LECTURE XI
Rudolf Steiner: Good morning, gentlemen! Does
anyone have a question?
Question: Has Mars' proximity to the earth
anything to do with the weather? The summer has been so unbelievably
bad! Have planetary influences in general any effect upon the
weather?
Dr. Steiner: The weather conditions which have
shown such irregularities through the years, particularly recent
years, do have something to do with conditions in the heavens, but
not specifically with Mars. When these irregularities are observed we
must take very strongly into consideration a phenomenon of which
little account is usually taken, although it is constantly spoken of.
I mean the phenomenon of sunspots. The sunspots are dark patches,
varying in size and duration, which appear on the surface of the sun
at intervals of about ten or eleven or twelve years. Naturally, these
dark patches impede the sun's radiations, for, as you can well
imagine, at the places where its surface is dark, the sun does not
radiate. If in any given year the number of such dark patches
increases, the sun's radiation is affected. And in view of the
enormous significance the sun has for the earth, this is a matter of
importance.
In another respect this phenomenon of sunspots is also
noteworthy. In the course of centuries their number has increased,
and the number varies from year to year. This is due to the fact that
the position of the heavenly bodies changes as they revolve, and the
aspect they present is therefore always changing. The sunspots do not
appear at the same place every year, but — according to how the
sun is turning — in the course of years they appear in that
place again. In the course of centuries they have increased
enormously in number and this certainly means something for the
relationship of the earth to the sun.
Thousands of years ago there were no spots on the sun.
They began to appear, they have increased in number, and they will
continue to increase. Hence there will come a time when the sun will
radiate less and less strongly, and finally, when it has become
completely dark, it will cease to radiate any light at all. Therefore
we have to reckon with the fact that in the course of time, a
comparatively long time, the source of the light and life that now
issues from the sun will be physically obliterated for the earth. And
so the phenomenon of the sunspots — among other things —
shows clearly that one can speak of the earth coming to an end.
Everything of the earth that is spiritual will then take on a
different form, just as I have told you that in olden times it had a
different form. Just as a human being grows old and changes, so the
sun and the whole planetary system will grow old and change.
The planet Mars, as I said, is not very strongly
connected with weather conditions; Mars is more connected with
phenomena that belong to the realm of life, such as the appearance
and development of the grubs and cockchafers every four years. And
please do not misunderstand this. You must not compare it directly
with what astronomy calculates as being the period of revolution of Mars,
(see Note 21 )
because the actual position of Mars comes into
consideration here. Mars stands in the same position relatively to
the earth and the sun every four years, so that the grubs which take
four years to develop into cockchafers are also connected with this.
If you take two revolutions of Mars — requiring four years and
three months — you get the period between the cockchafers and
the grubs, and the other way around, between the grubs and the
cockchafers. In connection with the smaller heavenly bodies you must
think of the finer differentiations in earth phenomena, whereas the
sun and moon are connected with cruder, more tangible phenomena such
as weather, and so on.
A good or bad vintage year, for example, is connected
with phenomena such as the sunspots, also with the appearance of
comets. Only when they are observed in connection with phenomena in
the heavens can happenings on the earth be studied properly.
Now of course still other matters must be considered if
one is looking for the reasons for abnormal weather. For naturally
the weather conditions — which concern us so closely because
health and a great deal else is affected by them — depend upon
very many factors. You must think of the following. Going back in the
evolution of the earth we come to a time of about six to ten thousand
years ago. Six to ten thousand years ago there were no mountains in
this region where we are now living. You would not have been able to
climb the Swiss mountains then, because you would not have existed in
the way you do now. You could not have lived here or in other
European lands because at that time these regions were covered with
ice. It was the so-called Ice Age. This Ice Age was responsible for
the fact that the greatest part of the population then living in
Europe either perished or was obliged to move to other regions. These
Ice Age conditions will be repeated, in a somewhat different form, in
about five or six or seven thousand years — not in exactly the
same regions of the earth as formerly, but there will again be an Ice
Age.
It must never be imagined that evolution proceeds in an
unbroken line. To understand how the earth actually evolves it must
be realized that interruptions such as the Ice Age do indeed take
place in the straightforward process of evolution. What is the
reason? The reason is that the earth's surface is constantly rising
and sinking. If you go up a mountain which need by no means be very
high, you will still find an Ice Age, even today, for the top is
perpetually covered with snow and ice. If the mountain is high
enough, it has snow and ice on it. But it is only when, in the course
of a long time, the surface of the earth has risen to the height of a
mountain that we can really speak of snow and ice on a very large
scale. So it is, gentlemen! It happens. The surface of the earth
rises and sinks. Some six thousand or more years ago the level of
this region where we are now living was high; then it sank, but it is
now already rising again, for the lowest point was reached around the
year 1250. That was the lowest point. The temperature here then was
extremely pleasant, much warmer than it is today. The earth's surface
is now slowly rising, so that after five or six thousand years there
will again be a kind of Ice Age.
