Lecture XII
Goetheanism
In Place of Homunculism and
Mephistophelianism
17th January, 1919 Dornach
In the two
lectures following the performance of the later
Walpurgis-night scene, from the second part of Faust, I hoped
to evoke the feeling that, in the whole of his inner life,
Goethe was in reality on the path to the supersensible world.
I wanted you to feel that he succeeded, as perhaps no other
artist, no other poet, has ever done, in developing an
artistic creation out of this spiritual life, so that in this
creation neither the art not the wisdom falls short and, in
its own place, each of the spheres — of striving and
wisdom — achieves harmonic expression.
I should not
like you to think that in what has been said I have been
wishing to give an interpretation of this poem; that was not
at all my aim. For in this sphere I consider interpretation
to be utterly useless. All that was attempted in these
studies was to create the possibility for you to absorb and
enjoy a poem, a work of art, in the same element in which it
was created. Such studies should simply teach the language,
as it were, the spiritual language, in which such a work is
written, and should not expound or interpret, for as a rule
that too often results in misconstruction and
misinterpretation.
Now, if we
keep to this mood in the matter, the following may perhaps be
of use. You see, there are two fundamental feelings at the
base of all striving for knowledge of every kind of striving
towards spiritual experience. One of these feelings comes
from man having to think, having to form ideas, as he lives
his life between birth and death in the physical body. I
think you will agree that we should not be complete human
beings, were we not to think about things and about
ourselves. Then, too, if we wish to make our lives fuller in
the physical body, between birth and death, we have not only
to think but also to will. And feeling lies midway between
thinking and willing; sometimes it partakes more of thinking
and forming ideas, sometimes more of willing. Hence, for the
purpose of our proposed study, we may ignore feeling, and
consider the one pole of forming ideas, thinking, and then
turn to the other pole of human activity, the willing. Man is
an thinking and a willing being. But there are special
features about this thinking and willing. The
trivially-minded, average man looks upon what can be attained
as the attainment of a goal if, on the one hand, he thinks as
clearly and forcibly as possible, in his own opinion, at
least, and if he wills in accordance with his needs. What
distinguishes the man of learning who is fundamentally
honest, is that he finally admits, when he tries to advance
on the path of thinking, that with his thinking in the
physical body he still only goes a certain distance towards
his goal.
With this
thinking, my dear friends, it is exactly as if a man were
striving towards a goal; he cannot see it though knowing in
what direction it lies. He wants to hasten towards it, but
although he knows where the goal must be, it is wrapped in
darkness. he imagines it will only become clear when he
reaches it. And while he is feeling that he is still nowhere
near the goal but a considerable distance from it, some being
seems to seize from from behind, and to stop him going
farther. And he says: Thinking, the forming of ideas, drives
me in a certain direction, then I am stopped; were I to
pursue the path of thought in this direction, I should never
be able to reach the goal thinking itself has indicated.
— Thus he comes to one of the boundaries to which he is
by nature subject in the life between birth and death. And it
may be said that whoever has never experienced the suffering
and blows of fate arising from the goal of thought, has
certainly no very deep cognitional life. If, by the inner
constitution of his soul, a man can fancy he is able to reach
the goal of thought by thinking, he is doomed to
superficiality. We can be preserved from superficiality only
when by trying to think as deeply and clearly as possible, we
begin to feel harassed by the hindrances to thought. This
feeling of being frustrated in thought is a profound human
experience, without which we cannot pass beyond
superficiality into a really deep comprehension of life.
And this is
not the only boundary set to the human being's full
experience between birth and death; the other is encountered
where the will is unfolded. This is the sphere in which there
germinate men's desires arising out of the life of instinct.
Man is driven to willing in the crudest sense through hunger
and thirst and other instincts; and there is then a rising
scale from instinct up to the purest spiritual ideals. In all
these impulses, from grossest instincts up to spiritual
ideals, willing is deployed. But now, if we are to try and
establish ourselves in life with our will that passes over
into action, we again come to a boundary. Fundamentally,
Goethe's aim in Faust was to establish Faust in life
by means of his will, so that he should be able to experience
all that makes life happy, all that shatters life, all that
gives freedom and all that is sinful. And if we try to take
our stand in life with the will that passes over into action,
the will translated into deed, we again find ourselves up
against a boundary. But now it is a different feeling that
arises. It is not so much that in our thinking we are stopped
and hindered from reaching our goal, but rather that, while
we are willing, we are seized upon, and our willing goes on
no longer in accordance with our own wishes. In the act of
willing one is snatched away. Someone else arises in our
willing, who carries us off.
