PREFACE TO THE REVISED EDITION, 1918
THERE
are two fundamental problems in the life of the human soul, to which
everything tends that is to be discussed in this book. One of these
problems concerns the possibility of attaining to such a view of the
essential nature of man as will serve as a support for whatever else
comes to meet him by way of life or of science, which, he feels,
cannot support itself and is liable to be driven, by doubt and
criticism, into the realm of uncertainties. The other problem is
this: Is man, as voluntary agent, entitled to attribute freedom to
himself, or is freedom a mere illusion begotten of his inability to
recognize the threads of necessity on which his volition, like any
natural event, depends? It is no artificial tissue of theories which
provokes this question. In a certain mood it presents itself quite
naturally to the human soul. And it is easy to feel that the soul
would lack something of its full stature which has never once
confronted with the utmost seriousness of inquiry the two
possibilities — freedom of the will or necessity. This book is
intended to show that the experiences which the second problem
causes man's soul to undergo, depend upon the position he is able to
take up towards the first problem. An attempt is made to prove that
there is a view concerning man's being which can support the rest of
knowledge; and, further, an attempt to point out how with this view
we gain a complete justification for the Idea of free will, provided
only that we have first discovered that region of the soul in which
free volition can unfold itself.
The view to which we here refer is one which, once
gained, is capable of becoming part and parcel of the very life of
the soul itself. The answer given to the two problems will not
be of the purely theoretical sort which, once mastered, may be
carried about as a conviction preserved by memory. Such an answer
would, for the whole manner of thinking adopted in this book, be no
real answer at all. The book will not give a ready-made and
conclusive answer of this sort, but point to a field of experience in
which man's own inward soul activity supplies a living answer to
these questions at every moment when he needs one. Whoever has once
discovered the region of the soul where these questions unfold, will
find precisely in his actual acquaintance with this region all
that he needs for the solution of these two problems. With the
knowledge thus acquired, he may then, as desire or destiny impels
him, adventure further into the breadths and depths of this
unfathomable life of ours. Thus it would appear that there is a kind
of knowledge which proves its justification and validity by its own
inner life as well as by the kinship of its own life with the whole
life of the human soul.
This is what I thought of the contents of this book when I first
wrote it twenty-five years ago. To-day, once again, I have to set
down similar sentences if I am to characterize the leading thoughts
of my book. At the original writing I contented myself with saying no
more than was in the strictest sense connected with the two
fundamental problems which I have outlined. If anyone should be
astonished at not finding in this book as yet any reference to that
region of the world of spiritual experience of which I have given an
account in my later writings, I would ask him to bear in mind that it
was not my purpose at that time to set down the results of spiritual
research, but first to lay the foundations on which such results can
rest. The Philosophy of Spiritual Activity contains no special
results of this spiritual sort, as little as it contains special
results of the natural sciences. But what it does contain is, in my
judgment, indispensable for anyone who desires a secure foundation
for such knowledge. What I have said in this book may be acceptable
even to some who, for reasons of their own, refuse to have anything
to do with the results of my researches into the Spiritual Realm. But
anyone who finds something to attract him in my inquiries into the
Spiritual Realm may well appreciate the importance of what I was here
trying to do. It is this: to show that open-minded consideration
simply of the two problems which I have indicated and which are
fundamental for every kind of knowledge, leads to the view that man
lives in the midst of a genuine Spiritual World.
The aim of this book is to demonstrate, prior to our entry upon
spiritual experience, that knowledge of the Spiritual World is
justified. This justification is so conducted that it is never
necessary, in order to accept the present arguments, to cast furtive
glances at the experiences on which I have dwelt in my later
writings. All that is necessary is that the reader should be willing
and able to adapt himself to the manner of the present discussions.
Thus it seems to me that in one sense this book occupies a position
completely independent of my writings on strictly spiritual
scientific matters. Yet in another sense it seems to be most
intimately connected with them. These considerations have moved me
now, after a lapse of twenty-five years, to republish the contents of
this book in the main without essential alterations. I have only made
additions of some length to a number of chapters. The
misunderstandings of my argument with which I have met seemed to make
these more detailed elaborations necessary. Changes of text have been
made only where it appeared to me that I had said clumsily what I
meant to say a quarter of a century ago. (Only ill-will could find in
these changes occasion to suggest that I have changed my fundamental
conviction.)
For many years my book has been out of print. In spite of the fact,
which is apparent from what I have just said, that my utterances of
twenty-five years ago about these problems still seem to me just as
relevant to-day, I hesitated a long time about the completion of this
revised edition. Again and again I have asked myself whether I ought
not, at this point or that, to define my position towards the
numerous philosophical views which have been put forward since the
publication of the first edition. Yet my preoccupation in recent
years with researches into the purely Spiritual Realm prevented my
doing as I could have wished. However, a survey, as thorough as I
could make it, of the philosophical literature of the present day has
convinced me that such a critical discussion, tempting though it
would be in itself, would be out of place in the context of what my
book has to say. All that, from the point of view of the
Philosophy of Spiritual Activity,
it seemed to me necessary to say about
recent philosophical tendencies may be found in the second volume of my
Riddles of Philosophy
[Not
yet published in English (yes, it is now — e.Ed).]
RUDOLF STEINER.
April, 1918.
|