From this you will realize that when weather conditions
are observed over ten-year periods, they are not the same; the
weather is changing all the time.
Now if in a given year, in accordance with the height of
the earth's surface a certain warm temperature prevails over regions
of the earth, there are still other factors to be considered. Suppose
you look at the earth. At the equator it is hot; above and below, at
the Poles it is cold. In the middle zone, the earth is warm. When
people travel to Africa or India, they travel into the heat; when
they travel to the North Pole or the South Pole, they travel into the
cold. You certainly know this from accounts of polar expeditions.
Think of the distribution of heat and cold when you
begin to heat a room. It doesn't get warm all over right away. If you
would get a stepladder and climb to the top of it, you would find
that down below it may still be quite cold while up above at the
ceiling it is already warm. Why is that? It is because warm air, and
every gaseous substance when it is warmed, becomes lighter and rises;
cold air stays down below because it is heavier. Warmth always
ascends. So in the middle zone of the earth the warm air is always
rising. But when it is up above it wafts toward the North Pole: winds
blow from the middle zone of the earth toward the North Pole. These
are warm winds, warm air. But the cold air at the North Pole tries to
warm itself and streams downward toward the empty spaces left in the
middle zone. Cold air is perpetually streaming from the North Pole to
the equator, and warm air in the opposite direction, from the equator
to the North Pole. These are the currents called the trade winds. In
a region such as ours they are not very noticeable, but very much so
in others.
Not only the air, but the water of the sea, too, streams
from the middle zone of the earth toward the North Pole and back
again. That phenomenon is, naturally, distributed in the most
manifold ways, but it is nevertheless there.
But now there are also electric currents in the
universe; for when we generate wireless electric currents on the
earth we are only imitating what is also present in some way in the
universe. Suppose a current from the universe is present, let's say,
here in Switzerland, where we have a certain temperature. If a
current of this kind comes in such a way that it brings warmth with
it, the temperature here rises a little. Thus the warmth on earth is
also redistributed by currents from the universe. They too influence
the weather.
In addition, however, you must consider that such
electromagnetic currents in the universe are also influenced by the
sunspots. Wherever the sun has spots, there are the currents which
affect the weather. These particular influences are of great
importance.
Now in regard to the division of the seasons —
spring, summer, autumn, winter — there is a certain regularity
in the universe. We can indicate in our calendar that spring will
begin at a definite time, and so on. This is regulated by the more
obvious relationships in which the heavenly bodies stand to one
another. But the influences resulting from this are few. Not many of
the stars can be said to have an influence; most of them are far
distant and their influence is only of a highly spiritual character.
But in regard to weather conditions the following may be
said. Suppose you have a disc with, let's say, four colors on it —
red, yellow, green, blue. If you rotate the disc slowly, you can
easily distinguish all the four colors. If you rotate it more
quickly, it is difficult but still possible to distinguish the
colors. But if you rotate the disc very rapidly indeed, all the
colors run into each other and you cannot possibly distinguish one
from the other. Likewise, the seasons of spring, summer, autumn and
winter can be distinguished because the determining factors are more
or less obvious. But the weather depends upon so many circumstances
that the mind cannot grasp all of them; it is impossible, therefore,
to mark anything definite in the calendar in regard to it —
while this is obviously quite possible in regard to the seasons. The
weather is a complicated matter because so many factors are involved.