This then is
the second feeling which, when experienced by man, leads him
out of superficiality into a profound conception of life.
Self-satisfied philistines, it is true, are of the opinion
that a man reaches his goal by sufficiently developing his
thinking and willing. But it is on these paths of complacency
and self-satisfaction that the superficiality of life. lies.
There does not lie here what makes it possible in life's
testing, after suitable probation and the crossing of an
abyss, to enter another world, a world that cannot be lived
through with the consciousness developed in the life between
birth and death. A man is tested when, with suitable
intensity, he realises in his soul the two boundary lines
already referred to. Men must understand precisely from what
Goethe has given, that it is not merely the bliss of endeavor
— often imaginary and based on pure illusion —
that can be experienced, but rather what leads a man to his
goal over all hindrances, disappointments and disillusions.
And whoever strives to avoid disillusionment, and refuses to
transform, to metamorphose, the whole human being in certain
moments of life, cannot press forward to knowledge of man, to
the understanding of man.
We need not
realise, my dear friends, that in this connection the
Christ-permeated conception of the world and of life must, in
the near future, experience a significant change. Hitherto,
Christianity through the way it has developed in the
different religious denominations is, usually, only at its
initial stage. If we want to describe this development, we
might say that it has created the feeling in man that Christ
did once exist. And even this feeling that Christ once
existed has been lost again in the materialistic research of
the nineteenth century. What Christ brought into the world,
Christ's connection with the striving of the human soul, into
all this life will first pour in future through the
researches of Spiritual Science, and through a spiritual kind
of cosmic feeling — a supersensible experience. This
will be seen if, to begin with, in this intellectual age, the
majority of mankind can only have the experience in
Imaginations, in imaginative pictures.
But these two
basic feelings of which I have just spoken as arising from
the two boundaries of self-knowledge and self-comprehension,
these two feelings must find a crossing-point from a passive
to an active Christianity. Just think how, for many people in
the past, Christ has been nothing more than a helper in
straits where a man is unable to help himself. Think of the
strange way in which the Roman Catholic Church took on, at a
certain time, the forgiveness of sins; anyone might sin as
much as he liked, provided he repented and did due penance
afterwards; he was forgiven. In short, Christ was there to
help in time of need, to make good what men as a whole had no
intention themselves of making good. And then look at the
other, more Protestant error, where a man remains passive
too, arranging his worldly life, his worldly activities, to
suit himself, and then perhaps expecting that merely by
belief in Christ, by a passive feeling of being united with
Christ, he will be saved. This twofold passive relation to
Christ belongs, and must belong, to the past. And what is to
take its place must be a relation to Christ that is an active
force, a going to meet Him, so that Christ does not do for a
man what the man does not want to do, but gives him power
through His being to do it himself. An active Christianity
— or rather a Christianity that comes to activity
— is what must take the place of passive Christianity
in which actually (forgive the trivial mode of expression) a
man does what he pleases on the physical plane, making God
into a kindly friend who pardons everything if only man turns
to Him at the right moment.
This my dear
friends, will at the same time mark the dividing line between
the age which must now belong to the past, the age that has
led to so terrible a human catastrophe, and the age that must
come. It is only when this coming age has passed over from a
Christianity that is passive to one that is active, that it
will be qualified to heal those evils that have already shown
themselves and will continue to do so increasingly so long as
the principles of the past prevail. These evils are rooted
deep in human hearts and souls; and they must be healed if
earth-evolution is to proceed.
The two basic
feelings of the boundaries to thinking and willing may also
be described by saying: The one boundary makes it clear that
a man cannot arrive at knowledge of his own nature. As human
beings we are so constituted that we cannot, on the one hand,
arrive at our own human nature, cannot with our thinking
reach ourselves. In willing we do this, for willing actually
proceeds form ourselves; in willing we lose ourselves; but
here another seizes us — another cosmic being is formed
simply according to the principle of this duality. He is a
dual being, not a monad, but a dual being. The one member of
this twofold being cannot reach itself, the other loses
itself.
