just
his reinterpretation of Steiner. Nevertheless, it makes sense,
and he used the expression from above.
Here is the
point (in my own words): The world is in itself enclosed
Spirit. Symbolised with 1. However, as a man feels he is a
separate being, so there is one more Spirit (the spirit, and
the image).
Now, you can put
on the left side 1, and on the right side 2, but now you have
to subtract the enclosed Spirit. You get: 1 = 2 - 1
And you can add
to the duality all you want (2+x), because you have to subtract
it together with the one (1+x), so you get:
1=(2+x)-(1+x)
So, from these
two sources (whom I do not know, but I don't think they went
through all the trouble just to make fun of someone), I
strongly believe that this is the right thing. It makes sense,
which is even more important. And, it works with ANY x ! This
corresponds with the lecture, as far as I can tell. My
truth-feeling is satisfied: it was very alarmed with the
expression in the text.
After this I
added part of the letter from Felix Hau (in German):
Das meint doch
unsere Mathematik, wie sie heute so eifrig an den
Universitäten gelehrt wird. Das ist aber nicht so. Die 2
kommt schon danach; aber es ist keine Steigerung, dass sie
kommt, es ist nur eine Separation der 1. Und diese 1 ist
immernoch da - nun schon als 2. Und wenn Sie jetzt, meine Damen
und Herren, sich einmal den Zeitbegriff anschauen, wie wir ihn
alltäglich benutzen, dann wird auch verständlich,
dass wir in demselben Augenblick, in dem wir so bei der zwei
angekommen sind, aus der All-Einheit der eins zunächst
gefallen sind. Wir haben eine Ausdehnung im Zeitlichen hinter
uns gebracht. Das ist im Grunde der Ursprung dessen, was die
Mathematik die zweite Dimension nennt: Es ist die Zeit. Denn
bislang, meine Damen und Herren, haben wir ja noch gar keinen
Raum benötigt! Wir haben ja noch *GAR KEINEN* Raum
benötigt! Wir waren ja rein im Geistigen - und dort haben
wir zunächst die Zeit. Der Raum kommt später; davon
will ich dann morgen zu Ihnen sprechen. Für heute soll es
uns genügen, zu wissen, wie man in der okkulten Forschung
das darstellen kann, dass die All-Einheit, die 1, die
Zeitlichkeit - 2 - schon enthält. Und das, liebe Freunde,
kann man so darstellen, dass man sagt: Nun, wir haben hier eine
1; die stellen wir auf die eine Seite. Auf die andere Seite
stellen wir ihr die 2 gegenüber und entnehmen ihr den
Geist - also die 1 -, der die zwei ja erst möglich gemacht
hat. Denn der steckt ja in ihr drin, der Geist, er hat sich ja
in ihr verdoppelt, aber er muss nun wieder hinaus, damit wir
sehen, dass er drinnen war! Und nun meine lieben Freunde - es
ist ganz erstaunlich - können Sie mit dieser okkulten
Formel die ganze Welt in ihrer erscheinenden Zerstreuung, Sie
können die gleichzeitig in sich geschlossene Diaspora des
Geistes veranschaulichen. Denn es ist ganz gleich, was sie der
2 noch zugesellen, wenn Sie es hinten zusammen mit dem Geist
wieder herausnehmen, dann haben Sie wiederum die 1 all-ein. Und
es steht ja, und darauf ist hinzuweisen, meine lieben Freunde,
es steht ja dort *gleichzeitig* auf der einen Seite der
all-eine Geist und auf der anderen die Welt in der zerstreuten
Erscheinung. So haben wir also eine Formel gefunden, die das
ausdrücken kann, was der Okkultist auf allerlei Weise
mitzuteilen sich bemüht. Und diese Formel ist
folgende:
1=(2+x)-(1+x)
Herzlich,
Felix
I know I keep
you busy :))), but it seems that I was right after all (the I
part is not important, to find the truth, however, is). I
myself did not take a look in the book, but I feel completely
satisfied with the above expression. Of course, it is up to
you, but I suggest, if I may, that you change it.
From the
heart,
Matija
[We thank
you, Matija – Ed]
|