But in old folklore something was known about these
things. Old folklore should not be cast aside altogether. When the
conditions of life were simpler, people took an interest in things
far more than they do today. Today our interest in a subject lasts
for 24 hours ... then the next newspaper comes and brings a new
interest! We forget what happens — it is really so! The
conditions of our life are so terribly complicated. The lives of our
grandparents, not to speak of our great-grandparents and
great-great-grandparents, were quite different. They would sit
together in a room around and behind the stove and tell stories,
often stories of olden times. And they knew how the weather had been
a long time ago, because they knew that it was connected with the
stars; they observed a certain regularity in the weather. And among
these great-grandparents there may have been one or two “wiseacres”,
as they are called. By a “wiseacre” I mean someone who
was a little more astute than the others, someone who had a certain
cleverness. Such a person would talk in an interesting way. A
“wiseacre” might have said to a grandchild or
great-grandchild: Look, there's the moon — the moon, you know,
has an influence on the weather. This was obvious to people in those
days, and they also knew that rainwater is better for washing clothes
than water fetched from the spring. So they put pails out to collect
the rainwater to wash the clothes — my own mother used to do
this. Rainwater has a different quality, it has much more life in it
than ordinary water; it absorbs bluing and other additives far
better. And it wouldn't be a bad idea if we ourselves did the same
thing, for washing with hard water can, as you know, ruin your
clothes.
So you see, these things used to be known; it was
science in the 19th century that first caused people to have
different views. Some of you already know the story I told once about
the two professors at the Leipzig University:
(see Note 22 )
one was called Schleiden and the other Fechner. Fechner declared that the
moon has an influence on the earth's weather. He had observed this and had
compiled statistics on it. The other professor, Schleiden, was a very
clever man. He said: That is sheer stupidity and superstition; there
is no such influence. Now when professors quarrel, nothing very much
is gained by it and that's mostly the case also when other people
quarrel! But both these professors were married; there was a Frau
Professor Schleiden and a Frau Professor Fechner. In Leipzig at that
time people still collected rainwater for washing clothes. So
Professor Fechner said to his wife: That man Schleiden insists that
one can get just as much rainwater at the time of new moon as at full
moon; so let Frau Professor Schleiden put out her pail and collect
the rainwater at the time of the next new moon, and you collect it at
the time of full moon, when I maintain that you will get more
rainwater. Well, Frau Professor Schleiden heard of this proposal and
said: Oh no! I will put my pail out when it is full moon and Frau
Professor Fechner shall put hers out at the time of new moon! You
see, the wives of the two professors actually needed the water! The
husbands could squabble theoretically, but their wives decided
according to practical needs.
Our great-grandparents knew these things and said to
their grandchildren: The moon has an influence upon rainwater. But
remember this: everything connected with the moon is repeated every
18 or 19 years. For example, in a certain year, on a certain day,
there are sun eclipses and on another day moon eclipses; this happens
regularly in the course of 18 to 19 years. All phenomena connected
with the positions of the stars in the heavens are repeated
regularly. Why, then, should not weather conditions be repeated,
since they depend upon the moon? After 18 or 19 years there must be
something in the weather similar to what happened 18 or 19 years
before. So as everything repeats itself, these people observed other
repetitions too, and indicated in the calendar certain particulars of
what the weather had been 18 or 19 years earlier, and now expected
the same kind of weather after the lapse of this period. The only
reason the calendar was called the Hundred-Years' Calendar was that
100 is a number which is easy to keep in mind; other figures too were
included in the calendar according to which predictions were made
about the weather. Naturally, such things need not be quite exact,
because again the conditions are complicated. Nevertheless, the
predictions were useful, for people acted accordingly and did indeed
succeed in producing better growing conditions. Through such
observations something can certainly be done for the fertility of the
soil. Weather conditions do depend upon the sun and moon, for the
repetitions of the positions of the moon have to do with the relation
of these two heavenly bodies.
In the case of the other stars and their relative
positions, there are different periods of repetition. One such
repetition is that of Venus, the morning and evening star. Suppose
the sun is here and the earth over there. Between them is Venus.
Venus moves to this point or that, and can be seen accordingly; but
when Venus is here, it stands in front of the sun and covers part of
it. This is called a “Venus transit”.
(see Note 23 )
(Venus, of course, looks much smaller than the moon, although it is, in
fact, larger.) These Venus transits are very interesting because for one
thing they take place only once every hundred years or so, and for
another, very significant things can be observed when Venus is
passing in front of the sun. One can see what the sun's halo looks
like when Venus is standing in front of the sun. This event brings
about great changes. The descriptions of it are very interesting. And
as these Venus transits take place only once in about a hundred
years, they are an example of the phenomena about which science is
obliged to say that it believes some things that it has not actually
perceived! If the scientists declare that they believe only things
they have seen, an astronomer who was born, say, in the year 1890
could not lecture today about a Venus transit, for that has not
occurred in the meantime, and presumably he will have died before the
next Venus transit, which will apparently take place in the year
2004. There, even the scientist is obliged to believe in something he
does not see!