Hence man is
never correctly represented when shown as a mere monad, but
only when an effort is made to show him as standing midway
between being unable to reach himself, and losing himself.
And when it is possible for men to feel both at the same time
with all intensity, then he feels himself rightly as a man on
earth. When he feels a kind of oscillation between the two,
then he feels himself man on earth. In spite of this
oscillation, what must be arrived at is repose of being. This
repose of being is attained in the physical sphere by the
pendulum, the balance; in the spiritual, moral sphere, man
must be able to attain the condition of repose reached by the
balance and the pendulum. He must not aspire to a position of
absolute rest; that would make him indolent and corrupt. He
should strive for the state of repose midway between the
beats, midway between the not-reaching and the losing
himself.
In order to
develop these feelings correctly it is essential that other
feelings be added concerning life and reality.
You know, my
dear friends, I have often called your attention to the
one-sided way in which evolution is understood today. Think
how the whole of evolution is now conceived as if what come
after were always the result of what went before. Actually,
the man of today thinks of the successive stages of evolution
almost like a set of cardboard boxes fitting into one
another. And then, as for development, one box represents the
human being between birth and the seventh year; then the
second is taken out, and that is the human being from seven
to fourteen; the third from fourteen to one-and twenty, and
so on — one always coming out of another. To modern man
the most acceptable idea is evolutionary advance in a
straight line.
This is
really at the bottom of all the grotesque notions that are
learnt at school nowadays, notions which in future will be
regarded as scientific lunacy of the enlightenment period of
the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. To imagine thus that
there was once a nebular condition (the Kant-Laplace theory)
and that then, one after another, cardboard box out of
cardboard box, the successive stages always proceeded out of
the earlier — this is an abnormal idea of present-day
science. For things are not like that. Just think how
evolution in the individual man between birth and death
appears, to even a moderately unprejudiced observation! The
actual limit of the first period in life is the change of
teeth, as we know — the cutting of the second teeth. I
have often drawn attention to this. How what is this second
cutting of teeth at about the seventh year, at the close of
the first life-period? It is a consolidation, a hardening, of
the human being, when a hardening process takes place in men.
It is like a drawing together of all the life-forces, so that
eventually the densest, most mineralised part, the second
teeth, can appear. It is a real concentration and
densification of all the forces of life.
The second
period in life ends at puberty. And the case here is exactly
the reverse. Here there is no concentration of life-forces
but, on the contrary, a rarafication of them all, a
dispersal, an overflowing. An opposite condition pulses in
the organism. And then again, only in a more refined way, in
the twenty-first year when the third life-period ends,
consolidation takes place in man, the forces of life are once
more drawn together. With the twenty-eighth year there is
again expansion. The twenty-first year has more to do with
the placing of what is within man,the twenty-eighth more with
his attitude to the whole wide universe. Approximately at the
thirty-fifth year there is again a kind of contraction. That
is the middle life — the thirty-fifth year.
Thus,
evolution does not go in a straight line but, rather, in
waves: contraction, hardening; softening, expansion. That is
essentially the life of man as a whole. By being born here in
the physical world, we contract into our individual skins;
while we are living our life between death and a new birth,
we are increasingly expanding.
What follows
from all this, my dear friends? It follows that the idea of
evolution going in a straight line is of no help at all; it
leads mankind astray, and we must reject it. All evolution
proceeds rhythmically; all evolution goes with the rise and
fall of waves — expanding, contracting.
Contraction,
expansion. Goethe sensed this in its elementary stages. Read his
Metamorphosis of Plants;
read his poem
The Metamorphosis of Plants,
and you will see how he follows
the particular formation from foliage leaf to foliage leaf,
then to petal, stamen, on to pistil; how he describes it as a
continuous expansion, contraction, not only in external
forms, the saps also expand with their forces and again
contract — expand, concentrate; expand, concentrate.
When in the eighties of the last century I wrote my first
introduction to Goethe's scientific works, I tried to
reconstruct his archetypal plant, tried to bring into a
picture this expansion, contraction, expansion, contraction
— on and on right up to the blossom. No one can really
understand life who does not picture it in rhythm, as a
progressive rhythmic process. It must be repeatedly
emphasised that to imagine evolution as proceeding in a
straight line does not help us to a true understanding of
life.
