Appendix
The parable of the unjust steward according to
Luke 16, 1–9
He also said to His disciples:
There was a certain rich man who had a steward, and an
accusation was brought to him that this man was wasting his
goods. So he called him and said to him, What is this I
hear about you? Give an account of your stewardship, for
you can no longer be steward.
Then the steward said to himself, What shall I do? For my
master is taking the stewardship away from me. I cannot dig; I
am ashamed to beg. I have resolved what to do, that when
I am put out of the stewardship, they may receive me into their
houses.
So he called every one of his master's debtors to him, and
said to the first, `How much do you owe my master?' And he
said, A hundred measures of oil. So he said to him, Take
your bill, and sit down quickly and write fifty. Then he
said to another, And how much do you owe? So he said, A hundred
measures of wheat. And he said to him, Take your bill, and
write eighty.
So the master commended the unjust steward because he had
dealt shrewdly. For the sons of this world are more
shrewd in their generation than the sons of light.
And I say to you, make friends with the unrighteous mammon,
that when you fail, they may receive you into an everlasting
home.
This parable is certainly somewhat “awkward,”
because it is difficult to reconcile these words of Christ with
the other virtues known as “Christian.”
It
may also be because nowadays we are no longer familiar with the
kind of Pharisaic-Sadducee sophistry of those times, whereby
one often spoke in a roundabout way, so to speak. The master
obviously resorted to it here for his purposes. I mean that one
may understand this passage basically quite
“simply” and interpret it more or less as
follows:
Obviously this parable is not about the teaching of economics,
but — as written — it is a parable, which is why it is
not about earthly, but about spiritual goods.
The
preceding parables
(in Luke 15)
all refer to the
soul-spiritual return from the diaspora of aberration to
the divine-spiritual home based of the insight of the
person concerned. For even though in the first parable (unlike
in the two that follow) it is the shepherd who brings back his
sheep, the occasion for this parable was that the “tax
collectors and sinners” “continually drew
near” to the Lord, that is, expressed a longing of their
own accord for his instruction and help, whereupon the scribes
criticized His dealings with them. It is true that the parable
of the unjust steward is addressed “also” to the
disciples, as it says, but the scribes are still present, and
before their eyes and ears Christ advises the disciples what
they should think of the conduct of these scribes, how they
should classify it, evaluate it. Then He turns again to the
Pharisees with the clear words: “It is you who make
yourselves appear righteous before men, but God knows your
hearts ...”
(Luke 16:15)
In
this overall context, then, the parable of the unjust steward
is given, and one may become aware that in terms of content and
style, it is similar to the parables in Matthew (“But
the kingdom of heaven is like ...” or the
parable of the owner of the vineyard).
With the example of the unjust scribes, the disciples were to
learn something about how to handle the spiritual gifts given
to them by God. For it is they, after all, who will be sent out
to proclaim the Gospel, the New Covenant of God, to the peoples
in all the world. Since the Lord had chosen them to be His
apostles, because they had known Him and had therefore been
given to Him by the Father
(John 17 Farewell Prayer)
— according
to the Prologue, that is, as “children of
God” “who received Him” — it was
indisputable that these Twelve were initially ahead of their
human brethren in the knowledge of Christ and the aims of the
New Covenant. They had been given special gifts, but at the
same time this brought with it equally great responsibilities.
(Attention is already drawn to this fact in the main text
).
“To whom much is entrusted, more will be
required,”
Luke 12:48
But
before the disciples (uneducated in the study of the
Scriptures, but whose hearts were directly trained by Jesus
Christ) were entrusted with the administration of the Word, an
administration that had been taken over by the scribes — a
notoriously degenerate connection to the tradition of the Old
Covenant, when spiritual matters were still in the hands of a
designated group, which was able to receive Yahweh's
instructions instead of the people, and was thus kept
“pure” as a priestly lineage through bloodlines. As
initiates, this group administered a knowledge that was
withheld from the others.
This was to fundamentally change with the establishment of the
New Covenant. How else should we understand the words:
“Nothing is covered up that will not be
uncovered, and nothing hidden that will not become known. What
I say to you in the dark, tell in the light, and what you hear
whispered, proclaim from the housetops.”
(Matthew 10:26-27)
or “No one after lighting a lamp
hides it in a jar or puts it under a bed, but puts it on
a lampstand, so those who enter may see the light. For nothing
is hidden that will not be revealed ...”
(Luke 8:16 f)
Each individual human being, through the sacrificial
death of Christ, should be lent the tools to be able as an
individual to become, as it were, a “priest”
himself one day through his faith in Christ, a responsible
person in the sense of the Holy Spirit, or an initiate in the
Pauline sense with direct knowledge of the reality of the Risen
One. In the future, knowledge of the mystery-secrets should no
longer be kept for one alone, but in so far as he or she may
know more than others, they are obliged to share it with the
others in a responsible way. In other words, the disciples were
not to imitate the scribes, who watched over the divine
teaching, claimed its sovereignty of interpretation for
themselves alone and judged others according to their
discretion.
Against this background, the “rich man” in
the parable of the unjust steward seems to be God
himself (his wealth is the “kingdom of heaven,”
divine wisdom and love), and the “steward” of his
property is the one who is chosen to have a certain insight
into or participation in this property, which in return obliges
him to manage it in a right way. The way in which the steward
“squanders” the master's “property”
however, consists in using the spiritual goods entrusted to him
for himself alone, that is, in misusing them and, moreover,
making others dependent by demanding interest and keeping it
for himself.
Then, when the steward is admonished by his master, he devises
a clever bargain to buy himself free by giving away the
master's goods (in form of the forgiven debt). And this is what
the master praises in response!
What are the disciples (those who want to follow Christ) to
learn from this?
Toward those to whom they are sent out, they should deal in the
same way with the gifts given to them as the steward deals with
the rich master's property toward the indebted trading partners
— but for opposite motives. (“For the sons of this
world are wiser in their generation than the sons of
light.”) In this parable, the unjust Mammon stands
for the keeping for yourself of spiritual goods, which are
actually entrusted to you for the purpose of increasing them by
giving them away (“... I have appointed you to go and
bear fruit, and that your fruit will last, so that the Father
may give you whatever you ask him in my name,”
John 15:16,
see also the parable of the entrusted talents.
Luke 19:11 ff
and
Matthew 25:14 ff).
If the unjust steward's behavior is
applied to the handling of spiritual gifts, the Gospel will
spread and the apostles and all the witnesses to the reality of
Christ will bear “fruit.” By giving away the Lord's
spiritual property, it is increased among the people.
“Make friends with the unrighteous mammon, that
when you fail, they may receive you into an everlasting
home.”
If
we apply the “model” of the unjust steward to the
spiritual, we are “wise” but “without
falsehood,” and we will make friends both among the
people, to whom we will give the possessions (which we have
wrongfully kept for ourselves), and at the same time make
friends with the angels, who will one day admit us to their
dwellings in return.
The
present passage can be understood in this sense. It fits with a
sentence which is taken from a lecture by Rudolf Steiner in
“Background to the Gospel of Mark,”
where it is written as a concluding remark. Whoever is familiar
with the meaning of the gospel passage touched on here will
perhaps also see this connection: “But what lies
dormant in the future can come to life if there are enough
people who know that knowledge is a duty, because we may
not return our souls to the world-spirit undeveloped; for then
we will have taken something from the world-spirit itself which
it has incorporated into us.”
(GA 124)
|