Here again, when Venus is having a special effect upon
the sun because it is shutting out the light, an influence is
exercised upon weather conditions that occurs only once about every
hundred years. There is something remarkable about these Venus
transits and in earlier times they were regarded as being
extraordinarily interesting.
Now when the moon is full, you see a shining orb in the
sky; at other times you see a shining part of an orb. But at new
moon, if you train your eyes a little — I don't know whether
you know this — you can even see the rest of the new moon. If
you look carefully when the moon is waxing, you can also see the
other part of the moon — it appears bluish-black. Even at new
moon a bluish-black disc can be seen by practiced eyes; as a rule it
is not noticed, but it can be seen. Why is it that this disc is
visible at all? It is because the part of the moon that is otherwise
dark is still illuminated by the earth. The moon is about 240,000
miles from the earth and is not, properly speaking, illuminated by
it; but the tiny amount of light that falls upon the moon from the
earth makes this part of the moon visible.
But now no light at all radiates from the earth to
Venus. Venus has to rely upon the light of the sun; no light streams
to it from the earth. Venus is the morning and evening star. It
changes just as the moon changes but not within the same periods.
Only the changes are not seen because Venus is very far away and all
that is visible is a gleaming star. Looked at through a darkened
telescope Venus can be seen to change, just as the moon changes. But
in spite of the fact that Venus cannot be illuminated from the earth,
part of it is always visible as a dull bluish light. The sun's light
is seen at the semi-circle above — but this is not the whole of
Venus; where Venus is not being shone upon by the sun, a bluish light
is seen.
Now, gentlemen, there are certain minerals — for
instance, in Bologna — which contain barium compounds. Barium
is a metallic element. If light is allowed to fall on these minerals
for a certain time, and the room is then darkened, you see a bluish
light being thrown off by them.
One says that the mineral, after it has been
illuminated, becomes phosphorescent. It has caught the light, “eaten”
some of the light, and is now spitting it out again when the room is
made dark. This is of course also happening before the room is dark,
but the light is then not visible to the eye. The mineral takes
something in and gives something back. As it cannot take in a great
deal, what it gives back is also not very much, and this is not seen
when the room is light, just as a feeble candle-light is not seen in
strong sunlight. But the mineral is phosphorescent and if the room is
darkened, one sees the light it radiates.
From this you will certainly be able to understand where
the light of Venus comes from. While it receives no light from this
side, Venus is illuminated from the other side by the sun, and it
eats up the sun's light, so to say. Then, when you see it on a dark
night, it is throwing off the light, it becomes phosphorescent. In
days when people had better eyes than they have now, they saw the
phosphorescence of Venus. Their eyes were really better in those
days; it was in the 16th century that spectacles first began to be
used, and they would certainly have come earlier if people had needed
them! Inventions and discoveries always come when they are needed by
human beings. And so in earlier times the changes that come about
when phosphorescent Venus is in transit across the sun were also
seen. And in still earlier times the conclusion was drawn that
because the sun's light is influenced at that time by Venus, this
same influence will be there again after about a hundred years; and
so there will be similar weather conditions again in a region where a
transit of Venus is seen to be taking place. (As you know, eclipses
of the sun are not visible from everywhere, but only in certain
regions.) In a hundred years, therefore, the same weather conditions
will be there — so the people concluded — and they drew
up the Hundred Years' Calendar accordingly.
Later on, people who did not understand the thing at
all, made a Hundred Years' Calendar every year, then they found that
the details given in the calendar did not tally with the actual
facts. It could just as well have said: “If the cock crows on
the dunghill, the weather changes, or stays as it is!” But
originally, the principle of the thing was perfectly correct. The
people perceived that when Venus transits the sun, this produces
weather conditions that are repeated somewhere after a hundred years.
Since the weather of the whole year is affected, then
the influences are at work not only during the few days when Venus is
in transit across the sun but they last for a longer period. So you
see from what I have said that to know by what laws the weather is
governed during some week or day, one would have to ask many
questions: How many years ago was there a Venus transit? How many
years ago was there a sun-eclipse? What is the present phase of the
moon? I have mentioned only a few points. One would have to know how
the trade winds are affected by magnetism and electricity, and so on.
All these questions would have to be answered if one wanted to
determine the regularity of weather conditions. It is a subject that
leads to infinity! People will eventually give up trying to make
definite predictions about the weather. Although we hear about the
regularity of all the phenomena with which astronomy is concerned —
astronomy, as you know, is the science of the stars — the
science that deals with factors influencing the weather (meteorology,
as it is called) is by no means definite or certain. If you get hold
of a book on meteorology, you'll be exasperated. You'll be exclaiming
that it's useless, because everyone says something different. That is
not the case with astronomy.