The same
applies to the understanding of man's historical life. In the
most recent number of the periodical Das Reich
(October 1918) where I dealt with Lucifer and Ahriman in
life, I pointed out how luciferic and ahrimanic periods
alternate rhythmically in historic evolution. Life never
proceeds in a straight line; it goes in waves. But while this
is so, it is associated also with an external change. And
only by looking clear-sightedly into these relations can we
arrive at a deeper comprehension of life. Those who think of
evolution as proceeding in a straight line, say: First there
existed the most undeveloped animals, then more and more
perfect ones, up to the apes, and out of these developed man.
— If we apply this to what is moral — I have
often called your attention to this — if we extend this
further, it follows that the genuine, thorough-going
Darwinian says: We already see in the human kindliness, and
so on. This again is a worthless idea, for it takes no
account at all of the rhythm of life. According to this idea
evolution goes on in a straight line, one cardboard box
coming out of another. In reality the matter is like this.
Imagine the most highly developed animals with their
proclivities further developed in a straight line —
this way you do not arrive at man, you would never come to
man. But the more highly developed animals would evolve those
very qualities you find attractive in the animal kingdom, in
a most unattractive way. What you admire in animals as
companionable, as incipient good-will and social behaviour,
when further developed turns to its rhythmic opposite —
to the principle of evil. Mad man developed according to
Haeckel's idea, then, my dear friends, there would have
evolved from the anthropoid apes a human society inevitably
destined to develop the war of all against all. For in all
these aptitudes, good as they may be in animals, there lies
the further evolutionary impulse to clash together in violent
and most bloody conflict. That is rhythm, a wave-like rise
and fall, and no one finds what is hidden in nature who does
not see the possibilities of evolution in rhythm. To look
only on the outside of events can never teach us to realise
what in reality is there. Man was able to develop only
because, in the higher animals, their evolutionary
possibilities did not come to anything, for these were met by
another wave of cosmic becoming which subdued the tendency to
evil, in a way overcame it, by what men were meant to be in
the very beginning. So that we have to picture it thus: The
animal kingdom rises to a certain height; then comes the
other wave to meet it, and this deadens the evil
development.
My dear
friends, reincarnation can also be regarded from the moral
point of view. What would man have become had he just been
born, over and over again on the physical plane, and being
thus born physically on the physical plane, he had not been
met by all that is constantly being taken up into the
spiritual world and again sent down; were man not thus
ensouled after birth then he would live always at war on
earth. They would only with to live in conflict and would
develop the most terrible fighting instincts. These fighting
instincts rest on the foundation of the human soul; they are
rooted in the human organism. But they are paralysed, if I
may so express it, by what comes from above out of the
supersensible, from those human beings who are constantly
taken up into the spiritual world. This is expressed also in
the outward form, my dear friends. It is altogether grotesque
for those with inner sight when the human head is represented
as having gradually evolved from the animal head. It is
indeed complete nonsense. The truth is that, were the animal
head to develop further, a fearsome monster would emerge in
what, in the present incarnation, you evolve out of the lower
part of your body. Were that alone to form the head, were it
to form the head out of itself, the result would be a real
abortion of a head — a horrible animal-monster. For
that is where the possibility of such a monstrosity lies.
Only because the spiritual comes from above and, as it were,
washes up against it, is the human head able to arise. It
springs from the relationship of two forces, the one pressing
upward from the body, the other coming to meet it from the
cosmos. This human head is constructed in a state of
equilibrium; and it is because of its equilibrium that we are
not able to deal freely with what we bring with us from the
spiritual world. We slip into our physical head and cannot
there clearly express what we actually are, when we hurry
into existence through birth. If we could think as we did
before birth, we should not think a Homunculus, we should
think a man, a Homo.
Actually were
we in possession of every technical resource, we should put
into the vial that represents Homunculus on the stage, only a
horrible little monstrosity, small, and therefore not
unattractive; and this is really what would come into being
were it left to the human body alone, out of itself, to
produce something. There would come forth a sort of animal
that nevertheless would be no animal but a human abortion;
something on the way to becoming human yet not quite
succeeding. Neither do we succeed if we do not make the
approach by way of this path to becoming men, this path that
does not reach man. We do not then succeed for we do not thus
enter inside ourselves.
And again, if
man grasps himself through his will, he is immediately seized
upon by another being. Then he loses himself, then all kinds
of strange motives and impulses surge up into his willing.
