PREFACE TO THE REVISED EDITION, 1918
EVERYTHING DISCUSSED
in this book centers around two problems which are
fundamental to the human soul-life. One of these problems concerns the
possibility of attaining such insight into human nature that knowledge of
man can become the foundation of all human knowledge and experience of life.
We often feel that our experiences and the results of scientific
investigations are not self-supporting; further experiences or discoveries
may shake our certitude. The other problem is Has man any right to ascribe
freedom to his will, or is freedom of will an illusion arising out of his
inability to recognize the threads of necessity on which his will depends,
just like a process in nature? This question is not artificially created. In
a certain disposition it arises quite spontaneously in the human soul. And
one feels that the soul lacks in stature if it has not at some time faced in
deep seriousness the question of free will or necessity. In this book the
intention is to show that the inner experiences caused by the second problem
depend upon what attitude man is able to take toward the first problem. The
attempt will be made to show that it is possible to attain such an insight
into man's nature, that this can support all the rest of his knowledge, and
further that this insight completely justifies the concept of freedom of
will, provided only that first the region of soul is discovered where free
will can unfold.
This insight in relation to the two problems is such that, once attained, it
can become a living content of man's soul life. A theoretical answer will not
be given which, once acquired is merely carried about as a conviction,
retained by memory. For the whole manner of thinking on which this book is
based, such an answer would be no answer. Such a finished, limited answer
will not be given, but a region of experiences within the human soul will be
pointed to, where, through the soul's own inner activity. living answers to
the questions are to be found ever anew and at every moment when man needs
them. Once the region of soul is discovered where these questions unfold, a
real insight into this region provides man with what he needs for the
solution of these two problems of life so that, with what he has then
attained, he can penetrate further into the breadth and depth of life's
riddles, as need or destiny leads him. — It will be seen that a
knowledge has here been outlined, which proves its justification and validity,
not only through its own existence, but also through the relationship it has
with the entire soul-life of man.
These were my thoughts about the content of this book when I wrote it
twenty-five years ago. To-day, again I must write similarly if I am to
characterize the aim of this book. In the first edition I limited myself to
saying no more than was in the strictest sense connected with
the two fundamental problems described above. If anyone should be surprised
at not finding in this book as yet, any reference to that region of the world
of spiritual experience described in my later writings, then he must consider
that at that time it was not my purpose to describe results of spiritual
research, but first to lay the foundation on which such results can rest.
This “Philosophy of Freedom” does not contain any special results of this
kind, any more than it contains special results of the natural sciences. But
what it contains cannot, in my view, be dispensed with by anyone who strives
for certainty in such knowledge. What I have said in this book can also be
acceptable to many who, for reasons of their own, will have nothing to do
with the results of my spiritual scientific research. But one who can regard
these results of spiritual scientific research as something to which he is
drawn, will recognize as important what is attempted here. It is this: to
prove that an open-minded consideration of just the two problems I have
indicated, problems which are fundamental to all knowledge, leads to
recognition of the fact that man is living within the reality of a spiritual
world. In this book the attempt is made to justify knowledge of the realm of
spirit before entering upon spiritual experience. And this justification
is undertaken in such a way that, for anyone able and willing to enter into
this discussion, there is no need, in order to accept what is said here, to
cast furtive glances at the experiences which my later writings have shown
to be relevant.
Thus it seems to me that, on the one hand, this book occupies a position
completely independent of my writings on actual spiritual scientific
matters, and yet, on the other hand, it is also most intimately connected
with them. All this has caused me now, after twenty-five years, to republish
the content of this book practically unaltered in all essentials. I have,
however, made additions of some length to several chapters. The
misunderstandings of my argument which have come to my attention seemed to
make these detailed extensions necessary. Alterations have been made only
where what I said a quarter of a century ago appeared to me clumsily
expressed. (Only ill-will could find in these changes occasion to suggest
that I have changed my fundamental conviction.)
The book has been out of print for many years. Nevertheless, and in spite of
the fact, apparent from what I have just said, that to me it seems that
to-day must be similarly expressed what I did express twenty-five years ago
about the problems I have characterized, I hesitated a long time about the
completion of this revised edition. Again and again I have asked myself
whether at this point or that, I ought not to define my position toward the
numerous philosophical views which have been put forward since the
publication of the first edition. Yet the heavy demands on my time in recent
years, due to purely spiritual scientific research, prevented me doing as I
might have wished. Also, a survey, as thorough as possible, of the
philosophical literature of the present day has convinced me that such a
critical discussion, tempting though it would be in itself, has no place in
the context of what this book has to say. All that, from the point of view
of the
“Philosophy of Spiritual Activity,”
it seemed to me necessary to say about recent philosophical tendencies, may
be found in the second volume of my
“Riddles of Philosophy.”
RUDOLF STEINER
April, 1918
|