I have now given you a brief survey of the laws
affecting wind and weather and the like. But still it must be added
that the forces arising in the atmosphere itself have a tremendously
strong influence on the weather. Think of a very hot summer when
there is constant lightning out of the clouds and constant thunder
growling: there you have influences on the weather that come from the
immediate vicinity of the earth. Modern science holds a strange view
of this. It says that it is electricity that causes the lightning to
flash out of the clouds. Now you probably know that electricity is
explained to children at school by rubbing a glass rod with a piece
of cloth smeared with some kind of amalgam; after it has been rubbed
for some time, the rod begins to attract little scraps of paper, and
after still more rubbing, sparks are emitted, and so on. Such
experiments with electricity are made in school, but care has to be
taken that everything has been thoroughly wiped beforehand, because
the objects that are to become electric must not even be moist, let
alone wet; they must be absolutely dry, even warm and dry, for
otherwise nothing will be got out of the glass rod or the stick of
sealing-wax. From this you can gather that electricity is conducted
away by water and fluids. Everyone knows this, and naturally the
scientists know it, for it is they who make the experiments. In spite
of this, however, they declare that the lightning comes out of the
clouds — and clouds are certainly wet!
If it were a fact that lightning comes out of the
clouds, “someone” would have had to rub them long enough
with a gigantic towel to make them quite dry! But the matter is not
so simple. A stick of sealing wax is rubbed and electricity comes out
of it; and so the clouds rub against one another and electricity
comes out of them! But if the sealing wax is just slightly damp,
electricity does not come out of it. And yet electricity is alleged
to come out of the clouds — which are all moisture! This shows
you what kind of nonsense is taught nowadays. The fact of the matter
is this: You can heat air and it becomes hotter and hotter. Suppose
you have this air in a closed container. The hotter you make the air,
the greater is the pressure it exerts against the walls of the
container. The hotter you make it, the sooner it reaches the point
where, if the walls of the container are not strong enough, the hot
air will burst them asunder. What's the usual reason for a child's
balloon bursting? It's because the air rushes out of it. Now when the
air becomes hot it acquires the density, the strength to burst. The
lightning process originates in the vicinity of the earth; when the
air gets hotter and hotter, it becomes strong enough to burst. At
very high levels the air may for some reason become intensely hot —
this can happen, for example, as the result of certain influences in
winter when somewhere or other the air has been very strongly
compressed. This intense heat will press out in all directions, just
as the hot air will press against the sides of the container. But
suppose you have a layer of warm air, and there is a current of wind
sweeping away the air. The hot air streams toward the area where the
air is thinnest.
Lightning is the heat generated in the air itself that
makes its way to where there is a kind of hole in the surrounding
air, because at that spot the air is thinnest. So we must say:
Lightning is not caused by electricity, but by the fact that the air
is getting rid of, emptying away, it's own heat.
Just because of this intensely violent movement, the
electric currents that are always present in the air receive a
stimulus. It is the lightning that stimulates electricity; lightning
itself is not electricity.
All this shows you that warmth is differently
distributed in the air everywhere; this again influences the weather.
These are influences that come from the vicinity of the earth and
operate there.
You will realize now how many things influence the
weather and that today there are still no correct opinions about
these influences — I have told you about the entirely distorted
views that are held about lightning. A change must come about in this
domain, for spiritual science, anthroposophy, surveys a much wider
field and makes thinking more mobile.
We cannot, of course, expect the following to be
verified in autopsies, but if one investigates with the methods of
spiritual science, one finds that in the last hundred years human
brains have become much stiffer, alarmingly stiffer, than they were
formerly. One finds, for example, that the ancient Egyptians thought
quite definite things, of which they were just as sure as we
ourselves are sure of the things we think about. But today we are
less able to understand things in the winter than in the summer.
People pay no attention to such matters. If they would adjust
themselves to the laws prevailing in the world, they would arrange
life differently. In school, for instance, different subjects would
be studied in the winter than in the summer. (This is already being
done to some extent in the Waldorf School.)
(see Note 24 )
It is not simply a matter of taking botany in the summer because the plants
bloom then, but some of the subjects that are easier should be transferred
to the winter, and some that are more difficult to the spring and autumn,
because the power to understand depends upon this. It is because our
brains are harder than men's brains were in earlier times. What we
can think about in a real sense only in summer, the ancient Egyptians
were able to think about all year round. Such things can be
discovered when one observes the various matters connected with the
seasons of the year and the weather.