Only when a man endeavours to bring the inner forces into
equilibrium does he succeed in becoming complete man.
Now, my dear
friends, with what I have said compare three different
passages in the second part of Goethe's Faust that you can
now have the opportunity on witnessing. Think of the sublime
moment when Faust appears before Manto. Goethe is trying here
to shed over the whole incident the inner repose of the human
soul called forth by experiencing equilibrium. Faust would
like, on the one hand, to avoid the sentimentality of the
abstract mystic, and one of his last speeches is “O,
could I from my path all magic ban”. he did not want
external magic, he wanted to find the inner path to the
supersensible world. He is near it, and then again far from
it. As I explained yesterday Goethe is perfectly honest when
Faust is standing before Manto. But Faust, my dear friends,
does not hold to this abstract repose; he is tossed from
pillar to post. Hence from the one side he is continually
thrown to the opposite, where man loses himself through the
will. Compare all this with what happens to Faust in the
scenes where he is developing his life with Mephistopheles.
There you have always the Faust of will, who, however is
continually losing himself by his impulses being seized by
Mephistopheles. This is where a man goes astray in his
willing, where he will lose himself; here you have all the
dangers that threaten man's moral impulses. And this is
expressed with tremendous depth in Goethe's Faust.
Then take the
moment when Mephistopheles joins the Phorkyads, when he
himself takes on the form of a Phorkyad, and in all his
ugliness goes as far as admitting it. Previously he was
lying, but when the Phorkyads surround him he is obliged to
admit his ugliness. Read the speech of the Phorkyads again;
they too acknowledge their ugliness, and are in a certain way
honest in their ugliness. In this moment you have a contrast
to that sacred and sublime moment when Faust stands before
Manto. What makes us lose ourselves in motives of will is
clearly seen when Mephistopheles appears for the last time
visibly, in the external drama, precisely in this scene with
Manto — Mephistopheles in the scene with the Phorkyads.
Goethe wished to indicate from the depths of his profound
experience that, fundamentally, what makes us lose ourselves
in the motives of will can only be set right if we not merely
abhor it morally, but also experience it as something
offending our taste. This was at the root of Schiller's
feeling too, when he placed what is moral in such close
connection with the aesthetic in his
Aesthetic Letters.
This is just
what is so distressing, my dear friends, that in the recent
development of mankind culture has been brought to such a
high pitch as, for instance, we see in Schiller's
Aesthetic Letters,
and this has all been forgotten.
Imagine how Schiller believed that in these letters, written
in the first place to the Duke of Augustonburg, he had
brought about a deed of political significance. Whoever
grasps the following two facts in their true depth learns
much concerning the evolution of mankind. First he learns
that Schiller's
Aesthetic Letters
were the outcome of
his conception of Goethe's urge towards becoming; and,
secondly, that this could be forgotten, that this forgetting
has largely contributed to the present human catastrophe.
Those who keep these two facts before them indeed learn much
about the evolution of humanity.
And, from the
point of view of drama, how great is the moment when in the
terrible scene where Mephistopheles is among the Phorkyads we
are shown how what is morally impermissible live in man like
a feeling that is aesthetically offensive. There, shown in
all its atrocity, is the impulse, the essential impulse, that
drives man to lose himself in the pole of will. Should a man
fail to recognise this it will prove his ruin; only by
realising it is one freed from it. You will find this
expressed in the last scene of my first Mystery Play,
The Portal of Initiation.
There it is shown how only
knowledge, a clear conception of who it is who tempts and
seduces us, can save us from being led astray. It is
therefore essential in the age of the consciousness-soul now
entered that, in order to overcome temptation, we should
strive in the right way to come to know the tempter, not
allowing ourselves to sink down into a merely external
knowledge of nature and a merely abstract mysticism.
In short, my
dear friends, abstract mysticism, the ‘easy
understanding of the divine within’, from which nothing
results but a terrible egotistical abstraction — this
abstract mysticism is just as bad as materialism.
As I said,
take three moments in Goethe's Faust. Take purely
artistically what you can feel as Faust stands before Manto;
what you feel when Mephistopheles becomes a Phorkyad among
the Phorkyads. And take the third moment when Homunculus
crashes against Galatea's shell-chariot — feel what
this Homunculus is. We come from the spiritual world seeking
through conception and birth for physical existence. In this
physical existence we meet with what, out of this physical
existence, is given us as our physical body. Every evening we
go back into the world that we leave at birth; every morning
we, as it were, repeat our birth when we plunge again into
our physical body. Then we can feel how, coming in from
without, we do not arrive at what man is; we meet only with
Homunculus, the manikin, the human being in embryo, and we
realise how difficult it is to come to the real man. we might
arrive at the real man could we contrive to have a perfectly
clear conception just before waking, when all the
evolutionary possibilities of the night are exhausted. This
clear conception, my dear friends, would be a
world-conception, it would be such that we should no longer
feel ourselves hemmed in by any boundary, but feel as if
poured out over the whole universe, over all cosmic light,
all cosmic sound, all cosmic life, and in front of us a kind
of abyss. One the far side of this would be a continuation of
what we were feeling before we met the abyss on waking
— namely, warmth. Warmth flows out over the abyss. Now,
however, we cross the abyss by waking, into air, water and
earth of which our organism is composed. Certainly we are
approaching man, and by letting Homunculus fructify in the
spiritual world, we have prepared ourselves to understand
man. But in the ordinary course of life we do not do what I
have just mentioned. The living conception we develop when
sleep should have had its effect upon us before we wake,
would have to be brought with us into waking life. This
conception would be an experiencing ourselves in light, in
cosmic sound, in cosmic life, a meeting with the beings of
the higher hierarchies, just as here the physical body comes
into connection with the mineral, vegetable and animal
kingdoms. This conception, developed concisely just before
waking when sleep has done its work upon us, we should have
to bring deep down into our physical body; then we should be
able to understand what this human body is. But alas
“the Gods will not suffer it”. We plunge down; it
flashes, flames up, and we hardly notice it. Instead of
looking into ourselves, we hear with our external ears;
instead of feeling ourselves within our skin, we feel what is
outside with our sense of touch. If we did not sink down into
what we are able to reach only by the physical eye, the
physical ear, through physical sound and physical touch,
Homunculus would receive new life and become man, but against
the resistance of the elements he is dashed to pieces. The
light of the eye flames up instead of cosmic light, we begin
to hear physical sound in the ear instead of cosmic sound,
the life of the body is aroused instead of cosmic life
— Homunculus is shattered. If we experience this
consciously, we experience the end of the Classical
Walpurgis-night. Thus, this end scene is taken from actual,
true life.
These things
are not there merely to be spoken of on Sunday afternoons in
the Anthroposophical Society. They are there as truth, to
become gradually known to mankind, so that as impulses they
may with their being penetrate what must be accepted in the
future evolution of man, if he is to advance to what can save
and not destroy. For men will really find the correct
connection with reality only if they adopt new concepts and
from now onwards they begin to see what has always been
extolled as the great achievement of the nineteenth century
is at and end.
You see, my
dear friends, it is not surprising that, from a certain point
of view, this achievement of the nineteenth century, that
continued into the twentieth, should be felt to be perfect.
It is not to be wondered at all. Is it not true that before
the tree becomes bare in autumn, it is in its fruiting in its
most perfect stage of development. This natural science of
the nineteenth century, that still haunts the twentieth, al
these technical perfections that have reached a certain
height, are the tree before it yields its fruit. All from
which it has grown has to wither, and it is not enough that
the tree should go on growing, a fresh seed must be sown in
the field of human culture, a new tree must be planted. It
does not suffice to think we understand the evolution of
animals, to think of them as having advanced to the stage of
man. It is not enough that frequently some spirit arises, who
first writs articles of genius about animals, and later, to
follow these, a book about the origin of man. Rather is it
essential that men should discard the idea of a straight line
in evolution, that they should learn to understand the rhythm
of life, flowing like the waves of the sea, that they should
learn how, in the inner being of man, the way does not go
straight on, but across two boundaries. At the one boundary
we feel almost suffocated, for someone seizes us and will not
allow us to go where our thinking would take us. On the other
side we feel as if the powers of Mephistopheles were dragging
us to destruction. We must find the balance between what
belongs to Homunculus and what belongs to Mephistopheles,
between not being able to reach ourselves in Homunculus, and
grasping the self only to lose it in Mephistopheles. The
understanding of this equilibrium is what modern man must
gain. And Goethe, foreseeing this in feeling, lived himself
into this understanding when with absolute honesty he tried
in his Faust to speak as he did of the riddle of
humanity.