Is there anything that is not clear? Are you satisfied
with what has been said? I have answered the question at some length.
The world is a living whole and in explaining one thing one is
naturally led to other things, because everything is related.
Question: Herr Burle says that his friends may
laugh at his question — he had mentioned the subject two or
three years ago. He would like to know whether there is any truth in
the saying that when sugar is put into a cup of coffee and it
dissolves properly, there will be fine weather, and when it does not
dissolve properly there will be bad weather.
Dr. Steiner: I have never made this experiment,
so I don't know whether there is anything in it or not. But the fact
of the sugar dissolving evenly or unevenly might indicate something —
if, that is to say, there is anything in the statement at all. I
speak quite hypothetically, because I don't know whether there is any
foundation for the statement, but we will presume that there is.
There is something else that certainly has meaning, for
I have observed it myself. What the weather is likely to be can be
discovered by watching tree frogs, green tree frogs. I've made tiny
ladders and observed whether they ran up or down. The tree frog is
very sensitive to what the weather is going to be. This need not
surprise you, for in certain places it has happened that animals in
their stalls suddenly became restless and tried to get out; those
that were not tethered ran away quickly. Human beings stayed where
they were. And then there was an earthquake! The animals knew it
beforehand, because something was already happening in nature in
advance. Human beings with their crude noses and other crude senses
do not detect anything, but animals do. So naturally the tree frog,
too, has a definite “nose” for what is coming. The word
Witterung (weather) is used in such a connection because it
means “smelling” the weather that is coming.
Now there are many things in the human being of which he
himself has no inkling. He simply does not observe them. When we get
out of bed on a fine summer day and look out the window, we are in
quite a different humor than when a storm is raging. We don't notice
that this feeling penetrates to the tips of our fingers. What the
animals sense, we also sense; it is only that we don't bring it up to
our consciousness.
So just suppose, Herr Burle, that although you know
nothing about it, your fingertips, like the tree frogs, have a
delicate feeling for the kind of weather that is coming. On a day
when the weather is obviously going to be fine and you are therefore
in a good humor, you put the sugar into your coffee with a stronger
movement than on another day. So the way the sugar dissolves does not
necessarily depend upon the coffee or the sugar, but upon a force
that is in yourself. The force I'm speaking of lies in your
fingertips themselves; it is not the force that is connected with
your consciously throwing the sugar into the coffee. It lies in your
fingertips, and is not the same on a day when the weather is going to
be fine as when the weather is going to be bad. So the dissolving of
the sugar does not depend upon the way you consciously put it into
your coffee but upon the feeling in your fingertips, upon how your
fingertips are “sensing” the weather. This force in your
fingertips is not the same as the force you are consciously applying
when you put the sugar into your coffee. It is a different force, a
different movement.
Think of the following: A group of people sits around a
table; sentimental music, or perhaps the singing of a hymn, puts them
into a suitable mood. Then delicate vibrations begin to stir in them.
Music continues. The people begin to convey their vibrations to the
table, and the table begins to dance. This is what may happen at a
spiritualistic séance. Movements are set going as the effect
of the delicate vibrations produced through the music and the
singing. In a similar fashion the weather may also cause very subtle
movements, and these in turn may influence what happens with the
sugar in the coffee. But I am speaking quite hypothetically because,
as I said, I don't know whether it is absolutely correct in the case
of which you are speaking. It is more probable that it is a
premonition which the person himself has about the weather that
affects the sugar — although this is not very probable either.
I am saying all this as pure hypothesis.
A spiritual scientist has to reject such phenomena until
he possesses strict proof of their validity. If I were to tell you in
a casual way the things I do tell you, you really wouldn't have to
believe any of it. You should only believe me because you know that
things which cannot be proved are not accepted by spiritual science.
And so as a spiritual scientist I can only accept the story of the
coffee if it is definitely proved. In the meantime I can make the
comment that one knows, for instance, of the delicate vibrations of
the nerves, also that this is how animals know beforehand of some
impending event — how even the tree frog begins to tremble and
then the leaves on which it sits also begin to tremble. So it could
also be — I don't say that it is, but it could be — that
when bad weather is coming, the coffee begins to behave differently
from the way it behaves when the weather is good.
So — let us meet next Wednesday.
(see Note 25 )
After that, I think we'll be able to have our sessions regularly again.
|