Mankind must
strive to grow out of what today is the typical point of view
of the crowd. Nothing is more resented at present than this
striving, and nothing is more injurious to mankind than this
hostility against any effort to rise above the commonplace.
On the other hand, as long as this resistance is not
definitely opposed by those who recognise the necessity of
penetrating into the supersensible, there can be no sure
human evolution. At the end of the nineteenth century
Hamerling, in his Homunculus sought to make what we
might call a last appeal to mankind out of the past, by
presenting all that is decadent in modern humanity as
Homunculism.
We might
picture this to ourselves, my dear friends; suppose someone
were now to read this Homunculus of Hamerling's which
appeared at the end of the eighties of the nineteenth
century. I have given many lectures about it, even before the
war I actually spoke of it, not without a certain
significance. Let us suppose then that someone reads
Hamerling's Homunculus and lets work upon him what
Hamerling imagines as the evolutionary progress of his
Homunculus. He thought it out at that time, when men had
already broken away from Goethe and all that he gave, and
wished to hear no more of it. Hamerling represented the
evolution of his Homunculus, how he was completely under the
sway of materialistic thinking, how he lived in a world where
people did not enrich themselves with spiritual treasure but
became millionaires instead. Homunculus was a millionaire. He
pictured the world where men treat even spiritual matters
with frivolity, the world in which journalism — with
respect be it mentioned — that was already developing,
has since sunk yet deeper into the slough. We assume then
that someone reads this Homunculus, and he might say:
Why, yes, this Hamerling who died in 1889, had, when he wrote
his Homunculus, with his physical eyes actually only
seen mankind as it then was, hurrying on its chosen path. He
might continue: Had people then taken seriously what
Hamerling emphasises in his Homunculus, had they let it work
upon them a little more deeply and not just as a literary
production, but as something to be taken in earnest, then
indeed they would not have been surprised to learn that,
because of men being as they then were, our present
world-catastrophe had of necessity to arise. This is what
anyone reading Homunculus today might say to himself.
What is there in the development of this world-catastrophe to
astonish us, when a writer in the eighties of the last
century was able to represent the man Homunculus in this way?
But, underlying this representation of man, of Homunculus,
is at the same time the appeal not to stop short at the life
that can give us only Homunculism, but to cross the abyss
where Spiritual Science speaks of the supersensible knowledge
that alone can change Homunculus into Homo. And so it might
be said: Mankind is placed in the Homunculism which, in the
scent we are today presenting, finds itself in a world the
man of today is not very eager to enter — in a world
leading to the region of the Phorkyads, between Homunculism
and Mephistophelianism. Goethe divined this and represented
it in his Faust; he also divined that a path must be made
that will avoid the crags of fantastic, abstract mysticism,
as it avoids the other crags of a phantom-like conception of
nature, remote from all reality,a path that leads to
supersensible knowledge where fresh social impulses will be
found.
This is a
very deep layer of consciousness. Let us penetrate it, let us
permeate our feeling with it, let us learn to understand the
language of this sphere of consciousness, coming as it does
from the region where we feel: Through thinking, a man cannot
reach himself; through willing he loses himself. To be unable
to reach oneself in thinking is Homunculism; losing oneself
in willing is Mephistophelianism. And when we feel this then
we enter into such profound scenes with a language that makes
intelligible what forms the conclusion of the Classical
Walpurgis-night. Ultimately, everyone views the universe
according to how the forces he has received enable him to
represent it. But the present task of mankind consists in
raising those forces, so that much of the universe may be
seen that, to man's hurt, has not been seen during the last
decades.
Thus, going
deeply into such a profound scene as the one we are now
producing, is a way for men to advance in the direction which
mankind at this time should take. What lies in true
Goetheanism is what mankind at this time should take. What
lies in true Goetheanism is what mankind must seek. This is
not the Goetheanism of the professors, not the Goetheanism of
the Goethe Society at the head of which is not a Goethe
enthusiast at all but a former finance minister bearing the
significant name of Kreuzwendedich; neither is it all
that men thought they must make out of Goethe's teaching at
the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth
century. What must be sought will become something good and a
good impulse towards man's advancement in the direction he
must go — if in the coming age he is to find salvation
and not destruction.
|